The Irony of Intelligent Design
twirkilaykdalinay
Member
(1) God wanted humans to be safe so He placed humans in a garden, designed the gardens gate to be open to humans enemies and left them alone.
(2) God didnt want Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit so he designed a very attractive short tree full of forbidden fruits that looked and smelled so good.
(3) God didnt want humans to have incest so He designed only two people so that people could have plenty of incest and a bunch of inbreds.
(4) God wanted women to give birth safely so He designed an umbilical cord which sometimes wraps around the fetal neck 360 degrees and lead to complications at birth with prevalence rate of 6% to 37%.
(5) God wanted only cool things in Garden of Eden so He designed fierce animals like snakes, lions, tigers and others that are built for the kill, eat nothing but flesh.
(6) God didnt want to destroy the earth so He designed meteors and asteroids that can fall upon the earth and wipe everything; He designed violent earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis, cyclones and hurricanes that can destroy entire nations.
(7) God loved humans so much that he designed immune system for humans and then He designed HIV virus that destroy the immune system.
(8) God wanted humans to eat and live so He designed the passage for swallowing food so that people especially babies risk choking anytime they eat.
(9) God wanted the truth of the Bible to be kept intact so He designed the human brain so that the only way some people know about the Bible, the Bibles message and the meaning of the message is through other corruptible human beings.
(10) God wanted His books to last forever so He wrote them on perishable materials.
(11) God wanted people to know him so he banished people from his presence, hid Himself somewhere, designed His whereabouts to be debatable and asked people to seek him out.
(12) God wanted to have peace of mind so He designed everything that disturbs Him.
Source: https://thatcontroversy.com/2017/04/02/the-irony-of-intelligent-design/
(2) God didnt want Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit so he designed a very attractive short tree full of forbidden fruits that looked and smelled so good.
(3) God didnt want humans to have incest so He designed only two people so that people could have plenty of incest and a bunch of inbreds.
(4) God wanted women to give birth safely so He designed an umbilical cord which sometimes wraps around the fetal neck 360 degrees and lead to complications at birth with prevalence rate of 6% to 37%.
(5) God wanted only cool things in Garden of Eden so He designed fierce animals like snakes, lions, tigers and others that are built for the kill, eat nothing but flesh.
(6) God didnt want to destroy the earth so He designed meteors and asteroids that can fall upon the earth and wipe everything; He designed violent earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis, cyclones and hurricanes that can destroy entire nations.
(7) God loved humans so much that he designed immune system for humans and then He designed HIV virus that destroy the immune system.
(8) God wanted humans to eat and live so He designed the passage for swallowing food so that people especially babies risk choking anytime they eat.
(9) God wanted the truth of the Bible to be kept intact so He designed the human brain so that the only way some people know about the Bible, the Bibles message and the meaning of the message is through other corruptible human beings.
(10) God wanted His books to last forever so He wrote them on perishable materials.
(11) God wanted people to know him so he banished people from his presence, hid Himself somewhere, designed His whereabouts to be debatable and asked people to seek him out.
(12) God wanted to have peace of mind so He designed everything that disturbs Him.
Source: https://thatcontroversy.com/2017/04/02/the-irony-of-intelligent-design/
0
Comments
-
inaccurate.0
-
He does not want people to have sex, but made sex so pleasurable.
A better god could have done this:
a. Made sex so detestable it feels like a root canal. And gay sex feels like a root canal done by a dental intern.
b. For people to reproduce, the husband and wife pray together to get preggie. That way, the atheists can't produce baby atheist.
That would be a more intelligent design and god would not be angry all the time and kept on burning Sodom, flooding the earth and send earthquakes to call centers.0 -
A better god could have done this:
a. Made sex so detestable it feels like a root canal. And gay sex feels like a root canal done by a dental intern.
b. For people to reproduce, the husband and wife pray together to get preggie. That way, the atheists can't produce baby atheist.
Sounds like a rookie god - does not demand accountability from his creatures.0 -
Accountability, my *****$. According to Catholic doctrine, Mary was born Immaculate. Gee, the gal was not even created with sinning tendencies. No accountability! She got preggie without a husband; big Jewish scandal! But she was able to claim that it was god who got him pregnant. Wow! Talk about in-your-face lack of sense of accountability.
Then, there was Jesus, who committed many of the sins in the Ten Commandments, yet people still think he was sinless. Wtf!0 -
He does not want people to have sex, but made sex so pleasurable.
