Home PEx Family and Society Buhay Pinoy
Speak your mind, but mind what you post. Let's not spread disinformation and/or misinformation.

LIBERALISM is a mental disorder.

Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

I'm speechless.


Exhibit A


California Forces Public Schools to Provide Free Menstrual Products in Male Bathrooms

Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signs laws aimed at students in grades 6-12

 on 9th October 2021 @ 1.00pm
male bathrooms will provide free menstrual products for students
© press
Male bathrooms will provide free menstrual products for students

California is now forcing public schools to provide free menstrual products in male bathrooms.

Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed legislation that will require all of the state's public schools serving students in grades 6-12 to stock free menstrual products in restrooms.

By law, they now must be provided in women's bathrooms, all-gender bathrooms, and at least one men's bathroom.

"On or before the start of the 2022–23 school year, a public school, including a school operated by a school district, county office of education, or charter school, maintaining any combination of classes from grades 6 to 12, inclusive, shall stock the school's restrooms at all times with an adequate supply of menstrual products, available and accessible, free of cost, in all women's restrooms and all-gender restrooms, and in at least one men's restroom," the new legislation states.

The new law is part of the Menstrual Equity for All Act of 2021, which was signed by Newsom.

The legislation will also require the California State University and each community college district to offer free menstrual products in at least one location on every campus.

democrat gov  gavin newsom signed the bill into state law© press
Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill into state law

The legislation describes having access to such products as a fundamental "human right."

"California recognizes that access to menstrual products is a basic human right and is vital for ensuring the health, dignity, and full participation of all Californians in public life," the legislation declares.

"California has an interest in promoting gender equity, not only for women and girls, but also for transgender men, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming people who may also menstruate and experience inequities resulting from lack of access to menstrual products," the legislation also states.

The legislation also argues that menstruation occurs "among all genders."

It goes on the state that schools must "normalize" the idea of men menstruating.

"It is the intent of the Legislature that this act provide for the health, dignity, and safety of menstruating students at every socioeconomic level, normalize menstruation among all genders, and foster gender competency in California schools, colleges, and universities," the bill reads.

the legislation also argues that menstruation occurs  among all genders© press
The legislation also argues that menstruation occurs 'among all genders'

Currently, in California, public schools serving students in grades 6-12 from low-income families must supply free feminine hygiene products in at least half of all bathrooms.

"What we’re doing here in California is unprecedented in nature and scale, but it all comes back to providing California’s students with the best opportunities to learn, achieve, and succeed,” said Governor Newsom.

"We’re implementing the historic, transformative measures needed to help support our students’ health and wellbeing," he added.

"I am thankful and thrilled that there are bills, and now law, that will drive more resources and support to students,” State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond gushed.

"I thank both Governor Newsom and the Legislature for their work to bring these much-needed resources to our campuses,” State Board of Education President Linda Darling-Hammond added.

«13456749

Comments

  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    The mental disorder is getting worse...



    New York Times Calls for Redesign of American Flag

    Leftist newspaper pushes six 'new designs' that are less 'divisive'

     on 9th October 2021 @ 1.00am
    the new york times is pushing for the flag to be redesigned
    © press
    The New York Times is pushing for the flag to be redesigned

    The New York Times is calling for the American flag to be redesigned in an effort to make the world's most iconic symbol of freedom less "divisive."

    In its incessant attempts to remake American history and compartmentalize the American people, the leftist newspaper offered six new designs for the American flag.

    "The American flag is a potent piece of national iconography, but its design shifted frequently until the early 1900s," the NYT argues.

    "What if it were redesigned today?

    "We asked artists and graphic designers to try."

    "Some are functional designs, others artistic renderings; some represent America as it could be, others how the artist sees the country now.”

    the leftist newspaper claims the flag is a symbol of division

    https://neonnettle.com/news/16961-new-york-times-calls-for-redesign-of-american-flag

  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    Send your money to a school shooter...



    GoFundMe Launched for Alleged School Shooter Because He Is Traumatized

    This undated photo provided by the Arlington Police Department in Arlington Texas shows Timothy George Simpkins Police are searching for Simpkins who is the suspected shooter at a Dallas-area high school leaving four people injured before fleeing authorities said Wednesday Oct 6 2021 Arlington Police Department via AP
    Arlington Police Department via AP
    8 Oct 20218,331
    2:03

    An attorney launched a GoFundMe campaign for alleged Texas high school shooter Timothy George Simpkins with a statement from this mother claiming Simpkins is traumatized.

