View Full Version : Paglilingkod sa Bayan
ЅUX2BÜ
Jan 28, 2008, 01:55 PM
Instead of just "continuing the tradition of 100% passing", why not start producing more pharmacists?
I wouldn't say that 10/10 is really good because 70/90 is way way better for a developing country like the Philippines which is experiencing brain drain.
:)
borlogs
Jan 28, 2008, 02:51 PM
^why not? if the government would start allocating more budget to UP then it could produce more graduates. :D
filial_piety
Jan 28, 2008, 02:54 PM
partida na yan konti na nga lang ang nag-take na taga UP-Manila and yet na-dominate pa nila always ang board exams!!!, ayan ang magaling!!!
Kirkegaard
Jan 28, 2008, 07:59 PM
5-year Pharmacy course Versus 4-year Pharmacy course. Congrats sa lahat ng mga pumasa.
UPM College of Pharmacy actually offers two degree programs, the 4-year BS Pharmacy and the 5-year BS Industrial Pharmacy. I believe the bulk of examinees belong to the former.
@SUX2BU
It would surely benefit the country if UP, or any other state U for that matter, could produce more pharmacists. However, since the government's allocation is limited, UP could not just churn out professionals, it had to concentrate on making leaders of the profession instead.
philippines123
Jan 28, 2008, 10:02 PM
Instead of just "continuing the tradition of 100% passing", why not start producing more pharmacists?
I wouldn't say that 10/10 is really good because 70/90 is way way better for a developing country like the Philippines which is experiencing brain drain.
:)
As you know, UP is a state U and it can not afford to accommodate and subsidize many students... hire more profs and give them highly competitive pay, add more classrooms and laboratories and lab equipment... plus if there are only few students who take UPCAT and choose Pharmacy as their course, what can UP do? If this is not what the High School honor grads want to take up in college, can UP convince them to take up this course? The only thing that UP can do is to refer grads who were not admitted to the course they want to pursue to other courses having some openings.
ЅUX2BÜ
Jan 28, 2008, 11:06 PM
Sa klaseng kakapiranggot lang ang bilang ng mga mag-aaral ay marapat lang at dapat lang na gumaling nga ang kakapiranggot na mga mag-aaral na 'yun.
'Yan ang partida.
:)
letsrockandroll
Jan 29, 2008, 03:34 PM
haha, UP AND UST again.
Kirkegaard
Jan 29, 2008, 06:58 PM
Sa klaseng kakapiranggot lang ang bilang ng mga mag-aaral ay marapat lang at dapat lang na gumaling nga ang kakapiranggot na mga mag-aaral na 'yun.
'Yan ang partida.
:)
Go make me Jump, jump! but licensure exams are not competitions, at least for us. So what does partida have to do with this? :lol:
philippines123
Jan 29, 2008, 09:51 PM
Sa klaseng kakapiranggot lang ang bilang ng mga mag-aaral ay marapat lang at dapat lang na gumaling nga ang kakapiranggot na mga mag-aaral na 'yun.
'Yan ang partida.
:)
Kahit konti o marami sila, walang duda na magagaling ang mga UP grads. Kayang kaya nilang ipasa ang exam. In fact, kahit saans skwelahan sila mag-aral, kaya nilang pumasa sa board.
Di ko lang maintindihan, meron talagang ibang skwelahan kung saan saan jan na ang dinidiscuss na nga sa klase hanggang review e ang mga posibleng lumabas sa board exam (take not, mismong Prof ng U** nagsabing wag ng pag-aralan yan dahil di naman lalabas yan sa board)... e hindi pa rin maka-100% passing sa board exam.
Sa ganitong paraan ng pagtuturo at resulta ng board exam, tunay ngang sayang lang ang ibinabayad ng mga estudyante sa ganitong klase ng paaralan/pamantasan.
Binabati ko ang mga pumasa ng Pharmacy Board.
ЅUX2BÜ
Jan 30, 2008, 12:07 AM
Ngayong may 300% patong na sa twisyon ay dapat mas marami at hindi lang kakapiranggot na pharmacists ang iluluwal ng up-manila. Aba, kailangan sila ng bansa.
:)
_SCUD_
Jan 30, 2008, 08:49 AM
At hindi lang yan, sabayan sana nila ng serbisyo sa bayan ang paghingi ng dagdag sa kanilang pondo.
Kung mas maraming pharmacist na manggagaling ng UP-Manila, mas maraming magsisilbi sa bayan, na dapat lang naman nilang suklian dahil pinondohan sila ng gobyerno.
Sa 100% na passing rate, sigurado ako 100% din sa kanila may damdaming makabayan. Pero ilan porsyento kaya ang maglilingkod sa bansa?
:)
Shinobi No Kami
Jan 30, 2008, 08:59 AM
Mission
The UPCP constantly strive to become the outstanding and relevant institution of higher learning in the pharmaceutical sciences by providing the highest quality of instruction, professional training, basic and applied research and community service.
link (http://www.upm.edu.ph/cp/mission.htm)
Kahit konti o marami sila, walang duda na magagaling ang mga UP grads. Kayang kaya nilang ipasa ang exam. In fact, kahit saans skwelahan sila mag-aral, kaya nilang pumasa sa board.
Di ko lang maintindihan, meron talagang ibang skwelahan kung saan saan jan na ang dinidiscuss na nga sa klase hanggang review e ang mga posibleng lumabas sa board exam (take not, mismong Prof ng U** nagsabing wag ng pag-aralan yan dahil di naman lalabas yan sa board)... e hindi pa rin maka-100% passing sa board exam.
Sa ganitong paraan ng pagtuturo at resulta ng board exam, tunay ngang sayang lang ang ibinabayad ng mga estudyante sa ganitong klase ng paaralan/pamantasan.
Kailangan daw kasi ng bansa.:lol: Quantity ata target nila.
Who do you think has the higher chance of finding a cure for AIDS: a large group of mediocre researchers or a small group of brilliant researchers?
ЅUX2BÜ
Jan 30, 2008, 10:17 AM
At hindi lang yan, sabayan sana nila ng serbisyo sa bayan ang paghingi ng dagdag sa kanilang pondo.
Kung mas maraming pharmacist na manggagaling ng UP-Manila, mas maraming magsisilbi sa bayan, na dapat lang naman nilang suklian dahil pinondohan sila ng gobyerno.
Sa 100% na passing rate, sigurado ako 100% din sa kanila may damdaming makabayan. Pero ilan porsyento kaya ang maglilingkod sa bansa?:)
'Yan ang napaka-gandang tanong. Sana naman ay paglingkuran at unahin ang bansa. Kailangan sila ng bansa. At dapat dumami sila't hindi lang kakapiranggot.
*okay*
philippines123
Jan 30, 2008, 02:22 PM
^^^
I think UPM is producing the right no. of grads per course per year. 300% increase will go to facilities improvement and other operating expenditures, research fundings, and employees' compensation. This is better I guess. Kawawa naman kase ang mga loyal na employees na sumusweldo doon na mas maliit pa kesa sa mga fresh grads, saka yung mga UPM grads na may magagandang research proposals pero inaamag lang sa library dahil hindi mapondohan. If everything is fine, maybe more grads can be produced.
Saka maliit lang ang lupang sakop ng UPM... baka di rin kayanin magdagdag ng additional classrooms for additonal students. Unless palalyasin na nila nag Supreme Court/DOJ/NBI don (I guess UPM na lupa talaga yun e). Kahit yung NBI na lang, mga bayaran lang naman sila e, hehehehhe...
_SCUD_
Jan 30, 2008, 03:21 PM
^^^
I think UPM is producing the right no. of grads per course per year. 300% increase will go to facilities improvement and other operating expenditures, research fundings, and employees' compensation. This is better I guess. Kawawa naman kase ang mga loyal na employees na sumusweldo doon na mas maliit pa kesa sa mga fresh grads, saka yung mga UPM grads na may magagandang research proposals pero inaamag lang sa library dahil hindi mapondohan. If everything is fine, maybe more grads can be produced.
Saka maliit lang ang lupang sakop ng UPM... baka di rin kayanin magdagdag ng additional classrooms for additonal students. Unless palalyasin na nila nag Supreme Court/DOJ/NBI don (I guess UPM na lupa talaga yun e). Kahit yung NBI na lang, mga bayaran lang naman sila e, hehehehhe...
Pero ito ang tanong, aprubado ka ba na kailangan maglingkod ang mga State and College University graduates na gaya ng UP grads na maglingkod ng at least 2 yrs sa Pilipinas bago isipin ang sarili at kumita ng limpak-limpak na salapi?
Sayang naman kung ang kanilang ipinagmamalaking RESEARCH ay hindi gagamitin sa paglilingkod sa bansa at tila bagang ginamit lang para makapasa sa kanilang post gradweyts stadis. Self serving kumbaga.
Shinobi No Kami
Jan 30, 2008, 04:28 PM
Pero ito ang tanong, aprubado ka ba na kailangan maglingkod ang mga State and College University graduates na gaya ng UP grads na maglingkod ng at least 2 yrs sa Pilipinas bago isipin ang sarili at kumita ng limpak-limpak na salapi?
Sayang naman kung ang kanilang ipinagmamalaking RESEARCH ay hindi gagamitin sa paglilingkod sa bansa at tila bagang ginamit lang para makapasa sa kanilang post gradweyts stadis. Self serving kumbaga.
I think that should be encouraged but not made mandatory. There are many ways to serve the nation aside from working in the Philippines right after graduation. Sabi nga nang isang UP professor : "OK lang na mag-abroad kaagad. Basta 'pag big time na kayo, invest in the Philippines.". One more thing, the ICT industry in the Philippines is not as developed as the first world countries. Eh, kung yung field na interested ka eh walang ganun sa Pilipinas? Sasayangin mo ba yung pinag-aralan mo at magpapakabayani dito o maghahanap ng suitable na trabaho abroad? Think out of the box, that's what UP grads do.
Kirkegaard
Jan 30, 2008, 05:06 PM
You see these people here flip-flopping, Jump,jump!-ing from one issue to another just so they'll have something to hurl at UP! Hilarious! :lol:
@SCUD
No, I don't think the government should require SCU graduates to stay and work in the country. In the first place, education is part of the social services the government owe the people. Remember tha SCU students, and their parents for that matter, are taxpayers too.
Second, we cannot make them stay in the country knowing that we do not have jobs for them. In other words, without job vacancies available, we will be merely wasting their education. You are assuming that there are jobs available for them when there are none.
Third, your proposal would necessarily hinder on people's freedoms - a constitutional right lest we forget. You cannot just shackle somebody from leaving the country absent a legal action against them that would prohibit them from going abroad or other issues leading to the same effect.
That said, it all boils down to nationalism and social conscience - that UP so hopes to inculcate in its students. As to how successful the State U is in this regard, I cannot give an answer.
Dacs
Jan 30, 2008, 09:56 PM
That said, it all boils down to nationalism and social conscience - that UP so hopes to inculcate in its students. As to how successful the State U is in this regard, I cannot give an answer.
Isipin mo, di lang naman graduates ng mga State U's ang may responsibilidad na pangalagaan ang bansa natin.
Lahat tayo. Mapa UP, Ateneo o UST graduate ka pa.
Dapat sa atin manggaling ang pagkakaroon ng kusa na isipin ang kapakanan ng ating bansa. Hindi mainam na ipagpipilitan ng pamahalaan ang ganito sa tao.
_SCUD_
Jan 30, 2008, 10:05 PM
You see these people here flip-flopping, Jump,jump!-ing from one issue to another just so they'll have something to hurl at UP! Hilarious! :lol:
@SCUD
No, I don't think the government should require SCU graduates to stay and work in the country. In the first place, education is part of the social services the government owe the people. Remember tha SCU students, and their parents for that matter, are taxpayers too.
Second, we cannot make them stay in the country knowing that we do not have jobs for them. In other words, without job vacancies available, we will be merely wasting their education. You are assuming that there are jobs available for them when there are none.
Third, your proposal would necessarily hinder on people's freedoms - a constitutional right lest we forget. You cannot just shackle somebody from leaving the country absent a legal action against them that would prohibit them from going abroad or other issues leading to the same effect.
That said, it all boils down to nationalism and social conscience - that UP so hopes to inculcate in its students. As to how successful the State U is in this regard, I cannot give an answer.
Ah ganun ba? Wala bang trabaho ang mga Pharmacists sa Pilipinas kaya kailangan lumayas agad? Aba teka lang, parang napakabilis magbago ng hangin, nung mga estudyante pa lang eh nag-aalab ang damdaming makabayan, pero nung makapasa sa board exam nagkukumahog makalabas ng bansa. Para saan nga pala ang hinihingi nyong pondo? Para madagdagan ang mga Pharmacists 'ikanyo, yun naman pala wala namang trabaho ayon na rin sa inyo. Hindi ba't isang malaking "DUH!"
Pabor ako sa dagdag na pondo para sa mga SUC's, hindi lang sa UP. Mas mabuti pang gamitin ang buwis na binabayaran ko para makapagprodyus ng matatalino at maaangas na estudyanteng siyento porsiyento ang passing sa board exam. Kalabisan ba na humingi rin ang mga taxpayers ng kapalit na 2 taon man lang na serbisyo sa bayan? Aba'y huwag naman puro kabig, tumulak naman kayo.
Pagsilbihan nyo muna ang mga pinoy na nangangailangan ng gamot, pleaseee lang kahit 2 taon. May opening ang Mercury Drug sa Quiapo, 24 oras na bukas yun
ЅUX2BÜ
Jan 30, 2008, 10:59 PM
Tama ka, _SCUD_, na kailangang pagsilbihan muna ang inang bayan lalo na ng mga pinag-aral ng mga nagbabayad ng buwis. Dapat gayahin ang ginagawa ng DOST na marapat lamang pagsilbihan muna ang Pinas bago mag-kumahog na mangibang bayan.
Tulad nga ng sabi ko mas maganda lalo kung hindi lang sila kakapiranggot na nagsasabing magagaling raw sila. Hindi nga ba't mas kailangan ng ating inang bayan ang mas marami pang "magagaling?" At kung lalo pa nga silang dumami ay mas mapagsilbihan talaga ang sambayanang Filipino ng mabilis at walang mintis, at hindi na kailan pa man masasabihan ang Mercury na "ang gamot ay laging bagal."
:)
kiko17
Jan 30, 2008, 11:29 PM
so ano na nga yung tungkol sa result ng board exam? or social responsibility at nationalism na ang topic? LOL
sana yung mga ala sa pinas, e wag mag-preach about serving the country eklavu, kasi may tawag dun....hypocrisy.
besides mga ate at kuya, there are ways to serve your country other than physically staying in the country. sa tinanda nating ito, siguro naman alam na nating lahat yun diba?
oh well.
Kirkegaard
Jan 30, 2008, 11:38 PM
Isipin mo, di lang naman graduates ng mga State U's ang may responsibilidad na pangalagaan ang bansa natin.
Lahat tayo. Mapa UP, Ateneo o UST graduate ka pa.
Sapul mo! *okay*
Although dapat nga naman na we give something back to society, dapat hindi lang naman tayo ang inaasahan na kumilos - responsibilidad ng lahat ito saang iskuwelahan man gumradweyt.
@SCUD
Where did that come from? :rotflmao:
Hinihingi ang pondo para tumaas pang lalo ang kalidad ng edukasyon, hindi para dumami ang estudyante ng UP.
Second point, mapapatunayan mo ba na "nagkukumahog makalabas ng bansa" nga ang mga graduate ng UP CP (o ibang SCU)? Aba'y madali talagang mag-assume, pero ang pagpatunay, iyon ang mahirap.
Pero sabihin na nating ganoon na nga, na nagkukumahog nga sila. E kung mahirap talaga ang pamilya nila, masisisi mo bang humanap sila ng maayos na pagkakakitaan kahit sa ibang bansa pa iyon? Pipigilan mo ba ang pagkakataong maiangat sa hirap yung pamilya nila? Hindi naman ata makatao iyan. Tandaan, karamihan sa ating kababayan ay mahirap. Kaya nga tuwang-tuwa pag gumradweyt na, sa paniniwalang tapos na ang pagsasakripisyo at hirap. Tapos patatagalin pa ng 2 taon?
Iyan ay hindi naman applicable sa lahat, may iba nga namang maykaya. Pero kung gagawa ka ng batas, which has blanket coverage (lahat maaapektuhan), aba'y pano naman ang mas nakararaming mahihirap?
Kaya nga ang sinabi ko noong una pa, depende na iyan sa konsensya. Hindi uubra yang ganyang batas.
cretinous00
Jan 31, 2008, 07:07 AM
Hindi naman lahat ng UP lumalabas. Ang karamihan, yung mga taga-ibang eskuela na hanggang call center lang dito, sabay pasok seaman sa abroad (di kasi nakapasa sa board.)
DavidAames
Jan 31, 2008, 08:40 AM
walang mga matinong trabaho para sa mga pharmacists sa pilipinas. yung lang masasabi. eh di sana nasa pilipinas kami ngayon at masaya kami sa aming mga sweldo.
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 09:15 AM
so ano na nga yung tungkol sa result ng board exam? or social responsibility at nationalism na ang topic? LOL
sana yung mga ala sa pinas, e wag mag-preach about serving the country eklavu, kasi may tawag dun....hypocrisy.
besides mga ate at kuya, there are ways to serve your country other than physically staying in the country. sa tinanda nating ito, siguro naman alam na nating lahat yun diba?
oh well.
Ah ganun ba? Wala bang karapatan ang ibang Pilipino na nangibang bayan pero nagbabayad pa rin ng buwis sa Pilipinas na makiusap na sana man lang magsilbi muna sa bayan ng 2 taon ang mga Pharmacists bago umalis ng bansa? Sorry ka Kuya, nagsilbi na ako sa bayan at patuloy pa rin na nagsisilbi. :D
Turuan kita kung ano ang meaning ng HYPOCRISY..yun bagang parally-rally sa kalsada at panay ang batikos sa gobyerno, pero hikayatin mo naman na tumulong para ayusin ang bansa nagbibingi-bingihan.
:)
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 09:29 AM
@SCUD
Where did that come from? :rotflmao:
Hinihingi ang pondo para tumaas pang lalo ang kalidad ng edukasyon, hindi para dumami ang estudyante ng UP.
Second point, mapapatunayan mo ba na "nagkukumahog makalabas ng bansa" nga ang mga graduate ng UP CP (o ibang SCU)? Aba'y madali talagang mag-assume, pero ang pagpatunay, iyon ang mahirap.
Pero sabihin na nating ganoon na nga, na nagkukumahog nga sila. E kung mahirap talaga ang pamilya nila, masisisi mo bang humanap sila ng maayos na pagkakakitaan kahit sa ibang bansa pa iyon? Pipigilan mo ba ang pagkakataong maiangat sa hirap yung pamilya nila? Hindi naman ata makatao iyan. Tandaan, karamihan sa ating kababayan ay mahirap. Kaya nga tuwang-tuwa pag gumradweyt na, sa paniniwalang tapos na ang pagsasakripisyo at hirap. Tapos patatagalin pa ng 2 taon?
Iyan ay hindi naman applicable sa lahat, may iba nga namang maykaya. Pero kung gagawa ka ng batas, which has blanket coverage (lahat maaapektuhan), aba'y pano naman ang mas nakararaming mahihirap?
Kaya nga ang sinabi ko noong una pa, depende na iyan sa konsensya. Hindi uubra yang ganyang batas.
Ano ba naman ang mahirap sa 2 taon na magtrabaho sa Pilipinas bago mag-abroad? Mahirap lang siguro pakinggan na hindi sa isang iskolar ng bayan nanggaling ang ganyang pakiusap.
Hihingi kayo ng dagdag na pondo para kamo itaas ang kalidad ng edukasyon. Anong kapalit? Saan gagamitin ang taas ng kalidad, talino at talento ng mga Iskolar? OK yan kung mamahagi muna ng gamot sa PGH pagkakuha ng lisensya.
Kulang ba talaga tayo sa Health Workers gaya ng Pharmacists kaya namomroblema ang DOH? O sobra sobra tayo sa Pharmacists kaya walang bakanteng trabaho sa Pilipinas?
ЅUX2BÜ
Jan 31, 2008, 10:06 AM
Hangga't hindi naisasakatuparan ang "pagsisilbi" na ito ng mga sinasabing "matatalino" at pagpaparami nila ay hindi mababago ang pananaw ko sa Mercury na "Ang gamot ay laging bagal."
:)
Dacs
Jan 31, 2008, 10:06 AM
Di naman dahilan ang pagbayad ng buwis upang ipasa sa iba ang tungkulin na paglinkuran ang bayad.
Kirkegaard
Jan 31, 2008, 10:26 AM
Madali lang sabihin na dalawang taon LANG, e paano naman kaya sa pamilyang matagal na naghirap magpa-aral?
Ngayon naman tungkol sa paghingi ng dagdag na pondo at kalidad ng edukasyon, tandaan na ang UP ay isang [i]research university[/b]. Hindi ko alam kung bakit makitid ang pananaw sa edukasyon ng karamihan; kapag sinabing kolehiyo, pagbibigay ng degree lamang ang layon. Sabagay, puro nga naman ganoon ang halos lahat ng mga unibersidad dito. Itong mga research na ito, isa sa mga direktang ambag ng UP sa lipunan at siyensya.
huntfan
Jan 31, 2008, 12:42 PM
Lahat naman may obligasyon na magsilbi sa bayan eh. Hindi lang yung mga graduates ng UP.
Kung tutuusin, dapat tanunging din yung more than 200+ na graduates ng UST sa pharma kung ano ba ang na-contribute nila sa bayan. Last time I checked eh mga mamamayan pa rin yan ng Pilipinas.
Ewan ko ba kung bakit utak talangka ang mga ibang Pexers dito. Paulit ulit na lang na argumento kasi.
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 01:16 PM
Hangga't hindi naisasakatuparan ang "pagsisilbi" na ito ng mga sinasabing "matatalino" at pagpaparami nila ay hindi mababago ang pananaw ko sa Mercury na "Ang gamot ay laging bagal."
:)
Ang hinahanap ko naman ay hindi lang "matatalino", pati na rin yung mga sinasabing "mga lider ng bansa" na dapat sana magpasimuno sa pagmamahal at pagsilbi sa bayan "sa isip, sa salita at sa GAWA"
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 01:24 PM
Madali lang sabihin na dalawang taon LANG, e paano naman kaya sa pamilyang matagal na naghirap magpa-aral?
Ngayon naman tungkol sa paghingi ng dagdag na pondo at kalidad ng edukasyon, tandaan na ang UP ay isang [i]research university[/b]. Hindi ko alam kung bakit makitid ang pananaw sa edukasyon ng karamihan; kapag sinabing kolehiyo, pagbibigay ng degree lamang ang layon. Sabagay, puro nga naman ganoon ang halos lahat ng mga unibersidad dito. Itong mga research na ito, isa sa mga direktang ambag ng UP sa lipunan at siyensya.
Palagay mo ba may gagawa ng RESEARCH kung hindi yan isa sa mga requirements para makapasa?
psycho_wrath
Jan 31, 2008, 02:15 PM
hindi lang naman estudyante ang sakop ng UP. marami kayang research centers na kasama sa UP System.
huntfan
Jan 31, 2008, 02:26 PM
Ang hinahanap ko naman ay hindi lang "matatalino", pati na rin yung mga sinasabing "mga lider ng bansa" na dapat sana magpasimuno sa pagmamahal at pagsilbi sa bayan "sa isip, sa salita at sa GAWA"
Yep, hinahanap ko din yang mga ganyang katangian sa mga 200+ graduates ng pharma ng UST. Yan din ang criteria na gusto kong i-impose, after all I consider UST grads as equal to UP grads.
May idea ka ba kung nasaan na sila Scud? Masyado ka kasing focus dun sa kakarimpot na graduate ng UP (pa-borrow ng term ng kakosa mong si SUX)..
sweet_ryan
Jan 31, 2008, 02:27 PM
Lahat naman may obligasyon na magsilbi sa bayan eh. Hindi lang yung mga graduates ng UP.
Kung tutuusin, dapat tanunging din yung more than 200+ na graduates ng UST sa pharma kung ano ba ang na-contribute nila sa bayan. Last time I checked eh mga mamamayan pa rin yan ng Pilipinas.
Ewan ko ba kung bakit utak talangka ang mga ibang Pexers dito. Paulit ulit na lang na argumento kasi.
very well said*okay* I just don't get it why other people are so fired up against those "few" UP grads who "opted to work abroad" rather than stay here in Pinas and serve the county. What about those hundreds of pharmacy grads that other schools produce? Nasan sila at ano ba ang lahi nila? Pinoy pa din naman di ba?:bop:
Dacs
Jan 31, 2008, 02:37 PM
Lahat naman may obligasyon na magsilbi sa bayan eh. Hindi lang yung mga graduates ng UP.
Kung tutuusin, dapat tanunging din yung more than 200+ na graduates ng UST sa pharma kung ano ba ang na-contribute nila sa bayan. Last time I checked eh mga mamamayan pa rin yan ng Pilipinas.
Ewan ko ba kung bakit utak talangka ang mga ibang Pexers dito. Paulit ulit na lang na argumento kasi.
Wala kang karapatan na tanungin ang mga produkto ng UST kung ano ang gusto nilang gawin sa kadahilanang sarili nilang pera ang ginamit nila sa pagaaral nila.
Ang mga magaaral lang na pinagpala ng mga buwis na binayaran ng mga mamamayang Pilipino (sampu ng pera na pinambayad ng TF, mga gastusin sa araw-araw at ang gastusin sa pagrerebyu ng board exam na nagmula sa dugo't pawis ng kanilang mga magulang) lang ang dapat tumugma sa pangangailan ng pagsasagawa ng mga gawaing para sa kapakanan ng ating bansa.
Dahil tayo lang ang dapat umako sa responsibilidad na pangalagahan ang kapakanan ng ating bansa!
Sarap pakinggan noh?
Shinobi No Kami
Jan 31, 2008, 02:52 PM
UP's international reputation depends on its research, not it's performance in some silly board exam. Besides, I doubt if the PRC has any international reputation/credibility to speak of.
In terms of the opinion of the quality of education in the Philippines as seen by other countries: would you rather have UP grads work abroad or let the grads from non-UP universities represent our country?
huntfan
Jan 31, 2008, 07:13 PM
Wala kang karapatan na tanungin ang mga produkto ng UST kung ano ang gusto nilang gawin sa kadahilanang sarili nilang pera ang ginamit nila sa pagaaral nila.
Ang mga magaaral lang na pinagpala ng mga buwis na binayaran ng mga mamamayang Pilipino (sampu ng pera na pinambayad ng TF, mga gastusin sa araw-araw at ang gastusin sa pagrerebyu ng board exam na nagmula sa dugo't pawis ng kanilang mga magulang) lang ang dapat tumugma sa pangangailan ng pagsasagawa ng mga gawaing para sa kapakanan ng ating bansa.
Dahil tayo lang ang dapat umako sa responsibilidad na pangalagahan ang kapakanan ng ating bansa!
Sarap pakinggan noh?
^^^ hahahhaha.. kaya nga nagkanda letse letse Pilipinas eh dahil sa mga taong utak talangka. Walang pinagkatandaan ang iba dito sa PEX.
Nung nasa Pilipinas pa ako, ang laki ng income tax na binabayaran ko taon taon (nasa maximum income tax bracket ako), aside pa syempre dun sa 12% VAT na kasama pag bumili ako ng consumer goods. Kung binigyan ako ng gobyerno na magdecide kung saan mapupunta ang pera ko, I would have liked to see 50% of my taxes go to UP. Kaso mo wala akong karapatan na ganun. Ayoko kasing mapunta kahit anong part ng tax ko sa pagconstruct ng mga imburnal or other flood control mechanisms dyan malapit sa isang unibersidad na bahain sa Espanya.. hahhaha.. Joke !! :D
huntfan
Jan 31, 2008, 07:53 PM
Ah ganun ba? Wala bang karapatan ang ibang Pilipino na nangibang bayan pero nagbabayad pa rin ng buwis sa Pilipinas na makiusap na sana man lang magsilbi muna sa bayan ng 2 taon ang mga Pharmacists bago umalis ng bansa? Sorry ka Kuya, nagsilbi na ako sa bayan at patuloy pa rin na nagsisilbi. :D
Turuan kita kung ano ang meaning ng HYPOCRISY..yun bagang parally-rally sa kalsada at panay ang batikos sa gobyerno, pero hikayatin mo naman na tumulong para ayusin ang bansa nagbibingi-bingihan.
:)
Taxpayers din ang mga taga UP, sampu ng mga alumni nito. Kung susumahin mo ang nakokolektang buwis ng gobyerno galing sa UP at sa mga alumni nito, more than enough yun para matustusan ang pangangailangan ng UP. Pero anong nangyari, binitin bitin ng gobyerno ang budget ng UP. Kulang lagi ang binibigay. Binawasan pa nga if you factor in inflation.
So ang simpleng sagot sa katanungan mo SCUD eh hindi. Walang karapatan ang taong kagaya mo na magimpose ng kondisyon sa mga UP graduates. UP has given the nation more than its fare share.
---------------
At ano itong obsession mo sa mga rallyists? Alam mo ba naging kahitnatnan ng lahat ng rallyists? .. Marami akong kakilala na active sa student activism nung panahon ko. They turned out alright, productive members ng society ngayon. Yung iba, nandun sa NGOs, nagtatrabaho para sa rights ng mga naagrabyadong Pilipino. Puro ka kasi stereotyping eh.. sino kaya ang ipokrito sa thread na ito? hehehe.. :bop:
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 10:13 PM
Huwaw! Nasaktan ang mga damdamin ng mga Iskolar ng Bayan, akalain mo nga naman wala daw karapatan makiusap na magtrabaho muna ng dalawang taon sa Pilipinas bago magrabaho sa ibang bansa?
Aba, hindi ako naka focus sa kakarampot na graduates ng UP, mas maganda pa nga madagdagan ang magagaling na manggagaling dyan. Ang punto ko dito, marami man o kaunti, obligasyon nyo na suklian ng serbisyo ang bansa na halos nagpaaral sa inyo ng libre. Tama kayo, lahat may pananagutan sa bayan, pero sino ba ang dapat manguna? Dapat yung self-imposed "leaders" ng bansa, di ba?
Masakit lang talagang tanggapin, dahil hindi galing sa isang iskolar ang mga ganitong salita. Reality bites. :)
Kirkegaard
Jan 31, 2008, 10:14 PM
At ano itong obsession mo sa mga rallyists? Alam mo ba naging kahitnatnan ng lahat ng rallyists? .. Marami akong kakilala na active sa student activism nung panahon ko. They turned out alright, productive members ng society ngayon. Yung iba, nandun sa NGOs, nagtatrabaho para sa rights ng mga naagrabyadong Pilipino. Puro ka kasi stereotyping eh.. sino kaya ang ipokrito sa thread na ito? hehehe.. :bop:
I agree. I personally know a lot of UP grads working in NGO's (I've been connected with some).
Now, unless you SCUD can provide us with statistics showing how many UP grads in total went where, then you better keep your baseless assumptions to yourself. We don't need them. They just add up to the clutter here.
borlogs
Jan 31, 2008, 10:24 PM
wag nyo na po sana pagtalunan ang anuman tungkol sa bayan. nalilihis lang po ng landas ang usapin sa thread na to...
sa mga pumasa na pharmacist, mga ka-isko at iska o maging taga uste ka pa naman, im sure palakpak ang mga taenga nyo dahil sa mga taong nakikipagtagisan ng talino para lamang maiangat ang inyong propesyon at paaralan.
taongbayan o magulang/kamag anak/kakilala/kaulayaw/kaibigan/at kung sino pa man ang nagbabayad ng inyong pangpaaral, lahat tayo ay may responsibilidad sa ating bayan. wag natin itong takasan.
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 10:30 PM
Lahat naman may obligasyon na magsilbi sa bayan eh. Hindi lang yung mga graduates ng UP.
Kung tutuusin, dapat tanunging din yung more than 200+ na graduates ng UST sa pharma kung ano ba ang na-contribute nila sa bayan. Last time I checked eh mga mamamayan pa rin yan ng Pilipinas.
Ewan ko ba kung bakit utak talangka ang mga ibang Pexers dito. Paulit ulit na lang na argumento kasi.
Utak talangka? Paano naging utak talangka ang pagsasabi na kailangan muna magsilbi sa bayan ang mga State U grads? Ano ang utak talangka dun? Kailangan kayo ng mga kababayan natin, nasan na ang pinagmamalaki nyong QUALITY?
_SCUD_
Jan 31, 2008, 10:57 PM
O isa munang patalastas bago kayo manggalaiti sa pagkainis. Tutal din naman eh napaguusapan ang mga pag-aaral at research, bakit kaya hindi muna natin basahin ang Powerpoint presentation ni Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan na kilala natin lahat na Propesor sa UP.
http://www.academyhealth.org/nhpc/foreignpolicy/2006/galveztan.ppt#256,1,Philippines: The Challenge of Managing Migration, Retention and Return of Health Professionals
Huwag niyo na lang basahin ang 6th Strategy kung ayaw nyo..
:)
kiko17
Jan 31, 2008, 11:06 PM
Ah ganun ba? Wala bang karapatan ang ibang Pilipino na nangibang bayan pero nagbabayad pa rin ng buwis sa Pilipinas na makiusap na sana man lang magsilbi muna sa bayan ng 2 taon ang mga Pharmacists bago umalis ng bansa? Sorry ka Kuya, nagsilbi na ako sa bayan at patuloy pa rin na nagsisilbi. :D
Turuan kita kung ano ang meaning ng HYPOCRISY..yun bagang parally-rally sa kalsada at panay ang batikos sa gobyerno, pero hikayatin mo naman na tumulong para ayusin ang bansa nagbibingi-bingihan.
:)
so kuya, yung mga nangibang bayan na taga UP at nagbabayad ng buwis e hindi din ba tumutulong. yun bagang tulad mo, nangibang bayan din, at nagbabayad din ng buwis? kung pwede na sa yo to, e di ba dapat pwede na din sa min? si kuya naman kung makapagsalita e akala mo ang ekonomiya ng buong pilipinas ay nakasalalay sa buwis na binabayad nya... :rolleyes:
eto pa example ng HYPOCRISY, manong, tutal nandito na din naman ang usapan. yung mga gustong makinabang sa bunga ng collective action (tulad ng rally, kuya ha? in case hindi mo alam, kasi alam ko hindi uso sa inyo to, except nung may dayaan sa nursing exam) pero ayaw naman makisalo sa paghihirap. wag maliitin ang kakayahan ng collective action, impo! some of the very freedom you enjoy right now are direct results of OUR collective action...
isa na lang kuya ha? talaga bang kailangan iasa sa iisang grupo ang pagsasa-ayos ng bansa? since you seem smart enough, siguro naman alam mo how the greek and roman city-states became empires, diba? tapos sumunod dyan yung idea of a 'nation'. i suggest you read on engels and marx. that would teach you loads on nation-building. ayan baka sabihin mo tibak ako kasi i read such authors. hindi naman, i just like to be informed. pero nakiki-rally din naman ako paminsan-minsan, at nagbabayad din ako ng buwis, at oo kuya, halos pareho ng timezone.
just my 2 cents...
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 1, 2008, 05:02 AM
Ang hinahanap ko naman ay hindi lang "matatalino", pati na rin yung mga sinasabing "mga lider ng bansa" na dapat sana magpasimuno sa pagmamahal at pagsilbi sa bayan "sa isip, sa salita at sa GAWA"
Kunsabagay minsan talaga ay 'yung mga tinatawag nilang "matatalino" ang sarili nila ay sila pa 'yung mga hindi karapat-dapat pagkatawilaan pagdating sa pagiging "lider ng bayan."
Dapat gayahin talaga 'yung ginagawa ng DOST na hindi puwedeng mag-kumahog sa pangingibang-bayan ang mga pinag-aaral ng kaban ng bayan.
At sa mga usapin at balitaktakan dito ha, mukhang talagang ramdam na ramdam mo ang pagkukumahog ng mga "iskolar ng bayan" na mangibang bansa. Wala na ba talagang pag-asa ang Filipinas?
:shrug:
Dacs
Feb 1, 2008, 05:31 AM
Yung iba, nandun sa NGOs, nagtatrabaho para sa rights ng mga naagrabyadong Pilipino.
I've known a few as well.
Hangga't hindi naisasakatuparan ang "pagsisilbi" na ito ng mga sinasabing "matatalino" at pagpaparami nila ay hindi mababago ang pananaw ko sa Mercury na "Ang gamot ay laging bagal."
Last time I checked, Mercury Drug is not exactly a government-run organization.
Dacs
Feb 1, 2008, 09:45 AM
Huwaw! Nasaktan ang mga damdamin ng mga Iskolar ng Bayan, akalain mo nga naman wala daw karapatan makiusap na magtrabaho muna ng dalawang taon sa Pilipinas bago magrabaho sa ibang bansa?
Aba, hindi ako naka focus sa kakarampot na graduates ng UP, mas maganda pa nga madagdagan ang magagaling na manggagaling dyan. Ang punto ko dito, marami man o kaunti, obligasyon nyo na suklian ng serbisyo ang bansa na halos nagpaaral sa inyo ng libre. Tama kayo, lahat may pananagutan sa bayan, pero sino ba ang dapat manguna? Dapat yung self-imposed "leaders" ng bansa, di ba?
Masakit lang talagang tanggapin, dahil hindi galing sa isang iskolar ang mga ganitong salita. Reality bites. :)
The best thing that you can do is ask your congressman to do something and have your proposal to be written of as a law.
Oooops nasa Canada ka pala, you cannot do that.
It's really a hardsell to hear all this crap from someone who is working other than his homecountry's interests.
Don't get me started that you've served under the army crap because at the end of the day, you're not here in the Philippines anymore.
Kailangan ka din namin. Maraming tulay dito ang nasisira na di maayos dahil ang mga mgagaling na Civil Engineers ay nasa ibayong dagat na.
See the irony?
Wag iasa ang responsibilidad ng paglinkod sa bayan sa kadahilanang nagbabayad lang kayo ng buwis. Nagbabayad ka pa ba ng buwis sa Pilipinas? I heard almost 40% ang buwis dyan sa Canada.
Following your logic, so you're doing **** to our country for the reason you're working overseas?
Pathetic.
Now, unless you SCUD can provide us with statistics showing how many UP grads in total went where, then you better keep your baseless assumptions to yourself. We don't need them. They just add up to the clutter here.
Ditto. Puros kasi assumptions eh.
Di lang kayo ang nagbabayad (wag na natin isama si _SCUD_, sahod nya Canadian dollars na eh). Kami rin mga naging Iskolar ng Bayan.
Ayaw ko ito isipin pero amoy talangka itong thread na ito.
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 10:16 AM
The best thing that you can do is ask your congressman to do something and have your proposal to be written of as a law.
Oooops nasa Canada ka pala, you cannot do that.
It's really a hardsell to hear all this crap from someone who is working other than his homecountry's interests.
Don't get me started that you've served under the army crap because at the end of the day, you're not here in the Philippines anymore.
Kailangan ka din namin. Maraming tulay dito ang nasisira na di maayos dahil ang mga mgagaling na Civil Engineers ay nasa ibayong dagat na.
See the irony?
Wag iasa ang responsibilidad ng paglinkod sa bayan sa kadahilanang nagbabayad lang kayo ng buwis. Nagbabayad ka pa ba ng buwis sa Pilipinas? I heard almost 40% ang buwis dyan sa Canada.
Following your logic, so you're doing **** to our country for the reason you're working overseas?
Pathetic.
Ditto. Puros kasi assumptions eh.
Di lang kayo ang nagbabayad (wag na natin isama si _SCUD_, sahod nya Canadian dollars na eh). Kami rin mga naging Iskolar ng Bayan.
Ayaw ko ito isipin pero amoy talangka itong thread na ito.
Gaya ng House Bill 2700 at House BIll 2926? Hindi mo pala alam ang mga yan? Mas maganda nga kasama lahat ng Health Workers. :)
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 10:40 AM
Kunsabagay minsan talaga ay 'yung mga tinatawag nilang "matatalino" ang sarili nila ay sila pa 'yung mga hindi karapat-dapat pagkatawilaan pagdating sa pagiging "lider ng bayan."
Dapat gayahin talaga 'yung ginagawa ng DOST na hindi puwedeng mag-kumahog sa pangingibang-bayan ang mga pinag-aaral ng kaban ng bayan.
At sa mga usapin at balitaktakan dito ha, mukhang talagang ramdam na ramdam mo ang pagkukumahog ng mga "iskolar ng bayan" na mangibang bansa. Wala na ba talagang pag-asa ang Filipinas?
:shrug:
Pansin ko nga ay talagang ramdam ang kuLo ng kanilang dugo pagdating sa usapin sa PAGLILINGKOD SA BAYAN. Hindi naman ito usapin tungkol sa UST o UP, ang punto dito ay krisis sa kakulangan ng Health Workers sa bansa gaya ng Pharmacists at kung karapat dapat nga bang lagyan ng mandatory 2 yr. service ang mga graduates ng SUCs.
Mismong sa Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan, na propesor ng UP at dating DOH Secretary, ang nagpahayag na kailangan ng mga "matatalinong lider ng bansa" ang magsilbi muna sa bayan bago umalis ng bansa. Sangayon ako dyan kesa sa mga Iskolar ng Bayan dito sa PEx na halata mong biased ang pananaw dahil lang sa hindi galing sa kauri nila ang isang mungkahi.
Aba, okay lang kung anong itawag nila sa akin. Pero yun talaga ang paniniwala ko, ang mga kagaya nilang nakinabang sa pagpapaaral galing sa buwis nating lahat ay kailangan munang magsilbi sa bayan ng dalawang taon bago isipin ang sarili.
Shinobi No Kami
Feb 1, 2008, 10:50 AM
UP is funded by taxpayers therefore UP should serve the people. Is UP for the people? Without question, the answer is "yes". Every Filipino citizen has the chance to study in UP. Kung di ka nakapasok o di mo piniling mag-aral sa UP, you have wasted your chance. UP grads still have an obligation to serve the country because they are Filipino citizens, not because they are grads of the state university.
Analogy:
Everyone who buys a lottery ticket has the chance to win. However, the winner(s) has no obligation or "utang na loob" to every person who bought a lottery ticket even if the bulk of his/her winnings are from their pockets.
-------------
UP and its graduates have been criticized in every conceivable by those on the outside looking in. UP and its graduates are not perfect but so is everybody else. Still, at the end of the day, UP is still the best in the country. UP will still be far ahead of everybody else in terms of research and international reputation. That's what UP does, that's what UP is. Deal with it.
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 11:28 AM
Ito (http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:lfVbD7LMNLUJ:www.pcij.org/stories/2005/nursing-crisis-galvez-tan.pdf+jaime+galvez+tan+national+health+service+act&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=ca) ay isang napakagandang paliwanag ni Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan kung paano mabigyan ng solusyun ang krisis sa kakulangan ng health workers sa bansa.
Institution the National Health Service Act. The Philippines is one of the few countries in SouthEast Asia that does not have a National Health Service Act. This is a compulsory requirement for all licensed health professionals to serve anywhere within the country for a number of years equivalent to the number of years it took them to study their health professions. While in the past there were attempts to have such a law passed, major objections centered on the individual human rights to move freely and practice their profession where each individual wants, such as in another country. However, with the globalization and active trading of health human resources and the inevitability of the severest brain drain to hit the Philippines, the country’s collective interest and collective rights should now prevail. At best, health professionals graduating from state universities, schools and colleges must be covered by the National Health Service Act. Their education have been heavily subsidized with the taxes paid by the Filipino people. It is but right that they repay the country with their services equivalent to the number of years of subsidy. If the PhilippineMilitary Academy (PMA) has been doing this since its foundation, government health sciences schools should no longer be exempted. Graduates from private health sciences schools can have a modified scheme in complying with the Act, but nevertheless should be covered as well. With the National Health Service Act, the country will be able to program scientifically the exit of our health professionals, thus ensuring a steady maintenance of health human resources in all health facilities, whether rural or urban.
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 1, 2008, 12:11 PM
Napaka-galing nitong mungkahi ni Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan ah. Taga-up siya, 'di ba? Aba, kung ganon nga ay siya ang dapat tularan ng mga "iskolar ng bayan." O dapat ba siyang itatwa ng mga ka-uri niya?
Pero bakit ba parang asiwang-asiwa ang mga tinatawag na "iskolar ng bayan" kapag ang pinag-uusapan ay "paglilingkod sa bayan?"
Siguro nga ay talagang lugmok na ang Filipinas at pinandidirihan na nilang pagsilbihan ito at kailangan na nila talagang mag-kumahog upang makakita na agad ng isnow. :mecry:
Aba, at ako pa pala ang kunwaring nagsimula ng hiblang ito.
:)
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 12:26 PM
Huwaw! Nasaktan ang mga damdamin ng mga Iskolar ng Bayan, akalain mo nga naman wala daw karapatan makiusap na magtrabaho muna ng dalawang taon sa Pilipinas bago magrabaho sa ibang bansa?
Aba, hindi ako naka focus sa kakarampot na graduates ng UP, mas maganda pa nga madagdagan ang magagaling na manggagaling dyan. Ang punto ko dito, marami man o kaunti, obligasyon nyo na suklian ng serbisyo ang bansa na halos nagpaaral sa inyo ng libre. Tama kayo, lahat may pananagutan sa bayan, pero sino ba ang dapat manguna? Dapat yung self-imposed "leaders" ng bansa, di ba?
Masakit lang talagang tanggapin, dahil hindi galing sa isang iskolar ang mga ganitong salita. Reality bites. :)
^^^^
Naku, palusot ka pa. Ngayon meron ka ng "self imposed" ek ek (*** kaya nagimposed nyan) at "marami or konti" na argumento... hahahhaa.. *** talaga manong. Wala kaming problema dun pagsisilbi sa bayan dahil ginagawa naman nyan. Ayusin mo muna yang basis of assumption mo bago ka magkalat sa PEX, kasi yan ang problema sa iyo eh.
Ang sa akin lang eh, masakit tanggapin na maraming tao na mataas naman ang pinagaralan eh ganun pa rin magisip.. utak talangka. :mecry:
heheheheheh.. :rotflmao:
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 12:42 PM
Utak talangka? Paano naging utak talangka ang pagsasabi na kailangan muna magsilbi sa bayan ang mga State U grads? Ano ang utak talangka dun? Kailangan kayo ng mga kababayan natin, nasan na ang pinagmamalaki nyong QUALITY?
Utak talangka ka. Plus nagmamaang maangan ka at nagmamalinis... Nagpuputak ka sa UP pero you failed to recognize that your own grads (na sobrang dami) eh meron ding responsabilidad sa nation building. Hindi lang UP.
Wala nga kaming problema dyan sa magsilbi sa bayan eh, dahil ginagawa namin nyan... I myself served in an NGO after graduation and after that sa private sector sa Pilipinas. Para kang sirang plaka eh.
And now jump ka naman sa QUALITY? .. hahaha.. si manong talaga. walang problema sa quality ng education sa UP, 100% nga sa board ng pharmacy and dominates the top 10.
Again, ang problema mo eh nagtuturo ka. You act like a typical politician in the Philippines. Turo ng turo ng problema (stating the ob vious I might add) pero solusyon ***. :bop:
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 12:43 PM
^^^^
Naku, palusot ka pa. Ngayon meron ka ng "self imposed" ek ek (*** kaya nagimposed nyan) at "marami or konti" na argumento... hahahhaa.. *** talaga manong. Wala kaming problema dun pagsisilbi sa bayan dahil ginagawa naman nyan. Ayusin mo muna yang basis of assumption mo bago ka magkalat sa PEX, kasi yan ang problema sa iyo eh.
Ang sa akin lang eh, masakit tanggapin na maraming tao na mataas naman ang pinagaralan eh ganun pa rin magisip.. utak talangka. :mecry:
heheheheheh.. :rotflmao:
babaw naman ng argumento na yan, yan ba ang utak iskolar?
Yoko patulan :)
Kirkegaard
Feb 1, 2008, 12:50 PM
Pero bakit ba parang asiwang-asiwa ang mga tinatawag na "iskolar ng bayan" kapag ang pinag-uusapan ay "paglilingkod sa bayan?"
