| Front Page | User Agreement | List of Forums | Contact Us |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Tell Me Pls....dapat Bang Iboto Si Manny Villar ?
This is what SEN. JOKER ARROYO said about MONNY VILLAR:
I rise on a question of collective privilege on a constitutional issue that affects the integrity of the House and it is very ripe to continue existing. In the course of the fight for the speakership, Rep. Agapito Aquino, chairman of the reform bloc, raised questions regarding the fitness of Rep. Villar to seek the speakership. Rep. Villar chose to answer the charges but he was overwhelmingly elected Speaker by this House. Successful election, however, does not answer the questions nor lay to rest charges of wrongdoing, not in government of laws. We had a colleague, we still have a colleague in the person of Congressman Jalosjos. He was elected by his district but that did not erase his conviction. So, drawing a parallel election does not wipe out the offense. The questions raised, nay, the charges against Speaker Villar are constitutional in character. And our duty as members of the legislature is peremptory and clear. We took oath to support and defend the Constitution and uphold the laws. The Constitution has been violated, laws have been broken. If we are to continue in the capacity of public officials, if this Chamber is to continue in its very character as legislature, an indispensable pillar in the system of checks and balances, then we must come to the Constitution’ s defense and the vindication of the laws. I hesitated long and pondered hard whether to raise these questions for fear of being accused of sour-graping and being a poor sport. But this has nothing to do with sports. Our duty is clear, there are charges of illegalities, the charges must be heard and answered. I am reminded of the case of Speaker Newt Gingrich of the United States House of Representatives. He was investigated by the United States House of Representatives for I think collecting some fees of books he wrote while Speaker (I am not too sure of the facts). But one thing I am sure of is this, the House after hearing censured its own Speaker and penalized him with a penalty was meted out. In other words, there are precedents and we must not hesitate to do our duty. Article XI of the Constitution is titled “Accountability of Public Officers” it proscribes in Section 16 that: “No loan, guaranty, or other form of financial accommodation for any business purpose may be granted, directly or indirectly, by any government or controlled bank or financial institution to the President, the Vice President, the Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Constitutional Commission, the Ombudsman, or to any firm or entity in which they have controlling interest, during their term.” Charge I. Low cost housing is totally dependent on government agencies such as PAG-IBIG, National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation (NHMFC), SSS, GSIS, and other government financial institutions. Speaker Villar and the companies of which he is President or Chairman, or where he has a controlling interest, are the biggest low-cost housing developers in the country. To be more specific, it is the Camella and Palmera Homes and its principal subsidiaries, the Household Development Corporation and Palmera and Communities Philippines. In violation of the constitutional injunction, these companies were given financial accommodations by government banks or financial institutions, among them, PAG-IBIG and the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation among others, during Speaker Villar’s term as Representative from 1992 to 1998 to finance their business purposes. Charge II. Representative Villar, from 1992 to 1998 did not divest himself of his interests in, nor did he sever his connections with, the companies aforestated. They obtained financial accommodations from the above government financial institutions while he was a Member of Congress. Since he did not, therefore, such companies were forbidden from entering into such financial arrangements. Because of our Constitution, Republic Act No. 6713 known as the “Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials” states in Section 9: “Divestment. – A public official or employee should avoid conflicts of interest at all times. When a conflict of interest arises, he shall resign from his position in any private business enterprise within thirty (30) days from his assumption of office and/or divest himself of his shareholdings or interest within sixty (60) days from such assumption.. .” Charge III. Nor has Speaker Villar, up to now, I am saying up to now, divested himself of his interests in, nor has he severed his connections with, the companies aforestated. Speaker Villar is in no hurry to divest because he has declared that he is under no obligation to do so. A continuing violation. Charge IV. Speaker Villar controls the Capitol Bank. Mrs. Villar is the chief executive officer. The Capitol Bank received loans, financial accommodations and guarantees from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas from 1992 to 1998 while he was a Representative. That is constitutionally forbidden. To sum it up, the constitutional prohibition is very simple. If a Representative has a controlling