    The Daily Mail reported the GoFundMe account was launched by Dallas-area attorney Kim T. Cole on Thursday with the goal of raising $25,000 for Simpkins.

    GoFundMe took the account down once the fund was brought to their attention — total donations: $150.00

    A statement from Simpkins’ mother was attached to the GoFundMe page. That statement said, in part:

    What you don’t know is that Timothy was robbed at gunpoint and stripped of his possessions a couple of weeks ago … And the unfortunate backstory is that Timothy’s father was brutally beaten to death. This fact definitely heightened Timothy’s fear for his life.

    She concluded, “My son has gone through a very traumatic experience. He needs counseling and therapy.”

    Breitbart News noted that Simpkins allegedly shot three people following a classroom fight at Timberview High School on Wednesday morning.

    Emergency personnel work the scene in the parking lot at Timberview High School after a student used a gun on campus on October 6 2021 in Arlington Texas Stewart F HouseGetty Images

    Emergency personnel work the scene in the parking lot at Timberview High School after a student used a gun on campus on October 6, 2021, in Arlington, Texas. (Stewart F. House/Getty Images)

    Gov. Greg Abbott (R) pointed out that Simpkins, who is 18-year-old, could not legally buy or possess the gun that was used in the shooting.

    Simpkins was released on bail Thursday night.

    The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports that a Facebook post by a Simpkins’ family spokesperson said the alleged shooter was made to look like a “menace to our society and nothing could be further from the truth.”

  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    Exclusive: LGBT Minority Farmers Given Taxpayer-Funded ‘Wellness’ Grants

    8 Oct 20211,090
    3:03

    The University of Delaware is promoting a “Northeast Queer Farmer Wellness Microgrant program” to support “queer and trans farmers” through taxpayer-funded grants.

    The university’s website explains what the grants can be used for:

    This project is administered by queer agricultural service providers and queer farmers across the Northeast to support queer farmers holistically in their needs. We believe queer and trans farmers know best what they need! We define stress and mental health broadly including the impacts of structural barriers and oppression of white supremacy and heterosexism. [Emphasis added].

    The funding for the grants is provided by the multi-billion-dollar Coronavirus Food Assistance Program and the Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network, which was created through the 2018 Farm Bill.

    Email ScreenshotPasa Sustainable Agriculture

    Screenshot from email/Pasa Sustainable Agriculture

    Any “LBGTQ+” farmer, farmworker, or land steward in Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, or Washington, DC, is eligible to apply for a grant, ranging from $100 to $500.

    “Black people, Indigenous people, and People of Color” are prioritized, as well as those “not usually defined as ‘farmers’ by dominant funding structures.”

    The funds are promoted for a variety of uses on the Expression of Interest form:

    We believe queer and trans farmers know best what we need! Please use this money however may support you including – but not limited to – therapy, childcare, a massage, rent, compensating you for unpaid organizing work you already do, attending community events, getting your nails done even if they are about to get dirty again, etc. [Emphasis added].

    Breitbart News spoke to Bo Dennis, a New Farmer Programs Specialist with Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners, who is in charge of outreach for the program and “grows flowers in Maine.”

    Bo Dennis pictured is in charge of communication for the Northeast Queer Farmer Wellness Microgrant program Bo DennisThe Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association

    Bo Dennis/The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association

    Dennis said the program has $23,000 to distribute, and they are prioritizing farmworkers. The “wellness” microgrants, initially publicized on September 24, have had hundreds of applicants so far, and he is concerned that they will not have enough money for everyone.

    The most recent round of Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network funding awarded $4.8 million to organizations in four U.S. regions. The Northeast is the only region where a university was not given the money, but instead, it was given to the National Young Farmers Coalition. The group, which supports “affordable land” and advocates for farmers of “every gender, race, and sexual orientation,” received federal dollars for their project, “Building an Inclusive and Comprehensive Network for Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance in the Northeast.”

  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    The Insanity continues...


    Democrats Push for Taxpayer-Funded College for Illegal Aliens

    Democrats’ $3.5 trillion federal reconciliation bill includes provision for illegal aliens

     on 10th October 2021 @ 1.00pm
    the democrats  provision gives tax payer funded college tuition to illegal aliens© press
    The Democrats' provision gives tax-payer-funded college tuition to illegal aliens

    Buried in the Democrats' economy-busting $3.5 trillion federal reconciliation bill is a provision that would give illegal aliens "free" taxpayer-funded community college tuition.