A better god could have done this:
a. Made sex so detestable it feels like a root canal. And gay sex feels like a root canal done by a dental intern.
b. For people to reproduce, the husband and wife pray together to get preggie. That way, the atheists can't produce baby atheist.
That would be a more intelligent design and god would not be angry all the time and kept on burning Sodom, flooding the earth and send earthquakes to call centers.Sounds like a rookie god - does not demand accountability from his creatures.Accountability, my *****$. According to Catholic doctrine, Mary was born Immaculate. Gee, the gal was not even created with sinning tendencies. No accountability! She got preggie without a husband; big Jewish scandal! But she was able to claim that it was god who got him pregnant. Wow! Talk about in-your-face lack of sense of accountability.
Then, there was Jesus, who committed many of the sins in the Ten Commandments, yet people still think he was sinless. Wtf!
Ruler: Its the sixth day. How far with the creation of the universe?
Servant: My lord, we ran out of supplies. We finished creating the universe but there were not enough supplies to fine tune it plus there is no one to praise us for the hard work.
Ruler: You mean, you havent created humans yet?
Servant: Yes my lord, we didnt have enough supplies to create humans plus we didnt have enough supplies to make the whole earth into forest where the humans and animals will coexist. We just have some tiny forest for habitats.
Ruler: Alright the earth is already created so get some clay and make a statue. Let me know when you are done. I will breathe some life into it and turn it into human.
(Servant molds statue from clay and Ruler breathes into it and it became a man.)
(Few days later.)
Ruler: Servant, it looks like Man alone is not enough to praise us. Lets get him woman so they can procreate. Then there will be many human beings to praise us.
Servant: That sounds like great idea but we already ran out of supplies.
Ruler: Break one of Mans rib and create Woman from it.
Servant: My lord, its done. Now they are ready for procreation.
(Few days later)
Servant: My lord, you look quite depressed today. Something wrong?
Ruler: The asteroids and meteors were not fixed properly. Soon they are going to fall upon the earth. Rocks and metals are boiling in the earth core; soon volcanoes are going to erupt. Violent earthquake, hurricanes and tsunamis are going to bring destruction upon the earth. On top of this, women are going to suffer great pain at birth. They are going to multiply and the forest cant contain them all. Humans are going to blame us instead of praising us.
Servant: My lord, lets find a way to blame it on humans. Lets make it look like everything bad is their fault. Of course we shall clam credit for everything good.
Ruler: Brilliant! Plant a very attractive tree with irresistible fruits in the forest. I know what to do.
Servant: My lord, its done already.
(Ruler visits Man)
Ruler: Hey Man, come here. Seen that charming forbidden tree with mouth watering fruits? Dont eat fruits from it. If you do, you will dead.
(Ruler goes back and looks upon the forest through a window)
(Woman sees snake on the forbidden tree)
Woman: Hey, you disgusting mother****er! Ruler said no one should go near that charming tree!
Snake: Calm down Woman. You are the most beautiful woman on earth (of course, the ugliest as well.) Ruler sent me to come to tell you that He has changed His mind. From now onward, you are free to eat from this tree. Look, I just ate from the forbidden tree, am I dead? If Ruler had not sent me, how come I am able to talk? Have you seen a talking snake before?
Woman: Awww, you are such an adorable snake. I love you cutie. Give me some fruits already.
(Woman eats some fruits from the forbidden tree. Snake goes away. Man comes.)
Woman: Hellooooo hubby, I have a surprise for you.
Man: and the surprise is ..
Woman: Just close your eyes and swallow whatever I put in your mouth.
Man: Sure, I am ready.
(Woman puts the forbidden fruit in Mans mouth and he swallows it.)
Woman: Darling, are you dead?
Man: What?
Woman: You just ate the forbidden fruit. Surprise, Surprise!
(Ruler appears)
Ruler: Oh I see! You guys have eaten the fruits I warned you not to eat. You have disobeyed Me! From now on, you are banished from the forest. Both of you will suffer the rest of your life. Every bad thing will come upon you without intervention from me. Your offspring will suffer the same fate. And lest I forget, all animals will suffer the same fate because of you. Its all your fault. Get away now!
(Ruler kicks Man and Woman out of the forest.)
Ruler (to Servant): Servant, we did it. Everything is fine now. The dilemma is over.
Senior Servant: Ruler, I dont think this is a good idea.
Ruler: How dare you challenge me! Do you think you can expose me to the humans? I will put enmity between you and humans. I will tell them you are the one that turned into snake and deceived them into eating the forbidden fruit. I will tell them you you seek nothing but their destruction. Now, we shall see if they will even listen to what you have to say. From now on, you are banished from my kingdom!
