RCC POPE PIUS IX abducts child from Jewish Parents!!!! Mortara family Tragedy!!! — PinoyExchange

RCC POPE PIUS IX abducts child from Jewish Parents!!!! Mortara family Tragedy!!!

Gusto ko malaman ang opinion ng mga RCC dito...baka sabihin na naman nila na gawa gawa na naman naming INC ang issue.

Is this something that is christianic in nature? Ala akong biblical scripture na pwedeng mag validate ng issue na ito...I mean kidnapping a CHILD!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgardo_Mortara
«1

Comments

  • Ateo
    Ateo Non est Deus. Fac cum eo.
    Never trust a religious with doctrine and power. Mortara, a Jewish child supposedly baptized secretly by a servant as Catholic ended up taken by the pope despite his parents' objections. It was a kidnapping that shocked world leaders and gave the Kingdom of Italy to invade the Papal States and Rome, thus ending papal sovereignty and created a weird zoombie state of Holy See within Italy.
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    The church never taught naman that members are impeccable. Gusto kasi ng iba dapat lahat miyembro ng simbahan eh impecabble, as if sila mga perpekto:lol:
  • TLG wrote: »
    The church never thought naman that members are impeccable. Gusto kasi ng iba dapat lahat miyembro ng simbahan eh impecabble, as if sila mga perpekto:lol:

    Ay ang obobs talaga...grabe sa pagka bulag hahhaa...hindi iyan miyembro unggoy POPE iyan!! supposed to be the most benevolent of your kind yet here he is stole a child!!! Imagine he alienated the son from his parents!!

    Problem kasi sa iyo puro ka theory at opinion pag bigyan ka ng facts ayan naman sasabihin mo. Abay ginawa pa ninyong saint!!! you canonized that said POPE pa!!!

    He was the longest-reigning elected pope in the history of the Catholic Church — over 31 years. During his pontificate, he convened the First Vatican Council (1869-1870), which decreed papal infallibility!!!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_IX

    the gall of the man!!! Infallible pa??? SHEESHHHH

    Sabi mo TLG impeccable eh claim niya sa sarili niya infallible ang POPES!!!
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    Ay ang obobs talaga...grabe sa pagka bulag hahhaa...hindi iyan miyembro unggoy POPE iyan!! supposed to be the most benevolent of your kind yet here he is stole a child!!! Imagine he alienated the son from his parents!

    Hindi daw member ng church ang pope:bop:

    Mas boborat talaga!:lol:

    Sabi mo TLG impeccable eh claim niya sa sarili niya infallible ang POPES!!!
    You don't seemed to know the difference of impeccable from infalliable:lol: obobs talaga.

    And wala akong maalala na sinabi ko na impeccable ang mga members of the church :bop:

    Also, please try to learn what is the doctrine of infalliability for popes! It would help you!:bop:
  • Here it is people, the Catholics' "God on Earth" stealing a child from their family!

    What an amazing show of integrity! Truly something to aspire to!
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Well, in defense of the church naman, the act was in accordance with the law of the state

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"


    Now the law may be bad, but it was the law at that time and in that state! You obey laws and not go above the law.


    If you go to saudi, you cannot blaspheme islam or else you'll end up being decapitated, it may be a bad law, but it is the law, you just have to follow it or get out of that country.


    He even became a priest, its not like he was abused.
  • TLG wrote: »
    Hindi daw member ng church ang pope:bop:

    Mas boborat talaga!:lol:



    You don't seemed to know the difference of impeccable from infalliable:lol: obobs talaga.