    Though the bill is struggling in Congress, it pushes for anyone living in America illegally to qualify for the scheme.

    The provision includes a section that states no one would be ineligible to receive free community college tuition based on their citizenship or immigration status, legal or otherwise.

    "Community college students eligible to receive tuition assistance under this bill are those who qualify for in-state community college tuition,” the Association of Community College Trustees wrote in a fact sheet for the bill.

    "Individuals who are precluded from qualifying for in-state tuition due to their immigration status are also eligible for tuition assistance under this measure."

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) warned Fox News in late September that the provision would lead to more illegal immigration.

    sen  tom cotton  r ar  warned the provision would lead to more illegal immigration© press
    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) warned the provision would lead to more illegal immigration

    “Illegal immigrants skipped the line and broke our laws — they should not be rewarded with free tuition,” Cotton said.

    “But Democrats want to use your money to pay for them to go to college.

    “That’s not fair, and it will only incentivize more illegal immigration,” he continued.

    A Democratic aide on the House Education and Labor Committee told the outlet that providing free community college tuition to illegal immigrants is no different than current K-12 education policies, which require schools to provide education to children whether they are citizens or not.

    David Burton, a senior economic policy advisor at the Heritage Foundation, told The College Fix that making community college free wouldn’t provide the benefits the Biden administration claims, saying that while “investing in human education is a good thing,” simply doling out money won’t fix a problem.

    The Colorado Newsline reported that the provision would provide “two years of tuition-free community college for students.”

    "The proposal calls for the federal government to dole out $111 billion to states from 2023 to 2028,” Newsline wrote.

    "The states would use that money to cover tuition for community college students.

    "To receive the money, though, states could not deny the tuition-free benefits based on ‘citizenship, alienage, or immigration status.’”

    The provision would violate laws in several states, the outlet reported.

    "Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina prohibit unauthorized immigrants from enrolling in at least some of their public universities and colleges,” Newsline reported.

    "Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee and Wisconsin bar undocumented students from receiving in-state tuition.

    "Other states impose other restrictions on tuition benefits for undocumented students.”

    giving  free  college to illegal aliens will only deepen the border crisis© press
    Giving 'free' college to illegal aliens will only deepen the border crisis

    In other states, such as Colorado and New York, illegal immigrants can receive in-state tuition and state financial aid.

    Some Democrats have voiced concerns over President Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion spending bill, including Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), who called the price tag the definition of fiscal insanity.”

    And while Democrats are trying to pass the bill under reconciliation, which would require only 51 votes in the Senate, the Senate Parliamentarian ruled in September that a citizenship path for illegal immigrants can’t be included.

  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    What is next? Neutral clothing aisle?


    Gavin Newsom Signs Law Requiring ‘Gender Neutral’ Aisles in Toy Stores

    Boy with dolls Getty
    Getty
    10 Oct 20212,599
    3:19

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed a host of bills into law on Friday, including AB 1084, which requires “gender neutral retail departments” in toy stores, so that shoppers will not be encouraged some toys for girls and others for boys.

    The bill, authored by Assemblymember Evan Low (D-Campbell), declares that differences in products that are marketed to girls or boys are “unjustified,” and that it is “inappropriate” to imply they should be used by one gender instead of another.

    Evan Low Rich Pedroncelli  Associated Press

    Democratic Assemblyman Evan Low (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

    As such, the bill provides:

    (a) A retail department store that offers childcare items or toys for sale shall maintain a gender neutral section or area, to be labeled at the discretion of the retailer, in which a reasonable selection of the items and toys for children that it sells shall be displayed, regardless of whether they have been traditionally marketed for either girls or for boys.

    (b) This section shall apply only to retail department stores that are physically located in California that have a total of 500 or more employees across all California retail department store locations. This section shall not apply to retail department stores that are physically located outside California.

    (c) Beginning on January 1, 2024, a retail department store that fails to comply with this section is liable for a civil penalty, not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for a first violation or five hundred dollars ($500) for a subsequent violation, which may be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General, or a district attorney or city attorney, in any court of competent jurisdiction. If the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney prevails in an action under this subdivision, the court shall award to the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

    Stores can still maintain boys’ and girls’ sections, as long as they create one “gender neutral” area, though the legislation is unclear whether retailers could be punished for selling the same toys in gendered and gender neutral sections of the store.

