Inconsistencies in the world of science of the totalitarian keepers
So, even if the expanding universe idea is no longer consistent with the recent discovery of the so-called accelerating expansion of the universe and the missing shadows, the keepers are bent on abandoning the most proven theory of science quantum mechanics instead of the erroneous ideas of the big bang and expansion. In addition, there are also inconsistencies in this old conceptual framework of approach in the viewing the universe.
As mentioned in previously, the key ideas and concepts of the keepers are inconsistent for they have a double standard in viewing the universe. They tell us that common sense is no longer reliable in science and that we should view the counterintuitive events as explained by relativity and quantum theories. Yet whenever the situation is not in accordance to the doctrine of creation of their old conceptual framework of approach they don’t apply it and so, the double standards of the old conceptual framework of approach.
For example, according to the keepers, because it always makes sense to start from the beginning, which is actually common sense, we should view the universe in the traditional old way in accordance to the basic doctrine of creation of the oldest vision that it started off with a big bang, and is expanding like an inflating balloon. So, therefore, there is a double standard in their so-called method of viewing the very large structure of the universe and the extremely tiny sub particles of the atom.
This simply means that if it is not in accord with the basic doctrine of creation of the oldest vision, any idea for that matter should be discarded. For instance, in the very large structure of the universe even if the acceleration of the universe is a cosmic motion meaning we are being suck up by a supermassive region of space that is full of matter, the keepers equated it with expansion to fit their idea of an eternal expansion specified by general relativity.
And in the extremely tiny sub particles of the very small world of the atom one of the quantum events shows that the universe doesn’t care if there is a beginning or end in time because it doesn’t have a sense of time we should just ignore it because it is not in accord with the basic doctrine of creation. And so they discarded it for it is not in accord with the basic doctrine of creation of the oldest vision and it doesn’t make sense to them because it is actually a counterfactual events.
Moreover, before the great conceptual revolutions so-called no one rules the world of science, meaning no particular vision or conceptual framework of approach by any camp whatsoever was adopted as a standard conceptual framework of approach but after the 5th stage of the intellectual struggle the doctrine of creation of the keepers of the oldest vision was adopted as the standard conceptual framework of approach for science. Clearly, these are evidences that they have fully abandoned now the reason why science was invented for the sake of their devotions to their doctrine of creation.