Miriam apologizes to LGBT community, is homosexuality a sin?

[goat1230]

thats perfect because i'm typing in the speed of light.

typing speed has nothing to do with one's fluency to any language. someone who has an undoubtly perfect english knowledge doesn't think about the grammar when they type.

ohh that is the most irresponsible conclusion I ever heard from a moron. Worship is not by force, it is by freewill now you are implying different scenario. But because you embraced a false cult naturally this cults uses forces and brainwashing drill to lure your senses.

you just backed up my point!
kulang ang smiley wahahahahahahahhaahhahaha!

if one's family's faith doesn't coincide with any one of that family's faith, what does one have to do with it?!

i'm not implying a different scenario, it is your judgemental idea that prohibits you to understand what I'm trying to tell you.

What you supposed to do with your family is incorrect ---pray what??? to your fake sugo? You cannot be a father in my opinion because you are defective.

i gave an example without involving INC, you insist INC is this picture. stop putting your words in my mouth.

wham!!! I am not ADD anymore moron!

back on you. your actions show how ADD has corrupted not just your actions, but your mind and critical thinking, and you have proven to me that after chasing me around RoT waving the banner that I'm protecting INC

I've nothing to hide, i've met several pexers in person and they can vouch that I'm not worshipping God anymore. (again, I don't need to drag them in this topic, they'll even laugh at your face if you keep it up )

you however, hiding in several altnicks, and won't even acknowledge a private message. shows clearly you want the whole world to see how ADD has stripped you of your sanity

GOOD you should not have a family, its not fitting to your moral to have one.

and you shouldn't too.

[secre_kept]

Pinalalabas mong homosexuals were born the way they are?

Malaking kalokohan…



Clearly, you are putting words (which I did not say at all) into my mouth, and then criticize me. Deceving ang tactic mo.

Again, a person sexual orientation is affected by nurture. As for most of the studies na nabasa ko while I’m still in college, homosexuality is attributed to external factors(environment), not biological factors. Pautot lang ng mga homosexuals ang “they were born that way,” simply because there’s no truth to it.



Hanep sa build-up, ah! Ikaw ba, hindi ka na nafo-fall sa gay friend mo?



Instant disclaimer…



Kita mo na? Sinabi ko lang na labag sa kalooban ng Diyos ang homosexuality, nagko-conlclude ka kaagad na galit ako sa mga homosexuals. Diretsahang pambibintang ‘yan.

I looked up to some of my professors in college. They are very intelligent and they know what they are teaching very well. And yes, some of them are gay. Do I hate them? Never. Not at all. But if I had things my way, I would have brought them to church again and again until they are convinced that homesexuality will ultimately cost them their soul’s salvation.



So, wala bang “tinatapakang tao” ang mga homosexuals, and their “symphatizers”?



Homosexuals lang and their symphatizers ang nagke-claim niyan. At least, yung mga in denial.

But most of the guidance counselors and Psychology grads that I know attest that this claim of homosexuals is not true. Not at all. Homosexuality is mostly caused by the sort of people one usually hangs out with. Ang analogy ngang binigay sa ‘kin, ganito. “Ang isang kamatis na sariwa, itabi mo sa bulok na kamatis, mabubulok din yung sariwa.

Fuck you and your religious beliefs.

[JaRvis_Jayren]

If you think it is your "right" to meddle with other people's businesses then good luck with that.
Just a friendly suggestion: If people call you a hypocrite because of that, please don't take it as persecution. It's a sign to back off and reflect first on how you really live your own life.

Sorry, it is a sort of persecution. In the first place, upholding our religious belief is our right, and we are not forcing you to believe as well in what we believe in, although we hope that you would listen. I don't think that's comparable to what homosexuals and their sympathizers are doing, which is labeling us negatively when we do not conform to their way of seeing this matter.

But again, we only urge others to consider what we believe in (regarding homosexuality) if they claim to believe in Jesus and/or the Bible. It is different from what others claim (that we allegedly shove in their faces what we wish they would believe in.)

[secre_kept]

Why don't you pray to your God and hope that your child becomes very very attractive. Stupid Christians.