    Boy with toy crown Getty

    Happy baby playing with toy blocks in the kindergarten. (Getty)

    Low told the Los Angeles Times: “Part of it is to make sure if you’re a young girl that you can find a police car, fire truck, a periodic table or a dinosaur,” Low said. “And then similarly, if you’re a boy, if you’re more artistic and want to play with glitter, why not? Why should you feel the stigma of saying, ‘Oh, this should be shamed’ and going to a different location?”

  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    Wait, wut?


    Gender Fluid Flights: British Airways Scraps ‘Ladies and Gentlemen’ Greeting to Be More Inclusive

    HEATHROW UNITED KINGDOM FILES A British Airways aircraft is pictured as passengers queue at Londons Heathrow airport in south-east England 14 August 2006 British Airways announced Thursday 25 January 2007 the cancellation of all its flights from Londons Heathrow airport for two days next week during a planned strike Speaking
    Leon Neal/AFP via Getty Images
    10 Oct 2021378
    3:13

    British Airways has become the latest institution to adopt woke language codes, telling pilots to refrain from using the common airline greeting of “ladies and gentlemen” in an apparent attempt to become more gender-neutral.

    British Airways (BA), the second-largest airline carrier in the United Kingdom, has instructed their pilots to celebrate the “diversity and inclusion” of its customer base and refrain from using gender-specific language.

    The move was to drop the traditional greeting of “ladies and gentlemen” was said to come in response to a desire to respect new woke societal norms and be inclusive of children, The Telegraph reported.

    A spokesman for British Airways told the broadsheet: “We celebrate diversity and inclusion and we’re committed to ensuring that all our customers feel welcome when travelling with us.”

    The leader of the anti-woke Reclaim Party, Laurence Fox, said that the decision represents an “attack on everything we are.”

    “The first thing a child understands is that they have a mum and a dad. Hence why those are usually their first words. This attack on the fundamentals of basic understanding is disorienting and wrong,” Fox explained.

    “It’s an attack on language. Which is an attack on thinking. Wake up,” he urged.

    Similar attacks on biological reality have been seen from the German airline Lufthansa, Britain’s EasyJet, and Air Canada, who have all told staff to use more politically correct terminology when addressing their customers.

    Airlines across the Anglosphere have jumped in on the fad, with Australian airline Qantas launching a so-called ‘Spirit of Inclusion‘ initiative in 2018 which asked staff to skirt traditional phrases for men and women.

    In the United States, Delta Air will also enact a similar policy in order to foster “a safe, comfortable and respectful space for all of our customers and employees.”

    The Tory Party-aligned advocacy group Conservatives Friends of Education remarked of the move from British Airways: “When will this stop? How long until teachers are no longer able refer to their pupils as ‘boys and girls?”

    In fact, British educational institutions have already attempted to put in place such language guidelines, including Manchester University, which told staff earlier this year that “binary gender terms” such as  “man/woman” and “girl/boy” should not be used as “some people identify with a gender opposite to that assigned to them as a child (trans) and others identify neither as men nor women (non-binary or genderfluid).”

    The new policy from BA comes as airlines are hoping to resume some sort of normal operation, with the government finally easing coronavirus travel restrictions and a full reopening of Britain’s borders expected sometime in November.

    Last week, the government’s Transport Secretary, Grant Shapps, cut the so-called “Red List” of prohibited countries down to seven, resulting in holiday searches on British Airway’s website climbing by 400 per cent in the hours after the announcement.

    Follow Kurt Zindulka on Twitter here @KurtZindulka

  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
  • Alpha_Greenv_2Alpha_Greenv_2 PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
    It’s quite simple, stop attacking ‘ISMS.’ :giggle:       

    Whenever you demonize someone for their race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs, you are creating fertile ground for hate…And all that follows. :unamused:          
  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
    It’s quite simple, stop attacking ‘ISMS.’ :giggle:       

    Whenever you demonize someone for their race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs, you are creating fertile ground for hate…And all that follows. :unamused:          
    It’s clear a certain party wants to continue attacking others based on race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs. :rofl:   

    That’s just how small minded and tribal they are! :loser: 


  • Alpha_Greenv_2Alpha_Greenv_2 PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    edited October 2021 #12
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
    It’s quite simple, stop attacking ‘ISMS.’ :giggle:       

    Whenever you demonize someone for their race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs, you are creating fertile ground for hate…And all that follows. :unamused:          

    Its not attacking, its FIGHTING BACK. Level headed people fight back because the left is PUSHING THE ENVELOPE. It was never really about ISMS. 

