Sa Mga Born Again Christians, Bakit kayo lumalabag sa Salita ng Diyos? | Realm of Thought | PinoyExchange

PEx Highlights

UAAP Volleyball: Rookies of Season 79

Who are the most anticipated rookies of season 79? Let us know your picks here!

read more

PROMO: xXx Return of Xander Cage

Get a chance to win movie items by joining this promo. Check out this thread for more info.

read more

PROMO: The Great Wall

Join the promo for a chance to win some movie goodies here! Check the thread for more details.

read more

2017 Movie Challenge

Join the 2017 PEx Challenge. Check out this page for more info. Can you be the strongest movie buff this year?

read more

Fortune Telling

Will the stars align for you this 2017? Check out our new fortune telling thread here!

read more

Leftover food recipes

What to do with your yummy leftovers? Here are some cool recipes suggested by some of our PEx foodies. We would love to know yours also!

read more

X

Hi! We’re doing a study on OFWs and we’d appreciate your support. Please take this quick survey to help us learn more about you. Get a chance to win one of four (4) Amazon gift certificates worth $50!

Click here

Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last
Results 1 to 20 of 27
  1. #1

    Sa Mga Born Again Christians, Bakit kayo lumalabag sa Salita ng Diyos?

    Bakit kayo nagrerely sa sarili nyong pang-unawa sa bible?

    Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation,[a] 21 for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God[b] spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

  2. #2
    Let's stop and talk awhile. tonton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sumatra beans
    Quote Originally Posted by nikeairviturin View Post
    Bakit kayo nagrerely sa sarili nyong pang-unawa sa bible?
    Kaninong pag-unawa dapat ang sundin?

    a. Manalo
    b. Pope
    c. HS
    d. Soriano
    e. Makeitupasyougo

  3. #3
    Salita ba ng diyos yan? O nun nagpanggap na Saint Peter?

  4. #4
    Tonton, malinaw ang title ng thread.


    Quote Originally Posted by tonton View Post
    Kaninong pag-unawa dapat ang sundin?

    a. Manalo
    b. Pope
    c. HS
    d. Soriano
    e. Makeitupasyougo

  5. #5
    Let's stop and talk awhile. tonton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sumatra beans
    Quote Originally Posted by nikeairviturin View Post
    Tonton, malinaw ang title ng thread.
    Kung hindi nga puwede ang sariling pangunawa, kaninong pang-unawa ang dapat gamitin? Umiiwas ka ba sa tanong?

  6. #6
    Sorry di ko alam nagborn again ka na pala!


    Quote Originally Posted by tonton View Post
    Kung hindi nga puwede ang sariling pangunawa, kaninong pang-unawa ang dapat gamitin? Umiiwas ka ba sa tanong?

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by nikeairviturin View Post
    Bakit kayo nagrerely sa sarili nyong pang-unawa sa bible?

    kasi wala silang tiwala sa pangunawa ng catholic church.

  9. Mar 21, 2013

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by jaycardel View Post
    si soriano lang naman ang imba sa bible eh, meron paba? kung nakikinig kayo sa kanya pati sa mga nakadebate nya siguro naman kilala nyo sya kung gano katinik sa bible, sabi nila memorization daw eh. pero hindi eh.

    ang catholic naman dagdag-bawas sila, tinago nila yung tunay na gospel ni jesus, sinabi sa pangatlong utos na huwag sumamba sa rebulto sige parin sila, binago nila yung pangatlong utos kaya dagdag-bawas yang mga epal na yan
    Mas epal ang mga protestante ang binawas nila ay pitong (7) libro.

  11. #10
    Kokonti lang ang post pero obviously iba-iba ang views. Yan ang epekto ng hindi malinaw na pagkasulat ng Bible. Dapat kasi isinulat nilang parang constitution para iisa lang ang interpretation. Yan ang crux of the matter - interpretation.

  12. #11
    President Prikongkong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Top of the World
    Quote Originally Posted by WAHEEHEE View Post
    Kokonti lang ang post pero obviously iba-iba ang views. Yan ang epekto ng hindi malinaw na pagkasulat ng Bible. Dapat kasi isinulat nilang parang constitution para iisa lang ang interpretation. Yan ang crux of the matter - interpretation.
    I'm agree to you, pero intellectual dishonesty ang tawag sa kinikilos ng mga nag iinterpret ng biblia. Kitang kita na, binabaluktot pa.

  13. #12
    @ts
    where was that quoted?? hmmm
    wala bang rule dito for proper citations?
    tsaka you just go and cursing without proving your statements, pakilinawan po yung nais mong iparating...

  14. #13
    Let's stop and talk awhile. tonton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Sumatra beans
    Quote Originally Posted by superGoogo View Post
    @ts
    where was that quoted?? hmmm
    wala bang rule dito for proper citations?
    tsaka you just go and cursing without proving your statements, pakilinawan po yung nais mong iparating...
    Yan lang kailangan mo pa ng citations?

  15. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by nikeairviturin View Post
    Bakit kayo nagrerely sa sarili nyong pang-unawa sa bible?
    gusto namin bakit? walang basagan ng trip nike!

    Kailangan ba bawat talata sa bibliya ipapa interpret sa Dakila Pastor? Ministro? o Pari? Perfect ba kailangan yung pagtatanungan?

    Etung simpleng verse na ito kailangan pa bang may mag explain nito? “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind."

    tsk tsk makagawa lang ng issue

  16. #15
    Walang basagan ng trip pero binabasag nyo ang sinasabi ng bibliya!


    Quote Originally Posted by jeric92002 View Post
    gusto namin bakit? walang basagan ng trip nike!

    Kailangan ba bawat talata sa bibliya ipapa interpret sa Dakila Pastor? Ministro? o Pari? Perfect ba kailangan yung pagtatanungan?

    Etung simpleng verse na ito kailangan pa bang may mag explain nito? “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind."

    tsk tsk makagawa lang ng issue

  17. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by nikeairviturin View Post
    Walang basagan ng trip pero binabasag nyo ang sinasabi ng bibliya!
    Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation,[a] 21 for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God[b] spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.
    san po pala hinugot yan nike?

    kaya nga ang tanong ko sayo

    Kailangan ba bawat talata sa bibliya ipapa interpret sa Dakila Pastor? Ministro? o Pari? Perfect ba kailangan yung pagtatanungan?

    Etung simpleng verse na ito kailangan pa bang may mag explain nito? “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind."

    tsk tsk makagawa lang ng issue

  18. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by superGoogo View Post
    @ts
    where was that quoted?? hmmm
    wala bang rule dito for proper citations?
    tsaka you just go and cursing without proving your statements, pakilinawan po yung nais mong iparating...
    magsimula ka sa 2 peter 1:20

    yang si nike, kilalang mandurugas yan kapag kausap mo.

  19. #18
    Banned by Admin
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Galaxy FarFar Away
    Quote Originally Posted by hisagi123 View Post
    magsimula ka sa 2 peter 1:20

    yang si nike, kilalang mandurugas yan kapag kausap mo.
    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/...20&version=KJV

  20. #19
    Eh sinabi na nga na bawal ang private interpretation, ang kukulit!

  21. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by nikeairviturin View Post
    Eh sinabi na nga na bawal ang private interpretation, ang kukulit!
    Madaling sabihin na bawal ang private interpretation patungkol sa Salita ng Diyos.
    Normal na magkaroon ng hindi pagkakaunawaan kung hindi mo ibabahagi sa lahat ang tunay at dapat gawin kung papaano mauunawaan ang mensahe ng SAlita ng Diyos.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  






X