Pope Francis vs the Filipino Bishops

sophion

Pope’s stance OK, but we’ll still fight RH law–bishops

Read more: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/86343/popes-stance-ok-but-well-still-fight-rh-law-bishops#ixzz2fpbjauzI
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook


Translation: "F uck you Pope Francis" - CBCP

iskrotum

So the higher ups in RCC couldn't care less about the RH law. Is this a case na gusto lang umepal ng mga local bishops.

alchemistofophir

the church supporting its hateful Deuteronomy and Leviticus provisions is schismatic. And if it's schismatic, it's not love. and if it's not love, it's hate.

So Pope Francis comes to save the day. Concentrate muna sa love, compassion. Love your enemies. Love those who advocate the RH bill.

And provisions in the RH bill is not compulsory to Catholics. Catholics can still be good Catholics even with the RH bill passed.

Ateo

The CBCP is only giving lip service to Francis' call. They are still focused on the domestic power politics; and the RH Bill is the current power game in town.

gotta lick it

Jose Rizal was right.

quoting, " ... no one has a monopoly of the true God, nor is there a nation or religion that can claim, or at any rate prove, that it has been given the exclusive right to the Creator or sole knowledge of His Being."

eaglemania

gotta lick it wrote: »

Jose Rizal was right.

quoting, " ... no one has a monopoly of the true God, nor is there a nation or religion that can claim, or at any rate prove, that it has been given the exclusive right to the Creator or sole knowledge of His Being."

So does that make Jose Rizal an agnostic, cuz that quote doesn't sound like it came from a devout catholic?

friedmorsel

They should follow the Pope's stance and not go against it.

If we were in the medieval times when they were burning witches and suddenly the Pope announces no more burning, and they will say, "I agree with the Pope. I mean, every one is entitled to their own opinion. But, we will still be burning witches".

Dangerous behaviors.

Fenix

sophion wrote: »

Pope’s stance OK, but we’ll still fight RH law–bishops

Read more: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/86343/popes-stance-ok-but-well-still-fight-rh-law-bishops#ixzz2fpbjauzI
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook


Translation: "F uck you Pope Francis" - CBCP

Pride na din siguro at ego. Ayaw mapahiya kasi.

ElCid

Shift lang daw ng focus pero ganun pa din. Kayo naman. Mas tama nga naman yung mensahe na mahalin ang kapwa - secondary na lang yung ipagbawal ang condom . Marami kase sa atin gusto magmahal ng kapwa gamit ang condom lols.

sophion

ElCid wrote: »

Shift lang daw ng focus pero ganun pa din. Kayo naman. Mas tama nga naman yung mensahe na mahalin ang kapwa - secondary na lang yung ipagbawal ang condom . Marami kase sa atin gusto magmahal ng kapwa gamit ang condom lols.

so ano sa tingin mo ang CBCP, nagshift nga ba ng focus or ganun pa din?

look at the commentaries of that news report. nearly everyone's angry with the bishops.

malinaw sabi ni pope, pagmamahal dapat nakikita sa church hindi iyung pakiki-alam.

gotta lick it

sabi sa inyo ..... ayaw ng vatican sa jesuits. liberal thinkers kasi.

alchemistofophir

Ateo wrote: »

The CBCP is only giving lip service to Francis' call. They are still focused on the domestic power politics; and the RH Bill is the current power game in town.

astute observation ateo. rh bill being torn down ay indication na malakas pa rin ang political power ng Simbahang Katolika.

The evangelicals can just use their power during elections. But the Church is trying to nullify a passed law. Let's see what happens, kung may ngipin pa rin ang Simbahan sa Pinas.

gotta lick it

eaglemania wrote: »

gotta lick it wrote: »

Jose Rizal was right.

quoting, " ... no one has a monopoly of the true God, nor is there a nation or religion that can claim, or at any rate prove, that it has been given the exclusive right to the Creator or sole knowledge of His Being."

So does that make Jose Rizal an agnostic, cuz that quote doesn't sound like it came from a devout catholic?

your presumption is as good as mine.





OnT:
Jose Rizal said this at a time the Philippines was under an unsecular state. and now, these men (bishops) are continuing their backward influence over our government even though the leaders of their religion has already accepted change.

frailocracy in the philippines ended a century ago and these bishops are clinging to every catholic sub-conscience that the filipino bishops are always right.

hindi na AMO ang tawag ng filipino sa pari ngayon ..... father na lang.

joma_s

gotta lick it wrote: »

hindi na AMO ang tawag ng filipino sa pari ngayon ..... father na lang.

Or mga KU.PAL na lang.