    If people don't draw the line and at some point, say 'ok this is too much now' then the left will never end their offensive. 
  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
    It’s quite simple, stop attacking ‘ISMS.’ :giggle:       

    Whenever you demonize someone for their race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs, you are creating fertile ground for hate…And all that follows. :unamused:          

    Its not attacking, its FIGHTING BACK. Level headed people fight back because the left is PUSHING THE ENVELOPE. It was never really about ISMS. 

    If people don't draw the line and at some point, say 'ok this is too much now' then the left will never end their offensive. 
    And yet these level headed people of yours represent a distinct minority. :wink:       

    Hitler blamed the Jews, the Sunni blame the Shia, the Scottish blame the English, the Protestants blame the Catholics, Conservatives blame the Liberal Media, and you blame every minority under the sun. 

    You are so bitter, and so entitled…And you live in the Philippines! 

    What did liberal culture ever do to you? Did they reject a mortgage? A loan application? Could you not hire enough maids to service your lifestyle?

    Enquiring minds want to know!

    :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:                  
  • Alpha_Greenv_2Alpha_Greenv_2 PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    edited October 2021 #14
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
    It’s quite simple, stop attacking ‘ISMS.’ :giggle:       

    Whenever you demonize someone for their race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs, you are creating fertile ground for hate…And all that follows. :unamused:          

    Its not attacking, its FIGHTING BACK. Level headed people fight back because the left is PUSHING THE ENVELOPE. It was never really about ISMS. 

    If people don't draw the line and at some point, say 'ok this is too much now' then the left will never end their offensive. 
    And yet these level headed people of yours represent a distinct minority. :wink:       

    Hitler blamed the Jews, the Sunni blame the Shia, the Scottish blame the English, the Protestants blame the Catholics, Conservatives blame the Liberal Media, and you blame every minority under the sun. 

    You are so bitter, and so entitled…And you live in the Philippines! 

    What did liberal culture ever do to you? Did they reject a mortgage? A loan application? Could you not hire enough maids to service your lifestyle?

    Enquiring minds want to know!

    :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:                  

    I said it before, if the liberal/left culture takes over AMERICA, the rest of the world is next. The PH could be next. In fact it's already happening. There are TRANSGENDER  restrooms now in premises of big name companies and in malls as well. 

    You still DID NOT answer my question. 

    WHEN IT TOO MUCH TOO MUCH? When should you DRAW THE LINE?
  • Alpha_Greenv_2Alpha_Greenv_2 PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    "And yet these level headed people of yours represent a distinct minority"

    Didn't we learn anything from the past year and a half?

    When people speak up against the LEFT, they:

    1. Get banned from social media
    2. Lose their jobs 
    3. LEFTIST MOBS throw incendiaries at their houses (police do nothing, media is silent)
    4. LEFTIST hacks will ruin their lives

    Now if you have a family, if you have children, would you want this to happen to you?

    It's not that they are not against it. They are obviously AFRAID to speak up. MINORITY MY A.SS
  • Alpha_Greenv_2Alpha_Greenv_2 PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    edited October 2021 #16


    David Chapelle's comedy TRIGGERED leftists, but 96% liked it. 

    MINORITY MY A.SS! you LEFTIST [email protected]!
  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    If you were to replace the word “LIBERALISM,” with the word “JUDAISM” in the thread title, that would tell you everything you need to know about Juan Plus One’s beliefs.   :wink:      

    If this were 1937, Juan Plus One would have been one of Hitler’s biggest cheerleaders. :loser:           
    How bout answering this question?

    For LIBERALISM (or LEFTISM), WHEN IS TOO MUCH TOO MUCH?

    Is there even an answer to that question? If people don't draw line and say "we accept this but if it comes to this, then enough is enough" then this whole FCKIN LEFTIST WAVE will get OUT OF CONTROL.

    Seems LEFTISTS like you seem to brand everyone who says so as BIGOTS or whatever "-ist" word you can think of.
    It’s quite simple, stop attacking ‘ISMS.’ :giggle:       

    Whenever you demonize someone for their race, sexual orientation, religion or beliefs, you are creating fertile ground for hate…And all that follows. :unamused:          

    Its not attacking, its FIGHTING BACK. Level headed people fight back because the left is PUSHING THE ENVELOPE. It was never really about ISMS. 

