Top Secret Codeword Revealed
Although it seems often that the ordinary lessons of Galilean defiance and cosmology, Newtonian gravity, the Darwinian evolution, Marx’s dialectical philosophy, Einstein’s relativity principle, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Everett’s multiverse, and Hawking’s eternal universe ideas are the only regular objects of attack there are in fact other victims. Truth, fairness, peace, freedom, true science, free inquiry, and the intellectual struggle take terrible beatings, too.
There is an extraordinary conscious effort in the suppression of extraordinary disquieting facts to divert the general public from the ordinary but real central issue. No one knows now why science was invented by our ancient ancestors because the keepers of the two competing visions have fully abandoned the real central issue of survival.
Most people are confused why science is studied and developed for, thus, more and more people shy away from it. As a matter of fact, people ask where science is leading us to.
Others, especially, the ordinary individual has been prone to dismiss scientific theories as irrelevant or as some kind of media hypes. The elitists and the greedy kudzus of unrestrained commercialism—double standard, double-talk, and discrimination—regard them simply rhetoric.
Even as they benefit from science and technology the dark forces of the mystical embracing memes, meanwhile, are exploiting the situation. By disseminating that the beginning of time is the real central issue the general public is more than ever befuddled on what is really our ultimate goal in trying to understand the universe.
So, despite the advances made in science and technology more and more people shy away from it because they find scientific theories difficult to grasp. People find them irrelevant too because the elitist but befuddled keepers haven’t emphasized that it is merely a tool in our intellectual struggle to understand the universe for our ultimate goal of survival.
To complicate matters, the keepers of the two seemingly competing visions in the world of science haven’t only tried hard devising perplexing scientific theories but linked them to creation. As a result, more and more people get more befuddled because even if the old fundamental contradictions and conflicts were discarded the new ones that evolved haven’t been resolved likewise until now.
To make matters worse, the keepers are conveying the wrong impression that reductionism is the real central issue. We all know that combining the two incoherent scientific theories and mixing the four fundamental forces isn’t the issue, meaning it is not a priority.
Hence, it becomes apparent that reductionism is a top secret code word in a top secret race among the keepers to build the ultimate weapon of mass destruction (UWMD) to leverage the world’s ruling elites. Because of the propensity of unbridled self-interest or greed the misguided elements and flawed men may misuse it again as in the irrational exercise of wisdom and power in order to preserve their interests.
We all know that science was invented not only to understand our universe but for survival. We also know that history is being studied not for the sake of knowing but why people are killing each other as in brutal and disastrous world wars but to stop the killing and prevent world wars from happening again.
But, the ruling keepers in the world of science haven’t only completely abandoned the real central issue of survival but replaced it for the sake of their firm beliefs of the two seemingly competing visions. Hence, it becomes apparent also that they aren’t only comfortable now in serving the interests of the world’s ruling elites in politics, economics and religion but to leverage them with the UWMD as partners in a new totalitarian world order.
In reality, the seemingly competing visions are two faces of the same thing.
If the old vision upholds the old myth of creation based on the sacred text the relatively newer vision upholds the modern scientific myth of big bang creation based on the pure mechanical philosophical materialism of Thales of Miletus of the great Ionian Awakening.
We, as men of science have not been willing to ignore these. We take seriously the usefulness, the benefits, quality of life, and opportunities for many people that true science has provided and; the economic prosperity and progress that science and technology on which our country spends billions of dollars in education and infrastructures.
We believed that science was invented by our ancestors for their survival and not to create problems. We believed that the real central issue in our intellectual struggle to understand the universe is survival and not proving the basic doctrines of the two seemingly competing visions of the keepers.
We believe that the real central issue in the world of science is still survival and not finding or proving the beginning of time because the human species is more than ever endangered than 50ys ago.
We care about being fairly treated. We care, too, about the reasonableness, fairness, and usefulness of the scientific process and development to progress and economic prosperity for the people.
We believe that humans invented science to solve problems for its survival, not to create them. We encourage its development, not to create obstacles to it. It is not perfect. It can be misused. It is only a tool. But so far, it is the best tool we have.
Indeed it should be self-questioning, self-correcting, ongoing, and applicable to everything. Some said that if it is the standard practice in religion and politics to suppress uncomfortable ideas this has no place in the endeavors of science.
Sad to say, however, after Albert Einstein unleashed his great initiatives, science became the bastion of the totalitarian keepers. Because of their entanglement with creation they cannot cut their links to the traditional old ways in viewing the universe. If there is double standard, inconsistency that exists in the world of science of the totalitarian keepers it is mainly because of the entanglement with creation.
Any other proposed solutions such as, the new theory of knowledge of the new cosmic approach that are diametrically opposed to the basic doctrines of the two seeming competing visions are automatically suppressed by the totalitarian keepers that rule the world of science.
They are allergic to the new cosmic approach even if it has been successful in identifying and resolving all the contradictions in an-all-round way, and once-and-for-all to see because it is a clear and presents danger to their totalitarian regime, they have relentlessly suppressed it. Thus, in this sense, science is stuck with the two old and obsolete derivative conceptual tools of the two seemingly competing visions.
We believe in good relations among other communities, as among people, are base on mutual respect. We believe in promoting mutual understanding and not deepening conflict, as in nurturing freedom and not serving bondage.
However, we denounce the misguided attacks on true science by the dark forces and their agents who misrepresents science. We are ready to stand by and defend the arguments of the reality of the usefulness of science and technology not only for the betterment but the ultimate survival of the human species.
We believed in the idea of free inquiry and protecting it. We believed that all the opposing ideas are as necessary steps in our intellectual struggle. We believed that there are other pathways such as the new power tool of the new cosmic approach, which is far better than the usual standard and the two old and obsolete conventional approaches in viewing our universe.
We believed that the universe is not to be comprehended as a complex of ready-made things, but as a complex process. We believed there is a common language that all technical civilizations, no matter how different, must have.
If music is the universal language, that common language of technical civilization is science and mathematics. If science is attack, we defend it. If it is misused we expose and oppose it.
As in the past, many people are ready to serve and support the goals of science on why it was invented and are not willing accomplices in a betrayal of its goals and ideals. To do so would mock the good faith of all the people who are supporting it.