    And wala akong maalala na sinabi ko na impeccable ang mga members of the church :bop:

    Also, please try to learn what is the doctrine of infalliability for popes! It would help you!:bop:

    Dude sino ba ang mas bobo sa atin? ang isang naniniwala sa isang religion na simulat sapul puro na lang kabalbalan ang pinagagawa sa history ng mundo. Ito malinaw na malinaw he abducted the child from its parents. Another thing he was ask to return the child yet ano ginawa niya?then you made this POPE a SAINT and canonize him even!!! Sino mas bobo sa atin ngayon?Canonizing a kidnapper

    Canonization (in American English) or canonisation (in British English and Oxford spelling) is the act by which the Catholic Church or Eastern Orthodox Church declares a deceased person to be a saint, upon which declaration the person is included in the canon, or list, of recognized saints

    Malinaw na malinaw ang ibig sabihin ng canonization yet ito they canonize a child abductor.

    Another thing this will be made a film/movie by Steven Spielberg and it will be watch by the whole world what kind of POPE your church has. Baka mamya niyan mag reklamo ang RCC na iban ang showing ng film na ito..

    http://variety.com/2014/film/news/steven-spielberg-tony-kushner-edgardo-mortara-1201157963/
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    Dude sino ba ang mas bobo sa atin?

    ikaw! sabi mo kasi hindi member ng church ang pope!:lol:
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    Ito malinaw na malinaw he abducted the child from its parents. Another thing he was ask to return the child yet ano ginawa niya?then you made this POPE a SAINT and canonize him even!!! Sino mas bobo sa atin ngayon?Canonizing a kidnapper

    Duh, it was done because it was the law of the state at that time idiot!

    When saudi beheads criminal, are they murderers? no they are not, they are just doing things in accordance with their law, stupid!:lol:
  • TLG wrote: »
    Well, in defense of the church naman, the act was in accordance with the law of the state

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"


    Now the law may be bad, but it was the law at that time and in that state! You obey laws and not go above the law.


    If you go to saudi, you cannot blaspheme islam or else you'll end up being decapitated, it may be a bad law, but it is the law, you just have to follow it or get out of that country.


    He even became a priest, its not like he was abused.

    Law of man or Law of GOD???ano ba talagang LAW ang sinusunod niyo???

    Sheesshhh eh di lumitaw din talaga ang totoo...Asan namang turo ni Christ and the apostles meron niyan na pwede kang mag abduct ng anak ng iba??

    Again another law of the RCC na alang biblical basis.....Sariling utos na naman ng PAPA!! With no absolute biblical basis.GRABE!!!!

    He even became a priest, its not like he was abused. Ever heard of the TERM Stockholm Syndrome????
  • TLG wrote: »
    ikaw! sabi mo kasi hindi member ng church ang pope!:lol:



    Duh, it was done because it was the law of the state at that time idiot!

    When saudi beheads criminal, are they murderers? no they are not, they are just doing things in accordance with their law, stupid!:lol:

    wag mo itutulad sa SAUDI obobs...dahil you killed muslims even then...good thing salahaddin stoped you on your tracks!!....

    Again ano ba talaga ang sinusunod na law ng RCC batas ng tao or batas ng DIYOS????

    So yung law nung time dun sa scotland na bago mo makasex ang asawahin mo kailangan muna isex ng lord ng area aceptable din dahil batas iyon nung mga english nung time na iyon??? Saw the movie BRAVEHEART????

    Another excuse of the RCC....cmon keep it coming TLG...OBOBS!!!
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    wag mo itutulad sa SAUDI obobs........
    Anong huwag itulad sa saudi,same lang pero dahil partial ka hindi mo makita na pareho lang sila, bobo ka pala, its the law, THE LAW at that time idiot!
    So yung law nung time dun sa scotland na bago mo makasex ang asawahin mo kailangan muna isex ng lord ng area aceptable din dahil batas iyon nung mga english nung time na iyon??? Saw the movie BRAVEHEART????
    Sinabi ko bang lahat ng batas acceptable? kaya nga may amendment sa batas kung hindi na ito acceptable eh! alam mo ba yun *****? pero as long that a law is in effect, you have to respect and obey the law! bobo!
  • TLG wrote: »
    Anong huwag itulad sa saudi,same lang pero dahil partial ka hindi mo makita na pareho lang sila, bobo ka pala, its the law, THE LAW at that time idiot!