    If people don't draw the line and at some point, say 'ok this is too much now' then the left will never end their offensive. 
    And yet these level headed people of yours represent a distinct minority. :wink:       

    Hitler blamed the Jews, the Sunni blame the Shia, the Scottish blame the English, the Protestants blame the Catholics, Conservatives blame the Liberal Media, and you blame every minority under the sun. 

    You are so bitter, and so entitled…And you live in the Philippines! 

    What did liberal culture ever do to you? Did they reject a mortgage? A loan application? Could you not hire enough maids to service your lifestyle?

    Enquiring minds want to know!

    :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:                  

    I said it before, if the liberal/left culture takes over AMERICA, the rest of the world is next. The PH could be next. In fact it's already happening. There are TRANSGENDER  restrooms now in premises of big name companies and in malls as well. 

    You still DID NOT answer my question. 

    WHEN IT TOO MUCH TOO MUCH? When should you DRAW THE LINE?
    It’s clear you just want more Culture War. 

    As for your question, isn’t that for voters to decide? If you ever moved to the US, you are free to live in a State that has banned abortions and vaccine mandates like Texas. :wink:    
  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️
    "And yet these level headed people of yours represent a distinct minority"

    Didn't we learn anything from the past year and a half?

    When people speak up against the LEFT, they:

    1. Get banned from social media
    2. Lose their jobs 
    3. LEFTIST MOBS throw incendiaries at their houses (police do nothing, media is silent)
    4. LEFTIST hacks will ruin their lives

    Now if you have a family, if you have children, would you want this to happen to you?

    It's not that they are not against it. They are obviously AFRAID to speak up. MINORITY MY A.SS
    Just a reminder, access to social media is an entitlement, not a right. The same holds true for employment, no one has a right to work. 

    If you violate your service agreement, or fail to comply with labor regulations, what do you expect will happen?

    As for leftist mobs, it’s seems right wing seditionists have caused much more trouble.

    Really, it’s as if you go through life with your eyes half closed. 

    :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:            
  • Juan Plus OneJuan Plus One Pexer of the Year! PEx Guru 🎖️🎖️

    The Insanity continues.  


    This is why Horny-Starr switched to solar powered *****.



    California Bans Sale of Lawnmowers, Chainsaws, Other Gas-Powered Tools

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signs anti-lawn-care equipment bill into law

     on 12th October 2021 @ 1.00pm
    the sale of lawnmowers and other gas powered equipment is now banned in california© press
    The sale of lawnmowers and other gas-powered equipment is now banned in California

    Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a bill into law that bans the sale of new gas-powered lawnmowers, chainsaws, leaf blowers, and other lawn-care equipment across California.

    The new law, signed by Newsom on Monday, requires small-motor landscaping equipment to be zero-emission.

    As a result, all equipment must be battery-powered or plug-in, by 2024 or as soon as the California Air Resources Board determines it is feasible to make the transition.

    The Los Angeles Times reported that new portable gas-powered generators are required to be zero-emission by 2028, or later if the agency says so.

    The ban covers all engines that produce less than 25 gross horsepower.

    It includes lawnmowers, weed trimmers, chain saws, golf carts, specialty vehicles, generators, and pumps.

    gov  gavin newsom signed the bill into california law on monday© press
    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill into California law on Monday

    It does not apply to on-road motor vehicles, off-road motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles, boats, snowmobiles, model airplanes, or cars.

    Gas-powered equipment purchased before the ban goes into effect can still be used.

    The author of the bill, Assemblyman Marc Berman (D), praised the governor for signing the law banning "dangerous" lawn care equipment.

    "Thank you @GavinNewsom for singing my bill to ban the sale of gas powered leaf blowers & other small engine equipment beginning in 2024!" Berman tweeted

    "This equipment is dangerous to the workers who use it, disruptive to communities, & terribly damaging to our climate."

    According to Berman, California will spend $30 million to assist professional landscapers and gardeners make the transition from gas-powered to electric equipment.

    However, an industry expert who spoke to the Times said that an estimated 50,000 California businesses will be impacted by the new law and $30 million won't be enough to help them cover the costs the new law will impose:

    Andrew Bray, vice president of government relations for the National Assn. of Landscape Professionals, said the zero-emission commercial-grade equipment landscapers use is also prohibitively expensive and less efficient than the existing gas-powered lawn mowers, leaf blowers and other small machinery.
    For example, a gas-powered commercial riding lawn mower costs $7,000 to $11,000, but its zero-emission equivalent costs more than twice that amount, he said.

