RoT Debate Challenge - Page 4 | Realm of Thought | PinoyExchange

Page 4 of 37 First ... 3 4 5 14 ... Last
Results 61 to 80 of 733
  1. #61
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Quote Originally Posted by jeric92002 View Post
    Christianity needs God image representation

    Affirmative: Elcid
    Negative: jeric92002

    Ok ba yang topic na yan Elcid?

    Para matapos na yang issue na yan...
    http://www.pinoyexchange.com/forums/...d.php?t=525461
    I doubt if ElCid would take this one...the proposition is clearly flawed...for one, RCCs doesn't claim that relics/representations are necessary/needed by Christianity...

    it's like saying that mankind need pictures....

  2. #62
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Quote Originally Posted by krams2 View Post
    kaya nga di ako bilib sa ganitong forum debate eh. Anonymous eh. kaya matapang ang mga ito katulad ni totnak kala mo magaling
    am not claiming to be good in debates....but am always prepared to defend my faith and what I believe in unlike some of those I know.....

    I've already proven my mettle here in PeX...unlike some who only know how to Troll and flame.....

  3. #63
    ^malay ba namin kung ikaw din ang kadebate mo

  4. #64
    kaya nga di ako bilib sa ganitong forum debate eh. Anonymous eh. kaya matapang ang mga ito katulad ni totnak kala mo magaling
    I can't really see what's wrong with a debate done anonymously. Anybody care to explain why?

  5. #65
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Quote Originally Posted by SmartDessa View Post
    ^malay ba namin kung ikaw din ang kadebate mo
    Hmmm...oo nga noh

  6. #66
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    how about a debate on the RH Bill? we could touch on it's scientific side by debating in here where life begins....at fertilization or conception?

  7. #67
    uy that would be nice. any takers?
    "With great looks comes great responsibility"

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by SmartDessa View Post
    delikado yan jeric.

    matatalo ka dyan, palitan mo yung topic na mas claro.
    Quote Originally Posted by Totnak View Post
    I doubt if ElCid would take this one...the proposition is clearly flawed...for one, RCCs doesn't claim that relics/representations are necessary/needed by Christianity...

    it's like saying that mankind need pictures....
    hello dessa,totnak, proposal palang naman e. Pumayag na makipag debate si Elcid, kaya lang next year na daw . Aww first time ko ito

    @papa totsky mas magandang pag-usapan sa debate yan

  9. #69
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ischaramoochie View Post
    uy that would be nice. any takers?
    I can take on the "Life begins at fertilization" side.....

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by SmartDessa View Post
    ^malay ba namin kung ikaw din ang kadebate mo
    Quote Originally Posted by Totnak View Post
    Hmmm...oo nga noh
    hindi dessa malay ba natin kung ikaw din at moderator yung kasama mu sa debate hihi

    haler papa tots

  11. #71
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Quote Originally Posted by jeric92002 View Post
    hindi dessa malay ba natin kung ikaw din at moderator yung kasama mu sa debate hihi

    haler papa tots
    pwede!

    Mooch, alternick pala kita eh

  12. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by Totnak View Post
    how about a debate on the RH Bill? we could touch on it's scientific side by debating in here where life begins....at fertilization or conception?
    its too vague. im worried that when i get to share my POV, people will justify how abortion can be immoral. i would like to touch more on the abortion side of the issue.

  13. #73
    Theistic Apologist Totnak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeitgeist699 View Post
    its too vague. im worried that when i get to share my POV, people will justify how abortion can be immoral. i would like to touch more on the abortion side of the issue.
    I believe it's actually the simplest topic to discuss about the current RH Bill controversy......where does life begin? during the union of the egg and the sperm a.k.a. fertilization? or during the implantation of the fertilized egg a.k.a conception?

  14. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by XIII View Post
    Uy oh. Game?
    well, we have to concretely define GOD first and then we'll go from there and to which side are you defending/rebutting. either you think god exists or do not exists. i would like to debate on the side to which i truly believe in, not just for the sake of it.

  15. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Totnak View Post
    I believe it's actually the simplest topic to discuss about the current RH Bill controversy......where does life begin? during the union of the egg and the sperm a.k.a. fertilization? or during the implantation of the fertilized egg a.k.a conception?
    well i believe that life begins during fertilization but i dont think its immoral to abort it to a certain extent. dont ask me why yet. i would like to debate on the abortion issue rather than that.
    Last edited by Zeitgeist699; Dec 13, 2011 at 11:23 PM. Reason: correction

  16. #76
    荒れ狂う稲光のシェルミー skye_phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Quote Originally Posted by Totnak View Post
    I can take on the "Life begins at fertilization" side.....
    Kala ko ba life begins at forty?

    (sorry can't help it, sabi ko na di ako bagay sa mga seryosong usapan eh )

  17. #77
    Please do not use prohibited words in your user ***le to avoid sanctions. razzer_rising's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    PGMAVindicated
    Sana yung topic naman na doesnt require religion or any holy books.

  18. #78
    yeah. mooch. ano yung rules? ayoko makipagdebate sa mga taong tanging ebidensya lang ay ang holy bible o hindi kaya "sabi ni god".

  19. #79
    Philosopher Wannabe XIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Schrodinger's Box
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeitgeist699 View Post
    well, we have to concretely define GOD first and then we'll go from there and to which side are you defending/rebutting. either you think god exists or do not exists. i would like to debate on the side to which i truly believe in, not just for the sake of it.
    My position: God exists. My definition of God would be Anselm's "that than which no greater could be conceived". This means basically that God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent and all those other traits that could be plausibly attributed to a highest, possible being (like timelessness and aseity).

    PS. Waw ah, may spammer.

  20. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by razzer_rising View Post
    Sana yung topic naman na doesnt require religion or any holy books.
    honga naman, magandang topic yung ibang napost tulad nung sa overpopulation tsaka RH Bill.

Page 4 of 37 First ... 3 4 5 14 ... Last

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •