Big Bang Theory Disproved

[Mojowatcher]

Hello! Is there anyone here in this thread who is a cosmologist or a physicist? Anyway, I am inviting all the top physicists and cosmologists in our country and the entire world to join in.

My friend told me this site doesn't only encourage but protects free inquiry and I believed him. At any rate, this is an opportunity to show to the entire world that we Filipinos aren't behind in cosmology and theoretical physics.

[sonyled]

Mojo dude, post something that can encourage discussion. Have a precise topic because its difficult to pinpoint what you are trying to tell us. You are close to typing a pocket book novel. Honestly, its giving me a headache. Just post 2-3 paragraphs like what we all do here, in forum readable length. Thank you.

[Mojowatcher]

Ok I see. Thanks for that sonyled.

If cosmologists are tormented between abandoning the big bang and expanding universe ideas and the most proven theory in science it is because they are entangled with creation.

They are entangled with creation because of the success of the 2nd initiative of Albert Einstein in firmly re-establishing the doctrines of creations, which he earlier demystified with his relativity principle and the quantum theory of light (photo-electric effect).

His general relativity theory of gravity was very successful not only in being a prime tool of astronomers but it was very successful also in having intertwined the doctrines of creations into the realms of scientific theories, such as the big bang and the expanding universe theory.

[Mojowatcher]

Science is as good as its keepers and its keepers are as good as their power tools, but, as it is, the two competing visions and their derivative frameworks of approaches are no longer appropriate to solve the greatest mystery of all time.

In reality, the two conventional frameworks of approaches are inconsistent and both lead to confusion. They are inconsistent because of the initiatives of Einstein. Because creation is always link to religion eventually confusion.

For example, although physicists correctly tell us that common sense is no longer reliable in science the keepers of the two competing visions tell us to portray the universe that it has beginning because, according to them, it always make sense to start from the beginning, which is actually the common sense.
Thus, there is inconsistency, a double standard exists.

The two old and conventional frameworks of approaches leads to creation because they haven't only violated the first rule of the new theory of knowledge but disregard an empirical evidence in one of the 32 quantum states. Sometimes causes are preceded by effects and vice versa, and sometimes they are simultaneous.

[Mojowatcher]

In reality, the beginning of time is a hotly debated issue because there are no data to support either one or the other hypotheses such as the simultaneous big bangs, cycle of big bangs, and no-bang at all.

If the big bang idea is the first successful working hypothesis of the expanding universe theory, dark energy is the first working hypothesis of the so-called accelerating expansion of the universe discovered by experimenters in 1998.

If there are no questions regarding the above, i will proceed to my proposals in cosmology.

[Mojowatcher]

By the by, I am sorry, anyone can ask questions, students of science, ordinary people, adult life long learners, curiosity seekers any one.

[Mojowatcher]

Also, I invite the keepers of the two competing visions.

[Mojowatcher]

Obviously, nobody here is aware of the fundamental problems of science and physics, thus, I presume no one can understand the solutions.

[Mojowatcher]

I can't blame you if you are having head aches in reading the stated problems and solutions. As a matter of fact, the keepers are in big dilemma between abandoning the expanding universe idea and the most proven theory in science.

Top scientists who are keepers of the two old competing visions and who read my proposals have found trouble grasping them, too.

The reality is that they are completely entangled with creation that they cannot cut their links to the traditional old ways.

In reality, my ideas are part of the copyrighted books I wrote. I will not reveal the books here because they will be printed and published soon in the U.S. of A and marketed internationally in three formats including eBook.

So, what you are getting from me isn’t only new but free. I want the Filipinos to know it first before the world so that you can catch up fast.

The solutions are diametrically opposed to the current views, and so I am aware that they aren’t acceptable yet. You should be aware that it takes time to grasp new ideas and takes time to validate them.

As a matter of fact, it took the scientists of the early 20th century science many years to grasp the relativity principle. I am not surprise at all if anyone here can grasp them.

[Mojowatcher]

It would be easier for me if you are familiar with the relativity principle, quantum theory, and the two great but incoherent scientific theories.

Anyway, you could ask questions if you don’t understand any of the key ideas of the old physics, while we go along the discussions of the new era in physics and cosmology. Don’t worry if you don’t understand the quantum theory because nobody does.

If you are mathematically inclined talk to me in private but please let’s not confuse the people further. As we all know, math terrorizes the beginners.

This is just an attempt to explore the full spectrum realities, and so let’s avoid escaping to math but realities.

[Mojowatcher]

If you followed and read my postings in the thread Grandfather Paradox, and assuming you were able to grasp my explanation you are close to grasping the solutions.

As mentioned previously, the crux of the conundrum and contradiction that stuck the keepers is kinda paradoxical like the Twin Paradox and Grandfather Paradox.