(Ruler kicks senior Servant from his kingdom)
To be continued.
https://thatcontroversy.com/2017/04/07/my-lord-we-ran-out-of-supplies/0 -
The fruit was symbolic. The transaction was actually gold. the element being Balancer of the Planet, the portion was extracted and thus created the Imbalance that mankind had suffered since then, and having fallen short from the Dimension of its former Glory mankind had experienced death and his sovereignty had been lost, for Sovereignty originates from God.
The logistics of gold transactions were traced since the ancient eras and up to the present and were embedded in the Treaty of Paris, hence the Mother Title OCT 01-4 of Motherland HACIENDA FILIPINA is integral in the Treaty for the Divine Wealth originated from the Garden of Eden of INANG BAYAN.
On November 28, 2012 the Supreme Court finally resolves the Ownership of the Mother Title in Supreme Court Resolution with Letter of Transmittal as Case is Closed, to the Sovereign Heir Hrh Salvacion Legaspi Y Espiritu Santo (Divine Feminine), the Owner once lost now Found revealed in the Secret Book of Redemption of Treaty of Paris through Divine highlights, the Christ Isa prophesied Queen of the South
After thousands, tens of thousands, hundred of thousand years the Divine Wealth is finally returned to INANG BAYAN with Sovereign Heir the Queen of Flower (Bae Buyak) with "one greater than Solomon" in the ONLY Miracle of Jonah for Redemption and regain of Sovereignty of Humanity with the Redeemer of Treaty of Paris.0 -
He does not want people to have sex, but made sex so pleasurable.
A better god could have done this:
a. Made sex so detestable it feels like a root canal. And gay sex feels like a root canal done by a dental intern.
b. For people to reproduce, the husband and wife pray together to get preggie. That way, the atheists can't produce baby atheist.
That would be a more intelligent design and god would not be angry all the time and kept on burning Sodom, flooding the earth and send earthquakes to call centers.
He (God) does not want people to have sex????
Ganyan ang style ni satanas noong dayain si Eva hihihihihi0 -
0
-
twirkilaykdalinay wrote: »(1) God wanted humans to be safe so He placed humans in a garden, designed the gardens gate to be open to humans enemies and left them alone.
(2) God didnt want Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit so he designed a very attractive short tree full of forbidden fruits that looked and smelled so good.
(3) God didnt want humans to have incest so He designed only two people so that people could have plenty of incest and a bunch of inbreds.
(4) God wanted women to give birth safely so He designed an umbilical cord which sometimes wraps around the fetal neck 360 degrees and lead to complications at birth with prevalence rate of 6% to 37%.
(5) God wanted only cool things in Garden of Eden so He designed fierce animals like snakes, lions, tigers and others that are built for the kill, eat nothing but flesh.
(6) God didnt want to destroy the earth so He designed meteors and asteroids that can fall upon the earth and wipe everything; He designed violent earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis, cyclones and hurricanes that can destroy entire nations.
(7) God loved humans so much that he designed immune system for humans and then He designed HIV virus that destroy the immune system.
(8) God wanted humans to eat and live so He designed the passage for swallowing food so that people especially babies risk choking anytime they eat.
(9) God wanted the truth of the Bible to be kept intact so He designed the human brain so that the only way some people know about the Bible, the Bibles message and the meaning of the message is through other corruptible human beings.
(10) God wanted His books to last forever so He wrote them on perishable materials.
(11) God wanted people to know him so he banished people from his presence, hid Himself somewhere, designed His whereabouts to be debatable and asked people to seek him out.
(12) God wanted to have peace of mind so He designed everything that disturbs Him.
Source: https://thatcontroversy.com/2017/04/02/the-irony-of-intelligent-design/
Actually, the real irony is you. You(or your source) have lots of gibberish talks. Go back when you are ready to talk INTELLIGENTLY about the logic and science of Intelligent Design. Your rhetorical shenanigans is a creation of nincompoop.0 -
twirkilaykdalinay wrote: »(1) God wanted humans to be safe so He placed humans in a garden, designed the gardens gate to be open to humans enemies and left them alone.
(2) God didnt want Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit so he designed a very attractive short tree full of forbidden fruits that looked and smelled so good.
(3) God didnt want humans to have incest so He designed only two people so that people could have plenty of incest and a bunch of inbreds.
(4) God wanted women to give birth safely so He designed an umbilical cord which sometimes wraps around the fetal neck 360 degrees and lead to complications at birth with prevalence rate of 6% to 37%.
