Protection against Personal Intrusion Act

This is not an ANTI-SELFIE Bill...
-My comments in italics

The following are acts that are considered as intrusion of privacy.

1. Capturing by a camera or sound recording instrument of any type of visual image, sound recording or other physical impression of the person.
e.g. the Patroller reports in TV Patrol would be illegal... kung may nakuhanan ka na nangongotong, inadmissible na ba sya sa korte?

2. Trespassing on private property in order to capture any type of visual image, sound recording or other physical impression of any person.
trespassing is trespassing and is therefore illegal... also sa mga bakeshops and other shops bawal kumuha ng picture/video... kahit nga sa ktv bawal eh...

3. Capturing any type of visual image, sound recording or other physical impression of a person or family activity through the use of a visual or auditory enhancement device even when no physical trespass has occurred, when the visual image, sound recording or other physical impression could not have been captured without a trespass if no enhancement device was used.
if it is done with malice... of course...
for surveillance? if it is under warrant...
now what if sa morning news nakuhanan ka or ang kotse mo while they are doing their traffic reports, intrusion of privacy na ba yun??

Comments

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file