:)
Ang hilig mo sa pag-imbento, kung ginamit mo na lang sana pag-imbento ng solusyon sa energy crisis, aba! mas mapapakinabangan pa! Talaga namang mapapa-Jump, jump! ka dito kay SUX2BU e! :rotflmao:
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 12:55 PM
Napaka-galing nitong mungkahi ni Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan ah. Taga-up siya, 'di ba? Aba, kung ganon nga ay siya ang dapat tularan ng mga "iskolar ng bayan." O dapat ba siyang itatwa ng mga ka-uri niya?
Pero bakit ba parang asiwang-asiwa ang mga tinatawag na "iskolar ng bayan" kapag ang pinag-uusapan ay "paglilingkod sa bayan?"
Siguro nga ay talagang lugmok na ang Filipinas at pinandidirihan na nilang pagsilbihan ito at kailangan na nila talagang mag-kumahog upang makakita na agad ng isnow. :mecry:
Aba, at ako pa pala ang kunwaring nagsimula ng hiblang ito.
:)
Yan na nga rin ang ipinagtataka ko, 2 taon lang naman ang hinihingi ng sambayanang Pilipino na bigyan sila ng de kalidad na serbisyo ng mga de kalidad na iskolar ng isang de kalidad na unibersidad, pagkatapos nun ay pwede na silang magtampisaw sa isnow at gumawa ng Frosty d' Snow man at Snow angels.
Aba'y itulad natin yan sa mga PMAers na handang magbuwis ng buhay alang alang sa "paglilingkod sa bayan". Walang masama dyan, napakasarap tumulong sa kapwa lalo na kung walang hinihinging kapalit.
:)
Kirkegaard
Feb 1, 2008, 01:12 PM
Simple lang. Let the UP grads give something back to the society in their own time. Hindi yung naghihirap pa e pipigilan mo pang kumita nang maayos. Don't fret; maraming naglilingkod sa bayan.
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 01:17 PM
Ito (http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:lfVbD7LMNLUJ:www.pcij.org/stories/2005/nursing-crisis-galvez-tan.pdf+jaime+galvez+tan+national+health+service+act&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=ca) ay isang napakagandang paliwanag ni Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan kung paano mabigyan ng solusyun ang krisis sa kakulangan ng health workers sa bansa.
Institution the National Health Service Act. The Philippines is one of the few countries in SouthEast Asia that does not have a National Health Service Act. This is a compulsory requirement for all licensed health professionals to serve anywhere within the country for a number of years equivalent to the number of years it took them to study their health professions. While in the past there were attempts to have such a law passed, major objections centered on the individual human rights to move freely and practice their profession where each individual wants, such as in another country. However, with the globalization and active trading of health human resources and the inevitability of the severest brain drain to hit the Philippines, the country’s collective interest and collective rights should now prevail. At best, health professionals graduating from state universities, schools and colleges must be covered by the National Health Service Act. Their education have been heavily subsidized with the taxes paid by the Filipino people. It is but right that they repay the country with their services equivalent to the number of years of subsidy. If the PhilippineMilitary Academy (PMA) has been doing this since its foundation, government health sciences schools should no longer be exempted. Graduates from private health sciences schools can have a modified scheme in complying with the Act, but nevertheless should be covered as well. With the National Health Service Act, the country will be able to program scientifically the exit of our health professionals, thus ensuring a steady maintenance of health human resources in all health facilities, whether rural or urban.
So anong problema mo dyan SCUD? .. Isang UP grad ang nagpropose ng solusyon sa kakulungan ng doktor sa Pilipinas. We lead ika nga. And you quote. So yung mga pinagsasabi mo dito, ginagawan ng paraan ng UP Med yan.. kaya nga may regionalization program sila eh as a start.. :bop:
Although personally, ayoko ng restrictions sa mga fellow UP grads ko, naintindihan ko si Doctor Tan. Pero karamihan sa amin (I can speak for my batch in ME at UP COE), di naman agad nag-aabroad, serve muna sa Pilipinas (in our own little way) and then go abroad for financial or other growth reasons. Yung iba kasi dito ina-assume agad na right after graduation sa UP eh lahat agad nasa abroad na ang mga grads ng UP. Thats far from the reality, mahirap ata iwanan ang mga kaibigan at kapamilya mo sa Pinas. So yung stat na nagsasabing maraming alumni ng UP ang nasa US eh natural lang yun.. Includes ba naman all alumni from 19 kopong kopong eh.. :rotflmao:
Magingat sa pagtuturo kasi sa kakaturo mo eh lumalabas yung natural mong utak talangka Scud. :D
Dacs
Feb 1, 2008, 01:21 PM
Pansin ko nga ay talagang ramdam ang kuLo ng kanilang dugo pagdating sa usapin sa PAGLILINGKOD SA BAYAN. Hindi naman ito usapin tungkol sa UST o UP, ang punto dito ay krisis sa kakulangan ng Health Workers sa bansa gaya ng Pharmacists at kung karapat dapat nga bang lagyan ng mandatory 2 yr. service ang mga graduates ng SUCs.
Yaman din lamang na ito na ang usapin natin, hindi lang ang pananatili ng isang tao sa ating bansa ang paraan upang makapaglingkod sa bayan.
Malamang ito'y gasgas na sa iyong pandinig, subalit wala ka sa lugar na sabihin sa madla ang mga saloobin ng mga magaaral/nagsipagtapos sa UP sa kadahilanang di ka nagaral doon.
Hilaw ang iyong kaalaman ng mga saloobin namin.
Mismong sa Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan, na propesor ng UP at dating DOH Secretary, ang nagpahayag na kailangan ng mga "matatalinong lider ng bansa" ang magsilbi muna sa bayan bago umalis ng bansa. Sangayon ako dyan kesa sa mga Iskolar ng Bayan dito sa PEx na halata mong biased ang pananaw dahil lang sa hindi galing sa kauri nila ang isang mungkahi.
Ako ay sumasang-ayon sa iyo na dapat na ang mga naging bunga ng mga SUC ay higit sa lahat, magkaroon ng tungkulin na paglinkuran ang bayan. Subalit di ako sumasangayon sa iyong ipinapahiwating na alinsunod sa iyong sinabi, na kami lang ang dapat umako sa tungkulin na ito.
Aba, okay lang kung anong itawag nila sa akin. Pero yun talaga ang paniniwala ko, ang mga kagaya nilang nakinabang sa pagpapaaral galing sa buwis nating lahat ay kailangan munang magsilbi sa bayan ng dalawang taon bago isipin ang sarili.
Mula sa sinabi ni Dr. Tan
Graduates from private health sciences schools can have a modified scheme in complying with the Act, but nevertheless should be covered as well.
Sa kanya din nagmula na tungkulin nating lahat ang makapagsilbi sa bayan.
Kung ako ang tatanungin mo, kung ito ay ipapasatupad, dapat sakop nito ang lahat ng mga produkto ng lahat ng pamatasan. Hindi lang ng mga galing sa SUC.
Sa simpleng kadahilanang na bilang isang mamamayang Pilipino, may tungkulin tayo na pangalagaan ang ating bansa.
Matanong ko lang, ano ba ang "vision and mission" nga mga pribadong pamantasan tulad ng UST?
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 1, 2008, 02:13 PM
From an article on brain drain published in up forum:
President Roman recognizes this growing problem and says that at every commencement exercise she has attended, she has implored the young UP graduates not to go. [B]“ I remind them that when they entered this University, they were committing themselves to the service of the country. I remind them to look to the men and women who came before them, so many of whom have kept true to the promise. I can only hope that the though might help them to stay the course no matter how far they might wander , and it might someday bring them back home”.
Para palang pagpasok mo sa up ay nakasukbit na dapat sa pagkatao mo 'yung diwa na "paglingkuran ang bayan."
Pero mukhang marami ang allergic diyan ah.
:)
Viva La Tigre
Feb 1, 2008, 02:15 PM
I've known a few as well.
Last time I checked, Mercury Drug is not exactly a government-run organization.
Aba, tama ka. Hindi nga government organization ang Mercury Drug.
Ngunit hindi ibig sabihin na hindi ka na naglingkod sa bayan kung sa isang pribadong kumpanya sa Pilipinas ka nagtrabaho. Ang mga katagang "pagsilbi sa bayan" ay hindi eksklusibo lamang sa pagiging empleyado ng gobyerno, bagkus ay sakop din nito ang ideya na ikaw ay nagtatrabaho sa Pilipinas, sa ilalim man ng isang banyagang kumpanya o hindi.
;)
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 02:53 PM
Napaka-galing nitong mungkahi ni Dr. Jaime Galvez Tan ah. Taga-up siya, 'di ba? Aba, kung ganon nga ay siya ang dapat tularan ng mga "iskolar ng bayan." O dapat ba siyang itatwa ng mga ka-uri niya?
Pero bakit ba parang asiwang-asiwa ang mga tinatawag na "iskolar ng bayan" kapag ang pinag-uusapan ay "paglilingkod sa bayan?"
Siguro nga ay talagang lugmok na ang Filipinas at pinandidirihan na nilang pagsilbihan ito at kailangan na nila talagang mag-kumahog upang makakita na agad ng isnow. :mecry:
Aba, at ako pa pala ang kunwaring nagsimula ng hiblang ito.
:)
Proud kami kay Dr. Tan. No problem dun. :D
And di ko maintindihan sa iyo eh bakit laging maasim ang post mo pag UP na pinaguusapan. Intensity ka pa lang maasim ka na, ngayon SUX ka na maasim ka pa din.. masarap maglingkod sa bayan, sabihin mo yan sa mga estudyante sa Espanya ha, kasi feeling ko for export mga produkto nyo.. di nagbebenefit yung mamamayang Pilipino sa 400+ na graduates nyo sa medicine taon taon. Magstay naman sila dito at magsilbi din sa bayan.. hahhaa.. :love:
Katuwa reference mo sa snow.. hahahha.. parang ikaw ang atat na atat sa snow eh... snow !! pag maasim talaga kung ano ano sinasabi.. hihihihihi.. rotflmao:
Jernat
Feb 1, 2008, 08:23 PM
"Graduates from private health sciences schools can have a modified scheme in complying with the Act, but nevertheless should be covered as well." - Dr. Tan
Ayan, lahat ng graduates ay may responsibilidad sa bayan. Huwag idiin sa mga SUC grads ang responsibilidad. Hindi ba't nangingibang bansa rin ang mga mediocre graduates ng ibang pribadong eskwelahan diyan?
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 09:23 PM
babaw naman ng argumento na yan, yan ba ang utak iskolar?
Yoko patulan :)
Right !!! .. Buti naman, umayos ka kasi. Hindi yang nagmamalaki ka at nagko-quote ka pa, mali naman interpretation mo. Isa pa, magbase ka sa real data, hindi yung nagiimbento ka ng mga claims dyan. Engineer ka pa **** na naturingan. :lol:
Tandaan mo, magingat ka sa kakaturo. Isang daliri yung nakaturo sa amin, pero tatlong daliri yun nakaturo back sa iyo.. Sheesh.. Enough said. :bop:
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 09:35 PM
"Graduates from private health sciences schools can have a modified scheme in complying with the Act, but nevertheless should be covered as well." - Dr. Tan
Ayan, lahat ng graduates ay may responsibilidad sa bayan. Huwag idiin sa mga SUC grads ang responsibilidad. Hindi ba't nangingibang bansa rin ang mga mediocre graduates ng ibang pribadong eskwelahan diyan?
Hayun nga eh, sinabi di Dr. Tan yan, conveniently forgotten by those people na nagmamagaling at nagmamalinis. Lahat dapat magsilbi sa bayan, di lang grads ng UP.
Kung tutuusin dapat applicable ito sa mga school na more than 400+ graduates na doktor taon taon. Imagine impact nun kung kahit kalahati nun magstay sa Pilipinas during their productive years. Eh hindi. Pero I understand, may mga reasons yang 400+ graduates na doktor na yan na lisanin ang Pilipinas. Naiintindihan ko yun and I dont think less of them and besides may iba iba tayong paraan ng pagsisilbi sa bayan. Hindi gaya ng mga hypocrites dito sa thread (read: SCUD na SUX).. hehehhe.. :rotflmao:
Reiii
Feb 1, 2008, 09:41 PM
Basta maglinkod sa bayan ng atleast 2 years bago umalis, tapos after a while balik ulit sa pinas para pagandahin yung sistema sa bansa..
The number of years may vary, but this is what health science grads should do.. imho. :)
Maganda naman yung magtratrabaho ka ng ilang taon dito sa Pilipinas tapos alis ka na diba? Tapos balik ka ulit, tayo ka ng negosyo sa naipon mo, give jobs to our kababayan, diba? :)
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 09:49 PM
Yan na nga rin ang ipinagtataka ko, 2 taon lang naman ang hinihingi ng sambayanang Pilipino na bigyan sila ng de kalidad na serbisyo ng mga de kalidad na iskolar ng isang de kalidad na unibersidad, pagkatapos nun ay pwede na silang magtampisaw sa isnow at gumawa ng Frosty d' Snow man at Snow angels.
Aba'y itulad natin yan sa mga PMAers na handang magbuwis ng buhay alang alang sa "paglilingkod sa bayan". Walang masama dyan, napakasarap tumulong sa kapwa lalo na kung walang hinihinging kapalit.
:)
2 taon?!? .. Sa iyo nagmula yang dalawang taon eh hindi sa taong bayan. At kailan ka pa naging tagapagsalita ng taong bayan? Imbento ka na naman eh.
Binasa mo ba talaga yung article ni Dr. Tan ha Scud? Naintindihan mo ba? Sabi nga ni Dr. Tan kung maipasa batas eh gawing compulsory requirement to ALL Health professionals yung pagserve anywhere within the country for a number of years it took them to study their health professionsto serve. So 4 years sa medicine !!
Walang problema sa akin kung ipasa yang batas na yan. Lahat magsilbi mas okay nga eh.. Ang problema ko ay yung mga nagmamagaling dito.. na conclude ng conclude na walang basis, as if alam nila story ng mga nag-abroad nating kababayan, mapa UP, UST or ano mang unibersidad.
Again umayos ka ng hindi ka nasusupalpal dyan. Self imposed (pa-borrow ng term ulit) Supalpelero ka pa naman.. :lol:
huntfan
Feb 1, 2008, 09:56 PM
From an article on brain drain published in up forum:
President Roman recognizes this growing problem and says that at every commencement exercise she has attended, she has implored the young UP graduates not to go. [B]“ I remind them that when they entered this University, they were committing themselves to the service of the country. I remind them to look to the men and women who came before them, so many of whom have kept true to the promise. I can only hope that the though might help them to stay the course no matter how far they might wander , and it might someday bring them back home”.
Para palang pagpasok mo sa up ay nakasukbit na dapat sa pagkatao mo 'yung diwa na "paglingkuran ang bayan."
Pero mukhang marami ang allergic diyan ah.
:)
^^^ Nagmaasim ka na naman. hehehhe.. apply mo yang magandang speech ni Dr. Roman sa lahat ng UST grads din.. mas maganda siguro yun. lalong uunland Pilipinas.. hehehehe...
ang asim talaga.. :rotflmao:
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 1, 2008, 10:30 PM
Nakakalungkot isiping mukhang kahit taun-taon sabihin ni Roman ang "I remind them that when they entered this University, they were committing themselves to the service of the country" ay parang sinasabi niya ito sa butas na basket.
:(
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 1, 2008, 10:44 PM
Yan na nga rin ang ipinagtataka ko, 2 taon lang naman ang hinihingi ng sambayanang Pilipino na bigyan sila ng de kalidad na serbisyo ng mga de kalidad na iskolar ng isang de kalidad na unibersidad, pagkatapos nun ay pwede na silang magtampisaw sa isnow at gumawa ng Frosty d' Snow man at Snow angels.
Aba'y itulad natin yan sa mga PMAers na handang magbuwis ng buhay alang alang sa "paglilingkod sa bayan". Walang masama dyan, napakasarap tumulong sa kapwa lalo na kung walang hinihinging kapalit.
:)
Ay, pumalpak 'yung una kong ginawang Frosty da Snowman noong winter ng 1983 (matamis-tamis pa ang gatas ko sa labi noon; ngayon ay umaasim na 'ata). Mahirap siyang iperpek sa mga unang attempt ha. :lol:
'Yun nga. Parang ichapwera nga talaga ang sinasabing madalas ni Roman. Bakit ka nga ba naman mag-aararo ng bukid sa probinsiya kung puwede ka namang mamitas na lang ng mga mansanas sa Oak Glen?
Na-sad ako.
:(
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 10:46 PM
So anong problema mo dyan SCUD? .. Isang UP grad ang nagpropose ng solusyon sa kakulungan ng doktor sa Pilipinas. We lead ika nga. And you quote. So yung mga pinagsasabi mo dito, ginagawan ng paraan ng UP Med yan.. kaya nga may regionalization program sila eh as a start.. :bop:
Although personally, ayoko ng restrictions sa mga fellow UP grads ko, naintindihan ko si Doctor Tan. Pero karamihan sa amin (I can speak for my batch in ME at UP COE), di naman agad nag-aabroad, serve muna sa Pilipinas (in our own little way) and then go abroad for financial or other growth reasons. Yung iba kasi dito ina-assume agad na right after graduation sa UP eh lahat agad nasa abroad na ang mga grads ng UP. Thats far from the reality, mahirap ata iwanan ang mga kaibigan at kapamilya mo sa Pinas. So yung stat na nagsasabing maraming alumni ng UP ang nasa US eh natural lang yun.. Includes ba naman all alumni from 19 kopong kopong eh.. :rotflmao:
Magingat sa pagtuturo kasi sa kakaturo mo eh lumalabas yung natural mong utak talangka Scud. :D
Nakakatawa ka naman, ganyang hindi mo kayang harapin ang isyu tungkol sa krisis sa kakulangan ng health workers sa Pilipinas ay tatawagin mo akong utak talangka dahil lang sinusuportahan ko ang pananaw ni Dr. Tan na magsilbi muna kayo sa bayan bago umalis. Bakit kaya hindi mo ipaliwanag sa lahat kung paano ako nagkaroon ng utak talangka? :) Ang tingin mo pa rin ay nasa baba ako at nanghihila ako ng mga mas nasa taas sa akin. hehehe
Aba tama ang ginawa nyo naiwan muna kayo at nag ambag sa Pilipinas bago nangibang bayan, so pabor ka na gawin yan mandatory? :)
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 10:52 PM
Yaman din lamang na ito na ang usapin natin, hindi lang ang pananatili ng isang tao sa ating bansa ang paraan upang makapaglingkod sa bayan.
Malamang ito'y gasgas na sa iyong pandinig, subalit wala ka sa lugar na sabihin sa madla ang mga saloobin ng mga magaaral/nagsipagtapos sa UP sa kadahilanang di ka nagaral doon.
Hilaw ang iyong kaalaman ng mga saloobin namin.
Ako ay sumasang-ayon sa iyo na dapat na ang mga naging bunga ng mga SUC ay higit sa lahat, magkaroon ng tungkulin na paglinkuran ang bayan. Subalit di ako sumasangayon sa iyong ipinapahiwating na alinsunod sa iyong sinabi, na kami lang ang dapat umako sa tungkulin na ito.
Mula sa sinabi ni Dr. Tan
Sa kanya din nagmula na tungkulin nating lahat ang makapagsilbi sa bayan.
Kung ako ang tatanungin mo, kung ito ay ipapasatupad, dapat sakop nito ang lahat ng mga produkto ng lahat ng pamatasan. Hindi lang ng mga galing sa SUC.
Sa simpleng kadahilanang na bilang isang mamamayang Pilipino, may tungkulin tayo na pangalagaan ang ating bansa.
Matanong ko lang, ano ba ang "vision and mission" nga mga pribadong pamantasan tulad ng UST?
Pabor ako dyan, lahat ng Health Workers magsilbi muna sa bayan, kahit mga grads ng Private Schools. Hindi mo nga binasa yung binigay kong House Bills na isinulong ng dalawang Kongresistang duktor na ganyan nga ang dapat mangyari.
Pabor ka na ba sa sinabi ni Dr. Tan na kayong mga SUC grads ay magsilbi sa bayan dahil na rin sa laki ng itinulong sa inyo ng gobyerno sa pagpapaaral?
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 10:59 PM
Utak talangka ka. Plus nagmamaang maangan ka at nagmamalinis... Nagpuputak ka sa UP pero you failed to recognize that your own grads (na sobrang dami) eh meron ding responsabilidad sa nation building. Hindi lang UP.
Wala nga kaming problema dyan sa magsilbi sa bayan eh, dahil ginagawa namin nyan... I myself served in an NGO after graduation and after that sa private sector sa Pilipinas. Para kang sirang plaka eh.
And now jump ka naman sa QUALITY? .. hahaha.. si manong talaga. walang problema sa quality ng education sa UP, 100% nga sa board ng pharmacy and dominates the top 10.
Again, ang problema mo eh nagtuturo ka. You act like a typical politician in the Philippines. Turo ng turo ng problema (stating the ob vious I might add) pero solusyon ***. :bop:
Alam mo kuya may solusyon dyan, ikaw talaga hindi ka nagbabasa.
Ang problema, nasa krisis ang bansa sa kakulangan ng health workers.
Ang solusyon, magsilbi ng dalawang taon ang lahat ng health workers sa pangunguna ng mga SUC grads na binigyan ng gobyerno ng subsidiya sa pagaaral.
paulit ulit no? Hindi makaintindi?
:)
_SCUD_
Feb 1, 2008, 11:05 PM
"Graduates from private health sciences schools can have a modified scheme in complying with the Act, but nevertheless should be covered as well." - Dr. Tan
Ayan, lahat ng graduates ay may responsibilidad sa bayan. Huwag idiin sa mga SUC grads ang responsibilidad. Hindi ba't nangingibang bansa rin ang mga mediocre graduates ng ibang pribadong eskwelahan diyan?
Aba, nagtrabaho muna at nagsilbi sa bayan ang mga mediocre students na sanasabi mo bago kumita ng limpak limpak na salapi na iyong kinaiinggitan.
Pabor ako dyan, gagawa ng modified scheme ang mga private schools para magsilbi muna sa bayan ang mga graduates. Pwede silang pakiusapan na magsilbi ng 1 yr and 11months.
Ngayon, kayo naman na naaambunan ng gobyerno ng subsidiya sa pagaaral, kailangan naman pwersahin kayo na magtrabaho sa Pilipinas.
Aba'y sayang ang inyong "talino at galing" kung hindi yan gagamitin.
:)
iRebirth
Feb 2, 2008, 12:07 AM
Sana ang kultura ng pagbabalik at paglilingkod sa bayan ay palaganapin ng mga kolehiyo't unibersidad, pribado man o pampubliko.
... lalo na ang mga paaralang nananatiling alipin ng kolonyal na kamalayan na sa tinagal-tagal ay ang pangunahing layon ay ang matugunan ang mga pangangailangan, hindi ng bansa, ngunit ng mga bayang banyaga
sweet_ryan
Feb 2, 2008, 12:32 AM
si SCUD pala ay nasa Canada? Natatawa ako.
iRebirth
Feb 2, 2008, 01:18 AM
Sana ang kultura ng pagbabalik at paglilingkod sa bayan ay palaganapin ng mga kolehiyo't unibersidad, pribado man o pampubliko.
... lalo na ang mga paaralang nananatiling alipin ng kolonyal na kamalayan na sa tinagal-tagal ay ang pangunahing layon ay ang matugunan ang mga pangangailangan, hindi ng bansa, ngunit ng mga bayang banyaga
Galvantic@STS
Feb 2, 2008, 03:10 AM
Who do you think has the higher chance of finding a cure for AIDS: a large group of mediocre researchers or a small group of brilliant researchers?
syempre yung small group of brilliant researchers, pero hindi naman lahat taga UP yung brilliant researchers.
so off topic po yan.
thanks.
;)
_SCUD_
Feb 2, 2008, 08:45 AM
Aba, tama ka. Hindi nga government organization ang Mercury Drug.
Ngunit hindi ibig sabihin na hindi ka na naglingkod sa bayan kung sa isang pribadong kumpanya sa Pilipinas ka nagtrabaho. Ang mga katagang "pagsilbi sa bayan" ay hindi eksklusibo lamang sa pagiging empleyado ng gobyerno, bagkus ay sakop din nito ang ideya na ikaw ay nagtatrabaho sa Pilipinas, sa ilalim man ng isang banyagang kumpanya o hindi.
;)
Tumpak!!!
Malaki ang naiaambag ng mga Pharmacists na nagtitinda ng gamot sa Mercury Drug. Siguro mababa ang tingin ng mga kaibigan natin sa mga Pharmacists na namamasukan dito, o kaya naman ayaw lang nilang magtrabaho sa Mercury Drug dahil maliit ang sahod.
Kung ganoon, maaari naman silang mamasukan sa Merced Drug and Bakeshop para sa dagdag na kita.
"Mang Isko, pabili po ng isang banig na Paracetamol at isang supot na Pan de Coco"
On Resources
Kritical ang resources sa isang institusyon, kahit anuman pa ito. Kailangan ng UP ng mas malaking pondo para mas makatulong sa bansa. Pero hindi necessarily na mas makakatulong ito kung mas marami pa ang chinuchurn-out na grads. Ang UP, bilang national university, ay dapat mag-serve na apex ng higher education system (quality over quantity) at hindi bilang base (mas maraming na-eeducate or quantity over quality). Dahil din dito kaya kailangan mag-maintain ang UP ng standards. Kaya minsan maraming mga taga-UP ang nagshishift out galing sa mga first majors nila. Kahit sa Engg na masasabing magaling na ang mga nakapasok dahil sa competition, merong mga na di nakakatapos dun mismo sa college. Hindi ibig sabihin mas marami kang prinoproduce na graduates e mas malaki yung naitutulong nung school or mas malawak/malaki ang nagagawa nila. Dapat sa UP, kahit kunti ang graduates, basta malaki ang impact!
Nakakalimutan din natin na hindi lang naman factor ang amount ng funds, asa allocation din ito, in fairness. Kung malaki ang demand dun sa isang course, internally mag-aalocate na ang UP ng pondo para sa classrooms, faculty items, etc..
On Requiring UP graduates to serve at least 2 years
Kung merong mauunang mag-cricriticize sa UP o mga taga-UP, I'm confident manggagaling lang din yun sa loob. Itong usapin na to, matagal na tong tapos sa loob ng unibersidad. Pero masisisi ba natin yung mga nag-ibang bansa? Bakit tayo magkakahon ng mga tao? Hindi ba imposition yun sa free will? E kahit hundreds pa ang i-train natin na mga magagaling na pharmacists kung ang trabaho lang na makukuha nila e sa call-center din (hindi ko minamaliit). Hindi ba mas okay kung magtrabaho na rin sila sa ibang bansa para magamit nila yung natutunan nila? Puede naman sila magpadala ng pera at required pa rin sila magbayad ng buwis. Hindi ba sa greater scheme of things, e parang ambag na rin natin sa mundo yun, na baka may isang gamot na ma-diskubre ang isang mananaliksik na Pinoy sa Amerika o Europa at mga kapwa-Pilipino din ang makikinabang sa future? Walang kwenta ang libo ng mga pharmacists kung di rin nila magagamit ang kaalaman nila. Tantamount lang yun dun sa sinasabing walang pakinabang na nag-ibang bansa. Hindi ibig sabihin na nag-ibang bansa na e di na nakakatulong sa sariling bansa.
In addition, natutunan ko na rin na dapat wag natin ipagkait ang mas magandang buhay sa kapwa nating tao. Pero hindi ibig sabihin nito, kakalimutan na lang natin kung san tayo nanggaling.
On "Wala kang karapatan na tanungin ang mga produkto ng UST kung ano ang gusto nilang gawin sa kadahilanang sarili nilang pera ang ginamit nila sa pagaaral nila."
Nakakatawa.
Tired na ang argument na dahil tax ang nagbabayad sa school fees e mas may responsibility ang mga estudyante ng state schools and universities sa nation. Tama yung sinasabi nung iba dito na responsibilidad naman talaga nating lahat yun.
Pero dapat i-reframe yung thought na yun: dapat yung mas binigyan (in terms of natural intelligence or maybe privileges), mas malaki yung return. I-extend natin yan: kung asa public position ka katulad ng pagiging presidente, kung mas matalino o mas may kakayahan ka, dapat kang manungkulan kahit anong school ka pa o kahit wala kang natapos. Goodluck sa ating lahat kung bobo or incompetente yung mga lider natin na power lang talaga habol. Kaya essential ang educational institutions sa isang bansa dahil dito nagsisimula ang progreso.
On mga nagrarally-rally
Gusto ko lang dumagdag against sa mga talak na puro stereotypes naman na laging dinidikit sa mga tibak ng UP. Maraming uri ng tibak sa UP, merong environmental, religious, at kahit sa militants maraming shades na distinct naman din sa isa't-isa. At kahit sa mga extreme na mga tibak, mas malaki pa ang naiaambag nila kesa sa pera o buwis. Nangunguna sila sa pag-aaral, pag-highlight, at pag-aksyon sa mga isyu. Mahalaga din ang wide political discourse. Hindi taxes lang ang kailangan natin para maging mapayapa at para magkaroon ng magandang buhay.
On Dapat yung self-imposed "leaders" ng bansa, di ba?
Sana naman demokrasya pa rin tayo no. Walang monopoly ang kahit anong school sa leadership or sa mga positions. Kahit sino dapat puedeng maging lider.
On “I remind them that when they entered this University, they were committing themselves to the service of the country."
Mula sa pagpasok, sa freshie orientation, hanggang sa graduation, at kahit alumni na, laging pinapa-alala sa mga taga-UP na committed sila. Kaya nga sikat si Oble e! Kaya nakalagay si Oble sa lahat ng campus ng Pamantasan ng Pilipinas.
On allergies (hehe)
Paano mo nasabi na maraming allergic sa ideya na manilbihan sa bansa? Kung mga taga-UP gusto mong patamaan, wala pa naman akong na-meet sa buong stay ko sa UP at pakikisalamuha sa mga taga-UP na nag-disagree o ayaw nito. Ang nakita ko ay marami talagang paraan. Hindi lang yung gusto mo yung only valid way. Hindi mo sakop ang universe ng mga ideas.
Dacs
Feb 2, 2008, 09:32 AM
Pabor ako dyan, lahat ng Health Workers magsilbi muna sa bayan, kahit mga grads ng Private Schools. Hindi mo nga binasa yung binigay kong House Bills na isinulong ng dalawang Kongresistang duktor na ganyan nga ang dapat mangyari.
Pabor ka na ba sa sinabi ni Dr. Tan na kayong mga SUC grads ay magsilbi sa bayan dahil na rin sa laki ng itinulong sa inyo ng gobyerno sa pagpapaaral?
I cannot speak in behalf of those who will be directly affected by this bill (should it pass).
But I must agree, there must be something that must be done to at least curb the drain that is happening today.
Ang akin lang, dapat lahat ng health workers ay sakop dito. Mapa publiko man o pribado.
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 2, 2008, 09:47 AM
Tama. Kaya nga dapat munang magsilbi sa bayan bago mag-tampisaw sa isnow. 'Wag dapat maging aligagang mag-abroad ang mga "isko ng bayan." Ibalik muna sa ating inang bayan ang inabono nito. Kung nakikinig lang ang mga upian dito sa panawagan ni Roman ay siguradong walang gulo at lalo pang lalago ang katiwasayan at tagumpay ng Filipinas.
At pagdating sa Mercury Drug ay isa rin itong paraan ng pagsisilbi sa bayan. Eh kung kakapiranggot lang ang nagsisilbi riyan eh 'di natigok na 'yung naghihintay na mabentahan ng gamot. Kaya nga "ang gamot ay laging bago" at hindi "ang gamot ay laging bagal."
Mabuhay!
:)
Dacs
Feb 2, 2008, 09:48 AM
n3X: Very well said, wala akong tiyaga na sumulat ng nobela but this really hits the spot :lol:
Kirkegaard
Feb 2, 2008, 10:02 AM
Aba, nagtrabaho muna at nagsilbi sa bayan ang mga mediocre students na sanasabi mo bago kumita ng limpak limpak na salapi na iyong kinaiinggitan.
Can you, at least, prove this? You keep on making assumptions without basis.
_SCUD_
Feb 2, 2008, 11:26 AM
Can you, at least, prove this? You keep on making assumptions without basis.
Ano ang gusto mo na i-prove ko..
a) na nagsilbi sa bayan ang mga sinasabi niyong mediocre students
b) o kumikita ng limpak limpak na salapi ang sinasbai nyong mediocre students?
:)
_SCUD_
Feb 2, 2008, 12:03 PM
si SCUD pala ay nasa Canada? Natatawa ako.
Kung nasa Netherlands ako, tatawa ka?
:)
_SCUD_
Feb 2, 2008, 12:31 PM
2 taon?!? .. Sa iyo nagmula yang dalawang taon eh hindi sa taong bayan. At kailan ka pa naging tagapagsalita ng taong bayan? Imbento ka na naman eh.
Binasa mo ba talaga yung article ni Dr. Tan ha Scud? Naintindihan mo ba? Sabi nga ni Dr. Tan kung maipasa batas eh gawing compulsory requirement to ALL Health professionals yung pagserve anywhere within the country for a number of years it took them to study their health professionsto serve. So 4 years sa medicine !!
Walang problema sa akin kung ipasa yang batas na yan. Lahat magsilbi mas okay nga eh.. Ang problema ko ay yung mga nagmamagaling dito.. na conclude ng conclude na walang basis, as if alam nila story ng mga nag-abroad nating kababayan, mapa UP, UST or ano mang unibersidad.
Again umayos ka ng hindi ka nasusupalpal dyan. Self imposed (pa-borrow ng term ulit) Supalpelero ka pa naman.. :lol:
Naku hindi lang sa akin nagsimula ang 2 taon na pagsisilbi sa bayan, iyan din ang pananaw sa SURVEY sa ibinigay kong Powerpoint Presentation ni Dr. Tan (http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:LEreZCFfKq0J:www.academyhealth.org/nhpc/foreignpolicy/2006/galveztan.ppt+the+challenge+of+migation+national+health+care+system+jaime+galvez+tan+powerpoint&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1). Sana man lang binasa mo at nang may matutunan ka :) Survey results revealed that compulsory service should be required from graduates of state colleges and universities. The favorable period for said service would be one to two years.
Palagay ko mas maganda nga talaga ang pananaw ni Dr. Tan na dapat mag legislate ng National Health Service Act, at tapatan ng mga SUC grads ang tagal ng kanilang pag-aaral katumbas ng tagal din na serbisyo sa bayan. Ganda di ba?
:)
KuyaDanny
Feb 2, 2008, 12:37 PM
Gumulo na ang usapan. :lol:
Sa tingin ko, dalawang uri ng paglilingkod ang nagiging paksa ng debate rito:
1) Ang tungkulin ng bawa't Pilipinong maglingkod sa bayan. Napaka peronal na desisyon iyan, at maaraming paraan ang pagsasagawa niyan. Sa tingin ko wala tayong K na magdikta sa ibang Pilipino kung paano sila maglilingkod. Wala rin tayong K na humusga kung wasto o kulang ang paglilingkod na ginagawa ng iba. Siguro magbigay na lang tayo ng halimbawa para tularan ng mga taong naghahanap pa ng landas.
2) Ang tungkulin ng mga institusyon (pamantasan, atbp) na maglingkod sa bayan. Maraming pamamaraan yan at sa ngayon, limitado ang kakayahan (ie, resources). Kaya dapat lang nating pagtaluhan kung anu-anong lunas ang dapat unahin o ipagpaliban ng malaman ng mga decision-maker kung ang ang nararamdaman ng mga taong bayan. Sana naman pakinggan tayo kahit konti.
Sa tingin ko, itong ikalawang punto ang nasa isip ni SUX2BU nang simulan niya ang usapan natin. ;) Ito na lang muna ang ating pag-ukulan ng pansin para maisaayos nating muli ang debate.
_SCUD_
Feb 2, 2008, 01:25 PM
Ay naku sorry gumulo ha,
Kasi naman eh pinasukan pa ng "mediocre students" at "Canada".
Masagot ko lang KD ang iyong opinyon..
May mga namumuhunan na nagbibigay ng "bond" sa mga bago nilang empleyado na tinuturuan bago lumipat ng ibang kumpanya. Ang mga maliliit na kawani ng gobyerno na binigyan ng "local trainings" at "overseas training" ay nakatali naman na gamitin ang kanilang natutunan sa pagsisilbi sa bansa.
Anong pagkakaiba ng mga SUC graduates, na hindi natin dapat diktahan na maglingkod sa bayan, sa mga government employees na dapat gamitin ang kanilang natutunan sa paglilingkod sa bayan bago lumipat?
philippines123
Feb 2, 2008, 03:02 PM
mahigit 2 years na ako nagtatrabaho sa Pilipinas mula ng grumadweyt.
tama ang pagbabayad ko ng buwis.
sumusunod akos a batas at walang inaagrabyadong tao.
di magtatagal, ang kinikita ng mga nag-a-abroad ay kikitain ko rin sa Pilipinas, kaya walang dahilan para umalis ako.
at kung di ko man ito kitain, di pa rin ako aalis dahil mahal ko ang pamilya ko at ako lang ang inaasahan nila.
huntfan
Feb 2, 2008, 03:15 PM
Alam mo kuya may solusyon dyan, ikaw talaga hindi ka nagbabasa.
Ang problema, nasa krisis ang bansa sa kakulangan ng health workers.
Ang solusyon, magsilbi ng dalawang taon ang lahat ng health workers sa pangunguna ng mga SUC grads na binigyan ng gobyerno ng subsidiya sa pagaaral.
paulit ulit no? Hindi makaintindi?
:)
hahahaha... hayun palpak ka na naman. Yung mga sinasabi mo, matagal ng alam yan ng taong bayan .. ewan ko ba kung bakit ngayon ka lang naging concern dyan. Ang tagal na na article ni Dr. Tan yan at nagpropose na nga sya ng mga posibleng solusyon na inulit ulit mo dito.. wala kang dinagdag sa dikusyon na ito except mag ngawa at magakusa at magisip talangka. Pareho kayo ng kakosa mong si SUX.. :naughty:
Nakakatawa ka naman, ganyang hindi mo kayang harapin ang isyu tungkol sa krisis sa kakulangan ng health workers sa Pilipinas ay tatawagin mo akong utak talangka dahil lang sinusuportahan ko ang pananaw ni Dr. Tan na magsilbi muna kayo sa bayan bago umalis. Bakit kaya hindi mo ipaliwanag sa lahat kung paano ako nagkaroon ng utak talangka? Ang tingin mo pa rin ay nasa baba ako at nanghihila ako ng mga mas nasa taas sa akin. hehehe
Aba tama ang ginawa nyo naiwan muna kayo at nag ambag sa Pilipinas bago nangibang bayan, so pabor ka na gawin yan mandatory?
Utak talangka ka.. yang post mo sa itaas eh proof na yan sampu ng iba mo pang post dito sa thread na ito. Ang problema mo kasi ay mahilig kang magmalinis.. pinupuna mo yung iba na kesyo ganito, na walang basehan naman, tapos yung sarili mong bakod di mo pinupuna. You lack sincerity and credibility sa mga posts mo.
Ngayon, yang sinasabi mong realidad ng krisis sa health workers. Mulat na mulat ang isipan ko dyan. Naging consultant ako ng matagal sa QA System ng isang malaking kumpanya sa Pilipinas na nagde-deploy ng seaman at nurses abroad. So alam ko ang puno at dulo ng hirap na dinadaanan ng mga kababayan natin para lang makapunta sa ibang bayan. Kaya pwede ba, tumigil ka sa kakasatsat mo sa mga bagay na wala kang ma-contribute ng matino sa usapan.. :bop:
Sa mga totoong taga UP at makabayan, may batas man o wala tungkol sa pag-stay sa Pinas, eh nagsisilbi kami ng kusa SCUD.. May kusa kami ewan ko sa iyo! :bop:
Kaya ang sagot ko sa tanong mo.. kung kailangan ng ultimate guarantee, then go ahead. Ipasa ang batas na magsasabi ng ganito, just make sure na applicable sa lhat yan dahil di kayang pasanin ng mga taga UP ang mga problema, kailangan namin ng tulong ng ibang unibersidad. :D
Ang nakakatawa eh yung sinasabi mong susuporta ka sa bill na yun.. Sa paanong paraan? Sumulat ka na ba sa congressman mo dito sa Pinas para malaman nya saluubin mo or dyan ka lang sa harap ng computer, putak ng putak at nanggigilaitin sa galit sa mga Iskolor ng Bayan.. heheheh...
sweet_ryan
Feb 2, 2008, 03:19 PM
Kung nasa Netherlands ako, tatawa ka?
:)
ay oo, tatawa pa din ako:lol: :rotflmao: :lol:
huntfan
Feb 2, 2008, 03:23 PM
Naku hindi lang sa akin nagsimula ang 2 taon na pagsisilbi sa bayan, iyan din ang pananaw sa SURVEY sa ibinigay kong Powerpoint Presentation ni Dr. Tan (http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:LEreZCFfKq0J:www.academyhealth.org/nhpc/foreignpolicy/2006/galveztan.ppt+the+challenge+of+migation+national+health+care+system+jaime+galvez+tan+powerpoint&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1). Sana man lang binasa mo at nang may matutunan ka :) Survey results revealed that compulsory service should be required from graduates of state colleges and universities. The favorable period for said service would be one to two years.
Palagay ko mas maganda nga talaga ang pananaw ni Dr. Tan na dapat mag legislate ng National Health Service Act, at tapatan ng mga SUC grads ang tagal ng kanilang pag-aaral katumbas ng tagal din na serbisyo sa bayan. Ganda di ba?
:)
OO nakalimutan ko, kinopya mo nga pala yan sa isang presentation ng taga UP na si Dr. Tan. Again, wala kang na-contribute dito na hindi pa napansin ng mga taga UP na katulad ni Dr. Tan.
Ayun, yaman din lamang agree ka na kay Dr. Tan, simulan mo na ang kampanya mo na magtrabaho ang graduates ng UST sa Pilipinas ng at least two years after graduation. You have a lot of work to do convincing your fellow school mates. Sana hindi ka mabato ng itlog !! hehehehhe... :lol:
huntfan
Feb 2, 2008, 03:43 PM
Aba, nagtrabaho muna at nagsilbi sa bayan ang mga mediocre students na sanasabi mo bago kumita ng limpak limpak na salapi na iyong kinaiinggitan.
Pabor ako dyan, gagawa ng modified scheme ang mga private schools para magsilbi muna sa bayan ang mga graduates. Pwede silang pakiusapan na magsilbi ng 1 yr and 11months.
Ngayon, kayo naman na naaambunan ng gobyerno ng subsidiya sa pagaaral, kailangan naman pwersahin kayo na magtrabaho sa Pilipinas.
Aba'y sayang ang inyong "talino at galing" kung hindi yan gagamitin.
:)
Naku parang pamilyar na sa akin ang technique mo na yan SCUD.. Ingat ka Jernat, any moment maglalabas na ng payslip yang si SCUD para masabi nyang kapakipakinabang sya sa mundo !! hehehe.. mga insecure na tao nga naman oo.. :D
At bakit, pakiusap lang.. gawin mo kayang mandatory for all yung pag-serve ng ilang taon sa Pilipinas after graduation. Quote quote ka pa kay Dr. Tan eh di mo naman pala susundin yung proposals nya. Ang mga hirit mo talaga.. :naughty:
Again, magsilbi tayo sa bayan sa abot ng makakaya natin, walang distinction kung graduate ka ng public or private schools. Tayo rin magbebenefit in the end sampu ng mga mga anak natin.. :D
Dacs
Feb 2, 2008, 08:54 PM
_SCUD_: Since you're hell bent in this proposal, uwi ka muna sa Pinas tapos punta ka sa isang Congressman at ipanukala mo ito :naughty:
Kasi kung puro posts lang ang gagawin mo dito, wala kang mapapala.
KuyaDanny
Feb 2, 2008, 09:13 PM
May mga namumuhunan na nagbibigay ng "bond" sa mga bago nilang empleyado na tinuturuan bago lumipat ng ibang kumpanya. Ang mga maliliit na kawani ng gobyerno na binigyan ng "local trainings" at "overseas training" ay nakatali naman na gamitin ang kanilang natutunan sa pagsisilbi sa bansa.
Anong pagkakaiba ng mga SUC graduates, na hindi natin dapat diktahan na maglingkod sa bayan, sa mga government employees na dapat gamitin ang kanilang natutunan sa paglilingkod sa bayan bago lumipat?
The employee/trainee will have a job, most likely one that makes full use of his talents and will reward him accordingly, when he completes his training. If this person isn't worth keeping, the training wouldn't have been proposed, would it?
Secondly, the employee/trainee has a choice in all of this. If he thinks the bond or loyalty conditions are too burdensome, he can choose not to be trained or not to take the job.
The SCU graduates (at least those who think of leaving), may not have jobs which they like, pay enough, or make use of their talents. That's why they look elsewhere.
And what I think you are proposing is some sort of "national service" in which SCU graduates are forced to do things against their will or desire. What kind of service will our people get?
Sometimes we use words like obligation or tungkulin when talking about paglilingkod sa bayan. In my mind I get images of involuntary servants going through the motions and counting the days until they are set free. What kind of contribution can we expect from people with this attitude? As I said before, you should expect every Filipino to serve the country, but the way he does it, you should leave up to him.
KuyaDanny
Feb 2, 2008, 09:31 PM
Wait. Maybe SCUD is suggesting that all SCU graduates be made to work in a government unit for a fixed term upon graduation. Obviously for this to work the government must make enough jobs available for those graduates.
This will be costly and I'm still skeptical, but if this is the idea I'll listen some more.
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 12:00 AM
Wait. Maybe SCUD is suggesting that all SCU graduates be made to work in a government unit for a fixed term upon graduation. Obviously for this to work the government must make enough jobs available for those graduates.
This will be costly and I'm still skeptical, but if this is the idea I'll listen some more.
KD, hindi ko sinasabi na kailangan sa gobyrno magtrabaho ang mga SUC grads, ang sinasabi ko dahil sa krisis at kakulangan ng health workers kailangan muna nilang gamitin dito ang nalalaman nila, kahit sa pribadong ospital pa sila mamasukan dahil totoo naman na kulang sa mga government hospitals..
(Ang problema kasi sa atin, kapag hindi sa isang taga UP nanggagaling ang mga ganyang panukala o kapag wala sa Pilipinas ang nagsasab eh hindi dapat pakinggan at nagaalburoto sila na parang mga bata. :lol:)
On topic, :), Ang Supreme Court ay nagpalabas ng "Mandatory Continuing Legal Education" , si Miriam ay gumawa ng "Mandatory Computer Education and Training of Government Employees Act", parehas yan ay sapilitan na ang nasa isip ay pagpapaunlad ng kaalaman na gagamitin para sa pagsisilbi sa bayan. Magastos din hindi ba? Pero kung lagi kasi nating iisipin na pagsikil sa karapatang pantao ang salitang "mandatory", maghihintay lang tayo ng mga tao na ang totoong nasa isip ay "public service"
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 12:17 AM
OO nakalimutan ko, kinopya mo nga pala yan sa isang presentation ng taga UP na si Dr. Tan. Again, wala kang na-contribute dito na hindi pa napansin ng mga taga UP na katulad ni Dr. Tan.
Ayun, yaman din lamang agree ka na kay Dr. Tan, simulan mo na ang kampanya mo na magtrabaho ang graduates ng UST sa Pilipinas ng at least two years after graduation. You have a lot of work to do convincing your fellow school mates. Sana hindi ka mabato ng itlog !! hehehehhe... :lol:
Napakatalino ng mga sagot mo huntfan, isa ka ngang Iskolar ng Bayan galing UP.