[Ateo]

Just a friendly suggestion: If you don't believe the Bible as we do, then you should consider that.

Again, as much as people claim that we allege to deny people of their rights just because they are homosexuals, it is actually homosexuals and their sympathizers who indirectly threatens to label us unfairly just because he live up to what we believe in RELIGIOUSLY, in the process, indirectly denying us of our right to uphold to what we believe in (if we don't agree with what homosexuals have been claiming and/or we continue believe that homosexuality is a sin, we are, in a way, persecuted, as having narrow minds and/or living in the past or something.)

This is shocking! A dominant majority, who holds the power of legislature, claims to be being treated unfairly by a minority. Can't you fight back? Constitutional amendments, laws to ban same-sex marriage, rallies? What are you doing to protect your majority rights? Nothing?

[Ateo]

It is a historic moment, something that historians will report on a hundred years from now. The US Commander-in-Chief and the world's most powerful person faced the camera and said that he supported same-sex marriage. It is the very first time in the US history that a sitting president supported this concept. It marked a dramatic shift in US social and political scene as it is only two presidencies ago when Bill Clinton signed a bill into law -- the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) -- that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. That law is now in tatters, as states like New York asserted state rights to define domestic laws and passed laws legalizing same-sex marriage. DOMA itself is left high and dry as the Obama Administration decided not to defend the federal law as it is being questioned in court (The New York Solicitor General led the case in killing the law as New York reasserted its role as the magisterium of the culture of the nation, hehehe.)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion...age/54865732/1

Obama is a straight man and this fact belies the claim that anybody who supports gays has to be gay himself. All social reforms in this country were led by people who are not members of the minority. It is freemen who abolished slavery; whites who legislated blacks' civil rights; males who voted women equal rights; and now straights expressing support for gay rights.

Think what would be the impact of this news item on a young gay person struggling with his own sexuality and seeing that the world's most prominent person is in fact supporting his rights to be gay. Bartt, it is time now to tell yourself who you really are.

[tonton]

That means he isn't interested in reelection. Imagine all the religious people he offended.

[sweet_athea]

That means he isn't interested in reelection. Imagine all the religious people he offended.

what a stupid conclusion from a gay muslim! Of course Obama wants to be reelected

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bristol...d-sasha-obama/

Is anyone really surprised by the fact that President Obama came out of the closet for gay marriage? What was most surprising is when he explained how his position (supposedly) “evolved,” by talking to his wife and daughters:

Bristol Palin is a bright girl like me she says :

"So let me get this straight – it’s a problem if my mom listened too much to my dad, but it’s a heroic act if the President made a massive change in a policy position that could affect the entire nation after consulting with his teenage daughters?

While it’s great to listen to your kids’ ideas, there’s also a time when dads simply need to be dads. In this case, it would’ve been helpful for him to explain to Malia and Sasha that while her friends parents are no doubt lovely people, that’s not a reason to change thousands of years of thinking about marriage. Or that – as great as her friends may be – we know that in general kids do better growing up in a mother/father home. Ideally, fathers help shape their kids’ worldview."

hak hak hak Kayong mga sinto-sintong hindi nakaka relate ng english burn your koran!

[K_Franklin]

*i deleted my post*

[marcus_hunt]

It is a historic moment, something that historians will report on a hundred years from now. The US Commander-in-Chief and the world's most powerful person faced the camera and said that he supported same-sex marriage. It is the very first time in the US history that a sitting president supported this concept. It marked a dramatic shift in US social and political scene as it is only two presidencies ago when Bill Clinton signed a bill into law -- the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) -- that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. That law is now in tatters, as states like New York asserted state rights to define domestic laws and passed laws legalizing same-sex marriage. DOMA itself is left high and dry as the Obama Administration decided not to defend the federal law as it is being questioned in court (The New York Solicitor General led the case in killing the law as New York reasserted its role as the magisterium of the culture of the nation, hehehe.)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion...age/54865732/1

Obama is a straight man and this fact belies the claim that anybody who supports gays has to be gay himself. All social reforms in this country were led by people who are not members of the minority. It is freemen who abolished slavery; whites who legislated blacks' civil rights; males who voted women equal rights; and now straights expressing support for gay rights.

