Peanut Gallery: Menorrah vs. Totnak: The 1st Century Church completely apostatized

[tanika47]

Oh my. Mooch has been impersonated hehehe

yes that is a long ago account of banimalek in RFP when he had a harshed fought with atheist. He impersonated Ischara back there in RFP. In fact he is banilaway there as the link shows.

_________
♥ I AM IN NO RUSH.
♥ ♥ I AM WILLING TO GIVE IT TIME.
♥ ♥ ♥ EVERYTHING IS NEGOTIABLE
♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ JUST TELL ME HOW BADLY YOU WANT ME

[salermo]

That decision in RFP is fake. Moochie and I are still to decide. Honestly, I am as curious as you why Moochie left without even saying goodbye. Bringing this debate to its logical conclusion is like raising a kid as a single parent, hhahahahahah.

But, I have decided to give Moochie a whole month to come back. Then, I will make the judging on my own. But I will have to re-read the entire thread because I have totally forgotten what does Trinity mean.

Also, I know this is a very close debate -- both debaters are good. But I won't give a tie decision. Ties are for puss.ies, and we are all machos here, hahaha.

Hi Ateo,

If you are trying to re-read the Trinity as you mentioned in boldface above, would your decision on the debate be affected from the opinion you posted on the other thread quoted below?

by Ateo

FM (hmm, there was another FM sometime ago in this country's past), you did it again! You again nailed an important point. This is the strongest argument against the divinity.

The very term Jesus Christ (Christ = Messiah) is a give-away. Christs are annointed ones. In biblical sense, these are humans annointed on order by God to assume political leadership positions. David, who was annointed by Sammy on God's order, was the the quintessential messiah that is why all would-be ones call themselves "the son of David". Christ is man! God cannot annoint himself, or logic would be murdered.

Hail to Manalo, or something like that. But I am not into that, hehehehe.[/b]

Since on that post above you were convinced that there is no Jesus divinity, hence no Trinity and it is a give-away then your re-reading Trinity on that debate is moot. Don't you think so? Besides hailing Manalo is the same as hailing his no belief in Trinity...which you still got into that...albeit unconsciously.

[sweet_athea]

its not good to have a judge who has a moral defects.

[Manunuwag]

Thank, God/Gods!

Now that you (Salermo and Chismojo) publicly questioned my integrity as judge, I am forced to excuse myself. There shall be no judging on this debate. It is enough that I gave my best to facilitate it.

Dadalawa lang naman sila at di ang mayoridad dito sa PEx R o T kaya anu pa man ang hatol mo ay paki dokumentado na lang. Pakilahad din kung anu ang iyong pinakapuno at matibay na sandigan ng iyong hatol.

Maigting ang inyong mga deliberasyon, ika nga bago kayong 2 ay mag desisyon maging hurado tapos yung lehitimong "MOD" pa yung isa kaya sana ay bumalik naman siya ah......at hwag naman sanang ganun-ganun lang. Kasi, ng dumatal na ang takdang oras ng paghatol ay kung anu=anu na ang mga sumusunod na pangyayari. Alalahanin mo rin na isinulat mo rito na marami ka na ring hinatulan na debate at sinang-ayuanan naman ng mga ibang mga nagpoposte rito.

Mabigat talaga ang magiging desisyon lalung-lalu na at mababasa sa sansinukubang sapot na elektronikong pagsusulatan, ugnayan at komunikasyon. Kaya, tunay na tunay na magkakaroon ng pangamba ang sinumang nakasapi sa 2 pananampalatayang yan kung tunay at dalisay nga ba kani-kanilang kinaaniban kapag ibinaba ang husga sa pormal na debatehang yan.

Ang MGA IDEDEKLARA ng mga administrador dito sa usaping ito ay tiyak malaki ang magiging epekto tungo sa mapapanatiling integridad ng PEx.

[chizmojo]

Hi Ateo,

If you are trying to re-read the Trinity as you mentioned in boldface above, would your decision on the debate be affected from the opinion you posted on the other thread quoted below?



Since on that post above you were convinced that there is no Jesus divinity, hence no Trinity and it is a give-away then your re-reading Trinity on that debate is moot. Don't you think so? Besides hailing Manalo is the same as hailing his no belief in Trinity...which you still got into that...albeit unconsciously.

Alam na!!! Nice catch.

[Ateo]

Thank, God/Gods!

Now that you (Salermo and Chismojo) publicly questioned my integrity as judge, I am forced to excuse myself. There shall be no judging on this debate. It is enough that I gave my best to facilitate it.

[Mabuhay-Rex]

Thank, God/Gods!

Now that you (Salermo and Chismojo) publicly questioned my integrity as judge, I am forced to excuse myself. There shall be no judging on this debate. It is enough that I gave my best to facilitate it.

Opps Ateo, bakit ka naman nag excuse diyan, tindigan mo ang pagiging moderator...hindi pwede na baliwalain mo lang ang debating ito...you have to make judging accordingly...