Gusto kong magtagisan tayo ng talino sa ibang forum sa labas ng Academe. ahihi :)
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 12:28 AM
May nahagilap ulit ako na isang presentasyon ni Dr. Tan sa pangungulit niya tungkol sa kakulangan ng health workers sa bansa, huwag na lang magbasa yung nagsasabing alam na nila lahat ang problema at solusyon tungkol dito
:)
http://www.metropolis2007.org/plenary/Tan_Jaime_Tues_Plenary_1145.pdf
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 02:58 AM
_SCUD_: Since you're hell bent in this proposal, uwi ka muna sa Pinas tapos punta ka sa isang Congressman at ipanukala mo ito :naughty:
Kasi kung puro posts lang ang gagawin mo dito, wala kang mapapala.
Ano nga kaya kung ang lahat ng mga UP graduates ay may mga ganitong pagiisip? :naughty:
kapag hindi kayang harapin at kalabanin ang isyu, ang sasabihin sayo ay
- wala kang karapatan dahil hindi ka taga UP
- Wala kang karapatan dahil wala ka sa Pilipinas
- Wala kang karapatan dahil utak talangka ka
Ang lalim ng mga sagot no? :)
OK, back to topic, paano nga kaya masosolusyunan ang brain drain lalo na sa Health Sector?
Ang sagot ko, mandatory service para sa mga pinag-aral ng gobyerno bago magtrabaho sa ibang bansa. Period. :)
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 07:23 AM
Ito nga pala ay halaw sa isang lumang special report ng Manila Times (http://www.manilatimes.net/others/special/2003/apr/23/20030423spe1.html) na napapanahon pa rin hanggang ngayon.
Regulating the departure
In this regard, Tan proposes a National Health Service Act that will enable the country to program the exit of health professionals to ensure a steady pool in all health facilities, rural and urban.
Tan says the Philippines is one of the few countries in Southeast Asia that still doesn’t have a National Health Service Act. This is a compulsory requirement for all licensed health professionals to serve anywhere within the country for a specified period that’s equal to the number of years it took them to finish their degree.
He proposes a mandatory service of three years for graduates from state universities. For graduates from private schools, he is proposing two years or whatever is appropriate to the private sector.
The education of health professionals who graduated from state universities, schools and colleges was “heavily subsidized with taxes paid by the Filipino people. It is only fair that they repay the country with their services equivalent to the number of years of subsidy. Graduates from private schools can have a modified scheme under the act,” he said.
Attempts to have such a law passed were met with objections because they were against the individual’s human rights to move freely and practice their profession where they want.
“But with globalization and the active trading of health human resources and the inevitability of a severe brain drain to hit the Philippines, the country’s collective interest and collective rights should now prevail,” argued Tan.
“It’s a mortal sin for them to leave immediately. Magsilbi naman sa bayan,” he said.
Dacs
Feb 3, 2008, 10:03 AM
Ano nga kaya kung ang lahat ng mga UP graduates ay may mga ganitong pagiisip? :naughty:
kapag hindi kayang harapin at kalabanin ang isyu, ang sasabihin sayo ay
- wala kang karapatan dahil hindi ka taga UP
- Wala kang karapatan dahil wala ka sa Pilipinas
- Wala kang karapatan dahil utak talangka ka
Ang lalim ng mga sagot no? :)
OK, back to topic, paano nga kaya masosolusyunan ang brain drain lalo na sa Health Sector?
Ang sagot ko, mandatory service para sa mga pinag-aral ng gobyerno bago magtrabaho sa ibang bansa. Period. :)
Anong di kayang kalabanin, nagbabasa ka ba?
Maka-ilang beses ko na sinabi ang saloobin ko. Magbasa ka nga muna!
Ikaw pa ang malakas magsalita ng "walang karapatan" pero sa mga paratang mo sa amin dito, parang inalisan mo na kami ng karapatan na sabihin ang saloobin namim!
Talking about double standards :rolleyes:
Heto pa ang malupit:
- Wala kang karapatan dahil wala ka sa Pilipinas
Paano mo ito nasabi ng taos sa puso mo?
Talking about irony :rolleyes:
On topic: We must not only attack the issue on one angle (which is forcing people to stay here) but to give incentives on people who would choose to stay here.
This is going to be a hardsell though, knowing that the overwhelming majority of the nursing graduates took nursing in the 1st place is to go abroad.
This a lose-lose to all.
The only thing that I can think of in making people (not only nurses but engineers, accountants, etc) here is to make the economy more palatable for people to stay here.
Buhay pa kaya ako nun?
Dacs
Feb 3, 2008, 10:06 AM
Heto ang mas mainam, idagdag sa requirements ng nursing (or sa iba pang medical) board examination ang pagkakaroon ng dalawang taon na pamamalagi at pagtratrabaho sa Pilipinas.
Di na kailangan ng masyadong palabok yan. Simpleng-simple lang yan.
Di naman makakapagabroad ang mga nurses kung wala silang lisensya dito diba?
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 3, 2008, 10:43 AM
Parang humanga ako kay Dr. Tan ah. Sa wakas, maliban sa mga dati kong kakosa sa up writers club at up-icw, ay tsaka na lang uli ako humanga sa isang upian (Parang inabot 'ata ng 12 taon ito :laugh: ).
Dapat naman talaga ay 'wag matakot magsilbi sa bayan. 'Yung mga nagsasabi na saan naman ang "freedom" nila kung ano ang gusto nila sa buhay nila ay tumahimik kayo. Sa madugong isyu ng brain drain sa Filipinas ay dapat lang na pangunahan niyo ang panukala ni Dr. Tan at pakinggan niyo ang paki-usap ng ina ninyong si Roman. Kayo na mahilig mag-angat sa mga sarili niyo at magsabing "matatalino", "matatapang" at "lider" daw ay kayo pa ang bahag ang buntot sa paglilingkod sa bayan.
Saan naman ang hustisya niyan?
Mabuhay! Mabuhay, Dr. Tan! Mabuhay ang ating inang bayan!
:)
huntfan
Feb 3, 2008, 12:22 PM
Napakatalino ng mga sagot mo huntfan, isa ka ngang Iskolar ng Bayan galing UP.
Gusto kong magtagisan tayo ng talino sa ibang forum sa labas ng Academe. ahihi :)
hihihihi.. humirit ka naman.. lalo mong pinapakita dito na wala ka talagang nalalaman sa mga pinagsasabi mo.
At may tagisan ka pa dyan ng talino, aba kung babayaran mo ba ako dyan sa pakikipagtagisan ng talino eh di go ahead i-pm mo ako.. Pero kung pataasan lang ng ihi yan gaya ng ginawa mo dati eh sorry try harder. Di ako insecure na gaya mo.. :love:
Ang sagot ko, mandatory service para sa mga pinag-aral ng gobyerno bago magtrabaho sa ibang bansa. Period.
Ang dami mong sinabi previously eh yan lang pala pakay mo. Again, this proves my point na utak talangka ka nga. Walang ka-idea idea sa mga pinagsasabi mo. Enough said.. :bop:
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 01:13 PM
KD, makalusot kaya? :)
------------------
Hindi. Huwag mo nang subukan uli. Hindi yan katapat-dapat sabihin ng edukadong tao.
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 01:36 PM
And what I think you are proposing is some sort of "national service" in which SCU graduates are forced to do things against their will or desire. What kind of service will our people get?
Sometimes we use words like obligation or tungkulin when talking about paglilingkod sa bayan. In my mind I get images of involuntary servants going through the motions and counting the days until they are set free. What kind of contribution can we expect from people with this attitude? As I said before, you should expect every Filipino to serve the country, but the way he does it, you should leave up to him.
KuyaArthur, darating ang panahon kakailanganin natin ang serbisyo ng mga health workers sa Hospital. Kung hindi man tayo maaring ang mga kamag-anak natin.
Mas nanaisin ko pa na may nagpapatuwad sa akin para eksaminin ang aking tumbong habang iniisip ang pagtatapos ng kanilang serbisyo, kaysa naman maghintay ako ng schedule para magpakonsulta sa ospital dahil sa kakulangan ng mga Health Workers gaya ng mga nararanasan ngayon sa ibang bansa.
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 02:18 PM
Parang humanga ako kay Dr. Tan ah. Sa wakas, maliban sa mga dati kong kakosa sa up writers club at up-icw, ay tsaka na lang uli ako humanga sa isang upian (Parang inabot 'ata ng 12 taon ito :laugh: ).
Dapat naman talaga ay 'wag matakot magsilbi sa bayan. 'Yung mga nagsasabi na saan naman ang "freedom" nila kung ano ang gusto nila sa buhay nila ay tumahimik kayo. Sa madugong isyu ng brain drain sa Filipinas ay dapat lang na pangunahan niyo ang panukala ni Dr. Tan at pakinggan niyo ang paki-usap ng ina ninyong si Roman. Kayo na mahilig mag-angat sa mga sarili niyo at magsabing "matatalino", "matatapang" at "lider" daw ay kayo pa ang bahag ang buntot sa paglilingkod sa bayan.
Saan naman ang hustisya niyan?
Mabuhay! Mabuhay, Dr. Tan! Mabuhay ang ating inang bayan!
:)
Aba'y 'wag ka naman gayan, hindi lang si Dr. Tan ang nagiisang UPisino (UPista na nga lang para malayo sa Tomasino) na may malasakit sa bayan. Si "Nars" Fely Marilyn E. Lorenzo ng Institute of Health Policy and Development Studies ng UP Manila at ang kanyang team, ay naglabas ng report na pinamagatang "Migration of Health Workers: Country Case Study Philippines" (http://www.ilo.ch/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/health/wp236.pdf) na sinusuportahan ang mandatory service sa mga SUC graduates, atbp.
Sila ay dalawa lamang sa mga iba pang "tunay na matatalinong" Pilipino sa pribadong sektor, gaya nila Bro. Andrew Gonzales ng DLSU na nagsulat ng librong "Higher Education, Brain Drain and Overseas Employment in the Philippines: Towards a Differentiated Set of Solutions" at ni Fr. Rolando de la Rosa, OP ng UST na dating CHED Chairman ang mga nagsasaayos para masolusyunan ang krisis sa "health sector" sa Filipinas.
:)
KuyaDanny
Feb 3, 2008, 03:27 PM
KuyaArthur, darating ang panahon kakailanganin natin ang serbisyo ng mga health workers sa Hospital. Kung hindi man tayo maaring ang mga kamag-anak natin.
Mas nanaisin ko pa na may nagpapatuwad sa akin para eksaminin ang aking tumbong habang iniisip ang pagtatapos ng kanilang serbisyo, kaysa naman maghintay ako ng schedule para magpakonsulta sa ospital dahil sa kakulangan ng mga Health Workers gaya ng mga nararanasan ngayon sa ibang bansa.
Alam ko, at ikinatatakot ko ito. Pero may elemento pa rin ng pagpipigil (umalis ng bansa) at pagpipilit (manilbihan sa iba)? Mas nakakatakot yata. Malay ko kung ano pa ang isaksak sa tumbong ko dahil sa bwisit niya. Kahit ba hindi sa akin bwisit, eh kung ako yung nandoon baka ako pa ang pagtripan. At kung aayusin natin ang problemang ito, ayusin na natin sa pamamaraang pangmatagalan. Masyadong mahalaga ang propesyon nila para pairalin ang ganyang uri ng pagmo-motivate.
I think you are concerned with making these people pay back their "subsidies", which you don't think private school graduates have. Fine. Why don't we just make them pay full fare for their studies, so that when they graduate, they "owe nothing"? Then, with the money the government saves, we can raise the pay of those health workers who choose to stay and work here? Walang sapilitan. Somebody here said something about incentives. Let's work on those instead of the sanctions.
Teka muna. Nasa Canada ka nga pala. Isa sa mga konsiderasyon kung kaya nagpapasiyang mag-migrate ang ibang mga kaibigan ko ay ang kagandahan ng health care diyan. Problema din ba diyan ang shortage ng mga health care workers? Anu-ano ang mga naiiisip nilang remedyo? Pagpigil din ba at pagpilit? O baka naman incentives?
Baka gusto mong iparating sa amin ang kaalaman mo tungkol dito. Baka may mapulot na ideya ang mga kinauukulan. Para makatulong ka na rin sa bayan. Pero kung ayaw mo, OK lang. Hindi ka namin pipilitin.
huntfan
Feb 3, 2008, 05:22 PM
Aba'y 'wag ka naman gayan, hindi lang si Dr. Tan ang nagiisang UPisino (UPista na nga lang para malayo sa Tomasino) na may malasakit sa bayan. Si "Nars" Fely Marilyn E. Lorenzo ng Institute of Health Policy and Development Studies ng UP Manila at ang kanyang team, ay naglabas ng report na pinamagatang "Migration of Health Workers: Country Case Study Philippines" (http://www.ilo.ch/public/english/dialogue/sector/papers/health/wp236.pdf) na sinusuportahan ang mandatory service sa mga SUC graduates, atbp.
Sila ay dalawa lamang sa mga iba pang "tunay na matatalinong" Pilipino sa pribadong sektor, gaya nila Bro. Andrew Gonzales ng DLSU na nagsulat ng librong "Higher Education, Brain Drain and Overseas Employment in the Philippines: Towards a Differentiated Set of Solutions" at ni Fr. Rolando de la Rosa, OP ng UST na dating CHED Chairman ang mga nagsasaayos para masolusyunan ang krisis sa "health sector" sa Filipinas.
:)
^^^
Kakakatuwa. Providing a link to a research article done by UP researchers doesnt make you problem solver. hehehehe... Para kang langaw na nakatungtung sa kalabaw, akala mo kalabaw ka na agad.. :naughty:
Again, napatunayan dito na ang mga taga UP gaya nung mga link na pinagpopost ni SCUD eh may malasakit sa bayan, alam ang problema ng bayan at may solusyon sa problema ng bayan. Handang magsilbi kahit wlang batas na nagsasabing kailangan silang magsilbi ng ilang taon.
-----
Cant help but agree dun sa sinabi ni Dacs.. an innovative incentive scheme should be developed para sa retention and repatration program sa health workers natin. Eto ang pagdebatihan kung paano, hindi yung pagyayabang at pabubuhat ng sariling bangko. :D
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 11:32 PM
I think you are concerned with making these people pay back their "subsidies", which you don't think private school graduates have. Fine. Why don't we just make them pay full fare for their studies, so that when they graduate, they "owe nothing"? Then, with the money the government saves, we can raise the pay of those health workers who choose to stay and work here? Walang sapilitan. Somebody here said something about incentives. Let's work on those instead of the sanctions.
Teka muna. Nasa Canada ka nga pala. Isa sa mga konsiderasyon kung kaya nagpapasiyang mag-migrate ang ibang mga kaibigan ko ay ang kagandahan ng health care diyan. Problema din ba diyan ang shortage ng mga health care workers? Anu-ano ang mga naiiisip nilang remedyo? Pagpigil din ba at pagpilit? O baka naman incentives?
Baka gusto mong iparating sa amin ang kaalaman mo tungkol dito. Baka may mapulot na ideya ang mga kinauukulan. Para makatulong ka na rin sa bayan. Pero kung ayaw mo, OK lang. Hindi ka namin pipilitin.
1) On paying back their "subsidies". That's fine, kung ayaw nilang magpapilit na bayaran ng serbisyo ang pagtulong sa kanila ng gobyerno, pilitin na lang natin silang ibalik ang pera na ginamit sa pag-aaral nila. Parang sa opisina sa gobyerno rin yan, pinag-training at hindi tinapos ang required year of service, bayad muna bago umalis. Tungkol naman sa "incentives", nasa report rin yan ni Dr. Tan na binasa natin, ang kailangan lang suportahan ang National Health Service Act, nakapaloob dyan ang mandatory service, incentives, cooperation sa ibang bansa at iba pang "strategies" para masolusyunan ang krisis.
Ang ipinagtataka ko lang, bakit ang Malaysia at Indonesia kaya nilang ipatupad ang MANDATORY SERVICE para sa mga health workers nila, bakit kinokontra sa Pilipinas?
2) Tungkol naman sa Health Care sa Canada, kulang na kulang dito. Ang problema, halos walang High School grads ang gustong kumuha ng Nursing kahit tambakan sila ng scholarships at iba pang incentives. At dahil na rin ang Canada ay isang Federal Government, kanya kanyang estilo ang mga probinsya dito kung paano nila solusyunan ang health care crisis sa kanilang probinsya, hal. Ang Ontario province ay may "Health Protection and Promotion Act", nakapaloob dito ang Mandatory Health Programs and Services AT iba pang insentibo para sa health workers.
Isa pang magandang solusyon ng mga Medical Students dito, dahil sa nakikita na nila ang problema ng sa "ageing population" at kakulangan ng health workers, sila mismo ang nagpalabas ng MANDATORY RETURN OF SERVICE (http://www.cfms.org/representation/papers_view.cfm?id=9) para sa kanilang hanay at hindi na hintayin pa ang dikta ng gobyerno at mga Canadians.
The public are increasingly aware that practice in this country is more difficult then it once was. However, our health care system is publicly funded, and simply stated, "the public do not want to lose their personal physicians". The pervasive feeling that these realities create is to turn to the more junior practitioners to fill the need. While this has always been the natural role of young physicians, the paying public has been frustrated by the "portability" issue of doctors. If established physicians are able to pack up and head elsewhere to a more reasonable practice, the frustrated people of Canada feel that they should be able to dictate to new physicians that young doctors should go where they are needed most. A perception exists in some quarters, which states that young physicians have received a "privileged education" and therefore it seems reasonable that new physicians should be expected to pay back their country for their investment
_SCUD_
Feb 3, 2008, 11:47 PM
Eto nga pala yung tamang link para sa Canada Health Act.
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/media/nr-cp/2002/2002_care-soinsbk4_e.html
Masyadong marami at mahirap isa-isahin. Balik na ba tayo sa topic? :)
_SCUD_
Feb 4, 2008, 12:02 AM
KD, makalusot kaya? :)
------------------
Hindi. Huwag mo nang subukan uli. Hindi yan katapat-dapat sabihin ng edukadong tao.
KD, nasaan naman ang aking "freedom of speech" . Ni"rambol" ko lang naman at inalis ang titik "L" sa Talangka na nagiisang makikita sa PUBLIC SERVICE, na hindi ko maintindihan kung paano nasabit ang salitang talangka sa isyu ng paglilingkod sa bayan
:)
Anyway, kung ayan ang desisyon mo. Wala akong magagawa
Dacs
Feb 4, 2008, 10:18 AM
_SCUD_: Heto observation ko lang naman, at malamang wala itong kinalaman sa usapin.
Kindly prove me wrong, but along with ЅUX2BÜ, it seems that you both guys have axes to grind against SUCs, UP in particular.
I apologize if I'm mistaken though.
Going back on topic, madali lang kasi sabihin na panatiliin sila dito nga ganun na lang.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for anything that will benefit our country. But by doing so, one must not be insensitive of the very reason why those people opt to go abroad.
Sinabi na ito ni KuyaDanny, mahirap kung sapilitan ang pagpapanatili ng isang tao dito sa Pinas. Baka kung ano din ang itusok sa wetpaks ko diba?
All I'm saying is the government should recognize the reasons why this drain continues to happen.
Wag din kalimutan na lahat ng mamamayan ay may pananagutan dito.
Going back to the SUCs, the govenment can force the graduates to stay and while this is going to be a benefit on a short-term basis, this is as well detrimental for the long-term since this policy will invite mediocrity as far as serving the country is concerned for those who are otherwise not covered with this policy: the private schools.
As I (and some others) said, it's much more worthwhile to invest in a program that will make the health workers think twice in leaving the country.
But if push comes to shove, then the government can enforce it, but in my opinion this should cover all workers since this is a concern for all health workers.
Natanong ko ito before, ano ba ang "vision and mission" ng mga private schools like UST?
_SCUD_
Feb 4, 2008, 01:15 PM
_SCUD_: Heto observation ko lang naman, at malamang wala itong kinalaman sa usapin.
Kindly prove me wrong, but along with ЅUX2BÜ, it seems that you both guys have axes to grind against SUCs, UP in particular.
I apologize if I'm mistaken though.
Going back on topic, madali lang kasi sabihin na panatiliin sila dito nga ganun na lang.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for anything that will benefit our country. But by doing so, one must not be insensitive of the very reason why those people opt to go abroad.
Sinabi na ito ni KuyaDanny, mahirap kung sapilitan ang pagpapanatili ng isang tao dito sa Pinas. Baka kung ano din ang itusok sa wetpaks ko diba?
All I'm saying is the government should recognize the reasons why this drain continues to happen.
Wag din kalimutan na lahat ng mamamayan ay may pananagutan dito.
Going back to the SUCs, the govenment can force the graduates to stay and while this is going to be a benefit on a short-term basis, this is as well detrimental for the long-term since this policy will invite mediocrity as far as serving the country is concerned for those who are otherwise not covered with this policy: the private schools.
As I (and some others) said, it's much more worthwhile to invest in a program that will make the health workers think twice in leaving the country.
But if push comes to shove, then the government can enforce it, but in my opinion this should cover all workers since this is a concern for all health workers.
Natanong ko ito before, ano ba ang "vision and mission" ng mga private schools like UST?
UST's Mission - The University of Santo Tomas, the Pontifical and Catholic University of the Philippines, a Dominican institution of higher learning, under the inspiration and patronage of St. Thomas Aquinas, commits itself to the pursuit of truth and to the preservation, advancement and transmission of knowledge in the arts and sciences, both sacred and civil, through the use of reason illumined by faith.
The university affirms its role in the formation of men and women to become competent and compassionate professionals committed to the service of the Church, the nation and the global community.
UST's Vision - By the year 2011, the University of Santo Tomas envisions itself as a center of excellence in various programs of teaching, an acknowledged expert in key areas of research in the pure and applied sciences, a leader in community/extension services, and as the Center of Contextualized Theology in Asia. It also envisions for itself an extended physical presence beyond Manila, and a more functional networking mechanism with other universities/institutions.
Now what?
Ewan ko ba kung bakit hirap kayo uimintindi, isaisahin ko nga ang sagot ko.
1) Pabor ba ako sa Mandatory Service para sa lahat Health Workers?
- Oo, 2 yrs para sa mga pinag-aral at binigyan ng subsidiya ng gobyerno at 1 yr para sa mga nagtapos sa pribadong eskwelahan. May sinabi ba ako na hindi kasali ang UST dyan, pakihanap nga kung meron. Kapag may nakita ka, hindi ako magrereply.
2) Bakit ako pabor sa Mandatory Service?
- Dahil sa krisis na nararanasan natin ngayon. Ewan ko kung alam mo to ha, pero ito ay ayon sa data ng PRC, POEA etc.
2001 - Bilang ng umalis na nurses sa bansa ayon sa POEA 13,546 , bilang ng mga bagong nurses na pumasa ayon sa PRC 4,430
2002 - Bilang ng umalis na nurses 11, 911. Bilang ng bagong nurses 4,228
Hindi ka ba naalarma sa ganyang bilang, 2008 na ngayon at wala pa rin nagiging solusyon . Mahigit pa sa doble ang nawawala kaysa pumapalit.
Ano ba ang nakikita mong masama kung sabihin ko na kailangan ng mandatory service at pangunahan yan ng SUC grads? Tandaan, hindi ko sinabing bawal mag-abroad at hindi ko rin sinabing SUC lang.
galileo_
Feb 4, 2008, 03:58 PM
This is one issue that needs to be addressed by our authorities in the government. Although there are no concrete figures, I think the Philippines is one of the top contributors of émigrés in the health care industry of developed nations.
I find it ironic that while it is true that we are on the path to economic development (of attaining the rosiest growth rate of 7.3 percent), brain drain situation in the Philippines is still at the alarming level.
If the government is serious in curbing the migration of workers abroad, they should start channeling priorities to other sectors that would further reinforce economic growth. Hailed as the modern-day heroes, our OFWs contribute a chunk to our growth rate through their dollar remittances. Our government should impose some kind of control and let other channels of growth flourish. Pejorative or not, we have become the proletariat of the world.
An economist from BNP Paribas said that the Philippine economy has to grow by at least 10% to 15% to curb the worsening brain drain. But will this assure us of a lesser pinoy nurses, physicians, engineers, accountants, pharmacists, care-givers going abroad?
Although we see poverty as the main reason why we have this massive hemorrhage of talent, we have to consider other factors that contribute to such exodus. Patriotism is one virtue that we have to foster among us Filipinos. We should not allow the western culture to dominate us or get lured by what the Americans have.
It would be awful to see one day, that given an improved per capita income that is comparable to the income levels of developed nations, the Philippines still suffering from brain drain.
In the meantime, given the current brain drain situation and the promises of the WTO-GATS (remember that we have a president who is a WTO proponent) we, as tax payers, all have the right to dictate to all UP graduates and other alumni of state colleges and universities to stay and serve the country. It is their moral obligation to serve the country because their education had been subsidized by the taxes collected from us.
i am glad to have stumbled upon an article by a UP journalism student regarding the issue. JM Tuazon, in an article titled "UP: Ang Galing Mo?" wrote when we step outside UP, we don’t tend to forget our greatness, in fact, we arrogantly proclaim it to the world. But what we tend to forget is to whom we owe that greatness, to whom it came from, and to whom it should be returned: the nation’s people who tirelessly paid for our education.
he further went on by saying we’re not called “Iskolar ng Bayan” for nothing. Yes, we are all scholars, but we’re also of the people, and therefore for the people (pardon this little cliché moment). UP’s relevance to this country doesn’t stop at being great; more importantly, it is made more significant and meaningful by our selfless offering to our homeland.
huntfan
Feb 4, 2008, 04:27 PM
UST's Mission - The University of Santo Tomas, the Pontifical and Catholic University of the Philippines, a Dominican institution of higher learning, under the inspiration and patronage of St. Thomas Aquinas, commits itself to the pursuit of truth and to the preservation, advancement and transmission of knowledge in the arts and sciences, both sacred and civil, through the use of reason illumined by faith.
The university affirms its role in the formation of men and women to become competent and compassionate professionals committed to the service of the Church, the nation and the global community.
UST's Vision - By the year 2011, the University of Santo Tomas envisions itself as a center of excellence in various programs of teaching, an acknowledged expert in key areas of research in the pure and applied sciences, a leader in community/extension services, and as the Center of Contextualized Theology in Asia. It also envisions for itself an extended physical presence beyond Manila, and a more functional networking mechanism with other universities/institutions.
Now what?
Ewan ko ba kung bakit hirap kayo uimintindi, isaisahin ko nga ang sagot ko.
1) Pabor ba ako sa Mandatory Service para sa lahat Health Workers?
- Oo, 2 yrs para sa mga pinag-aral at binigyan ng subsidiya ng gobyerno at 1 yr para sa mga nagtapos sa pribadong eskwelahan. May sinabi ba ako na hindi kasali ang UST dyan, pakihanap nga kung meron. Kapag may nakita ka, hindi ako magrereply.
2) Bakit ako pabor sa Mandatory Service?
- Dahil sa krisis na nararanasan natin ngayon. Ewan ko kung alam mo to ha, pero ito ay ayon sa data ng PRC, POEA etc.
2001 - Bilang ng umalis na nurses sa bansa ayon sa POEA 13,546 , bilang ng mga bagong nurses na pumasa ayon sa PRC 4,430
2002 - Bilang ng umalis na nurses 11, 911. Bilang ng bagong nurses 4,228
Hindi ka ba naalarma sa ganyang bilang, 2008 na ngayon at wala pa rin nagiging solusyon . Mahigit pa sa doble ang nawawala kaysa pumapalit.
Ano ba ang nakikita mong masama kung sabihin ko na kailangan ng mandatory service at pangunahan yan ng SUC grads? Tandaan, hindi ko sinabing bawal mag-abroad at hindi ko rin sinabing SUC lang.
^^^
Anak ng tinapa naman .. ngayon mo lang sinabi kaya yang sa itaas. Nagsimula ka dito eh kung ano ano sinabi mong pagmamaasim sa mga taga SUCs and UP in particular. You make it sound na walang ginawa ang mga taga UP para maibsan ang problema at ikaw ang pasimuno ng idea na magsilbi sa bayan ang mga taga UP. Kung tutuusin lahat ng mga pinagquote mo dito eh, galing sa mga alumni or work ng mga taga UP. And then nag-inject ka pa ng unrelated topics like pag-rarally. Naku madami ka pang ginawa, balikan mo kaya yung previous pages. If you stick to the topic, wala sanang problema, pero dahil nga utak talangka ka, you cant help but show your true colors. :lol:
And dapat lang talaga ma-involve ang mga graduates ng ibang schools dito dahil we are talking about nation building and tackling national problems.
Umayos ka and we will respond in kind.. yun lang .. :)
huntfan
Feb 4, 2008, 05:00 PM
Ang malaking irony dito eh yung mga tao na naga-assume na walang ginawa ang UP people and alumni sa mga problema ng bayan. Tapos ang iko-quote or ili-link eh yung mga nagpapatunay sa commitment and actions ng mga taga UP para masolusyunan ang problema ng bayan. :D
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 5, 2008, 10:59 AM
This is one issue that needs to be addressed by our authorities in the government. Although there are no concrete figures, I think the Philippines is one of the top contributors of émigrés in the health care industry of developed nations.
I find it ironic that while it is true that we are on the path to economic development (of attaining the rosiest growth rate of 7.3 percent), brain drain situation in the Philippines is still at the alarming level.
If the government is serious in curbing the migration of workers abroad, they should start channeling priorities to other sectors that would further reinforce economic growth. Hailed as the modern-day heroes, our OFWs contribute a chunk to our growth rate through their dollar remittances. Our government should impose some kind of control and let other channels of growth flourish. Pejorative or not, we have become the proletariat of the world.
An economist from BNP Paribas said that the Philippine economy has to grow by at least 10% to 15% to curb the worsening brain drain. But will this assure us of a lesser pinoy nurses, physicians, engineers, accountants, pharmacists, care-givers going abroad?
Although we see poverty as the main reason why we have this massive hemorrhage of talent, we have to consider other factors that contribute to such exodus. Patriotism is one virtue that we have to foster among us Filipinos. We should not allow the western culture to dominate us or get lured by what the Americans have.
It would be awful to see one day, that given an improved per capita income that is comparable to the income levels of developed nations, the Philippines still suffering from brain drain.
In the meantime, given the current brain drain situation and the promises of the WTO-GATS (remember that we have a president who is a WTO proponent) we, as tax payers, all have the right to dictate to all UP graduates and other alumni of state colleges and universities to stay and serve the country. It is their moral obligation to serve the country because their education had been subsidized by the taxes collected from us.
i am glad to have stumbled upon an article by a UP journalism student regarding the issue. JM Tuazon, in an article titled "UP: Ang Galing Mo?" wrote when we step outside UP, we don’t tend to forget our greatness, in fact, we arrogantly proclaim it to the world. But what we tend to forget is to whom we owe that greatness, to whom it came from, and to whom it should be returned: the nation’s people who tirelessly paid for our education.
he further went on by saying we’re not called “Iskolar ng Bayan” for nothing. Yes, we are all scholars, but we’re also of the people, and therefore for the people (pardon this little cliché moment). UP’s relevance to this country doesn’t stop at being great; more importantly, it is made more significant and meaningful by our selfless offering to our homeland.
Kawawang JM Tuazon, tulad nina Tan at Roman, ay mukhang nagsasalita rin ito sa butas na basket. :shrug:
Gising upians sa PEx! Imulat ang mga mata at magsilbi sa bayan! Tigilan na ang mga "Freedom! Freedom!" na linya't mas unahin ang isyu ng brain drain sa Filipinas. Ibalik niyo muna ang inabono sa inyo ng bayan bago kayo mag-kumahog makakita ng isnow at gumawa ng Frosty da Snowman.
'Yan ay kung may konsensiya kayo.
:)
math_techie
Feb 5, 2008, 01:52 PM
This is one issue that needs to be addressed by our authorities in the government. Although there are no concrete figures, I think the Philippines is one of the top contributors of émigrés in the health care industry of developed nations.
I find it ironic that while it is true that we are on the path to economic development (of attaining the rosiest growth rate of 7.3 percent), brain drain situation in the Philippines is still at the alarming level.
If the government is serious in curbing the migration of workers abroad, they should start channeling priorities to other sectors that would further reinforce economic growth. Hailed as the modern-day heroes, our OFWs contribute a chunk to our growth rate through their dollar remittances. Our government should impose some kind of control and let other channels of growth flourish. Pejorative or not, we have become the proletariat of the world.
sadly, I don't think this government is serious in curbing the migration of workers. The labor force...as what GMA said before, is the biggest export that we can produce. Our economy, given its current state would not stand if the government regulates the export of workers.
Mind you, even if the government regulates the number of OFW's, where will we put those people here? Saan sila magtratrabaho. Hindi direct implication na kung magstastay ang mga Pilipino dito, eh magdedevelop ang ibang mga industry. Tataas lang ang unemployment rate natin...ngayon pa nga lang eh short na tayo sa trabaho, paano pa kaya kung pipigilan nating umalis ang mga Pilipino.
Circular kasi yung problem, we have a shortage of health workers, kasi the government cannot support them, the government cannot support them kasi walang pera ang gobyerno, walang pera ang gobyerno kasi mabagal ang ekonomiya...paano aasenso ang ekonomiya sa setting natin ngayon?...eh di umasa sa mas mataas na remittance mula sa mga OFW, siyempre may iba pang paraan, stabilization, encourage capital, improve infrastracture...etc...pero puro long term yun, ang short term solution sa mga probblema natin eh OFW.
An economist from BNP Paribas said that the Philippine economy has to grow by at least 10% to 15% to curb the worsening brain drain. But will this assure us of a lesser pinoy nurses, physicians, engineers, accountants, pharmacists, care-givers going abroad?
If the Philippines can compete with the salaries that are given by foreign employers...then perhaps the engineers, accountants, etc...will stay.
Although we see poverty as the main reason why we have this massive hemorrhage of talent, we have to consider other factors that contribute to such exodus. Patriotism is one virtue that we have to foster among us Filipinos. We should not allow the western culture to dominate us or get lured by what the Americans have.
It would be awful to see one day, that given an improved per capita income that is comparable to the income levels of developed nations, the Philippines still suffering from brain drain.
In the meantime, given the current brain drain situation and the promises of the WTO-GATS (remember that we have a president who is a WTO proponent) we, as tax payers, all have the right to dictate to all UP graduates and other alumni of state colleges and universities to stay and serve the country. It is their moral obligation to serve the country because their education had been subsidized by the taxes collected from us.
Those who are studying at private schools... do you agree that your parents have the right to dictate to you that you should stay in your family, and serve them?...It would always be good to pay them back what they invested in you, pero I don't think they will want to impose those virtues to you. Diba? May father would always say to me. "Anak, hindi ko hinihiling sayo na alagaan ako pag matanda na ako, ang hinihiling ko lang sayo eh maging mabuti ka ring magulang sa mga anak mo"
i am glad to have stumbled upon an article by a UP journalism student regarding the issue. JM Tuazon, in an article titled "UP: Ang Galing Mo?" wrote when we step outside UP, we don’t tend to forget our greatness, in fact, we arrogantly proclaim it to the world. But what we tend to forget is to whom we owe that greatness, to whom it came from, and to whom it should be returned: the nation’s people who tirelessly paid for our education.
he further went on by saying we’re not called “Iskolar ng Bayan” for nothing. Yes, we are all scholars, but we’re also of the people, and therefore for the people (pardon this little cliché moment). UP’s relevance to this country doesn’t stop at being great; more importantly, it is made more significant and meaningful by our selfless offering to our homeland.
I fully agree to his call for nationalism among UP students. We UP students should bring back to our country whatever it has invested on us. But what bothers me is the way some people would insist that UP students should be forced to stay just to avert the brain drain that we are suffering.
There seems to be a contradiction on what they say and to what they ask us to do. They say that UP students should be nationalistic...should be patriotic...etc.... How do they plan to make us nationalistic...patriotic...by requiring us to stay. Magkasalungat diba?
If there will be a law that would require us to stay...nationalism pa rin ba kung magstay kami dito? Hindi na diba? Kasi hindi na bukal sa puso namin yung ginagawa namin. Hindi na namin pwedeng iclaim na nationalistic kami, kasi nag stay kami dito...eh in the first place, kaya naman sila nag stay eh dahil inutusan niyo kami mag stay.
You see, if you really want to see nationalism in this country, then hayaan natin ang mga taga-UP. They will serve this country. We will serve this country. Hindi niyo na kailangan pang iimpose sa amin na magsilbi kami.
Peace.
(Ang problema kasi sa atin, kapag hindi sa isang taga UP nanggagaling ang mga ganyang panukala o kapag wala sa Pilipinas ang nagsasab eh hindi dapat pakinggan at nagaalburoto sila na parang mga bata. :lol:)
On topic, :), Ang Supreme Court ay nagpalabas ng "Mandatory Continuing Legal Education" , si Miriam ay gumawa ng "Mandatory Computer Education and Training of Government Employees Act", parehas yan ay sapilitan na ang nasa isip ay pagpapaunlad ng kaalaman na gagamitin para sa pagsisilbi sa bayan. Magastos din hindi ba? Pero kung lagi kasi nating iisipin na pagsikil sa karapatang pantao ang salitang "mandatory", maghihintay lang tayo ng mga tao na ang totoong nasa isip ay "public service"
You forget yung context ng mga bagay-bagay!
Ang continuing legal education ay kinakailangan sa propesyon ng mga abogado dahil sa nature ng field nila. Yung computer education at training ng government employees naman ay kailangan para ma-empower ang mga manggagawa para mas efficient sila.
Yung mandatory na pag-stay ng medical professionals ay KINAKAILANGAN. Lahat tayo nag-aagree dun dahil magkocollapse na ang health system natin. Naiintindihan ng lahat yun!
Pero ang mandatory na pag-stay sa Pilipinas ng 2 taon ng mga graduates ng SUCs ay unfair, unwarranted and mas lalong unproductive. Wala siyang contexto na ginagalawan, unlike dun sa health system natin. OVERKILL ang proposal na yan na dapat saklaw lang naman ang medical professionals!
So bakit unproductive din? Dahil ang dapat message naman talaga natin ay magsilbi tayong lahat sa bayan, mas lalo na yung mga inaasahan at may natatanging responsibilidad. Yung mandatory na 2 years na pag-stay ay mas magrereinforce ng panget na mentality na selfish and limited. Siyempre, maiisip nung mga tao, "ay nakaserve na ako ng 2 years, sapat na yun na paninilbihan sa bayan, puede ko na gawin gusto ko." Ito ba gusto natin? Hindi ba mas maganda na i-inculcate natin sa mga bata na habang buhay dapat ang paninilbihan para sa iba, ang tulungan, dahil in the end, tayong lahat din ang magbebenefit at magwawagi dun?
Ang lakas mo magsabi ng mga bagay na "nagaalburoto sila na parang mga bata" pero yang mga remarks mo e napaka-childish at immature naman.
boy_wonder
Feb 5, 2008, 07:40 PM
Hindi lamang UP ang may obligasyon (if this is even the appropriate term) niyan. Obligasyon yan ng lahat ng paaralan.
Kaya naman, mas makabuluhan kung ang pagpapaluwag sa quota (meaning dadagdagan ang budget) ng UP ay sasabayan ng promotion of excellence at pagpapaigi ng instruction (or is it the curriculum?) ng UST! Though I think the latter should be easier and have been done centuries ago. :D
In the meantime, given the current brain drain situation and the promises of the WTO-GATS (remember that we have a president who is a WTO proponent) we, as tax payers, all have the right to dictate to all UP graduates and other alumni of state colleges and universities to stay and serve the country. It is their moral obligation to serve the country because their education had been subsidized by the taxes collected from us. [/I]
I would like to state my earlier point that the argument of UP graduates and other alumni of SCUs having this "moral" obligation, emanating from the fact that their education was subsidized by tax money, is problematic.
It is wrong to impose our will on other people just because we subsidized their education. Let us not forget that education is a right! The state has the responsibility of developing its citizens fully and providing opportunities for growth and learning. It doesn't necessarily follow that those who were directly funded OWE the government or other citizens their education. Do not confuse yourselves: education is the public good, not its graduates!
This "dictatorship," an imposition of will, goes against one of the basic tenets of democracy. People must be the masters of their own destiny!
The proposal also carries this notion that people who went to private schools are free to leave anytime and couldn't be asked to serve the country. No one is saying this but, nonetheless, in our minds, dichotomies are created. Of course, the best and brightest must recognize their natural obligation to serve others--that it is also in their best interest that society makes use of their talents. This proposal, however, would only make people see that studying in SCUs is a "burden." No one wants their actions curtailed! This is a natural reaction. Serving the nation shouldn't be seen as a burden. It is an obligation borne by everyone!
galileo_
Feb 5, 2008, 09:33 PM
sadly, I don't think this government is serious in curbing the migration of workers. The labor force...as what GMA said before, is the biggest export that we can produce. Our economy, given its current state would not stand if the government regulates the export of workers.
Mind you, even if the government regulates the number of OFW's, where will we put those people here? Saan sila magtratrabaho. Hindi direct implication na kung magstastay ang mga Pilipino dito, eh magdedevelop ang ibang mga industry. Tataas lang ang unemployment rate natin...ngayon pa nga lang eh short na tayo sa trabaho, paano pa kaya kung pipigilan nating umalis ang mga Pilipino.
the current situation (and i mean here the health care industry) dictates that we have to “ensure a steady maintenance of health human resources in all health facilities” (Dr. Jaime Tan on National Health Service Act). We are being selective here and it does not necessarily mean that it should cover all profession outside of the health care industry. So, i don’t think the economy would collapse if the National Heath Service Act is enacted.
Circular kasi yung problem, we have a shortage of health workers, kasi the government cannot support them, the government cannot support them kasi walang pera ang gobyerno, walang pera ang gobyerno kasi mabagal ang ekonomiya...paano aasenso ang ekonomiya sa setting natin ngayon?...eh di umasa sa mas mataas na remittance mula sa mga OFW, siyempre may iba pang paraan, stabilization, encourage capital, improve infrastracture...etc...pero puro long term yun, ang short term solution sa mga probblema natin eh OFW.
i find this reasoning rather old-fashioned. don’t you get tired of hearing “the government cannot support them; walang pera ang gobyerno; mahirap ang gobyerno; mabagal ang ekonomiya…?” are we forever doomed to be poor? i’ve been hearing this since Cory’s time. the current macroeconomic environment simply contradicts your argument.
ang problema kasi sa karamihan (at lalung-lalo na yung mga “mahilig mag-angat sa sarili”) eh ayaw tumanggap ng sweldong sapat; ang gusto eh malaki agad. bakit hindi magsakripisyo at isantabi muna ang pagpapapirata sa ibang bansa?
I fully agree to his call for nationalism among UP students. We UP students should bring back to our country whatever it has invested on us. But what bothers me is the way some people would insist that UP students should be forced to stay just to avert the brain drain that we are suffering.
There seems to be a contradiction on what they say and to what they ask us to do. They say that UP students should be nationalistic...should be patriotic...etc.... How do they plan to make us nationalistic...patriotic...by requiring us to stay. Magkasalungat diba?
My dear, patriotism is not exclusive to UP. Wala naman ako sinabi na Upians lang ang dapat meron nyan.
Sa sitwasyon na lumalala na ang kakulangan ng mga propesyonal sa health care industry ay marapat lang na pangunahan ng mga graduates ng UP at iba pang nagsipagtapos sa mga pampublikong unibersidad at kolehiyo ang mungkahing ito.
Ngayon, sa pansamantalang kakulangan ng batas (dapat maipasa ang National Health Service Act), ang konsiyensya o ang patriyotismo ang dapat iiral sa mga Upians na tulad ninyo na nakinabang o nakikinabang sa mga buwis na binabayad namin. Iyan eh kung may konsiyensya kayo.
It is the responsibility of the state to protect and promote the national interest. Democracy has its own defects. I agree with Washington Sycip when he said that the ideal model for rapid economic development is to have a strong and authoritarian political leadership. Freedom is not absolute. The United Nations and the World Bank in a study said that democracy is sustainable only if income levels are above $3,000 or $4,000.
math_techie
Feb 5, 2008, 10:46 PM
the current situation (and i mean here the health care industry) dictates that we have to “ensure a steady maintenance of health human resources in all health facilities” (Dr. Jaime Tan on National Health Service Act). We are being selective here and it does not necessarily mean that it should cover all profession outside of the health care industry. So, i don’t think the economy would collapse if the National Heath Service Act is enacted.
in your previous post you were talking about brain drain...so my reply was a general reply. Pero if we health care, sige. Bakit hindi na lang natin gawing general yung requirement...meaning everyone whio graduates from the medical field will be required to stay?
[/QUOTE]
The argument is the same since then, because we are still in the same environment. The country is still poor. And the only solution that we have right now is to keep on sending OFW's abroad. The 7.3 GDP growth is NOT because of good governance. The 7.3 % GDP growth is because of the OFW's (and partly because 2007 is an election year)...ergo, the regulating migration is surely a path to doom.
[QUOTE]
ang problema kasi sa karamihan (at lalung-lalo na yung mga “mahilig mag-angat sa sarili”) eh ayaw tumanggap ng sweldong sapat; ang gusto eh malaki agad. bakit hindi magsakripisyo at isantabi muna ang pagpapapirata sa ibang bansa?
define sweldong sapat? A regular nurse in a government hospital earns around 10 thousand a month. According to Ibon foundation, a filipino family needs more than 500 pesos a day to live decently. 500 pesos a day is 15 thousand a month. So sapat ba?
My dear, patriotism is not exclusive to UP. Wala naman ako sinabi na Upians lang ang dapat meron nyan.
Sa sitwasyon na lumalala na ang kakulangan ng mga propesyonal sa health care industry ay marapat lang na pangunahan ng mga graduates ng UP at iba pang nagsipagtapos sa mga pampublikong unibersidad at kolehiyo ang mungkahing ito.
Ngayon, sa pansamantalang kakulangan ng batas (dapat maipasa ang National Health Service Act), ang konsiyensya o ang patriyotismo ang dapat iiral sa mga Upians na tulad ninyo na nakinabang o nakikinabang sa mga buwis na binabayad namin. Iyan eh kung may konsiyensya kayo.
It is the responsibility of the state to protect and promote the national interest. Democracy has its own defects. I agree with Washington Sycip when he said that the ideal model for rapid economic development is to have a strong and authoritarian political leadership. Freedom is not absolute. The United Nations and the World Bank in a study said that democracy is sustainable only if income levels are above $3,000 or $4,000.
I agree that hindi lang UP students ang may monopolyo sa nationalism. And I agree na dapat nasyonalismo ang pairalin ng mga tao. What I am against is a law that will hinder our chance to be nationalistic.
Dacs
Feb 5, 2008, 10:53 PM
The arguments are getting convoluted so we need to sort these out.
There's this topic about the lack of health workers and the proposed solution for it.
And there's another topic of serving the country of people who graduated from SUCs.
I've given my 2 cents about the former. IMHO it's in our best interests to enforce it to all health workers, not only to SUC's products. By just enforcing it to SUCs, it gives the wrong message that graduates from other schools can actually get away with not rendering service to our country. It gives the wrong impression that only those who came from SUCs are only the ones who have the obligation to do this.
After all, this issue is everyone's responsibility.
On the latter, this has been said quite a number of times here. Different strokes for different folks. My idea of serving our country may be different from yours.
And going someplace else doesn't equate in ditching the country to the pits.
But to give you guys another perspective at things, UP is a state-subsidized university. And it's known that UP produces quality graduates. Time and time again.
This alone speaks volumes on how UP caters to the part in how we serve the country. By producing quality graduates that we can be proud of, both here and abroad.
After all, our taxpayer's money is being put to good use.
All my 2 cents. Sige guys, troll away! :lol:
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 12:01 AM
Yung mandatory na pag-stay ng medical professionals ay KINAKAILANGAN. Lahat tayo nag-aagree dun dahil magkocollapse na ang health system natin. Naiintindihan ng lahat yun!
Pero ang mandatory na pag-stay sa Pilipinas ng 2 taon ng mga graduates ng SUCs ay unfair, unwarranted and mas lalong unproductive. Wala siyang contexto na ginagalawan, unlike dun sa health system natin. OVERKILL ang proposal na yan na dapat saklaw lang naman ang medical professionals!
