Why are atheists angry at God whom they say doesn't exist?

[doombot]

maybe the asteroids and the ice age was during these 2 verses...

diba nga sabi sa verse 2, and it was void and empty. malamang katakot takot na terraforming ang nangyari bago nagflood

plausible.

7 days can mean and differ if the alien is living outside our galaxy hehehehe

[SmartDessa]

Ummm. The bones in Catalhoyuk were human. Say, for example, that they actually just resembled humans and really weren't, then God's "image and likeness" would've been with them first. Not with Adam. Or at least they could've been failed experiments to create God's image and likeness, but "failed" is probably the last term one would associate with an omnipotent and omniscient God.

Sorry, but the 6000 year old Adam is just simply bollocks.

again, image and likeness, does not necessarily mean God had an as$.

image and likeness is for dispensing God's life.
we can say that preadamic creatures were created not to contain God, Adam was created to contain God. maybe there are creature that resembles man, but they are, strictly speaking, in God's terms, not man.

We can say that God defines a man not because of his physical features, but because of His functional features.
He did not created man just to have a replica of Him, He create man to express and be glorified through man.



nobody has seen God, well Jesus is God, He is God manifested in the flesh.

[Lola_Rose]

^The one true God Father) is spirit = invisible.
Jesus (the Son) - definitely not invisible.

Jesus is man.

[kuroihikari]

again, image and likeness, does not necessarily mean God had an as$.

image and likeness is for dispensing God's life.
we can say that preadamic creatures were created not to contain God, Adam was created to contain God. maybe there are creature that resembles man, but they are, strictly speaking, in God's terms, not man.

We can say that God defines a man not because of his physical features, but because of His functional features.
He did not created man just to have a replica of Him, He create man to express and be glorified through man.



nobody has seen God, well Jesus is God, He is God manifested in the flesh.

So those humans who lived in Catalhoyuk were not created to "express and glorify God"? What are they then, animals? How about those Homo Sapiens settlements from 10000 year old China? Or North-America? Were these also non-humans?

[SmartDessa]

So those humans who lived in Catalhoyuk were not created to "express and glorify God"? What are they then, animals? How about those Homo Sapiens settlements from 10000 year old China? Or North-America? Were these also non-humans?

I don't know. what I know is that they are creatures.

[doombot]

So those humans who lived in Catalhoyuk were not created to "express and glorify God"? What are they then, animals? How about those Homo Sapiens settlements from 10000 year old China? Or North-America? Were these also non-humans?

they are humans propogated by a different alien faction. kaya nga iba iba itsura ng tao hehehe

[Mustaine]

I don't know. what I know is that they are creatures.

So they look like humans, think like humans but are "creatures" and not humans?

[SmartDessa]

So they look like humans, think like humans but are "creatures" and not humans?

maybe they are v1 humans, Adam is v2

that's why the Bible refers to the first Adam, instead of first human, or first man.

still, I really don't know, yet

[doombot]

maybe they are v1 humans, Adam is v2

that's why the Bible refers to the first Adam, instead of first human, or first man.

still, I really don't know, yet

so totoo nga ang human experimentation ng mga alien. hehehe

[kuroihikari]

they are humans propogated by a different alien faction. kaya nga iba iba itsura ng tao hehehe

Para pala silang gangsta nun. May kanya-kanyang 'hood. Sa China yung mga singkit na alien, tapos sa America yung mga alien na may mga feathers sa ulo at facepaint

[matangkahoy]

Painfully amusing to watch SmartNessie try to dance the tinikling with a twisted ankle.

[matangkahoy]

They're in denial, but of course they'd deny that they're in denial.

Did you pick that avatar because you have fat thighs just like it? Just wondering.

[doombot]

Para pala silang gangsta nun. May kanya-kanyang 'hood. Sa China yung mga singkit na alien, tapos sa America yung mga alien na may mga feathers sa ulo at facepaint

uu pre pero theory ko lang naman yan heheheheh

[jnyarop]

LOL. Topic post pa lang wala ng kwenta. Bakit gngeneralize mo ang atheists?

For example, pumunta ka sa isang country at may naamoy ka ng isang citizen na mabaho, sasabihin mo na ba agad na lahat ng tao dun sa bansang yon ay mabaho?

[quick_ben]

How can you hate an idea that's so ridiculous it's funny?

But then... if that idea drives people to kill others, doesn't it deserve to be hated?

You can't hate a non-existent person. But you can hate an existing concept or idea. Especially a stupid one.

[SmartDessa]

Painfully amusing to watch SmartNessie try to dance the tinikling with a twisted ankle.

I don't dance tinikling, and my ankles are fine.

[tonton]

I don't dance tinikling, and my ankles are fine.

Can you take a picture of your ankle and post it here?

[rachel_05]

LOL. Topic post pa lang wala ng kwenta. Bakit gngeneralize mo ang atheists?

For example, pumunta ka sa isang country at may naamoy ka ng isang citizen na mabaho, sasabihin mo na ba agad na lahat ng tao dun sa bansang yon ay mabaho?

Isn't it kind of common to use generalization when many persons in a certain group are doing it? For example, men generalize women as emotional even if some women aren't.

I don't think that this topic is as worthless as you say it is. I think I have a point.

a generalization. it's not necessary that what you see or read would be applicable to other atheists.

Yeah, I realize that. I should have said 'many' atheists.

[rachel_05]

How can you hate an idea that's so ridiculous it's funny?

But then... if that idea drives people to kill others, doesn't it deserve to be hated?

You can't hate a non-existent person. But you can hate an existing concept or idea. Especially a stupid one.

Which religion are you talking about?

[jnyarop]

Isn't it kind of common to use generalization when many persons in a certain group are doing it? For example, men generalize women as emotional even if some women aren't.

I don't think that this topic is as worthless as you say it is. I think I have a point.


Yeah, I realize that. I should have said 'many' atheists.

Sorry I don't believe in generalization. May sarili ka bang pananaw or naniniwala ka lang sa "some"?

If that's the case, sure, we can generalize. I read an article before that some christians murdered a child. Logic: Christians are murderer.

I read an article before that some filipino students are lazy. Logic: Fil Students are lazy.

Madami pa. Baka kulang pa ang buong buhay ko kakageneralize amp