interest in a firm or entity, that firm or entity cannot be extended a loan, a guaranty, or a financial accommodation for any business purpose from any government financial institution. If that firm or entity would like to obtain a loan, a guaranty or a financial accommodation from a government financial institution, that firm or entity must first relieve itself of the controlling interest of the Representative. It is my humble submission that Speaker Villar did not do either. Republic Act No. 3019, otherwise known as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, provides in Section 6 therefore as follows: “Sec. 6. Prohibition on Members of Congress. – It shall be unlawful hereafter for any Member of the Congress during the term for which he has been elected, to acquire or to receive any personal or pecuniary interest in any specific business enterprise which will be directly and particularly favoured or benefited by any law or resolution authored by him previously approved or adopted by the Congress during the same term. The provision of this section shall apply to any other public officer who recommended that initiation in Congress of the enactment or adoption of any law or resolution, and acquires any such interest during his incumbency.” In other words, even if he was not the principal author, if he did ask or initiated the enactment of such a law, he is covered by the prohibition. Simply put, during our term of office, each one of us, it shall be unlawful for us to author any law or resolution that would benefit or favor us. The above prohibition shall apply even to that representative who just recommended, not even authored, the enactment of such law that benefited him. Charge V. Representative Villar, in his bid for the speakership, prepared a propaganda kit that he distributed to Congressmen and media. I think you were given copies of the one. It is entitled “Manny B. Villar, Jr., Achiever and Visionary Leader,” and [in] the “Legislative Performance of Congressman Manny B. Villar, Jr.” Representative Villar unequivocally said that he “incorporated in the landmark Comprehensive and Integrated Shelter Finance Act, Republic Act No. 7835, the recapitalization of the National Home Mortgage and Finance Corporation and the amendment to the Agri-Aqua Law to include housing investment.” Speaker Villar’s companies are engaged in housing. He thereby violated the Anti-Graft Law. The aforementioned Act, which incorporates H.B. No. 6145, co-authored by then Representative Villar mandates “banks to extend to housing loans not utilized for agriculture and agrarian reform credit.” In other words, loanable funds for agriculture and agrarian credit are to be re-channeled to housing, Speaker Villar’s business. Representative Villar co-authored H.B. No. 11005 which “increased the capital of the National Home Mortgage and Finance Corporation” and is the main source of funding of Speaker Villar’s companies. President Estrada admitted that the National Home Mortgage and Finance Coporation is presently bankrupt. He said that to the following: LAMP President Edgardo Angara, Congressman Agapito Aquino, Presidential Legislative Liaison Officer Jimmy Policarpio, former Congresman Miguel Romero and myself. The President no less said that it is bankrupt. Increasing the capitalization of a bankrupt GFI benefited Representative Villar’s housing companies. In the same propaganda kit of Speaker Villar, it states that “also passed by the House were Villar’s measures to make Pag-ibig Find contributions compulsory and to increase housing investments with the SSS.” Pag-ibig is a main source of funding of Speaker Villar’s companies. In a word, Representative Villar’s legilslation from 1992 to 1998 were designed to benefit his business, a violation of the Anti-Graft Law. Now, the same provision of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, provides in the third paragraph of Section 6 thereof, as follows: It shall likewise be unlawful for such member of Congress or other public officer, who, having such interest prior to the approval of such law or resolution authored or recommended by him, continues for thirty days after such approval to retain such interest. Charge VI. When those bills that Representative Villar introduced or co-authored were enacted into law, he did not divest himself of his interest in his companies that benefited therefrom. Now, Republic Act 6713, known as the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials provides in Section 3 (j): Section 3 (j) “Divestment” is the transfer of title or disposal of interest in property by voluntarily, completely and actually depriving or dispossessing oneself of his right or title to it in favour of a person or persons other than his spouse and relatives as defined in this Act. Charge VII. Manuela Corporation applied for and was granted a loan of P1 billion by the SSS, a government financial institution. Another P2 billion loan would be syndicated with another government financial institution, the GSIS. Total syndicated loan from the two GFIs: P3 billion. Manuela Corporation, a housing and realty corporation, is owned by the family of the wife of Speaker Villar. An indirect financial accommodation. Again, the same Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials states in Section 3 (k) thereof: Section 3 (k) “Relatives” refers to any and all persons related to a public official or employee within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity, including bilas, inso, or balae. SSS, historically and as a matter of public policy does not extend direct loans to any company. It extends loans to banks or to public or private financial institutions but not directly to business enterprises. The direct loan to Manuela Corporation is a first in SSS history. Charge VIII. Manuela Corporation owes the Capitol Bank, which also owned by Speaker Villar, P150 million. There may be nothing wrong with that because both are private entities. However, out of the P3 billion earmarked to liquidate the P150 million Capitol Bank loan to the failing Manuela Corporation. In other words, it is a financial accommodation extended by GFIs to relieve Capitol Bank, owned by Speaker Villar, of the P150 million loan. Another indirect financial accommodation. Charge IX. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) is being undertaken in obedience to a constitutional mandate. All lands covered by CARP cannot be used for residential, agricultural, industrial or other uses unless a clearance, conversion, or exemption for a particular property is first issued by DAR. Speaker Villar’s companies are developing or have developed 5,950 hectares or almost 60,000,000 square meters of CARP lands into residential subdivision without the appropriate DAR issuances that would authorize such lands to be used for residential purposes. A traducement of the constitutionally directed CARP law. Article XIII of the Constitution, in Sections 4,5,6,7 and 8 states with clarity what the agrarian reform program is all about. Just to give you an idea about how big 60,000,000 square meters is – my constituency of Makati is only one-third of that size. It is only roughly 21,000,000 square meters. If you add the entire area of Las Piñas and Makati, that is the residential subdivisions covered by the companies of Speaker Villar. The House cannot reform itself, much less even operate effectively if a cloud of doubt hangs over the Speaker of the House. It is to the interest of the Speaker and the Members no less if these concerns are addressed frontally and resolved forthwith to clear the path for meaningful reforms. Public office is a public trust. We, the representatives of the people pay a price for getting elected to public office. The Constitution imposes on us certain constraints which we must follow to the letter. Let me allude to the Members of Congress who are barristers – the Constitution forbids us, lawyers, from appearing in court. In my case, for instance, I was a practitioner up to 1992. I got elected to the House so I stopped practicing, or in other words, I no longer appear in court. That is the price I have to pay. I think I was earning adequately in the practice of law, but I have to make a choice. Do I want to be a lawyer or I want to be a Congressman? If I want to continue being a lawyer, then I must not be a Congressman. If I have to be a Congressman then I must stop lawyering. That is what the Constitution says. So in the case of Speaker Villar, it is simple. If he wants to go/continue in business and deal with government financial institutions, he can do so but he cannot also be a Congressman. If he wants to be a Congressman, then he must not be in business which deals with the government. We have to pay a price. So, this case is a learning experience for us all. Whatever the outcome, it will show the things we can do, the things we cannot do, and the things we must do. I would propose that the House of Representatives constitute itself into a Committee of the Whole to hear the charges and the Speaker’s defense. He will have a trial that is more than fair to him for he will be judged by the very peers who elevated him to be the first among equals, only this time they will judge him according to the law. I will never seek the speakership again nor in any manner challenge the leadership of Speaker Villar except on this specific issue of constitutional breach that calls into question the rule of law. This is how important it is. So I rest my cause. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
AntiChimp Crusader
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metro_Manila
|
A BIG NO!
If you want another magnanakaw president like Gloria, Then Villar is the Man. ![]() Frankly the way he buys his supporters, nakakatakot si Villar. He is the worst in the list of candidates. I may even vote for Erap kung sila lang dalawa ang pagpipilian. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Noynoy fans are desperate. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
AntiChimp Crusader
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metro_Manila
|
ahaha kraven if you want, you can vote for Villar or Gibo, alam naman namin ang mga tipo mong kandidato...
mga magnanakaw at mga associated sa mga magnanakaw... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Mabuhay Gordon
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Flinders St.
|
Quote:
Erap nalang kesa Villar, better the devil you know. Natatakot din ako. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
SIGAW NG BAYAN : VILLAR, ISAULI MO ANG 6.22 BILLION PESOS NA NINAKAW MO !!!
