RoT Debate Challenge

[ElCid]

Who is Jerick? Where did he leave off?

Kung evangelical ka o protestante pagdebatihan na lang natin ang paksa na ganito:

SOLA SCRIPTURA DOCTRINE IS SELF REFUTING.

I will take the affirmative.

[ElCid]

Kung evangelical ka o protestante pagdebatihan na lang natin ang paksa na ganito:

SOLA SCRIPTURA DOCTRINE IS SELF REFUTING.

I will take the affirmative.

Walang titindig maski na sinong secta na hindi catolico dito sa paksang ito?

[jnyarop]

wala bang ibang topic dyan na pwde salihan?

[Totnak]

Walang titindig maski na sinong secta na hindi catolico dito sa paksang ito?

katuwaan lang oh.....titindigan ko negative side ng proposition na iyan.....

hanap ka judge/mod....

[ElCid]

katuwaan lang oh.....titindigan ko negative side ng proposition na iyan.....

hanap ka judge/mod....

There would be no joy in thrashing you in a debate tots lols. Di tayo talo eh :P

[Totnak]

^^ if we'll do this one, we could show SOLA SCRIPTURA advocates here how much we know about this foolish doctrine and why we can never be persuaded about it....

[sophion]

Kung evangelical ka o protestante pagdebatihan na lang natin ang paksa na ganito:

SOLA SCRIPTURA DOCTRINE IS SELF REFUTING.

I will take the affirmative.

miski nung born again pa ako i knew about this verse:

1 Corinthians 11:2
I praise you for remembering me in everything and for holding to the traditions just as I passed them on to you.

I'm sure the evangelical members of rot know that as well. which is why they wont take up the challenge.

protestants believe that much of the catholic traditions did not originate from the apostles.

[sophion]

^^ if we'll do this one, we could show SOLA SCRIPTURA advocates here how much we know about this foolish doctrine and why we can never be persuaded about it....

since the debate isnt happening i will create the thread and you can show everyone how foolish it is.

[skye_phoenix]

Kramsie, ba't di nyo na lang idaan ni ElCid sa official debate dito sa RoT yang topic na yan? For sure hindi naman tatanggi si ElCid eh. It's up to you.

[Mustaine]

Bakit ba kasi naghahamon ng live debate sa isang forum na maraming forum debate?

[OrionPax]

Ayun..hindi pala LALABAN sa forum debate eh..tapos ang usapan

[mequiteshy]

Debate about sa existence ng GOD cnu ba pde mka debate dyan?

[jnyarop]

what's your stand?

[kundera_tan]

Some motions (which are not quite the kind of stuff usually posted here, but I think, are still within the realms of <social> sciences and moral philosophy):

1. Whether or not gay public figures have the social and moral duty to come out of the closet.

2. Whether or not national and international bodies should be created to specifically regulate social media.

3. Whether or not man should know the end of the word.

4. Whether or not couples applying for a marriage license should be required to undergo HIV and other STD tests, and have the results disclosed to both parties.

5. Whether or not man should strive for immortality.

6. Whether or not the Constitution be amended to allow the President and Vice-President to be re-elected at most once.

7. Whether or not display of religious objects should be banned in government offices.

8. Whether or not the State has the right to destroy the religious and cultural sites/places of its enemies.

9. Whether or not terrorism can be justified.

10. Whether or not the RoT thread has contributed to the critical development of public discourse.
***

[jnyarop]

some motions (which are not quite the kind of stuff usually posted here, but i think, are still within the realms of <social> sciences and moral philosophy):

1. Whether or not gay public figures have the social and moral duty to come out of the closet.

2. Whether or not national and international bodies should be created to specifically regulate social media.

3. Whether or not man should know the end of the word.

4. Whether or not couples applying for a marriage license should be required to undergo hiv and other std tests, and have the results disclosed to both parties.

5. Whether or not man should strive for immortality.

6. Whether or not the constitution be amended to allow the president and vice-president to be re-elected at most once.

7. Whether or not display of religious objects should be banned in government offices.

8. Whether or not the state has the right to destroy the religious and cultural sites/places of its enemies.

9. Whether or not terrorism can be justified.

10. Whether or not the rot thread has contributed to the critical development of public discourse.
***

4 and 7.

[stifbend]

...

10. Whether or not the RoT thread has contributed to the critical development of public discourse.
***

Patay tayo diyan, ahahaha.

[tlpnds]

Some motions (which are not quite the kind of stuff usually posted here, but I think, are still within the realms of <social> sciences and moral philosophy):

1. Whether or not gay public figures have the social and moral duty to come out of the closet.

2. Whether or not national and international bodies should be created to specifically regulate social media.

3. Whether or not man should know the end of the word.

4. Whether or not couples applying for a marriage license should be required to undergo HIV and other STD tests, and have the results disclosed to both parties.

5. Whether or not man should strive for immortality.

6. Whether or not the Constitution be amended to allow the President and Vice-President to be re-elected at most once.

7. Whether or not display of religious objects should be banned in government offices.

8. Whether or not the State has the right to destroy the religious and cultural sites/places of its enemies.

9. Whether or not terrorism can be justified.

10. Whether or not the RoT thread has contributed to the critical development of public discourse.
***

magagandang mga points.

meron lang akong gustong idagdag.

11. Whether whatever decision you make, you consider whether innocent people die because of the consequences of your decision.

Example A:

Objective:
ERADICATE TERRORISM

Decision:
GO TO WAR IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ

Consequences:
INNOCENT PEOPLE DIE

Meron pang ibang mga decisions. Tulad nito.

Mission:
ERADICATE FAMILY PLANNING

Decision:
BAN CONDOMS AND CONTRACEPTIVES

Consequences:
BROTHER AND SISTER KILL EACH OTHER FOR INHERITANCE (R*mGen R*vill*)

[magdagul]

pwede po ba tayo mag topic ng tungkol sa INC at ADD?? UN LANG PO

[nOewei]

Bakit po hindi pa nadedeclare yung winner sa debate between Menorrah and XIII?

[TLG]

Bakit po hindi pa nadedeclare yung winner sa debate between Menorrah and XIII?

Dahil walang moderator dun!