PEx Highlights

PHOTOS: ADMU Edges DLSU

Kiefer Ravena played like a man possessed in the 4th quarter to lead the ADMU Blue Eagles past the DLSU Green Archers 97-86.

read more

What's Wrong With the Green Archers?

After being penned the favorites of UAAP Season 77, the DLSU Green Archers are off to a slow opening in the season, now at 0-2.

read more

Top Celebrity Loveteams!

Check out which loveteams dropped and which ones came out on top this week!

read more

PROMO: Guardians of the Galaxy

Get a chance to movie passes to the special PinoyExchange 15th Anniversary Block Screening of GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY!

read more

PHOTOS: PLDT Repulses NU

The PLDT Turbo Boosters pulled away with a tough 25-16, 25-23, 24-26, 25-19 victory over the gritty NU Lady Bulldogs.

read more

PHOTOS: Ferrer Leads UST Past FEU

Kevin Ferrer nailed crucial triples in the game's final minutes to help the UST Growling Tigers escape the FEU Tamaraws 69-67.

read more

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    Talking

    Facts: Ex-girlfriend wishes the barangay captain to mediate a domestic squabble with ex-boyfriend. Ex-girlfriend lives in Barangay A, ex-boyfriend lives in Barangay B and goes to work in Barangay C.

    Question: Does Barangay Captain C have jurisdiction in this matter?

  2. #2

    Talking

    assuming the subject matter is within the jurisdiction of the barangay, venue should be in barangay "b" by virtue of section 3 of pd 1508 which states:

    "disputes between or among persons actually residing in the same barangay shall be brought for amicable settlement before the Lupon of said barangay. Those involving actual residents of different barangays within the same city or municipality shall be brought in the barangay where the respondent or any of the respondents actually resides, at the election of the complainant."


  3. #3

    Cool

    kd / gg: the question is "does Bgy. Captain C have jurisdiction over the squabble?"

    Ans: on the given facts, NO. The determining factor in referring cases to the Bgy. is firstly: a) the nature of the controversy; b) the particular residences of the parties (must be belonging to the same or adjacent barangays) and c) does not fall under the exception of the katarungan pambarangay law, among which are as follows: 1) one of the the parties is a corporation, when one party is the government or its agencies, 3)the offense has no private offended party (ex. bribery) etc. etc. (haba eh!) http://www.pinoyexchange.com/goon.gif

  4. #4

    Red face

    So if ex-boyfriend in this case receives summons from Barangay Captain C, he may refuse service on the grounds of "lack of jurisdiction"?

  5. #5

    Talking

    kd: yup - any other question? http://kozmo.yakima.net/~demo/gif/smiley01.gif




    [This message has been edited by senator yak (edited 05-23-2000).]

  6. #6

    Talking

    http://kozmo.yakima.net/~demo/gif/smiley01.gif


    ang cute ng smiley mo senator! gigantum!!!

  7. #7

    Talking

    nakakatakot nga, eh. http://www.pinoyexchange.com/lol.gif hahahaha!

  8. #8

    Talking

    Counsel,

    Sorry to beat this horse, but this is a true case, so my questions arise as the case evolves.

    It now happens that ex-boyfriend received summons from Barangay Captain C and decides to respond by personally appearing at the barangay hall, where he meets the complainant. After some discussion, the complaint is dismissed on the merits. Ex-boyfriend did not need to use the improper jusrisdiction argument.

    Ex-girlfriend, though, is a tenacious creature, and we are anticipating further action.

    Supposing ex-girlfriend discovers that the place of complaint was wrong in the first place, can she file the same complaint in the *correct* place, i.e. Barangay B?

  9. #9

    Talking

    BTW, adidas ang tatak ng tenacious niya. http://www.pinoyexchange.com/lol.gif

  10. #10

    Talking

    kuyadanny - in my look (sa tingin ko), the girl cannot do that anymore. the proper party to raise the objection of improper jurisdiction is the respondent or the government agency. in this case, there were no such objections hence they all submitted freely to the jurisdiction of baranggay captain "c". if she does file it with baranggay captain "b", you can raise the defense of "forum shopping" (which is probably where she got her tenacious - hehe).

    please feel free to ask, kuyadanny. i think i can speak for bb and senator yak when i say we welcome these queries from our fellow pexers.

    (senator yak, bb - please comment on my advice above. thanks.)

  11. #11

    Talking

    kd:/gg:

    The Katarungan Pambarangay Law clearly specifies who has jurisdiction over controversies covered by the said law.

    In your problem, it is quite clear that Bgy. C has no jurisdiction. So, even though the parties voluntarily submitted themselves before Bgy. C, and that the complaint was dismissed on the merits, still, the ex-girlfriend can file the complaint in the proper forum, i.e. Bgy. B or A.

    To sustain the action of Bgy. C in dismissing the complaint is similar to a litigant asking a disinterested court to rule on a legal issue. The principle of law following this controversy is that "jurisdiction is defined by law and is not subject to the whims and caprices of party litigants."

    I hope this helps.

    BTW - ex-boyfriend can always raise the defenses he raised in Bgy. C to warrant the dismissal of the case.

  12. #12

    Post The latest developments

    This is no longer an issue of a barangay captain's jurisdiction. Shortly after my last post, my driver was sued for the felony of slight physical injuries, "People of the Philippines vs My Driver*" in the Metropolitan Trial Court of Mandaluyong. In the past eight months, we have experienced a wonderful education on the expeditious and economical ways of the Philippine justice system.

    My driver was found guilty last Monday, and sentenced to a fine of P200, which he paid on his way back to the office from the court. He has 15 days to appeal the decision.

    My questions, counsel, are these:

    Is this a typical sentence? It seems a little light, and absurd, to me. By levying such a light sentence, is the court trying to send defendant a signal to not consider filing an appeal and forget about the whole affair?

    ----------
    *name was changed to protect the guilty

  13. #13
    Laker fan for life
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Seoul, S. Korea

    Talking

    It all has to do with the Revised Penal Code, and other applicable criminal laws.

    Most of them were promulgated many decades ago, so the amounts of the fines are ridiculously low. They weren't when they were first conceived, but now some serious thought has to be put into establishing a more prohibitive set of penalties.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Hot Topics

UAAP:

ADMU Blue Eagles blast DLSU Green Archers 97-86

ADMU Blue Eagles blast DLSU Green Archers 97-86

read more
SHOWBIZ:

Jennylyn Mercado not yet ready to be friends with ex-BF Luis Manzano

Jennylyn Mercado not yet ready to be friends with ex-BF Luis Manzano

read more
TV:

Fourth Pagotan evicted from PBB All In

Fourth Pagotan evicted from PBB All In

read more
SPORTS:

Army Lady Troopers topple AirAsia 25-19, 25-23, 25-16 to enter SuperLiga Finals

Army Lady Troopers topple AirAsia 25-19, 25-23, 25-16 to enter SuperLiga Finals

read more
PBA:

Terrence Romeo and co. lift Pinoys to championship vs taller Qatar in FIBA 3x3

Terrence Romeo and co. lift Pinoys to championship vs taller Qatar in FIBA 3x3

read more
CHIT CHAT:

What are the events that made you appreciate PinoyExchange even more?

What are the events that made you appreciate PinoyExchange even more?

read more