thus, your claim is COMPLETELY WRONG....
The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug is swift and exciting, giving fans an epic view of things to come.read more
Reigning champs the DLSU Lady Spikers continued their romp as they demolished the NU Lady Bulldogs 25-8, 25-22, 25-19read more
The highest fan and issue threads will be posted weekly. Check out the gorgeous female celebrities that came out on top this week!read more
Fans just got a taste of what to expect this season. Here are the numbers that shaped the first week of UAAP volleyball action.read more
thus, your claim is COMPLETELY WRONG....
The INC's interpretation of Genesis 1:28 is definitely erroneous.....
Ka Bularan said the following verbatim from 5:14 of the video:
"kasama po sa utos na dapat supilin or to bring under control pagka malala na ang pagdami ng populasyon...."
now, that's overstretching what Genesis 1:28.....
the said passage DID NOT made mention of anything about population.....what the verse said was that God gave man the authority to "subdue the earth" and nothing more than that.....
to be continued......
Are you sure??
is it the Earth that needs to be subdued or the act of filling the Earth??Genesis 1:28
New International Version (NIV)
28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground. ”
kokontrolin mo ang mundo?? GOODLUCK!!
the Ob-Gyne's opinion about the Rhythm method is not totally true.....using the Rhythm method doesn't equate to suppressing your s-e-xual urge towards your wife/husband.....I'm pretty surprised that as a doctor herself, this Ob-Gyne should have known that s-e-xual gratification doesn't come in c-umming inside the reproductive hole itself.....even if the wife is fertile, it doesn't prevent the actual intercourse only that, the actual sperm should be released elsewhere.....
Sa mga ateo, agnostics, catholics, protestants, fundamentalists, INCs, subukan ninyong pakinggan ang "The Great Adventures Bible Study" ni Jeff Cavins. It is a basic teaching of the OT and NT. It shows the connection, continuation and the story of God's salvation history. It shows the CONSTANT REPETITION of events with greater and better theological understanding of events. This also explains certain Jewish terms with profound theological meaning, and why we can not really separate the Old from the New Testaments. Hindi yung paputol putol na ginagawa ninyo sa pagbabasa nang bibliya. You can't get the value of the salvation history of God's people by reinterpreting the meaning of God's word according to your liking.
Manalist lang sila.
Hindi mo naman pwedeng sabihin lang "Kristyano ako" kristyano ka na
Eh di sabihin ko na lang "Superman ako" ibig sabihin lumilipad ako hahahaha
Pwede raw ang self declared sugo... fine. Sa larawan, kapag kamukha ng doktrina na gawa mo ang doktrina nila, pero may sariling koleksyon ng pera.... di yun pwede. Dapat magbottleneck ka kay Manalo na kanilang center of faith (real center of faith).
Bakit? Bakit pro-RH ang mga Manalist?
Simpleng sagot. Kasi ang non-self-declared sugoists, ang Simbahan ay anti-RH bill. Since ang purpose ng Manalists ay sirain ang unity ng mga non-muslims, hindi sila pwedeng mag-anti-RH.
After all, si Manalo naman ang sentro ng pananampalataya nila at hindi si Kristo.
Hindi sila ang unang ganyan. Ang Mason din na Orctard (Orc-support o tagapagsilbing alipin ng Jihad movement) ganyan din ang gawain nila... kontra ng kontra.
Malaki na pinagbago since the days of the Hashassins, dumarami na sila. Most of them walang malay na pinagsisilbihan nila ang animal na Muhammad na yan.
(wala na ang pieno waaaa password lost)
that part of the verse, "would you agree that its just part of THE EARTH" and not the EARTH itself??Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground. ”
Like you said, Baptism rites was used by "Christ", thus a Christian baptism rite is NOT pagan anymore. Giving reverence or respect to pagan statues (represented by a pagan god like Baal or Zeus) is idolatry indeed.
But giving reverence or respect to a representation of God or Jesus? It is NOT paganism. A representation like an image is a tool for worship. Worshipping the "tool" is idolatry like If a Catholic considers the "image" as a "god".
No true Catholic will pray or worship to the image or statue itself as a "god"
Christian Baptism is NOT pagan anymore...because it is a Christian sacrament. Wherein these sacraments are considered Christian "rites" in Catholicism
Catholic practices are NOT pagan because it does NOT associate itself with a PAGAN DEITY or belief
Christmas in particular is NOT pagan since it celebrates Christ's birth. It becomes "pagan" if one remembers Sol Invictus instead
I think you are NOT even aware that the Crusades was bourne out of the Islamic invasion of France, the Iberian Peninsula and the Holy Land, it is NOT a purely religious expeditionary war (For the Pope, the main goal is to restore access the Holy Land and Christian lands). It is NOT the pope who initiated it, the Pope "blessed" the requests to the Western and Byzantine Emperors and Monarchs. The secular authorities have other agendas than religious fervor
Im sure you failed to see thru the POLITICAL and ECONOMIC agenda of the those monarchs and secular authorities who were also involved in such (like most Protestants and Christian sects do)
Isang example na dito ang pag-claim na dyos si Cristo, pinagbotohan lang ng mga obispo ang pagka-Dyos ni Cristo sa council of Nicea around 300AD. It means, ang original na turo sa unang Iglesia ni Cristo ay tao s'ya na ginawang banal.
Lots of things were hidden in plain sight. Kilala ang RCC noon sa husay sa pagmamanipula(and their best tool that they've incorporated with their teachings is; the Pope is Infallible).
Errr, the Council of Nicaea was only the re-affirmation of the divinity of Christ due to the rise of Arian belief among some of the bishops
The divinity of Christ was already evident in 2nd CE Church Father in the teachings and writings of Sts. Ignatius, Polycarp, and Clement (4th Pope) (who were DIRECT students and ordained disciples of the APOSTLES). Even St. Peter himself chastised the Gnostic beliefs of the heretic Simon the Magus
The agenda is to re-affirm the doctrine and stamp out heresies like the ECFs had done with Gnosticism in the 1st and 2nd Century.
You were clearly misinformed, you took the Anti Catholic sites, hook, line and sinker