So bakit unproductive din? Dahil ang dapat message naman talaga natin ay magsilbi tayong lahat sa bayan, mas lalo na yung mga inaasahan at may natatanging responsibilidad. Yung mandatory na 2 years na pag-stay ay mas magrereinforce ng panget na mentality na selfish and limited. Siyempre, maiisip nung mga tao, "ay nakaserve na ako ng 2 years, sapat na yun na paninilbihan sa bayan, puede ko na gawin gusto ko." Ito ba gusto natin? Hindi ba mas maganda na i-inculcate natin sa mga bata na habang buhay dapat ang paninilbihan para sa iba, ang tulungan, dahil in the end, tayong lahat din ang magbebenefit at magwawagi dun?
Parang magulo yata ang mga sinabi mo.
Una sabi mo, "Yung mandatory na pag-stay ng medical professionals ay kinakailangan".
Tapos sinundutan mo naman ng "Pero ang mandatory na pag-stay sa Pilipinas ng 2 taon ng mga graduates ng SUCs ay unfair, unwarranted and mas lalong unproductive"
Paano magiging unproductive, unwarranted at unfair ang isang bagay na alam nating KAILANGAN nating lahat? Fair ba sa mga Pilipino na hindi sila magagamot dahil umalis ang mga manggagamot na hindi pinigilan? Fair ba sa mga bata na kulang sila sa bakuna dahil sarado ang mga Health Centers sa probinsya dahil sa kakulangan ng mga health workers?
Ulit mas gugustuhin ko pa na magpagamot, magpatingin at magpakonsulta sa mga Health Professionals kahit na ang unang nasa isip ay abroad at pangalawa na lang ang pagalingin ang kapwa. Kaysa naman mamatay na lang sa sakit na hindi man lang matingnan ng kahit sino.
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 12:23 AM
You forget yung context ng mga bagay-bagay!
Yung mandatory na pag-stay ng medical professionals ay KINAKAILANGAN. Lahat tayo nag-aagree dun dahil magkocollapse na ang health system natin. Naiintindihan ng lahat yun!
Pero ang mandatory na pag-stay sa Pilipinas ng 2 taon ng mga graduates ng SUCs ay unfair, unwarranted and mas lalong unproductive. Wala siyang contexto na ginagalawan, unlike dun sa health system natin. OVERKILL ang proposal na yan na dapat saklaw lang naman ang medical professionals!
Hmm, teka. Mukhang hindi yata tayo nagkakaintindihan.
Hindi ko sinabi na lahat ng UP at iba pang State Universities and Colleges grads ng ibang kurso maliban sa Health related courses ay magsilbi sa bayan. Ang pinaguusapn at lagi kong pinipilit ay ang tungkol sa 2 yr MANDATORY SERVICE para sa mga "Health Professionals"
Kung ikaw ay isang Management o Comerce at sa tingin mo ay kaya mong makipagsabayan sa labas at ayaw mo magsilbi sa bayan, eh di sumige? Pero ang mga Health and Medical Professionals natin, na alam natin na World Class at kailangan sa Pilipinas, pareho tayo na nagsasabing ang "MANDATORY" service ay kailangan dahil magcocollapse ang health system natin. Kaya nga dapat pangunahan nyo yang ganyan panawagan tutal malaki ang gastos sa inyo ng gobyerno na nanggagaling sa buwis nating lahat.
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 12:41 AM
It is wrong to impose our will on other people just because we subsidized their education. Let us not forget that education is a right! The state has the responsibility of developing its citizens fully and providing opportunities for growth and learning. It doesn't necessarily follow that those who were directly funded OWE the government or other citizens their education. Do not confuse yourselves: education is the public good, not its graduates!
This "dictatorship," an imposition of will, goes against one of the basic tenets of democracy. People must be the masters of their own destiny!
Wow, napakaingrata mo naman.
Mukhang kailangan yata natin dalhin ang bangkay ni John F. Kennedy sa Pilipinas, iikot sa lahat ng eskwelahan na maguumpisa at magtatapos sa UP.
Dictatorship? Dictatorship bang matatawag ang "TERMINATION OR BAN ON DEPLOYMENT OF MIGRANT WOKERS"?
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 01:17 AM
If there will be a law that would require us to stay...nationalism pa rin ba kung magstay kami dito? Hindi na diba? Kasi hindi na bukal sa puso namin yung ginagawa namin. Hindi na namin pwedeng iclaim na nationalistic kami, kasi nag stay kami dito...eh in the first place, kaya naman sila nag stay eh dahil inutusan niyo kami mag stay.
You see, if you really want to see nationalism in this country, then hayaan natin ang mga taga-UP. They will serve this country. We will serve this country. Hindi niyo na kailangan pang iimpose sa amin na magsilbi kami.
Peace.
Ouch! Para mo namang sinabi na ang mga sundalong nagsisilbi sa bayan ay hindi Nationalistic dahil inuutusan sila sa batas at obligasyon nila ang sumunod.
Balik sa krisis pangkalusugan. Sinabi nyo na "Education is a Right", eh ang UP Education ba.. a right? or a privelege?
Hindi namin kayo inaalisan ng karapatan na humingi ng dagdag na pondo sa gobyerno, sanay na kami sa gayan.
Pero kung may karapatan ang IILANG PILIPINO na pangalagaan at gastusan ng gobyerno ang kanilang EDUKASYON SA KOLEHIYO. May karapatan din ang LAHAT NA PILIPINO na pangalagaan at gastusan ng gobyerno ang kanilang KALUSUGAN. Kasama na dyan ang "access" sa medical and health workers
kiko17
Feb 6, 2008, 01:58 AM
tama ang sinabi mo na patriotism is not exclusive to UP...mabuti naman at may isa sa inyo na nakapansin nito...ang tanong ngayon, bakit kailangang iasa tangi sa UP ang pangangalaga ng bansa? manguna ba ika mo? yung mga panukala at mga mungkahing maghain ng batas para lunasan ang suliraning ito ay hindi ba galing sa mga taga UP? ang galing nyo nga mag-quote ng mga nasabi, hindi po ba? yung mga panawagan upang magsilbi, hindi po ba e galing din sa UP? alam namin ang aming tungkulin, ang tanong ngayon, alam nyo ba ang sa inyo? o kuntento na lang kayo bilang tagamasid at taga-puna...eto catholic teaching for your royal and pontifical self, "he who has not sinned cast the first stone." e halos mapuno ng mga ka-eskwela mo ang MD Anderson, Baylor, at UT Hospitals.
nakinabang kami sa buwis NYO? at bakit ikaw lang ba ang nagbabayad ng buwis? si kuya naman kung makapagsalita e akala mo buwis nya lang ang nagpapatakbo ng ekonomiya ng pilipinas, sorry tatlo pala kayo kasama nung 2 pang kasamahan mo, na kung makaangkin-angkin ng buwis e akala mo sila lang nagbabayad ng buwis...LOL, peace tayo kuya ha? feeling ko lang kasi mas malaki naman ang buwis na binabayad ko pero hindi naman ako nag-mamaktol tulad nyo...
habang hindi ka natututong lumipad at gumagamit pa din ng mga daan, e nakikinabang ka din sa buwis KO! using you're line of thinking, hindi ba dapat e magsilbi ka din dahil nakikigamit ka lang din ng mga daang naitayo sa tulong ng buwis ko? pakisagot ha?
off topic: hi sa maga taga-canada jan! balita ko nag -40 daw jan last week. tama ba _SCUD_?
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 09:51 AM
alam namin ang aming tungkulin, ang tanong ngayon, alam nyo ba ang sa inyo? o kuntento na lang kayo bilang tagamasid at taga-puna...eto catholic teaching for your royal and pontifical self, "he who has not sinned cast the first stone." e halos mapuno ng mga ka-eskwela mo ang MD Anderson, Baylor, at UT Hospitals.
off topic: hi sa maga taga-canada jan! balita ko nag -40 daw jan last week. tama ba _SCUD_?
Napupuno rin pala ng mga Thomasians ang mga ospital dyan sa US?
Dito rin sa Canada halos lahat mga Tomasinong Health Workers ang nagsisilbi. Kaya kilalang kilala ang UST dito sa Canada (Vancouver nga pala ako at -3 lang last week) dahil ang mga nurses at iba pang health workers dito ay may puso, matatalino, skilled at may matibay na WORK EXPERIENCE na nakuha nila mula sa Pilipinas.
Malaking bagay din nga pala na mataas ang QUANTITY ng mga qualified health workers ang iniiaambag ng UST sa bansa. Kaya sa 400 na graduates, kahit 200 lang ang maiwan sa Pilipinas at 200 ang mag-abroad, malaking tuling pa rin.
Wow, napakaingrata mo naman.
Mukhang kailangan yata natin dalhin ang bangkay ni John F. Kennedy sa Pilipinas, iikot sa lahat ng eskwelahan na maguumpisa at magtatapos sa UP.
Dictatorship? Dictatorship bang matatawag ang "TERMINATION OR BAN ON DEPLOYMENT OF MIGRANT WOKERS"?
Ingrata? Paano ako naging ingrata? Ang galing nyo magsabi ng mga ganyang bagay pero di nyo naman po lubos na naiintindihan. :rolleyes:
Ang rami nyong sinasabi pero wala namang value na ina-add dito sa diskusyon. Tingnan nyo nga yung arguments nyo mula umpisa tapos tingnan nyo kung paano nag-develop yung discussion. Walang progress sa part nyo po! :bop:
At saka po, wala pong magulo sa part namin. Baka kayo nagugulhan dahil besieged na kayo. Kung i-deconstruct natin mga sagot ninyo e napaka-gulo. Lagi kayong nag-iinsert ng ibang sinasabi o nag-dedepart bigla. Hindi ninyo ina-attack mismo yung arguments. Tapos mamaya uulitin nyo naman mga nauna nang sinabi ng mga tao.
Puro kayo hirit. Puro kayo talak. :bop:
la_flash
Feb 6, 2008, 11:04 AM
college education is not a right, but a privelege. it was already discussed before.
if you're given a privelege for a UP education, then something must be expected from you, in return.
I agree to this 2year mandatory service of Health Professionals. Serve the Filipino people first, before you serve outside of the country. It's only the way to solve our current problem in health services in our country. The lack of doctors, nurses especially in rural areas is quite a pity.
What about the other graduates from other universities? They are also enjoined to serve the country first. I don't know if the government can make them stay here for two years, because we all know that the government did not subsidize their education. But if the government can do just that, then well and good. :D
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 11:52 AM
^^ Ay? ang ibig pala sabihin hindi mo nakuha ang sinabi ko tungkol kay John F. Kennedy. Ano ba tagalog ng "read between the lines" ?
Sensya na ha, akala ko kasi alam ng lahat ng mga isko ang tungkol kay JFK at sa kanyang pamosong "speech"
Palagay ko talaga, ikaw ang hindi makaintindi :)
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 12:13 PM
I've given my 2 cents about the former. IMHO it's in our best interests to enforce it to all health workers, not only to SUC's products. By just enforcing it to SUCs, it gives the wrong message that graduates from other schools can actually get away with not rendering service to our country. It gives the wrong impression that only those who came from SUCs are only the ones who have the obligation to do this.
Aba'y mabuti naman at nagkaintindihan. Meron ba nagsabi na SUC grads lang ang dapat na magsilbi at lagyan ng Mandatory Service? Kung may maiprisinta kayo na posts na sinabi namin na UP lang ang dapat magsilbi ay ipost nyo nga :)
Paulit ulit, pero eto nga ang proposal sa National Health Service Act na si Dr. Tan na rin nga ang nagsabi
1) Mandatory Service sa mga SUC grads gaya ng UP na katumbas ng subsidiya sa kanila ng gobyerno, ayon sa survey OK na ang 2 years.
2) Mandatory Service sa mga private grads depende kung ilan taon ang mapagkasunduan nila.
^^ Alam mo kahit wala yung "ask not" na speech ni JFK, kuhang kuha na namin punto na yun sa Oblation pa lang. 1935 may konsepto na ng Oblation, 1961 pa naganap yung speech ni JFK. Wala kang moral ascendancy sa pagsabi niyan. :bop:
Halata naman kahit mismong mga linya na binibitiw ng mga tao e di mo nga magets. Di ko nga alam kung bakit pinapatulan ko rin mga sinasabi mo. :rotflmao:
---
And dun sa college education is a privilege chorva, debatable yun!
Sabi sa 1987 constitution:
Section 17. The State shall give priority to education, science and technology, arts, culture, and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism, accelerate social progress, and promote total human liberation and development.
Kasamang-kasama na dito yung advanced knowledge na galing sa higher education. Hindi puedeng mag-stop lang sa secondary education ang sinasabing promotion ng "total human liberation and development." Mas lalo sa isang global knowledge economy, mas kinakailangan pa nga ngayon na i-develop ang human resources ng bansa. Hindi pa nga sapat ang current education system kung saan grumagradweyt na tayo ng 16 habang sa ibang bansa e 18. Marami ng pag-aaral tungkol dito at may plano na nga ang DECS na dagdagan pa ng isang taon ang basic education system.
If I knew better, ayaw lang siguro gastusan ng mga taga-GOVERNMENT ang higher education para lang mas marami mapunta sa mga bulsa nila. Wag tayong *****. :grrr:
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 10:41 PM
^ Uy teka, mesyado ka naging advance sa Philippine Constitution.
Pinuntahan mo agad ang Section 17 at nilaktawan mo ang iba, dagdagan ko lang.
Section 4. The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the people. The Government may call upon the people to defend the State and, in the fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under conditions provided by law, to render personal, military or civil service.
Section 13. The State recognizes the vital role of the youth in nation-building and shall promote and protect their physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual, and social well-being. It shall inculcate in the youth patriotism and nationalism, and encourage their involvement in public and civic affairs.
Section 15. The State shall protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.
Naku, pano 'tong "right to health of the people"? Wala nang mag-aalaga sa kanila dahil ubos na ang mga health workers
_SCUD_
Feb 6, 2008, 10:53 PM
At ito pa ang aking pinakapaboritong seksyon sa Konstitusyon na makikita sa Bill of Rights. Para naman sa mga nagsasabing mayron sila "right to travel" kahit pa pinag-aral sila ng mga "Filipino Citizens" na dapat lamang nilang pagsilbihan..
Section 6. The liberty of abode and of changing the same within the limits prescribed by law shall not be impaired except upon lawful order of the court. Neither shall the right to travel be impaired except in the interest of national security, public safety, or public health, as may be provided by law.
Kailangan talagang maging batas na ang National Health Service Act para maging pormal na ang MANDATORY SERVICE
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 6, 2008, 11:10 PM
Mukhang 'yung self-proclaimed leaders natin ay ayaw akuin at maging ehemplo sa panawagan na mag-silbi muna sa bayan at talagang hindi sila kikilos kung hindi rin kikilos ang kanilang binansagang "followers" (Nasaan na ang linya niyo na "We lead, you follow?").
Bakit kayong upians lang? O, bakit hindi? Eh kayo itong palaging nag-mamagaling, nagli-lider-lideran, at nag-tatapang-tapangan kaya hindi ninyo maaalis sa mga tinatawag niyong "followers" na kayo ang dapat asahan at makakitaan ng inisyatibo at pag-kalinga sa bayan.
Hindi ba kayo mahihiya at kikilabutan niyan kung ang mga taga-UST o La Salle o St. Mary's Academy of Meycauayan, Bulacan ang mangunguna sa panukalang maging mandatory ang pagsisilbi sa bayan? Bakit pa kaakibat ninyo ang pangalan ng Filipinas kung kayo mismo ay bahag ang buntot at nagkukumahog makakita agad ng isnow at gumawa ng Frosty da Isnowman?
Saan naman ang hustisya niyan?
At sa mga nagsasabing kailangan ng bawa't isa sa atin ang magkaroon ng kalayaan sa pag-pili kung ano ang dapat gawin natin sa buhay natin ay magsi-tigil nga kayo! Sa panahon na may dagok sa buhay ng ating sambayanan (giyera, tag-gutom, tag-tuyot, o brain drain) ay kailangan lang na ipakita rin ninyo at pangunahan ang pag-sisilbi sa bayan!
Na-sad ako talaga sa pag-iisip ng mga upian.
:(
Dacs
Feb 6, 2008, 11:20 PM
Aba'y mabuti naman at nagkaintindihan. Meron ba nagsabi na SUC grads lang ang dapat na magsilbi at lagyan ng Mandatory Service? Kung may maiprisinta kayo na posts na sinabi namin na UP lang ang dapat magsilbi ay ipost nyo nga :)
Paulit ulit, pero eto nga ang proposal sa National Health Service Act na si Dr. Tan na rin nga ang nagsabi
1) Mandatory Service sa mga SUC grads gaya ng UP na katumbas ng subsidiya sa kanila ng gobyerno, ayon sa survey OK na ang 2 years.
2) Mandatory Service sa mga private grads depende kung ilan taon ang mapagkasunduan nila.
Pabor ako dyan, gagawa ng modified scheme ang mga private schools para magsilbi muna sa bayan ang mga graduates. Pwede silang pakiusapan na magsilbi ng 1 yr and 11months.
Granted that this can be interpreted in a number of ways, but as far as I know, pakiusapan is hardly what I call mandatory.
Anyhow, I think it's still better just to place this requirement in obtaining a license.
They won't be able to go abroad anyway without it. Para lahat ng gusto magka license dadaan dito.
boy_wonder
Feb 6, 2008, 11:26 PM
Kawawang JM Tuazon, tulad nina Tan at Roman, ay mukhang nagsasalita rin ito sa butas na basket. :shrug:
Gising upians sa PEx! Imulat ang mga mata at magsilbi sa bayan! Tigilan na ang mga "Freedom! Freedom!" na linya't mas unahin ang isyu ng brain drain sa Filipinas. Ibalik niyo muna ang inabono sa inyo ng bayan bago kayo mag-kumahog makakita ng isnow at gumawa ng Frosty da Snowman.
'Yan ay kung may konsensiya kayo.
:)
Gusto mong mag-apply?:lol:
math_techie
Feb 7, 2008, 01:39 AM
Ouch! Para mo namang sinabi na ang mga sundalong nagsisilbi sa bayan ay hindi Nationalistic dahil inuutusan sila sa batas at obligasyon nila ang sumunod.
Balik sa krisis pangkalusugan. Sinabi nyo na "Education is a Right", eh ang UP Education ba.. a right? or a privelege?
Hindi namin kayo inaalisan ng karapatan na humingi ng dagdag na pondo sa gobyerno, sanay na kami sa gayan.
Pero kung may karapatan ang IILANG PILIPINO na pangalagaan at gastusan ng gobyerno ang kanilang EDUKASYON SA KOLEHIYO. May karapatan din ang LAHAT NA PILIPINO na pangalagaan at gastusan ng gobyerno ang kanilang KALUSUGAN. Kasama na dyan ang "access" sa medical and health workers
it is different, kasi they chose to be soldiers...and they know that their primary role nila is to serve the country. This is different with health workers, since most of those who chose to enter the medical field chose to because they want to earn (although some would want to serve).
question: I don't want to stay here in the Philippines, pero the government requires me to stay, therefore I stayed here...do you call that nationalism? Is it love for country?
kiko17
Feb 7, 2008, 05:37 AM
Napupuno rin pala ng mga Thomasians ang mga ospital dyan sa US?
Dito rin sa Canada halos lahat mga Tomasinong Health Workers ang nagsisilbi. Kaya kilalang kilala ang UST dito sa Canada (Vancouver nga pala ako at -3 lang last week) dahil ang mga nurses at iba pang health workers dito ay may puso, matatalino, skilled at may matibay na WORK EXPERIENCE na nakuha nila mula sa Pilipinas.
Malaking bagay din nga pala na mataas ang QUANTITY ng mga qualified health workers ang iniiaambag ng UST sa bansa. Kaya sa 400 na graduates, kahit 200 lang ang maiwan sa Pilipinas at 200 ang mag-abroad, malaking tuling pa rin.
sobra naman ata ang bilib mo sa UP. akala mo siguro e pagkagraduate e kinabukasan ay fly na ang mga lola nyo...kumukuha din syempre ng experience yan. may mga requirements such as testing, accreditation, etc. hindi po ba? ang lolo mo naman! at wag kunin sa literal na konteksto ang sinabi kong napupuno ang mga ospital. ang ibig ko lang sabihin e mga ka-uri mo ang nauunang magkumahog mangibang-bayan. do i need to spell it out clearer? sabihin mo lang. kaya wag sanang magparatang nang basta-basta na atat ang mga taga UP mangibang-bayan. kuha mo na po ba?
wala namang nang-mamaliit sa kakayahan nyong tumulong, kayo lang tong kung makasumbat-sumbat e akala mo kung sinong walang sala. hence the whole reason for this thread. hindi po ba?
so ang tanong ngayon, kuntento ka na lang ba bilang tagamasid at tagapuna?
my friend are in edmonton, i don't know if i heard him correctly. he might as well have said -14. i'll be in vancouver for a few days next week on business. i'll be more than happy to let you inside the mind of a UP alum. you seem to have misguided notions regarding us. who know, baka ikaw din misunderstood lang. =)
cretinous00
Feb 7, 2008, 06:50 AM
Why are there far more UP graduates appointed or elected to high government positions than Thomasians and Ateneans? Is it because of a stronger desire to serve or greater abilities? :glee:
kapitangkiko
Feb 7, 2008, 07:58 PM
Di ko naman makuha ang logic nung Serving = Staying. Parang porke umalis ka ng Pilipinas ibig sabihin hindi ka na nagssisilbi sa bayan. What is the point of calling OFW's bagong bayani ng bayan (not that I agree with it) if leaving the country means forsaking her?
I have a friend who went to UP for pre-med and med and who's eventually become a medical specialist in the US. He's done a lot of research on Alzheimer's and stroke there and has issued quite a number of publications on the matter. He has been awarded multi-million dollar research grants which he'd put to good use. He now comes back to the Philippines to share what he's learned from the US.
Did he stop serving the country when he left? Is he not serving the country now? Did someone who stayed and became a barrio doctor serve the country better than my friend did?
Maybe. I think though that only a petty mind would say that my friend did not serve or is not serving the country because he didn't stay after he graduated.
Jernat
Feb 8, 2008, 09:54 AM
Mukhang 'yung self-proclaimed leaders natin ay ayaw akuin at maging ehemplo sa panawagan na mag-silbi muna sa bayan at talagang hindi sila kikilos kung hindi rin kikilos ang kanilang binansagang "followers" (Nasaan na ang linya niyo na "We lead, you follow?").
Bakit kayong upians lang? O, bakit hindi? Eh kayo itong palaging nag-mamagaling, nagli-lider-lideran, at nag-tatapang-tapangan kaya hindi ninyo maaalis sa mga tinatawag niyong "followers" na kayo ang dapat asahan at makakitaan ng inisyatibo at pag-kalinga sa bayan.
Hindi ba kayo mahihiya at kikilabutan niyan kung ang mga taga-UST o La Salle o St. Mary's Academy of Meycauayan, Bulacan ang mangunguna sa panukalang maging mandatory ang pagsisilbi sa bayan? Bakit pa kaakibat ninyo ang pangalan ng Filipinas kung kayo mismo ay bahag ang buntot at nagkukumahog makakita agad ng isnow at gumawa ng Frosty da Isnowman?
Na-sad ako talaga sa pag-iisip ng mga upian.
:(
Ay, hindi ba taga-UP sina Pres. Roman at Dr. Tan na paulit-ulit nyong binanggit sa thread na 'to? Kuya naman, kung makapag-generalize parang walang pinag-aralan. Saan ka ba grad uli? Hindi ka ba nahihiya? :laugh:
tantararantaran
Feb 8, 2008, 08:43 PM
At ito pa ang aking pinakapaboritong seksyon sa Konstitusyon na makikita sa Bill of Rights. Para naman sa mga nagsasabing mayron sila "right to travel" kahit pa pinag-aral sila ng mga "Filipino Citizens" na dapat lamang nilang pagsilbihan..
Section 6. The liberty of abode and of changing the same within the limits prescribed by law shall not be impaired except upon lawful order of the court. Neither shall the right to travel be impaired except in the interest of national security, public safety, or public health, as may be provided by law.
Kailangan talagang maging batas na ang National Health Service Act para maging pormal na ang MANDATORY SERVICE
I think ang context nung public health is if the traveling would bring imminent danger to the community (e.g. may sars yung tao, for example), his right to travel is impaired. Kasi yun yung context ng national security and public safety (read: jail). Kailangan nila lahat idetain in a place, one way or another. The public health issue discussed here is totally of a different context than that which is described by the abovementioned section.