    Sinabi ko bang lahat ng batas acceptable? kaya nga may amendment sa batas kung hindi na ito acceptable eh! alam mo ba yun *****? pero as long that a law is in effect, you have to respect and obey the law! bobo!

    The police had orders from Holy Office, authorized by Pope Pius IX. Edgardo had been secretly baptised Catholic as an infant

    Ito pa...Under Catholic doctrine, "emergency" baptism may be administered to a person in danger of imminent death by anyone, man or woman, even a non-Christian, and is considered a valid baptism as long as it is done in the manner in which the Catholic Church baptizes. Originally intended as a relief for Catholic families suffering high infant mortality rates, it had not been intended to be used for Jewish families. This rule allowed anyone to perform emergency baptism so the infant would not die unbaptised. Its use in the case of very ill Jewish children was accepted by the Christian population.
    TLG wrote: »
    Duh, it was done because it was the law of the state at that time idiot!

    Anong pinagsasabi mong law of the state??? Catholic Doctrine iyan OBOBS!!! BUTATA KA NA NAMAN BATA!!! :)......
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    The police had orders from Holy Office, authorized by Pope Pius IX. Edgardo had been secretly baptised Catholic as an infant

    Ito pa...Under Catholic doctrine, "emergency" baptism may be administered to a person in danger of imminent death by anyone, man or woman, even a non-Christian, and is considered a valid baptism as long as it is done in the manner in which the Catholic Church baptizes. Originally intended as a relief for Catholic families suffering high infant mortality rates, it had not been intended to be used for Jewish families. This rule allowed anyone to perform emergency baptism so the infant would not die unbaptised. Its use in the case of very ill Jewish children was accepted by the Christian population.

    Bobo ka talaga basahin mo ang nasa link mo

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"





    Roborat9 wrote: »
    Anong pinagsasabi mong law of the state??? Catholic Doctrine iyan OBOBS!!! BUTATA KA NA NAMAN BATA!!! :)......
    Ulitin ko lang ulit ang sinabi ko sa taas

    Bobo ka talaga basahin mo ang nasa link mo

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"
  • TLG wrote: »
    Bobo ka talaga basahin mo ang nasa link mo

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"



    Ulitin ko lang ulit ang sinabi ko sa taas

    Bobo ka talaga basahin mo ang nasa link mo

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"

    The Papal States were territories in the Italian Peninsula under the sovereign direct rule of the pope, from the 700s until 1870.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_States

    Siguro naman marunong ka magbasa ano??? And since when did a local state involve themselves with a law for baptism?? only papal states and papal states are ruled by no other than??? the POPE!!!

    Sige TLG hataw pa..!!
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    The Papal States were territories in the Italian Peninsula under the sovereign direct rule of the pope, from the 700s until 1870.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_States

    Siguro naman marunong ka magbasa ano??? And since when did a local state involve themselves with a law for baptism?? only papal states and papal states are ruled by no other than??? the POPE!!!

    Sige TLG hataw pa..!!

    Bobo ka talaga! Namanamin mong mabuti eto

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"

    Ngayon kung may problema ka sa batas ng papal state noon, hindi ko na problema yan, pero dahil makitid utak mo hindi mo ma-realize na pinatupad lang nila ang batas!

    Pumunta ka sa saudi, siraan mo ang islam, tapos pag nahatulan ka ng pugot ulo ayon sa batas nila magngangawa ka at sabihin mo mga murderers sila, pero di mo na-realize pinatupad lang nila batas nila! Bobo!
  • TLG
    TLG The Dark Knight
    Roborat9 wrote: »
    He even became a priest, its not like he was abused. Ever heard of the TERM Stockholm Syndrome????

    Another form of kabobohan!

    Eto sabi sa stockholm sydrome

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
    Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."

