kawawang ahas dahil kay Taning nadamay!

[tomenjeri]

Genesis 3:14

14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

ay! bakit po pinarusahan lahat ng ahas sa kasalanan po ni Taning? wala pong hustisya ang diyos na iyan! naway mayroong makatugon dine salamat po!

[Fenix]

Patulan ang isang kawawang nilalang (na sya din naman ang gumawa) na wala naman kasalanan? What a petty god.

[SmartDessa]

may ahas po na nasa puno sumasabit

[Fenix]

may ahas mo na sa puno sumasabit

Kahit lumilipad pa yan o nagpapatugtog ng ukulele habang naglalaro ng scrabble:
Patulan ang isang kawawang nilalang (na sya din naman ang gumawa) na wala naman kasalanan? What a petty god.

[doombot]

may ahas mo na sa puno sumasabit

ano yun uli? ahas ni fenix sa puno sumasabit? kakalito hahaha

[-alucard-]

^shhh... only the smart lang daw ang makakaintindi niyan.

AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!

[SmartDessa]

so ano yun? exempted yung mga lumilipad na ahas?

[doombot]

so ano yun? exempted yung mga lumilipad na ahas?

hindi naman sila actually lumilipad. tawag dun falling with style heheheh

[rosang_pana]

There were an Adam and Eve, but the figures of a tree with fruit and a talking serpent are symbolic.

[SmartDessa]

nope, there was a tree, and serpent. as well.

[rosang_pana]

Many of the Old testament stories contain both literal elements and figurative elements. It is a false dichotomy to say that a story must be entirely literal or entirely figurative (and so fictional, they say). Obviously, elements such as a talking serpent, and a fruit that is a mortal sin to eat, but that gives knowledge, are figures.

But just as obviously, the human race must have had a starting point. Jesus in the Gospels, and the Holy Spirit speaking through Paul in the Epistles, speak of Adam and Eve as two real persons.

[TLG]

Eto talaga yung ahas sa genesis.Kaya natukso si Eba kasi macho yung ahas. Dito din nakuha ni Adan ang idea sa paggawa ng bahag.

[SmartDessa]

Many of the Old testament stories contain both literal elements and figurative elements. It is a false dichotomy to say that a story must be entirely literal or entirely figurative (and so fictional, they say). Obviously, elements such as a talking serpent, and a fruit that is a mortal sin to eat, but that gives knowledge, are figures.

there are many figures in the OT that were made real in the NT.

the bronxe serpent, for example, is a figure of the Lord Jesus.
but it doesn't mean that the bronze serpent was not real.

the hidden manna, is also a figure of the Lord Jesus. does that make the manna, fictional?

even persons, such as Adam, is a figure of Christ as the bridegroom to Eve who is the church.

true, that the serpent, is a figure of Satan. but it is also a literal serpent that talked to Eve, which became a dragon in Revelations.

But just as obviously, the human race must have had a starting point. Jesus in the Gospels, and the Holy Spirit speaking through Paul in the Epistles, speak of Adam and Eve as two real persons.

I see, so if it sounds weird, it's figurative
if it's somehow a bit realistic, literal.

[Fenix]

^ And who has the authority to dictate which ones are figurative and which ones should be taken literally?

[SmartDessa]

Fenix, you mean ^^^, not ^

[sweet_athea]

^ And who has the authority to dictate which ones are figurative and which ones should be taken literally?

Well definitely its not you because in 1914 evil was reborn and Manalo conspired to satan to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. You see 10 years of your stay here nearly zeroed your morals.

[Fenix]

^ A simple question led to that. Says a lot about you.
btw I am not a Manalo follower.

[SweetMagda]

ahas! ay mahilig si sweet athea nito. expert po siya. alam nyang ang kay BARTT ay maliit lang, ahas na bebe. si alaskador at si bartt mahilig din nito nagsasalita man o hindi ang ahas.

[tonton]

Genesis 3:14

14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

ay! bakit po pinarusahan lahat ng ahas sa kasalanan po ni Taning? wala pong hustisya ang diyos na iyan! naway mayroong makatugon dine salamat po!

May original sin din pala ang ahas ano.

[banimalek]

May original sin din pala ang ahas ano.

sino naman kaya ang tutubos sa kasalanan minana ng ahas, may ideya kaba tonton?