Think what would be the impact of this news item on a young gay person struggling with his own sexuality and seeing that the world's most prominent person is in fact supporting his rights to be gay. Bartt, it is time now to tell yourself who you really are.

What Pastor Pacman said about that:

After Obama vocalized that he was in support of gay marriage earlier this week, Pacquiao was adamant that the president had got it wrong. In an interview with the National Conservative Examiner while training in Los Angeles, Calif., Pacquiao spoke about the need for society to put "God's words first."

The boxer quoted Leviticus 20:13 when referring to the president's decision to advocate for same-sex marriage.

"If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable," Pacquiao told the Examiner. "They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."
...
While the 33-year-old boxer said he respected Obama, he told the Examiner that the president should read the bible or "manual of life" to better society.

"God only expects man and woman to be together and to be legally married, only if they so are in love with each other," Pacquiao said. "It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old."

Laban?

[tonton]

Nag aala James si Pacman. Self-righteous na. Buhay nga naman oo.

[Ateo]

Pacquiao's is a case of "little learning is a dangerous thing". Natuto lang ng Bible ay yan na palagi ang iwinawagayway. If only he knows a little bit more, he should have known that no sensible RoTers and Christians would use the OT to make a point. RoTers are embarrassed with Leviticus; the less it is mentioned the better. Everybody explains that the OT is tribal practices of the ancient Hebrews and does not apply to us modern Christians.

Konting basa pa, Pacman, although I truly wish you to stay where you are good at (boxing) rather than claim expertise in all other things (politics, religion, business, showbiz, etc.).

[nultraciscoed]

Gay = an evolutionary dead end.

[tonton]

Tama yan Ateo. kaunting basa lang akala niya expert na siya at napaaggresibo pumuna ng ibang tao. Dapat pumunta siya dito sa RoT para makita niya din ang dark side ng biblia to have his faith shaken at masopla siya paminsan minsan.

[goat1230]

may kaugnayan kaya ang religious turn over nya sa inihaing divorce sa kanya ni Jinky

[tonton]

May kinalaman yan sa mga pastor na idinikdik sa utak niya na sobrang makasalanan niya at kailangan niya si Jeeezas para magbago.

[Ateo]

may kaugnayan kaya ang religious turn over nya sa inihaing divorce sa kanya ni Jinky

Divorce? saan? sa States?

[goat1230]

Divorce? saan? sa States?

eto link o

http://www.complex.com/sports/2012/0...divorce-papers

In his last bout against Juan Manuel Marquez, Manny Pacquiao didn't look like his normal self. However, he still managed to escape with a majority decision. A couple of days later, Pacquiao's trainer Freddie Roach mentioned to the media that some outside-of-the-ring issues probably distracted his fighter. Now, Roach reveals that the real reason behind Pac-Man's lackluster performance is due to the fact that Manny got served with divorce papers by his wife Jinkee the night before his big fight with Marquez.

napakinggan ko lang kanina sa AM Radyo kaya napagoogle ako bigla

[JaRvis_Jayren]

This is shocking! A dominant majority, who holds the power of legislature, claims to be being treated unfairly by a minority. Can't you fight back? Constitutional amendments, laws to ban same-sex marriage, rallies? What are you doing to protect your majority rights? Nothing?

Sorry, but what is shocking is you don't even realize that homosexuals are all over the entertainment industry and media, and you don't realize/notice that homosexuals and their sympathizers are almost at the point of mocking us (who believe that homosexuality is a sin) for upholding to our belief, which, they claim, is a thing of the past. They even call us closed-minded (like you do.) And you make it appear that we (whom they consider as "makaluma ang pag-iisip")
are not mocked by them (the homosexuals and their sympathizers).

Again, I assert that labeling us negatively just because we don't agree with what you believe in is in itself a form of persecution against us for upholding our belief.

[marcus_hunt]

They mock you, but you condemn them. Parang patas lang

As if "upholding your belief" does not include pressuring lawmakers and using the pulpit for politics etc

I saw posted signs on the streets condemning gays, you can bet thats done by a "religious organization".

Magpaawa ba?