(5) God wanted only cool things in Garden of Eden so He designed fierce animals like snakes, lions, tigers and others that are built for the kill, eat nothing but flesh.
(6) God didnt want to destroy the earth so He designed meteors and asteroids that can fall upon the earth and wipe everything; He designed violent earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunamis, cyclones and hurricanes that can destroy entire nations.
(7) God loved humans so much that he designed immune system for humans and then He designed HIV virus that destroy the immune system.
(8) God wanted humans to eat and live so He designed the passage for swallowing food so that people especially babies risk choking anytime they eat.
(9) God wanted the truth of the Bible to be kept intact so He designed the human brain so that the only way some people know about the Bible, the Bibles message and the meaning of the message is through other corruptible human beings.
(10) God wanted His books to last forever so He wrote them on perishable materials.
(11) God wanted people to know him so he banished people from his presence, hid Himself somewhere, designed His whereabouts to be debatable and asked people to seek him out.
(12) God wanted to have peace of mind so He designed everything that disturbs Him.
Source: https://thatcontroversy.com/2017/04/02/the-irony-of-intelligent-design/He does not want people to have sex, but made sex so pleasurable.
A better god could have done this:
a. Made sex so detestable it feels like a root canal. And gay sex feels like a root canal done by a dental intern.
b. For people to reproduce, the husband and wife pray together to get preggie. That way, the atheists can't produce baby atheist.
That would be a more intelligent design and god would not be angry all the time and kept on burning Sodom, flooding the earth and send earthquakes to call centers.
Did you really research on the science and logic of Intelligent Design? Twerky and you are barking at the wrong tree.0 -
Did you really research on the science and logic of Intelligent Design? Twerky and you are barking at the wrong tree.
An intelligent designer creating universes.
© 2002, by John Holden- The Intelligent Design (ID) argument doesn't qualify as a proper scientific theory.
- The ID argument has the trappings of a logical argument, but it is full of logical gaps and holes.
- It is "pseudo-logic".
- No scientific evidence specifically supports the assumptions of the theory. Any evidence seemingly supportive of it could equally support countless other fantastic theories, even contradictory ones.
- The argument uses words in deceptive ways, without carefully defining them.
https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/empty.htm0 -
twirkilaykdalinay wrote: »https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/holden/bubbles.gif
An intelligent designer creating universes.
© 2002, by John Holden- The Intelligent Design (ID) argument doesn't qualify as a proper scientific theory.
- The ID argument has the trappings of a logical argument, but it is full of logical gaps and holes.
- It is "pseudo-logic".
- No scientific evidence specifically supports the assumptions of the theory. Any evidence seemingly supportive of it could equally support countless other fantastic theories, even contradictory ones.
- The argument uses words in deceptive ways, without carefully defining them.
https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/empty.htm
Can you substantiate all the claims above point by point?
Btw, who is John Holden? (Can you present here his substantiated claims point by point as he summarized above?)
All I can see is strawman by you and/or your source.0 -
0 -
twirkilaykdalinay wrote: »
Write down!0 -
twirkilaykdalinay wrote: »
Some of those who criticize the science and logic of Intelligent Design become unintelligible themselves. They over-indulge in their extreme ignorance of ID.
I do not necessarily believe in the theory of ID but be intelligent and informed enough in order to attack or discredit the theory with justice. Recently I'm trying to get into the heart of this theory(the arguments by its main architects Behe, Dembski, Meyer..) To discredit the theory, you need to offer your plausible counter argument. Whether your like it or not ID is science and it deserved from us if necessary to scientifically and rationally dispute its claims.
Do not rely on secondary materials to debunk the theory. Its main antagonist or critics Miller,Shermer, Prothero can not even grasp the most fundamental elements of ID. I am.not an ID proponent. However, do justice and try to think when you are exposing a theory you dimly perceive.
I have so much to say but until then..0 -
Scientists do not know how life began on Earth. They do know that the early Earths atmosphere was very different from the atmosphere now.
In 1952, Stanley Miller was working with Harold C. Urey designed an experiment to see how complex organic molecules might have formed under the conditions of early Earth. They believed the early Earth atmosphere would have been composed of methane, ammonia, hydrogen and water vapor. They sealed these gases in an airtight container, and then exposed the gases to sparks of electricity to simulate lightning. They continued the lightning for a week, and by the end, a reddish-brown substance had coated the walls of the container. This substance contained 11 of the 20 amino acids used by life on earth. Since Miller and Urey performed this experiment, its results have been confirmed many times by other scientists. Many scientists now believe that the early Earths atmosphere was composed of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and water vapor.
