^Calm down. Percentage wise, the number of viruses written for windows is also staggeringly higher compared to mac, that makes your rant pretty much moot.

Summer seems to be ending, but the feeling doesn't have to end. Check out this list for awesome road-trip getaways!
read more
Twelve of the best brains across Asia compete to be hired in the ultimate job interview in The Apprentice Asia
read more
The NU Lady Bulldogs outlast the AdU Lady Falcons in 4 sets, taking their first trip to the Shakey's V-league finals.
read more
Guess the theme! Have you seen Twilight, Sister Act and these other movies? Share your thoughts and reviews in here!
read more^Calm down. Percentage wise, the number of viruses written for windows is also staggeringly higher compared to mac, that makes your rant pretty much moot.
Well there are blinded users...within the Mac community may mga ganyan din...*** iba nag start mag Mac because of their iPods, iPhones and iPad (which i don't have, find it useless)...may ibang mayayabang lang talaga...and some of us who really use our machines for work, not only in coffee shops but at home.
I still prefer running an antivirus. There really is no reason to not run one.
In the App Store, you can at least install Intego's VirusBarrier Express. It's free, it's lightweight, and it doesn't insert itself deep into the system. Even just scheduling a scan once a week would make you a lot safer than not running any anti malware at all.
If you require on-access protection, I recommend Avira for Mac. It's free and also lightweight, and is a lot more stable than the other free major AV, Sophos.
For all you know, the reason why you might feel so comfortable is that the malware isn't showing symptoms, but is still there running in the background. Everyone can say they're doing best practices to avoid malware. But what if the malware was coded cleverly enough to force itself into legit sites, and later, into your computer? If you've been reading the news, the latest version of Flashback doesn't even need to ask for an admin password.
This is just my opinion, but I think refusing to install any sort of malware protection software is a sign that you're still blinded by Apple's marketing that Macs are invulnerable to malware. Ang daming libre dyan, pero ayaw pa ring i-install. What's that about?
Andami kong nababasang commenters sa Internet who say stuff like "Flashback isn't a virus... it's a worm. Macs don't have viruses". Mga in denial pa talaga.![]()
Apple was widely criticised for its tardiness in rolling out a patch for the known Java vulnerability exploited by the Flashback attacks. In the end, it came six weeks after Microsoft, Adobe and Oracle released their fixes. Cupertino does not release regular bulletins. It does not rate vulnerabilities and doesn't discuss security issues until patches are available. OS X is too popular now to continue with this outdated strategy.
full article
still Apple claims they have the most advanced OS on this planet.
■■■■■■■■■■
Apple Products Surprisingly Vulnerable, Studies Find
04/20/2012
Alright, Apple fans, it's time to face the truth: Your Macs aren't as safe as you might think.
According to PCWorld, a report recently released by Internet security firm Trend Micro shows that Apple posted the highest number of reported security vulnerabilities during the first three months of 2012, leading all other OS and software vendors with 91 vulnerabilities.
full article
![]()
1 In 5 Macs Are Infected With Malware [Study Results]
April 24, 2012
Research firm Sophos recently released a claim in which the company says 1 in 5 systems out of 100,000 tested were infected with some form of malware. The study reveals that 20% of Macs carry at least one and in many cases more than one form of Windows based malware.
full article
"[Apple] will understand very soon that they have the same problems
Microsoft had ten or 12 years ago. They will have to make changes in
terms of the cycle of updates and so on and will be forced to invest
more into their security audits for the software," Kaspersky's CEO and
founder told CBR in an interview at Info Security 2012.
full article
Windows versus Mac: which is more secure?
May 10, 2012
The long-running debate over whether Apple's Mac OS is more secure than
Microsoft's Windows is distorted by marketing, myth and misinformation, writes Liam Tung.
"Macs are definitely not more secure," explains Dr Charlie Miller from US IT security firm Accuvant.
"The security updates issued by Apple are issued too slow and not an any regular schedule," says Rik Ferguson, director security research at antivirus firm, Trend Micro.
But even those without antivirus to sell they agree Apple is slow to respond to security threats." "[Apple has] always been slow, it's just never really been an issue until now," says Miller.
Other reasons for the unprecedented infection is that Apple has wrongly convinced people Macs don't need antivirus, and its Java security update came 50 days after Oracle had fixed it.
full article
Apple mentioned malware for the first time ever at a WWDC keynote address.![]()
Mac security: Apple under fire
Published 31 May 2012
Apple Mac OS's reputation for being more secure than Windows, however false, has taken a battering recently after a series of damaging incidents raised questions about the way the technology giant approaches security. Steve Evans reports.
Apple has long had the reputation that its desktop operating system, Mac OS, is more secure than Microsoft's Windows. It is not true.
Banned by Admin
^
Boss ang ganda ah... Ayos!
Bootcamp yan, pwede mag-install ng Windows OS?..![]()
All those ads about OS X not being susceptible to malware are marketing BS. The Apple fantards sure ate those up...
The primary reason OS X didn't have malware before was NOT because it is inherently secure, but because hackers wouldn't bother with an OS that had such minimal market penetration. That situation has changed nowadays as Macs become a lot more popular. Meanwhile, Windows, post XP, seems to be slowly going from strength to strength when it comes to security. Microsoft may have made a lot of snafus when it comes to the front-facing part of Windows, but I think their kernel(*) guys have been doing excellent work that trounces anything Apple has.
(*) I can't say the same about another low-level aspect though: When it comes to APIs I think Apple has also been doing a better job lately than Microsoft - specially when it comes to continuity and consistency. MS keeps schizophrenically changing their APIs - to the chagrin of developers. I should watch more MSDN Channel 9 to get myself brainwashed again in favor of Microsoft's recent moves![]()
like ko ang magic mouse kasi smooth magscroll at saka ang wireless keyboard....ang liit at gaan ilagay sa lap. Enjoy naman ako sa iMac so far.![]()