let's clarify a few things home used to be owned by PLDT and then they sold it to the lopezes so know they have home and sky but in exchange for the sell out of HOME to LOPEZ was not in cash but shares of stocks PLDT has 32percent of the shares of what the majority stocks of the lopezes has. I think it's unfair to the consumers of HOME before b'coz back then we have discovery channel but when the lopezes owned home they took away discovery and replaced it with National Geographic which we all know sucks so know they have this bargaining power if you want discovery you upgrade to sky. so why in the hell did they have to purchase HOME in the first place if it's going to compete with SKY. PLDT should have sold it to someone else with no vested interest
some people may disagree with my views. I think it's unfair to the consumers we want something that is affordable at the same time with quality you called that HOME channel line up Quality that's a lot of bull.