Modern experiments with this mixture of gases produce similar results suggesting that early conditions on Earth produced complex organic molecules that probably became the basis for the development of more complex organisms. However, scientists have not been able to replicate the formation of even simple organisms, or anything that can really replicate itself. There are several theories as to how the amino acids might have made the leap into the complex, self-replicating life we see today.
Metabolism - First
Some scientists believe that metabolism, in other words - the ability to break down carbon dioxide in the presence of a catalyst into small organic molecules - was how the first life developed. These reactions might have evolved to become more complex, and then genetic molecules somehow formed and joined in later. There are many different theories as to exactly what types of molecules and catalysts would have been involved.
Genes - First
Other scientists believe that the first living organisms were genes. These genes were single molecules that had developed in such a way as to be able to catalyze their own replication. This theory seems more likely, since even simple systems such as crystals, have been demonstrated to evolve with modifications that breed true. Some scientists have suggested that certain compositions of clay create the right environment for these reactions to propagate.
RNA
RNA is a complex molecule found in all living things that seems to be able to catalyze its own reproduction. Many scientists believe that simple RNA molecules developed and eventually became more complex and developed into the organisms we see today.
LUCA
Astrobiologists and biochemists want to understand something they call LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor). The idea is that all life on Earth has a common ancestor, kind of like a great-great-great-....-great grandmother. They search for traits that are common across all life forms and assume that any traits that are common to all life forms today must have been inherited from LUCA, who had them all as well.
Biochemists know quite a bit about LUCA and her biochemistry. She stored her genetic information in DNA, she had several hundred proteins performing a variety of functions, and she used the same 20 amino acids we use in our proteins. She used RNA and had some kind of double-layer lipid membrane. She was probably the ancestor of the three kingdoms of life: Archaea, Eukaryotes and Bacteria.
LUCA lived at least 2 billion years ago, before there was much oxygen in the atmosphere. She used enzymes containing iron in her metabolic pathways the way much life on early Earth did. Studying how life arose on Earth is useful to astrobiologists, but they keep in mind that the way life formed on Earth is not the only way life could have formed. It is simply one way that it did.
Links:https://lco.global/spacebook/how-did-life-start-earth/
About: https://lco.global/about/0 -
twirkilaykdalinay wrote: »Scientists do not know how life began on Earth. They do know that the early Earths atmosphere was very different from the atmosphere now.
In 1952, Stanley Miller was working with Harold C. Urey designed an experiment to see how complex organic molecules might have formed under the conditions of early Earth. They believed the early Earth atmosphere would have been composed of methane, ammonia, hydrogen and water vapor. They sealed these gases in an airtight container, and then exposed the gases to sparks of electricity to simulate lightning. They continued the lightning for a week, and by the end, a reddish-brown substance had coated the walls of the container. This substance contained 11 of the 20 amino acids used by life on earth. Since Miller and Urey performed this experiment, its results have been confirmed many times by other scientists. Many scientists now believe that the early Earths atmosphere was composed of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and water vapor.
https://lco.global/files/web_misc/.thumbnails/644px-Miller-Urey_experiment-en.png/644px-Miller-Urey_experiment-en-644x600.png
Modern experiments with this mixture of gases produce similar results suggesting that early conditions on Earth produced complex organic molecules that probably became the basis for the development of more complex organisms. However, scientists have not been able to replicate the formation of even simple organisms, or anything that can really replicate itself. There are several theories as to how the amino acids might have made the leap into the complex, self-replicating life we see today.
Metabolism - First
Some scientists believe that metabolism, in other words - the ability to break down carbon dioxide in the presence of a catalyst into small organic molecules - was how the first life developed. These reactions might have evolved to become more complex, and then genetic molecules somehow formed and joined in later. There are many different theories as to exactly what types of molecules and catalysts would have been involved.
Genes - First
Other scientists believe that the first living organisms were genes. These genes were single molecules that had developed in such a way as to be able to catalyze their own replication. This theory seems more likely, since even simple systems such as crystals, have been demonstrated to evolve with modifications that breed true. Some scientists have suggested that certain compositions of clay create the right environment for these reactions to propagate.
RNA
RNA is a complex molecule found in all living things that seems to be able to catalyze its own reproduction. Many scientists believe that simple RNA molecules developed and eventually became more complex and developed into the organisms we see today.