Please read this ; 12 solons sign Senate report on C-5 probe By Maila Ager, INQUIRER.net Twelve senators have signed a committee report that recommended Senator Manny Villar’s censure for unethical behavior when he allegedly used his position to profit from the C-5 road extension project. Those who signed the report are Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, Senators Ma. Ana Consuelo “Jamby” Madrigal, Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III, Mar Roxas, Rodolfo Biazon, Juan Miguel Zubiri, Panfilo “Ping” Lacson, Juan Edgardo Angara, Richard Gordon, Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada, Francis Escudero, and Francis “Kiko” Pangilinan. Enrile is head of the Senate committee that investigated the C-5 road controversy while Madrigal was the complainant in the ethics complaint filed against Villar. Estrada and Pangilinan were also among those who signed a resolution late last year seeking the dismissal of the case against Villar. But Estrada has already told that he would withdraw his signature from the resolution, saying he only signed it because there was an agreement that it would only be filed after the committee comes out with its own report. Pangilinan’s sudden turn around on the issue came as a surprise as he was a known friend of Villar. Pangilinan and Villar were members of the so-called Wednesday Club at the Senate. The report is expected to be filed at the Senate Monday night for floor deliberations. The report also seeks the return and restitution of P6.22 billion spent for the said road project. In signing the report, Pangilinan explained that he was simply abiding the decision of his group, the Liberal Party. “The LP today took an official party stand on the issue of the committee report of the committee of the whole,” he said in a statement. “It is the decision of the Party leadership that regardless of whether we believe in the guilt or innocence of Sen. Villar, at the very least, the proponents of the report should be allowed to present their findings in plenary,” he said. “Senators can then vote either for or against the findings at the appropriate time. As a member of the LP, we will abide by the Party decision and allow for the report to be presented in plenary,” he further said. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
AntiChimp Crusader
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metro_Manila
|
^^
abay ma'am prisma nag agree din tayo ![]() Gudluck to your demonic Gordon aihihi joke lang pow ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Bullsh!t Detector
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Ay di dapat iboto yang Noynoy na yan.
I agree TS. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Can I ask a question? what happened to Noynoy's pork barrel for 11 years?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
SIGAW NG BAYAN : VILLAR, ISAULI MO ANG 6.22 BILLION PESOS NA NINAKAW MO !!!
What P6.22 Billion of our money can buy? Should Villar drop out of the race? by Cocoy, thepoc.net So the Philippine Senate is censuring Manny Villar. For the price of PHP6.22B that’s all we the people get? Seriously? That’s a lot of money! How huge is this? Let’s see what our money can buy. Six point twenty-two billion pesos could have been spent on putting up hospitals or funding local healthcare clinics. That money could have been spent to buy 31 Linear Accelerators to fight cancer. Six point twenty-two billion pesos could have been used to buy rubber boats and rescue vehicles for our disaster preparation team as well as fund the much needed Doppler radar system for PAGASA so we can monitor the storms coming our way. It could have meant that lives were saved and infrastructure damage reduced. Six point twenty-two billion pesos could have been spent on giving school children 20,000 computers. What else could we have bought with Six point twenty-two billion pesos? A hundred and twenty four thousand Filipino children could have been given fifty thousand pesos worth of education each. If you wanted to put Six point Twenty-Two Billion pesos in education infrastructure that’s 10,366 fully furnished schoolrooms with restrooms. That money our government wasted could have built 8,293 houses for 8,923 families made up of four children each. That translates to 49,758 people with a roof over their head. Since Manny Villar is such an expert and such a staunch supporter of Entrepreneurs that money wasted on C5? You know the cost of this controversy could fund 124,400 Small and Medium Enterprises, which can provide livelihood for many Filipinos who have no job. Six point twenty-two billion pesos could have been used and could be used to provide books in all subject areas for all students from grade 1 to fourth year high school. And all we get is a censure? Where is the justice in that? If Manny Villar has been found guilty by his peers to have violated the constitution and ethics that we hold our officials and employees of government accountable what more if he was President? The price of this crime against Filipinos must not merely censure nor only the return of Six point two billion pesos but it must also mean Manny Villar’s withdrawal from the race for President of the Philippines. Dear Filipino, if his peers have found him guilty of this horrible transgression, and if you want change, then here is a man who is not fit to be our president. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
kUNG ISSAULI LANG NI VILLAR YUNG 6.22 BILLION PESOS NA NINAKAW NIYA,
MAKAKAPATAYO SANA TAYO NG 6,220 NA olympic size swimming pool upang sa malinis na tubig na lalangoy ang ating mga kabataan.... hindi sa dagat ng basura. Naging masaya sana at garbo ang pasko ng 6,220,000 na mga bata.......at wala sanang namasko sa gitna ng basura. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
HINDI PA MAN PRESIDENTE ; MAY PLUNDER CASE NA SI MONEY VILLAR !!!!