[chizmojo]

Thank, God/Gods!

Now that you (Salermo and Chismojo) publicly questioned my integrity as judge, I am forced to excuse myself. There shall be no judging on this debate. It is enough that I gave my best to facilitate it.

I wonder why you didn't include sweet_athea.

Seriously, it doesn't matter anyway. Even if Moochie comes back, there's 50% favor guaranteed for Menorrah. And I want him to win!!!

[Ateo]

Opps Ateo, bakit ka naman nag excuse diyan, tindigan mo ang pagiging moderator...hindi pwede na baliwalain mo lang ang debating ito...you have to make judging accordingly...

In my view, it was a close debate; both debaters are good. But I was not planning to give a tie. Ties are for sissies. It would have been a clear decision.

But now, even before I could give my judgment, some are already questioning my integrity. It is as if my comments in other threads are indications that I could not rise beyond my own views and give a fair judgment.

Well, I am not masochistic enough to enjoy being the target for the losing side of my decision. If emotions between the two groups are such that they cannot even give judges the courtesy of presumption of fairness, then let us not stoke those emotions some more.

[razzer_rising]

So you are basically affected by negative opinions of some pexers here, ateo? Isnt that being a sissy?

[Ateo]

So you are basically affected by negative opinions of some pexers here, ateo? Isnt that being a sissy?

yes, sissy and shaking in fear. but don't tell anybody.

[razzer_rising]

A judge-moderator should be courageous enough to give a verdict no matter how unpopular that will be here in pex. I hope mooch comes back to give his verdict.

[Ateo]

I hope too. That was a courageous judge. I miss him.

[sweet_athea]

Thank, God/Gods!

Now that you (Salermo and Chismojo) publicly questioned my integrity as judge, I am forced to excuse myself. There shall be no judging on this debate. It is enough that I gave my best to facilitate it.

In my very very humble opinion the decision of Ateo to inhibit himself from judging is good and worthy. And must be imitated by bias judges in the controversial impeachment trial. If he changes his mind it means he is not only defective but super bias, and moreover he has no knowledge and competency to meddle on any doctrinal debates.

[Gunnar]

A judge-moderator should be courageous enough to give a verdict no matter how unpopular that will be here in pex. I hope mooch comes back to give his verdict.

Reminds me of Malayang Isip

[Ferdinand]

This is the kind of people you don't want with you in times of trouble, they easily buckle even with just a slight pressure. Pinitik lang sa kamay umiyak na agad...sa halagang sinko eh mukhang magbebenta na agad.

Ateo, at first I thought you were joking since I don't see why you have to review the doctrine of the Trinity in this debate, but when salermo questioned you about it, you easily caved in as if you where looking for a way out of rendering your judgement on this debate.

Don't be naive Ateo, you know that when you accepted the job as a moderator of this debate some people will criticize you whatever your judgement is, that is a fact as seen in the previous debates. I on my part have no intention of criticizing the judges here no matter what the result is, but excusing yourself because someone questioned you about something, this, I've got to say is chicken sh!t!!! No one is forcing you to excuse yourself, you did it out of cowardice and you know it. Si salermo pa lang ang kumantyaw sa iyo eh iyak ka na agad, eh paano na kung Chinese invasion na iyan.

You have conducted yourself admirably as a moderator until you excuse yourself. I did not expect you to buckle this easily. But suit yourself Ateo, I hope you change your mind for the sake of your integrity and for those who followed this debate.

[chizmojo]

This is the kind of people you don't want with you in times of trouble, they easily buckle even with just a slight pressure. Pinitik lang sa kamay umiyak na agad...sa halagang sinko eh mukhang magbebenta na agad.

Ateo, at first I thought you were joking since I don't see why you have to review the doctrine of the Trinity in this debate, but when salermo questioned you about it, you easily caved in as if you where looking for a way out of rendering your judgement on this debate.

Don't be naive Ateo, you know that when you accepted the job as a moderator of this debate some people will criticize you whatever your judgement is, that is a fact as seen in the previous debates. I on my part have no intention of criticizing the judges here no matter what the result is, but excusing yourself because someone questioned you about something, this, I've got to say is chicken sh!t!!! No one is forcing you to excuse yourself, you did it out of cowardice and you know it. Si salermo pa lang ang kumantyaw sa iyo eh iyak ka na agad, eh paano na kung Chinese invasion na iyan.

You have conducted yourself admirably as a moderator until you excuse yourself. I did not expect you to buckle this easily. But suit yourself Ateo, I hope you change your mind for the sake of your integrity and for those who followed this debate.

Yup, that's right. I sekan demonyo.

[Ateo]

Bite me.


The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters.

[admiral__cidric]

Well the debaters have done their part. The judges-moderators should also comply with the agreed debate rules.

If the moderator-judge is bias, he should have not agreed with the debate rules in the first place.

[-alucard-]

may decision na si tito moochie...

post na ako...maya lumalagablab na itong thread na ito.

AH! AH! AH! AH! AH!