    If you can prove that mortara was "intermittently harassed, beat, threatened, abused, or intimidated" then you might be right, if you can not prove otherwise, then we will just assume you to be either a liar or an idiot trying to sound smart!

    Really done speaking to boborat!
  • TLG wrote: »
    Another form of kabobohan!

    Eto sabi sa stockholm sydrome

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
    Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other."

    If you can prove that mortara was "intermittently harassed, beat, threatened, abused, or intimidated" then you might be right, if you can not prove otherwise, then we will just assume you to be either a liar or an idiot trying to sound smart!

    Really done speaking to boborat!

    you and I and all the other people that reads this thread knows that your uttering nonsense and i am posting facts after facts. your just denying the inevitable TLG. Its already stated and yet your just a blind cow looking for a place where you can hide by posting nonsense yet its very much obvious. gagawin ngang movie ni Spielberg iyan. Tignan mo magiging reaction ng mga tao pag napanood nila ang pelikula.

    your the epitome of azealot. pag tinignan ko sa dictionary ang meaning ng word i will see your avatar next to it..hehehehehe...

    Imagine PAPAL state na pinamumunuan ng POPE na sila din ang gumawa ng batas sa state tapos the POPE ordered the abduction and hindi pa rin daw kasalanan ng POPE or hindi daw maituturing na kasalanan dahil BATAS daw iyon ng state??? HELLOO!!!?????? TLG!!!! saang planeta ka galing??? KALOKOHAN!!! Anong klaseng religious leader iyan??

    vi0enp.jpg
  • TLG wrote: »
    Bobo ka talaga! Namanamin mong mabuti eto

    "According to canon law, which was the law of the Papal States, non-Christians could not raise a Christian child even if the child was their own"

    Ngayon kung may problema ka sa batas ng papal state noon, hindi ko na problema yan, pero dahil makitid utak mo hindi mo ma-realize na pinatupad lang nila ang batas!

    Pumunta ka sa saudi, siraan mo ang islam, tapos pag nahatulan ka ng pugot ulo ayon sa batas nila magngangawa ka at sabihin mo mga murderers sila, pero di mo na-realize pinatupad lang nila batas nila! Bobo!

    Sino gumawa ng law ng papal states?? sino ang namumuno ng PAPAL states?? THE POPE!!!!

    dapat siguro ipa abduct din sa mga ISIS ang anak mo para marealize mo ang napakalaking kalokohan ng pinagsasabi mo :)
  • Ateo
    Ateo Non est Deus. Fac cum eo.
    What I could not understand is why a good pope could not see the immorality of his position but other people (his contemporaries) were able to see it. Emperor Franz Josef of the Holy Roman Empire disapproved the incident. Emperor Napoleon III, a papal ally who was guarding Rome against the invasion of the new Kingdom of Italy, was also against the Mortara kidnapping. The public opinion against the pope was what gave King Emmanuel II of Italy to invade the pope's territory and Rome and to unify Italy. The new Italian kingdom was liberal and dismantled the canon Law. (It was then equivalent in effect to Saudi Arabia forced to dismantle the Sharia Law.)
  • Ateo wrote: »
    What I could not understand is why a good pope could not see the immorality of his position but other people (his contemporaries) were able to see it. Emperor Franz Josef of the Holy Roman Empire disapproved the incident. Emperor Napoleon III, a papal ally who was guarding Rome against the invasion of the new Kingdom of Italy, was also against the Mortara kidnapping. The public opinion against the pope was what gave King Emmanuel II of Italy to invade the pope's territory and Rome and to unify Italy. The new Italian kingdom was liberal and dismantled the canon Law. (It was then equivalent in effect to Saudi Arabia forced to dismantle the Sharia Law.)

    abay mukhang kamag anak or direct lineage ni Pius IX itong si TLG....sobrang katigasan ng ULO..imagine ginawa pa nilang santo!!! GRABE!!!

    2yuyid3.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.