    Another major expense will be batteries.
    Bray said a three-person landscaping crew will need to carry 30 to 40 fully charged batteries to power its equipment during a full day's work.

    "These companies are going to have to completely retrofit their entire workshops to be able to handle this massive change in voltage so they're going to be charged every day," Bray said.
    the law bans the sale of new gas powered lawnmowers and other equipment
    © press
    The law bans the sale of new gas-powered lawnmowers and other equipment

    The ban on small-motor equipment follows an executive order Newsom signed last September that effectively bans the sale of passenger cars that run on internal combustion by 2035.

    Newsom's executive order directed the California State Air Resources Board to begin drafting regulations to outlaw the sale of gasoline-powered engines in the state and the agency was prepared to enact new rules on small-motor equipment even before the governor signed the ban into law.

  • Herr_StarrHerr_Starr Member PEx Icon 🎖️🎖️🎖️

    The Insanity continues.  


    This is why Horny-Starr switched to solar powered *****.



    California Bans Sale of Lawnmowers, Chainsaws, Other Gas-Powered Tools

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signs anti-lawn-care equipment bill into law

     on 12th October 2021 @ 1.00pm
    the sale of lawnmowers and other gas powered equipment is now banned in california© press
    The sale of lawnmowers and other gas-powered equipment is now banned in California

    Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a bill into law that bans the sale of new gas-powered lawnmowers, chainsaws, leaf blowers, and other lawn-care equipment across California.

    The new law, signed by Newsom on Monday, requires small-motor landscaping equipment to be zero-emission.

    As a result, all equipment must be battery-powered or plug-in, by 2024 or as soon as the California Air Resources Board determines it is feasible to make the transition.

    The Los Angeles Times reported that new portable gas-powered generators are required to be zero-emission by 2028, or later if the agency says so.

    The ban covers all engines that produce less than 25 gross horsepower.

    It includes lawnmowers, weed trimmers, chain saws, golf carts, specialty vehicles, generators, and pumps.

    gov  gavin newsom signed the bill into california law on monday© press
    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill into California law on Monday

    It does not apply to on-road motor vehicles, off-road motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles, boats, snowmobiles, model airplanes, or cars.

    Gas-powered equipment purchased before the ban goes into effect can still be used.

    The author of the bill, Assemblyman Marc Berman (D), praised the governor for signing the law banning "dangerous" lawn care equipment.

    "Thank you @GavinNewsom for singing my bill to ban the sale of gas powered leaf blowers & other small engine equipment beginning in 2024!" Berman tweeted

    "This equipment is dangerous to the workers who use it, disruptive to communities, & terribly damaging to our climate."

    According to Berman, California will spend $30 million to assist professional landscapers and gardeners make the transition from gas-powered to electric equipment.

    However, an industry expert who spoke to the Times said that an estimated 50,000 California businesses will be impacted by the new law and $30 million won't be enough to help them cover the costs the new law will impose:

    Andrew Bray, vice president of government relations for the National Assn. of Landscape Professionals, said the zero-emission commercial-grade equipment landscapers use is also prohibitively expensive and less efficient than the existing gas-powered lawn mowers, leaf blowers and other small machinery.
    For example, a gas-powered commercial riding lawn mower costs $7,000 to $11,000, but its zero-emission equivalent costs more than twice that amount, he said.

    Another major expense will be batteries.
    Bray said a three-person landscaping crew will need to carry 30 to 40 fully charged batteries to power its equipment during a full day's work.

    "These companies are going to have to completely retrofit their entire workshops to be able to handle this massive change in voltage so they're going to be charged every day," Bray said.
    the law bans the sale of new gas powered lawnmowers and other equipment
    © press
    The law bans the sale of new gas-powered lawnmowers and other equipment

    The ban on small-motor equipment follows an executive order Newsom signed last September that effectively bans the sale of passenger cars that run on internal combustion by 2035.

    Newsom's executive order directed the California State Air Resources Board to begin drafting regulations to outlaw the sale of gasoline-powered engines in the state and the agency was prepared to enact new rules on small-motor equipment even before the governor signed the ban into law.


    This is what Santa Monica is projected to look like by 2100…And Juan Plus One is up in arms over over gas powered lawn equipment? :loser:
Sign In or Register to comment.