[Mojowatcher]

While all the philosophers and scientists before me eluded success in figuring out the puzzle I was successful because I have unravelled the missing piece of the puzzle that stuck them.

I devised an entirely new framework of approach that is consistent, coherent, and comprehensive because the two old and obsolete frameworks of approaches of the keepers aren’t only inconsistent but they lead to confusion.

In other words, I was successful in identifying the real nature of the principal and secondary contradictions, thus, the resolutions are in an all-round-way and once-and-for-all. In short, what you are getting from me are solutions.

But obviously, no one can appreciate them yet because nobody here is aware what stuck the keepers.

[Mojowatcher]

Before we proceed to the solutions you should know what are the old contradictions and conflicts in the past that are unresolved yet, and the new contradictions and conflicts that were brought about as a result of the successful initiatives of Albert Einstein.

In other words, what is the problem of the keepers that they have shown the gross incapacity to resolve them. In short, what are the given.

By the by, in the new science of dialectics, nothing is permanent because everything is transitory, nothing is absolute because everything is relative, and there are no sacred truths because we aren’t only after the ultimate reality but the penultimate reality.

In addition, we do not view the contradictions as problems. Moreover, while the keepers reject the other visions the new cosmic approach that I devised recognizes all the other visions on their own merits.

[Mojowatcher]

Largely not known is that science is stuck because the keepers aren’t aware that they are entangled with creation. They are entangled with creation because they have completely abandoned why science was invented and replaced with their doctrines of creations.

No one can deny that the keepers rule the world of science now but no one can deny also that they are principally engaged in finding and proving how the universe started off.

They ceased to be interested in finding new knowledge for the betterment of humans and its ultimate survival because they are fully devoted to their doctrines of creations.

[Mojowatcher]

Best Proofs of Entanglement with Creation

In reality, there is no essential difference between the two competing visions because they are merely the two faces of the same thing, they both uphold creation.

The oldest vision aka philosophical idealism upholds the oldest myth of creation based on the sacred text.

The relatively newer vision upholds the scientific myth of the big bang creation based on the pure mechanical philosophical materialism of Thales of Miletus of the great Ionian Awakening.

By the by, you should be aware that physics evolved out of natural philosophy as a distinct discipline starting from the third stage of the great intellectual revolutions.

Galileo and Newton started and led this during the 17th century. This great intellectual revolution produced three new sciences 200ys later, thus, some said Newton incurred the wrath of the Church.

The defenders of modern creation invented the anthropic principle to justify their violation to the first rule of the new theory of knowledge. This rule said that any other use of the two competing vision lead to creation and because it is always connected to religion eventually confusion. The reality is that they are still confuse up to know.

This anthropic principle said that we exist in order to explain the universe. In reality, this principle is a variant of the two old conceptual tools.

It is also one of the violations of the first law of contradictions of the new theory of knowledge aka the new world vision. Because this principle always linked scientific theories to creation and, therefore it is a tool for confusion.

In addition, it is also one of the best proofs of the complete success of Einstein in firmly re-establishing the basic doctrine of creation, meaning we were completely indoctrinated until now.

Moreover, the so-called God particle (Higgs boson) being validated now at the Atlas Experiments in Geneva, Switzerland is also a proof of the keeper's deep entanglement with creation.

As we know now, the discoverer Peter Higgs disapproves naming it as such, thus, it is also the best proof that creation has pervaded the minds of the totalitarian keepers.

[Mojowatcher]

Please forgive me Lolarose, I want to congratulate you for starting this thread. As we will see, the big bang theory has reached its usefulness, it can be tossed out now.

[Mojowatcher]

My Arguments
In a world completely indoctrinated by the doctrines of creations it is difficult at first perhaps to accept that there is no beginning at all even if it’s just an assumption. Some of my arguments are:

1) What is the point of inventing science if we only have to find and prove the beginning of time?

2) Isn’t it ironic that the mechanical quantum theory of gravity is a great deflection?

3) What is the point of proving the backward approach by using the forward approach?

[Ateo]

near death experiences may prove an afterlife, but does not prove that god exists. it's like saying "i've seen a ghost, therefore god exists, allelluia!!!"

i'm an atheist and i believe in near death experiences.

i'll even give you a link
http://www.near-death.com/

I am an atheist too. But shouldn't near-death experience simply be considered as proof of near-death experience only? It could NOT be used to prove the afterlife. The afterlife, if it exists, only exists after death and could not be seen near death.

Near-death experience could be explained with the brain shutting down and is desperately racing to try to stay alive.

[TheRealCitizen]

Hoy Mojowatcher walang magbabasa sa mga sinulat mo

[Mojowatcher]

Hi realcitizen! thanks for that.