Please read this ; Plunder raps set vs Villar at Ombudsman By Maila Ager – INQUIRER.net MANILA, Philippines – Senator Ma. Ana Consuelo “Jamby” Madrigal is readying a plunder case against Senator Manny Villar over his alleged involvement in the anomalous C-5 road extension project. Madrigal said she would personally file the case at the Office of the Ombudsman. “Abangan niyo po ang kasong plunder na isasampa namin laban kay Senator Villar sa [Watch out for the plunder case that we will file against Senator Villar at the] Ombudsman,” she said at a press conference on Tuesday. “This is major plunder case to the tune of P6.2 billion,” she said, referring to the amount that was supposedly spent for the road project. Madrigal was among the 12 senators who signed a report by the Senate committee of the whole that recommended Villar’s censure. The same report demanded the return and restitution of the money to the public coffers. It was Madrigal who filed the ethics complaint at the Senate against Villar. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Mabuhay Gordon
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Flinders St.
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
KC,Sarah,Chard,MANNY VILLAR
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Big Brother House
|
sa napansin ko unti unti ng dumadami ang naninira kay Villar hmmm..baka effective lamang ang mga commercials nya sa tv kasi tumataas ang ratings eh,kaya ang mga fans ng kalaban nyang presidentiables ay natatakot na ata maungusan ang kanilang idol eh.kaya dinadaga na sila ngayon..ayon ang paninira na kay Villar ang kanilang ginagawa che!
..kaya ayan left and right ang paninira nila kay Villar ha! gosh ! kaya huwag na iboto si Gordona esti Gordon pala at si Noynita esti Noynoy pala ...dito na tayo sa unti unti nang lumalakas sa mga surveys kay Villar tayo |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Villar is competent to become a president together with Gibo ang Gordon.
Kung bayaran ba ni Villar ang 6.22 Bilyon na yan mapasakanya ba ang C5? hehe Wala namang naibulsa si Villar ah inamin naman nila na mahina ang direktang paricipasyon ni Villar ![]() Para sa akin,Pulitika lang talaga... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
KC,Sarah,Chard,MANNY VILLAR
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Big Brother House
|
^correct politika lang talaga...e dagdag na rin natin ang mga ingiterang mga pang_t na mga gumagala sa mga anti villar thread tulad nito..sana hindi na dumami ang lahi nila ano kasi nakakasuka sila
as in hindi dapat tularan,ang mga ugaling mapanira sa kanilang kapwa ha..kasi nga pang_it sila mga baliktad ang paniniwala![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
^ plain and simple- traditional politics lang yan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
|
Bakit pinatagalan ang paglabas ng resolution na yan? Dahil ba dikitan na ang laban sa survey? hehe Dahil umaangat na si Villar?
Takot ba sila kung saan ni Villar babawiin ang ginastos niya? Di sila natakot doon sa taong nagpapatakbo ng pinondohan ng mayayaman at malalaking negosyante? Paano nila bayaran ang utang na loob nila na pinondohan sila ng milyones para manalo? Abangan na lang naten sa Mayo hehe... If Gordon or Gibo wins..panalo pa rin ang mga Pilipino.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned by Admin
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
![]() I think we should be more discerning when it comes to this kind of issues kasi hindi maganda na magkaroon tayo ng MAGNANAKAW na presidente. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|