X CJ Corona's next stop? To teach?

[travelmate76]

palusot po ang tawag doon, remember, abogado po siya !!!!!

[rising1genius]

just read my previous posts kung bakit hindi na siya qualified magturo

paulit-ulit na lang !

'Yun na nga, abugado siya, but can you actually fault him for misinterpreting the law? Let's say palusot man yun or hindi, from a legal standpoint ang tanong ko lang, lahat ba ng dissenting opinion sa Supreme Court mali? May mga decisions nga especially on reconciling two conflicting laws na sobrang close. That's what happened to Corona, punished for a wrong view on the law. I think it's unfair to judge his character based on that SALN issue alone.

Kung palusot man yun, take this simple matter. May mga abugado na nagpapalusot, gamit ang batas, ng mga criminal. Ibig bang sabihin wala na silang integrity? Are they not fit to be lawyers? Just because it is their legal obligation to serve a client, even those guilty of the most heinous crimes, means na wala na they have no ascendance to teach/practice law?

I've read your posts and most of them centered on Corona's family issues. I'll give it the benefit of the doubt na indeed "ginulang"/"niloko" niya mga kamag-anak niya. Does that matter in practicing/teaching law? Corona was not even charged with Graft and Corruption. For me, if ilalabas lahat ng baho nga mga propesor, wala nang makakapagturo sa kahit anumang unibersidad, not even priests. If we would be absolute about honesty and integrity then no one is fit to teach anything, anywhere.

But let us assume na may intention nga siya, regardless of his defense, to hide his income. I think mali rin na sabihing bawal na siya magturo. What does hiding of income mean? Ill-gotten wealth? Tax evasion? These were not established and proved in the impeachment trial. And even if it was, sabihin na natin na criminal nga siya, the issue becomes about ex-convicts having any civil rights at all. Maski nga 'yung mga dating kriminal nakakapagtrabahao pagkatapos lumaya, si Corona pa?

Corona may be guilty as charged, but to what extent are his honesty and integrity affected by the ruling? I think the fact na public office lang siya bawal means na the Constitution and the Senate for that matter, thinks na he can be honest and he can have integrity fit for private life.


Yung punto ko lang, mahalaga ang honesty and integrity, pero to what extent kahalaga ito sa pagtuturo assuming na some people may have been dishonest at some point in their lives?

Hindi naman siguro siya magsisinungaling sa estudyante niya. Kung ganun, maraming babagsak, tatanggalin siya ng school niya.

[travelmate76]

'Yun na nga, abugado siya, but can you actually fault him for misinterpreting the law? Let's say palusot man yun or hindi, from a legal standpoint ang tanong ko lang, lahat ba ng dissenting opinion sa Supreme Court mali? May mga decisions nga especially on reconciling two conflicting laws na sobrang close. That's what happened to Corona, punished for a wrong view on the law. I think it's unfair to judge his character based on that SALN issue alone.

Kung palusot man yun, take this simple matter. May mga abugado na nagpapalusot, gamit ang batas, ng mga criminal. Ibig bang sabihin wala na silang integrity? Are they not fit to be lawyers? Just because it is their legal obligation to serve a client, even those guilty of the most heinous crimes, means na wala na they have no ascendance to teach/practice law?

I've read your posts and most of them centered on Corona's family issues. I'll give it the benefit of the doubt na indeed "ginulang"/"niloko" niya mga kamag-anak niya. Does that matter in practicing/teaching law? Corona was not even charged with Graft and Corruption. For me, if ilalabas lahat ng baho nga mga propesor, wala nang makakapagturo sa kahit anumang unibersidad, not even priests. If we would be absolute about honesty and integrity then no one is fit to teach anything, anywhere.

But let us assume na may intention nga siya, regardless of his defense, to hide his income. I think mali rin na sabihing bawal na siya magturo. What does hiding of income mean? Ill-gotten wealth? Tax evasion? These were not established and proved in the impeachment trial. And even if it was, sabihin na natin na criminal nga siya, the issue becomes about ex-convicts having any civil rights at all. Maski nga 'yung mga dating kriminal nakakapagtrabahao pagkatapos lumaya, si Corona pa?

Corona may be guilty as charged, but to what extent are his honesty and integrity affected by the ruling? I think the fact na public office lang siya bawal means na the Constitution and the Senate for that matter, thinks na he can be honest and he can have integrity fit for private life.


Yung punto ko lang, mahalaga ang honesty and integrity, pero to what extent kahalaga ito sa pagtuturo assuming na some people may have been dishonest at some point in their lives?

Hindi naman siguro siya magsisinungaling sa estudyante niya. Kung ganun, maraming babagsak, tatanggalin siya ng school niya.

OMG, maling-mali ang interpresyon mo sa salitang integrity at honesty, huwag mo naman sanang babuyin

kung ako ay isang law student, ayoko ng teacher na may bahid na kasalanan lalo na sa judiciary at sa bayan natin. Ang pagdeklara ng maling SALN ay malaking kasalan sa ating mga taxpayer na nagpapasahod sa mga public officials

Ang tao ay hindi nagbabago overnight, malimit man sa hindi, ang ugali ng tao ay permanente na unless may 'divine intervention'. Ang pinakita ni Corona sa impeachment ay puro kasinungalingan na mismo ang kanyang mga defense lawyers ay naloko niya kaya PALPAK ang strategy nila, nag self-destruct si Corona. Iyan ba ang gusto ninyong GURO, mahina sa decision-making at pabago-bago ng isip.

Integrity hindi lang sa opisina pati sa mga kaanak. Grabe, naawa ako sa isang patay na, siniraan pa ng dahil sa lupa na hindi naman pala talaga sa kanila. Hindi ba masamang ehemplo ito sa mga estudyante, lahat naman tayo nag-aral ng GMRC, hindi ba ?

From day 1 sinubaybayan ko na ang Impeachment Trial at dito ko talaga napag-aralan at obserbahan ang pabago-bagong ugali ni Corona, puro palusot, akala niya ***** ang taong-bayan dahil sa abogado siya.

Hindi karapat-dapat magturo pa ang isang taong may bahid na ng kasamaan. Anong matututunan ng isang law student sa isang guro na mahina ang comprehension sa mga Batas na dapat ay alam-na-alam niya

rising1genius, konsensiya at takot sa Diyos na lang sana ang pairalin ni Corona at ng pamilya, huwag nang mandamay ng mga estudyante

[KingofDex]

dapat alamin mo rin yung ginawa nila doon sa clerk from Davao

ang hustisya ay para sa lahat, hindi lang sa may kapangyarihan, tama ba ako ?

*** Clerk of Court sa Davao natanggal dahil sa DOUBLE COMPENSATION, not on SALN Dscrepancies..


Para malinaw sa lahat.

[gene69]

^^ oo nga naman. dapat matukoy muna ang exact basis kung bakit natanggal yung clerk of court bago i-apply yung case niya to the case of corona.

mabasa nga yang case na yan.