Eating the words of God TLG will explain same w/ literal eating of blood by Catholics

zapebayota

When your words came, I ate them; they were my joy and my heart's delight, for I bear your name, LORD God Almighty. Jer 15:16

Then he said to me, "Son of man, eat this scroll I am giving you and fill your stomach with it." So I ate it, and it tasted as sweet as honey in my mouth. Eze 3:3

magpapakitang Gilas si TLG kung paano kinakain ang salita ng Diyos dahil sa turong katoliko KINAKAIN nila ang DUGO at KATAWAN ni Jesus ng LITERAL

TLG

zapebayota wrote: »

Then he said to me, "Son of man, eat this scroll I am giving you and fill your stomach with it." So I ate it, and it tasted as sweet as honey in my mouth. Eze 3:3

Did you even read chapter 1 of ezekiel? That story was part of a vision zape! What are the chances that in a vision, he ate that scroll, and what are the chances that its just a figure of speech? Can you tell me???????? Magbasa muna kasi!

zapebayota wrote: »

magpapakitang Gilas si TLG kung paano kinakain ang salita ng Diyos dahil sa turong katoliko KINAKAIN nila ang DUGO at KATAWAN ni Jesus ng LITERAL

Comparing apple with oranges.... hay naku..pag ikaw naman tinanong, hindi ka naman sumasagot.

jandean

zape is insane

zapebayota

TLG wrote: »

Did you even read chapter 1 of ezekiel? That story was part of a vision zape! What are the chances that in a vision, he ate that scroll, and what are the chances that its just a figure of speech? Can you tell me???????? Magbasa muna kasi!




Comparing apple with oranges.... hay naku..pag ikaw naman tinanong, hindi ka naman sumasagot.

anong pinagkaiba ng pagkain ng salita ng Diyos at pagkain ng katawan at Dugo ni Kristo???

hindi ka ba KumaKain ng salita ng Diyos???

Tanong paano mo kinakain at iniinom si kristo????

hindi makakalusot yang double standard mo sakin both are eating ngayob mo ilabas ang pagkaliteral mo lol

zapebayota

jandean wrote: »

zape is insane

May back up pa non sense naman lolz

TLG

zapebayota wrote: »

anong pinagkaiba ng pagkain ng salita ng Diyos at pagkain ng katawan at Dugo ni Kristo???

For one..."salita" is an invisible utterance of sound that conveys messages, can you chew something immaterial?...while "bread and wine" are real foods with texture and are edible for human consumption.......

Two different things...like I said, you are comparing apples with oranges!

So "eating the words of God" has to be a figure of speech, and the other one was to be literal eating of bread and wine (or else INC wont have have their bread and wine sa kanilang banal na hapunan sa umaga)....and you can't even differentiate the two of them....OMG!

zapebayota wrote: »

hindi makakalusot yang double standard mo sakin both are eating ngayob mo ilabas ang pagkaliteral mo lol

You, or techinically INC's are the kings of Double Standards!

zapebayota

TLG wrote: »

For one..."salita" is an invisible utterance of sound that conveys messages, can you chew something immaterial?...while "bread and wine" are real foods with texture and are edible for human consumption.......

Two different things...like I said, you are comparing apples with oranges!

So "eating the words of God" has to be a figure of speech, and the other one was to be literal eating of bread and wine (or else INC wont have have their bread and wine sa kanilang banal na hapunan sa umaga)....and you can't even differentiate the two of them....OMG!





You, or techinically INC's are the kings of Double Standards!

AH so hindi ka kumakain ng salita ng Diyos???

ah yun naman pala yung bread and wine ang kinakain niyo ng LITERAL good job TLG you just prove my point and thanks for the very good explanation mabuhay ka

TLG

Tnx zape, you've proven a point here... you can't comprehend a simple explanation.. lolz..

zapebayota

marunong ka naman pala umintindi yung BREAD and WINE yung LITERAL hindi yung TOTOONG DUGO at katawan ni KRisto salamat TLG

TLG

In all appearance yes.. that is why transubstantiation is a faith based belief.. na explain ko nasayo yan db sa ibang thread.. you dont ask science to prove a faith based belief..so I dont need to tell it again to you...

But that is not the point of your thread.. you want "eating the words of God" and "eating food" to be on the same page lolz...

Moriadne

TLG wrote: »

In all appearance yes.. that is why transubstantiation is a faith based belief.. na explain ko nasayo yan db sa ibang thread.. you dont ask science to prove a faith based belief..so I dont need to tell it again to you...

But that is not the point of your thread.. you want "eating the words of God" and "eating food" to be on the same page lolz...

This duck I am holding is actually a lion. It may quack like a duck, waddle like a duck, and lay eggs like a duck. But see, I have this old piece of paper that says it's a lion, so therefore it must be a lion.

It's faith.

TLG

Moriadne wrote: »

This duck I am holding is actually a lion. It may quack like a duck, waddle like a duck, and lay eggs like a duck. But see, I have this old piece of paper that says it's a lion, so therefore it must be a lion.

It's faith.

Ah ok since you pretend to be smart and started using science to demolish faith.. prove to me scientifically the greatest faith of all.. prove to me scientifically that God exist. Go!

If you can't then can we say that as per your own duck standard, ive demolished your faith about God?