LUCA
Astrobiologists and biochemists want to understand something they call LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor). The idea is that all life on Earth has a common ancestor, kind of like a great-great-great-....-great grandmother. They search for traits that are common across all life forms and assume that any traits that are common to all life forms today must have been inherited from LUCA, who had them all as well.
Biochemists know quite a bit about LUCA and her biochemistry. She stored her genetic information in DNA, she had several hundred proteins performing a variety of functions, and she used the same 20 amino acids we use in our proteins. She used RNA and had some kind of double-layer lipid membrane. She was probably the ancestor of the three kingdoms of life: Archaea, Eukaryotes and Bacteria.
LUCA lived at least 2 billion years ago, before there was much oxygen in the atmosphere. She used enzymes containing iron in her metabolic pathways the way much life on early Earth did. Studying how life arose on Earth is useful to astrobiologists, but they keep in mind that the way life formed on Earth is not the only way life could have formed. It is simply one way that it did.
Links:https://lco.global/spacebook/how-did-life-start-earth/
About: https://lco.global/about/
...and so they say. The myth of the cosmic soup. Up to now you are believing and parroting a lie guised as science. Is it really science when it is saturated with unproven assumptions? You are parroting a debunked and obsolete theory. The best you could answer is "I do not know".0 -
Mark P. Cosgrove, The Amazing Body Human (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1987), pp. 106109.
If we are honest, we will face the facts and admit that we can find no evolutionary development to explain our unique speech center [in the human brain]. Ibid., p. 164.[/I]
Humans have both a prewired brain capable of learning and conveying abstract ideas, and the physical anatomy (mouth, throat, tongue, larynx, etc.) to produce a wide range of sounds. Only a few animals can approximate some human sounds.
Because the human larynx is low in the neck, a long air column lies above the vocal cords. This helps make vowel sounds. Apes cannot make clear vowel sounds, because they lack this long air column. The back of the human tongue, extending deep into the neck, modulates the air flow to produce consonant sounds. Apes have flat, horizontal tongues, incapable of making consonant sounds.
Jeffrey T. Laitman, The Anatomy of Human Speech, Natural History, Vol. 93, August 1984, pp. 2026.
Chimpanzees communicate with each other by making vocal sounds just as most mammals do, but they dont have the capacity for true language, either verbally or by using signs and symbols. ... Therefore, the speech sound production ability of a chimpanzee vocal tract is extremely limited, because it lacks the ability to produce the segmental contrast of consonants and vowels in a series. ... I conclude that all of the foregoing basic structural and functional deficiencies of the chimpanzee vocal tract, which interfere or limit the production of speech sounds, also pertain to all of the other nonhuman primates.
Speech is what separates humans most decisively from animals. No other species can master syntax, and even though chimpanzees can learn a vocabulary of hand signs, there is an unmistakable difference between a human infant and a baby chimp: starting from birth, the human experiments with the production of complex speech sounds.
Edmund S. Crelin, The Human Vocal Tract (New York: Vantage Press, 1987), p. 83.
0 -
There is no irony as although God's creation were all very good (Genesis 1:31), He has given them to mankind:
Psalm 8:4 what is mankind that you are mindful of them,human beings that you care for them?
5 You have made them a little lower than the angels
and crowned them with glory and honor.
6 You made them rulers over the works of your hands;
you put everything under their feet
It was mankind's responsibility to keep everything in harmony with God's will but as God gave mankind free will, they did not listen to God's instructions and commandments and did whatever they please to destroy the earth and create chaos and sufferings among themselves. They forgot the true God and did whatever they please. Mankind brought all these to themselves.
1 Corinthians 1:25
New International Version
For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.0
Welcome to PinoyExchange!
Forums
- 4.5K All Categories
- 27K PEx Sports
- 56.7K PEx Local Entertainment
- 30.4K PEx International Entertainment
- 41.7K PEx Lifestyle
- 26.8K PEx Hobbies
- 64.1K PEx News and Tech
- PEx Business and Careers
- 44.5K PEx Family and Society
- 25.3K PEx Relationships
- 13.1K PEx Chat
- 29.5K PEx Campus
- 32.3K PEx Classifieds
- 703 PEx Community
In this Discussion
- KidlatNgayon 45 posts
- JuanTamad_ 38 posts
- logitext 7 posts
- emptypo 6 posts
- twirkilaykdalinay 4 posts
- Sovereign R 2 posts
- Ateo 2 posts
- almario38 1 post
- -=Sniper=- 1 post
- right 1 post