I might be wrong though, as I'm far from being a lawyer (even farther from being a lawmaker). But I'm pretty sure the statement is out of context. Just my two-cents worth.
_SCUD_
Feb 8, 2008, 10:34 PM
question: I don't want to stay here in the Philippines, pero the government requires me to stay, therefore I stayed here...do you call that nationalism? Is it love for country?
DUTY ang tawag dyan, o kaya naman obligasyon sa bayan. Kung halimbawang may giyera at kailangan ng bansa ang mga marunong mag-martsa sa ROTC, suunod ka sa ayaw mo o sa gusto.
Kumbaga sa "ask not" Inaugural Speech ni JFK, yan yung "what you can do for your country"
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 8, 2008, 10:43 PM
Engot pala sina Tan at Roman kung ang konsepto nila ng paghikayat sa mga upian na 'wag munang umalis ng ating inang bayan upang pag-silbihan ito ay mali.
:shrug:
_SCUD_
Feb 8, 2008, 10:44 PM
Why are there far more UP graduates appointed or elected to high government positions than Thomasians and Ateneans? Is it because of a stronger desire to serve or greater abilities? :glee:
"KONEKSYON"
Pansin ko nga rin yan eh, kulang ng mga Tomasino kagaya ni Jun Lozada ang nasa mataas ma tungkulin sa bansa.
Pero tingnan mo ha, ano na ba ang kalagayan ng Pilipinas ngayon sa ilalim ng mga "UP graduates appointed or elected to high government positions?"
_SCUD_
Feb 8, 2008, 11:04 PM
I think ang context nung public health is if the traveling would bring imminent danger to the community (e.g. may sars yung tao, for example), his right to travel is impaired. Kasi yun yung context ng national security and public safety (read: jail). Kailangan nila lahat idetain in a place, one way or another. The public health issue discussed here is totally of a different context than that which is described by the abovementioned section.
I might be wrong though, as I'm far from being a lawyer (even farther from being a lawmaker). But I'm pretty sure the statement is out of context. Just my two-cents worth.
Mali, malinaw na sa Saligang Batas ang salitang "in the interest of national security, public safety and public health" . Hindi na natin kailangan maghintay ng "imminent danger" dahil kahapon pa nangyari yan, marami nang nagsarang ospital sa Mindanao dahil sa kakulangan ng health workers.
Nagawa na natin ang "BAN ON DEPLOYMENT" sa mga piloto nung 90's. Nasa batas yan.
cretinous00
Feb 9, 2008, 10:31 AM
"KONEKSYON"
Pansin ko nga rin yan eh, kulang ng mga Tomasino kagaya ni Jun Lozada ang nasa mataas ma tungkulin sa bansa.
Pero tingnan mo ha, ano na ba ang kalagayan ng Pilipinas ngayon sa ilalim ng mga "UP graduates appointed or elected to high government positions?"
So i'll take your your asnwer to be, "UP graduates show greater ability to be appointed/elected to high positions than both Ateneans and Thomasians. However, they fall short of improving a country wherein UP graduates are (unfortunately) a decided minority."
Alright my dear UPians, the people have spoken. It's time to look beyond proving you're better than the rest. That issue is celebrating its centennial this year :glee: It's time to build this great nation despite budget cuts for our education, whining tax payers, and limited human resources outside of our University's "sphere of influence." :glee:
ONWARD YE SCHOLARS OF THE NATION!
math_techie
Feb 9, 2008, 02:29 PM
DUTY ang tawag dyan, o kaya naman obligasyon sa bayan. Kung halimbawang may giyera at kailangan ng bansa ang mga marunong mag-martsa sa ROTC, suunod ka sa ayaw mo o sa gusto.
Kumbaga sa "ask not" Inaugural Speech ni JFK, yan yung "what you can do for your country"
so hindi nationalism yun diba?
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 9, 2008, 10:09 PM
So i'll take your your asnwer to be, "UP graduates show greater ability to be appointed/elected to high positions than both Ateneans and Thomasians. However, they fall short of improving a country wherein UP graduates are (unfortunately) a decided minority."
My apprentice, correction: "...greater ability to be appointed/elected to high positions to lapastangan the kaban ng bayan." :lol:
In a way, I like the idea of the "kakapiranggot gradweyts" of up. Lesser "pasaway ng bayan" every year, ika nga. *okay*
On-topic: So now it's clear that upians would rather "make tampisaw in da isnow" than stay in our barrios and take care of our sick kababayans.
Puwede na sigurong isara ang sinulid na ito kung ganun nga.
:shrug:
_SCUD_
Feb 10, 2008, 11:19 AM
so hindi nationalism yun diba?
Pwede mong sabihin na magkaiba ang Nasyonalismo at simpleng Paglilingkod sa Bayan.
Pero kung tunay nga tayong may malasakit sa bayan, mas gusto ko pang tawagin na "Public Servant" kesa tawaging "Nationalistic at Patriotic" sa isip lang at salita.
_SCUD_
Feb 10, 2008, 11:42 AM
Sa akin ok lang kung kakapirangot o kasindami ng ibang eskwelahan ang mga graduates na naiiambag nila sa bayan. Ang importante ay magsilbi muna sila. Pagkatapos ng 2 taon ay pwede na silang maglaho sa Pilipinas, para hindi na makapaminsala pa sa inang bayan na gaya ng ginagawa ng mga "appointed/elected offcials na iskolar ng bayan"
Napatunayan lang natin na ang kanilang "motitto" (mumunting motto) na "We lead, you follow" ay isang malaking kalokohan na isinisigaw nila habang paakyat ng eroplano o habang nakapila sa Disneyland.
tantararantaran
Feb 10, 2008, 02:43 PM
Mali, malinaw na sa Saligang Batas ang salitang "in the interest of national security, public safety and public health" . Hindi na natin kailangan maghintay ng "imminent danger" dahil kahapon pa nangyari yan, marami nang nagsarang ospital sa Mindanao dahil sa kakulangan ng health workers.
Nagawa na natin ang "BAN ON DEPLOYMENT" sa mga piloto nung 90's. Nasa batas yan.
Can you please quote an annotated text of the said section from a credible author to clarify the lawmakers' intention when the said provision was drafted? Only then will I believe that the said section is in context with what is described here.
In case you haven't noticed, It's the argument that I'm attacking, not your stand on the issue. The laws are subject to interpretation, and can very well be taken out of context when presented in argumentations such as this. In any case, the lawmaking body can very well draft another law which will satisfy your apparent craving for Filipinos to mandatorily work here in the country, and it is another story. At the end of the day, it is the contextualization of the arguments that i am after, not exactly whether your or anyone else's stand is right or wrong. Thanks if you can present your annotated bill.
Mr. Yo
Feb 10, 2008, 04:56 PM
Kung mandatory na pag-stay dahil sa kakulangan ng health workers sa Pilipinas ang pag-uusapan, hindi siguro "Paglilingkod sa Bayan" ang dapat na title ng thread na ito dahil hindi lang naman ang pagtatrabaho dito ang tanging paraan ng pagtulong sa bayan. Bakit ba ine-equate ang paglilingkod sa bayan sa pag-stay sa Pilipinas?
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 10, 2008, 10:20 PM
Sa akin ok lang kung kakapirangot o kasindami ng ibang eskwelahan ang mga graduates na naiiambag nila sa bayan. Ang importante ay magsilbi muna sila. Pagkatapos ng 2 taon ay pwede na silang maglaho sa Pilipinas, para hindi na makapaminsala pa sa inang bayan na gaya ng ginagawa ng mga "appointed/elected offcials na iskolar ng bayan"
Napatunayan lang natin na ang kanilang "motitto" (mumunting motto) na "We lead, you follow" ay isang malaking kalokohan na isinisigaw nila habang paakyat ng eroplano o habang nakapila sa Disneyland.
Wala, labas ilong 'yang "motitto" na 'yan. Dapat 'yan "You lead, we lead" na 'ata.
Sa palagay ko ay napakasarap ng pakiramdam nung bago pumila sa Disneyland at makita sina Mickey at Minnie Mouse ay ginamot o napag-bentahan muna ng gamot 'yung mga nakapilang mahihirap na Filipino.
:)
kapitangkiko
Feb 11, 2008, 03:00 PM
I think a narrow mind equates Medicine - the profession - to "manggamot" or "magbenta ng gamot".
There's a heck of a lot more to the medical profession, including nursing, pharmacy, etc., than "taking care of sick people" just as there's a heck of a lot more ways for a doctor to serve the country than by dispensing prescriptions to our sick countrymen.
Parang yung thinking na you need a mechanical engineer to repair your car. :rolleyes:
Viva La Tigresa
Feb 11, 2008, 03:48 PM
^ You obviously didn't get the point.
They used it as an example but they don't mean to confine the issue to doctors, pharmacists alone, ok?
Ang isyu ng paglilingkod sa bayan ay para sa ating lahat, inhinyero ka man o arkitekto o taga-benta ng gamot sa Mercury Drug. Kaya ikaw, kung maka-graduate ka, 'wag ka muna maging excited magpunta sa labas ng Pinas para magtrabaho dun. Sa Pilipinas ka muna para naman magkaron ka ng silbi sa iyong bansang sinilangan. ;)
paenggoy
Feb 11, 2008, 03:54 PM
About the claim that education is a right (which implies that UP graduates may work outside the country) I think the right refers only to primary and secondary education; at least that's what appears in the Constitution.
It was mentioned earlier that proof has to be shown that most public tertiary ed students work in the private sector or abroad. I think the need for proof works for both sides, i.e., it has to be shown that most don't. And proof should probably be in the form of statistical information with links to reputable online sites or biblio info.
Finally, indeed, there should be other ways of providing training to people without the need for a college or university education. Other countries concentrate on shorter-term vocational and technical training to fulfill the same needs.
kapitangkiko
Feb 11, 2008, 05:39 PM
^ You obviously didn't get the point.
They used it as an example but they don't mean to confine the issue to doctors, pharmacists alone, ok?
Ang isyu ng paglilingkod sa bayan ay para sa ating lahat, inhinyero ka man o arkitekto o taga-benta ng gamot sa Mercury Drug. Kaya ikaw, kung maka-graduate ka, 'wag ka muna maging excited magpunta sa labas ng Pinas para magtrabaho dun. Sa Pilipinas ka muna para naman magkaron ka ng silbi sa iyong bansang sinilangan. ;)Missed the point? I don't think so. Kaya nga I generalized it to include doctors and nurses and pharmacists and engineers.
Can you tell me in simple words kung paanong ang hindi pag-alis sa Pilipinas ay paglilingkod sa bayan?
Dacs
Feb 11, 2008, 09:14 PM
Apparently, some statements of some pexers here must be taken as bible truth.
The hell with statistics :naughty:
n3X
Feb 11, 2008, 10:07 PM
About the claim that education is a right (which implies that UP graduates may work outside the country) I think the right refers only to primary and secondary education; at least that's what appears in the Constitution.
read again.
kapitangkiko
Feb 12, 2008, 01:51 AM
Sa Pilipinas ka muna para naman magkaron ka ng silbi sa iyong bansang sinilangan. ;)
Pakipaliwanag na rin kung paanong ang pag-alis ng Pilipinas ay pagiging walang silbi sa bayang sinilangan.
i don't think I'm the one missing the point. :rolleyes:
math_techie
Feb 12, 2008, 02:34 AM
Pwede mong sabihin na magkaiba ang Nasyonalismo at simpleng Paglilingkod sa Bayan.
Pero kung tunay nga tayong may malasakit sa bayan, mas gusto ko pang tawagin na "Public Servant" kesa tawaging "Nationalistic at Patriotic" sa isip lang at salita.
para sa akin paglilinkod sa bayan is different from nationalism. paglilinkod sa bayan is serving ones country, and as far as I know, everyone has the duty to serve this country.
nationalism/patriotism denotes love of country.
we may serve this country, but not be called as patriotic or nationalistic.
MY question is this, what are you asking from SUC graduates, nationalism or service to our country?
Galvantic@STS
Feb 12, 2008, 04:42 AM
'yung mga DOST scholars 'di ba may government bond sila?
they are not allowed to work outside the Philippines for like 2 years?
thanks.
:)
boy_wonder
Feb 12, 2008, 07:19 AM
Some people don't go out of the country because they simply can't. Ganun lang naman yun. But given the opportunity, malamang lang e papatulan din yan.
But that's only beside the point that national service is not state-bound and that staying in the country does not automatically qualify the action as being nationalistic.
Well, kanya-kanyang values lang din talaga 'yan. The important thing is we all sincerely aim to serve the country- in the best way we think we can.
la_flash
Feb 12, 2008, 09:27 AM
About the claim that education is a right (which implies that UP graduates may work outside the country) I think the right refers only to primary and secondary education; at least that's what appears in the Constitution.
obviously n3x doesn't know that.
Tertiary education is not a right but a privelege. If it's a right, then just everybody can get into a university, at least a private one at that, without fear of being not qualified. :rolleyes: Compare that to primary and secondary education wherein the public schools cannot just turn away students because it's their right to acquire education. :rolleyes: Now n3x, if you still didn't get that, i don't know what explanation do you need. At least some UPian did... :lol:
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 12, 2008, 10:44 PM
'yung mga DOST scholars 'di ba may government bond sila?
they are not allowed to work outside the Philippines for like 2 years?
thanks.
:)
Yup. Ipit ka sa NAIA kapag nagtangka kang mag-tampisaw sa isnow nang hindi mo pa napapagsilbihan ang nag-abono sa pag-aaral mo.
Dapat gayahin ang DOST. Mukhang epektib eh.
:)
_SCUD_
Feb 12, 2008, 11:32 PM
Can you please quote an annotated text of the said section from a credible author to clarify the lawmakers' intention when the said provision was drafted? Only then will I believe that the said section is in context with what is described here.
In case you haven't noticed, It's the argument that I'm attacking, not your stand on the issue. The laws are subject to interpretation, and can very well be taken out of context when presented in argumentations such as this. In any case, the lawmaking body can very well draft another law which will satisfy your apparent craving for Filipinos to mandatorily work here in the country, and it is another story. At the end of the day, it is the contextualization of the arguments that i am after, not exactly whether your or anyone else's stand is right or wrong. Thanks if you can present your annotated bill.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8042
Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995
SEC. 4. Deployment of Migrant Workers - The State shall deploy overseas Filipino workers only in countries where the rights of Filipino migrant workers are protected. The government recognizes any of the following as guarantee on the part of the receiving country for the protection and the rights of overseas Filipino workers:
(a) It has existing labor and social laws protecting the rights of migrant workers;
(b) It is a signatory to multilateral conventions, declaration or resolutions relating to the protection of migrant workers;
(c) It has concluded a bilateral agreement or arrangement with the government protecting the rights of overseas Filipino workers; and
(d) It is taking positive, concrete measures to protect the rights of migrant workers.
SEC. 5. TERMINATION OR BAN ON DEPLOYMENT - Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 hereof, the government, in pursuit of the national interest or when public welfare so requires, may, at any time, terminate or impose a ban on the deployment of migrant workers.
Wag na natin iliko-liko pa ang usapan tungkol sa Ban on Deployment dahil nasa batas na yan. Kaya nagkakaproblema tayo sa Pilipinas dahil sa daming gustong magbigay ng interpretasyon sa batas para lang makalusot.
_SCUD_
Feb 12, 2008, 11:41 PM
para sa akin paglilinkod sa bayan is different from nationalism. paglilinkod sa bayan is serving ones country, and as far as I know, everyone has the duty to serve this country.
nationalism/patriotism denotes love of country.
we may serve this country, but not be called as patriotic or nationalistic.
MY question is this, what are you asking from SUC graduates, nationalism or service to our country?
Naku, para naman yang yung sinusulat ko sa slambook nung highchool, "Sometimes Love Just Ain't Enough"
Anong mapapala ng mga tao sa mga SUC grads na nagsasabing nationalistic at patritotic sila, eh madaling gumawa ng mga ganyang slogan eh. In the service of the Filipinos worldwide.. Karangalan po namin ang maglingkod sa Bayan..Serbisyong totoo saan man panig ng mundo
Sa usang banda mas masarap pakinggan ang mga ganyan kahit salita lang.
n3X
Feb 13, 2008, 03:18 AM
obviously n3x doesn't know that.
Tertiary education is not a right but a privelege. If it's a right, then just everybody can get into a university, at least a private one at that, without fear of being not qualified. :rolleyes: Compare that to primary and secondary education wherein the public schools cannot just turn away students because it's their right to acquire education. :rolleyes: Now n3x, if you still didn't get that, i don't know what explanation do you need. At least some UPian did... :lol:
hahaha alam mo this is not my first discussion on this topic. puede ba, *** yung may kailangan ng marami pang explanations. :rotflmao: And I dont care about other Iskos understanding dahil at the same time marami ring bobong taga-UP. Ako, bobo ako sa maraming stuff. Ganun talaga e. :lol:
If you read the constitution, walang specific na nakalagay na primary and secondary education na yun lang ang right ng mga tao. Subject kasi sa interpretations ang primary documents. Yung principle ang nakalagay. When you apply that principle in this time and age, it would logically include higher and technical education. Read my previous post again, the constitution says "total human liberation and development."
So bakit na-eemphasize ang primary and secondary education? Kailangang universal ang primary education dahil yun pinaka-basic. Sa secondary, kung titignan natin yung educational systems sa mundo, there are countries na kapalit na nung secondary ang technical education. Bakit nagkakaroon ng ganitong mga disparities? Puede na kc magkaroon ng specialization. Case in point and pag-refute na rin dun sa "public schools cannot turn away students" na assertion ay mga specialized high schools like science high schools or even yung arts high schools (e.g. Philippine Science High School and Philippine High School for the Arts). They are public high schools and they in fact turn down a lot of applicants. Why? Because of qualifications.
E pano naman yung mga hindi makakapasok? The government also provides regular high schools. So may egalitarianism pa rin dun.
Now lets extend this sa higher education. Bakit meron tayong iniisip na privilege daw ang higher education. Well maraming rason kung paano nagkaroon ng ganitong kaisipan. Pero siguro isa is hindi ganun ka-established ang state colleges and universities. Actually may plano ang gobyerno na nga na bawasan ang support for SCUs systematically over time. Pero maraming SCUs na para sa egalitarianism (in contrast with UP, na comparable/analogous sa Pisay and sa Makiling) katulad ng PUP, PLM, CLSU, Bulacan ST, Benguet SU, MSU, etc. Meron na ngang bagong Taguig University eto lang.
Ngayon bakit "privilege" daw? I think confused ang tao sa konsepto na dahil select lang siguro ang nakakapunta sa unibersidad e privilege na daw ito at hindi karapatan. Ang katotohanan diyan ay hindi para sa lahat ang higher education dahil sa qualifications. Ganun talaga ang buhay. May matalino at may medyo slow. Natural yun sa mundo. So paano yun? Kaya hinati ang edukasyon na galing sa estado sa tatlong bodies: ang DECS (primary, secondary), ang CHED (para sa higher education) and lastly na hindi narerealize ng mga tao e ang TESDA (for technical education and skills development). Kaya may TESDA para saklaw pa rin lahat ng tao kahit after high school.
So baka sabihin mo, privilege ang higher education still. Yes and No. Yes, because its enjoyed by a class beyond that of common citizens but No, because it is not exclusively given to a selectfew (in terms of irrelevant discriminators) Dahil kung may natural talento/talino ka naman, you could still claim that right to higher education. It is reserved for anyone who is able, but not everybody can claim it. This is consistent din sa kaisipan sa law na all rights are not absolute.
Marami talagang mga private universities ang tanggap lang ng tanggap kahit hindi qualified dahil business din yan. Kawawa ang mga pineperahan. :bop:
la_flash
Feb 13, 2008, 09:45 AM
naku n3x, even if public high schools such as Pisay and MaSci turn down their applicants because of qualifications, those applicants can still enroll in public high schools such as Magsaysay, Arellano, Recto, et. al. Those schools will never turn them down because that's against the policies formulated by DepED in complying with the rules of law.
And if I may correct you, those SUCs you cited also have their own qualifications, may be not as rigid as UP... but still they have their own set of qualifications. :rolleyes:
PLM for one (though not an SUC because it is more of a city university funded by the local government and not by the national govt), has its own set of qualifications. Even some honor students from other high schools flunk the PLMAT. :rolleyes: Not everyone has the privelege to enter PLM... Even the bona fide Manilenos cannot enroll in PLM if they cannot pass the PLMAT. And PLM also has cut-off... even if you pass the PLMAT but you're below the cut-off, you still cannot enroll (percentile rank).
BOTTOM LINE, ALL universities and colleges have their own qualifications... hence the poor JUAN and JUANAS are not guaranteed a slot in tertiary education, even in a public university, even if they want to. :rolleyes: This is what makes it different from SECONDARY AND PRIMARY EDUCATION wherein the "BOPOLS" can still enroll.
MAYBE, what you're trying to say is that EDUCATION should be a RIGHT and not a PRIVELEGE... if you said so, then I should have agreed to you.
BUT in the current setting, in our current socio-economic condition, NO, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE FOR TERTIARY EDUCATION TO BE A RIGHT TO EVERYBODY.
And I dont care about other Iskos understanding dahil at the same time marami ring bobong taga-UP. Ako, bobo ako sa maraming stuff. Ganun talaga e.
Natuwa naman ako dito... at least you admit it. :lol:
===================
YOUR TERTIARY EDUCATION IS A PRIVELEGE... use that privelege to the benefit of this country.
I believe that SCUD already pointed out the provisions in constitution that allow the STATE to IMPOSE its citizens to do service to the public when needed. THIS has been discussed in your PolSci, am I right? :rolleyes:
It's now a matter of perspective, on how you look at this... Do you have a sense of nationalism to give in to the govt rules and to serve this country in a small period of time before you do what you long to do?
Do you see your education as something that you owe to the people and that you would like to return it back in form of public service? or you see your education as something that the people owe to you because you regard yourself as the best among the best? :rolleyes:
cretinous00
Feb 13, 2008, 09:54 AM
Just a suggestion to the venerable moderator: stop posting board results. Makes 'other' people feel small and nationalistic. :glee:
KuyaDanny
Feb 13, 2008, 10:35 AM
Suggestion read, and ignored.
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 13, 2008, 10:37 AM
Even if 18 of the 35 new UST architects decide to work abroad, the rest who will stay and serve the Philippines are way still more than the 11 produced by diliman.
The sad question is "How many of these new diliman architects will heed Tan and Roman's call?"
:shrug:
tantararantaran
Feb 13, 2008, 11:27 AM
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8042
Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995
SEC. 4. Deployment of Migrant Workers - The State shall deploy overseas Filipino workers only in countries where the rights of Filipino migrant workers are protected. The government recognizes any of the following as guarantee on the part of the receiving country for the protection and the rights of overseas Filipino workers:
(a) It has existing labor and social laws protecting the rights of migrant workers;
(b) It is a signatory to multilateral conventions, declaration or resolutions relating to the protection of migrant workers;
(c) It has concluded a bilateral agreement or arrangement with the government protecting the rights of overseas Filipino workers; and
(d) It is taking positive, concrete measures to protect the rights of migrant workers.
SEC. 5. TERMINATION OR BAN ON DEPLOYMENT - Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 hereof, the government, in pursuit of the national interest or when public welfare so requires, may, at any time, terminate or impose a ban on the deployment of migrant workers.
Wag na natin iliko-liko pa ang usapan tungkol sa Ban on Deployment dahil nasa batas na yan. Kaya nagkakaproblema tayo sa Pilipinas dahil sa daming gustong magbigay ng interpretasyon sa batas para lang makalusot.
exactly my point, you might be giving out a [mis]interpretation on your previous post. you should have quoted this RA instead of the previous one if you want to make the point. And I want to reiterate, I was attacking your argument per se, not your whole stand on the issue, that's why whether this law exists or not is irrelevant. ;)
la_flash
Feb 13, 2008, 11:53 AM
Feel smart and nationalistic as opposed to REALLY smart and REALLY nationalistic. :lol:
n3X
Feb 13, 2008, 07:30 PM
naku n3x, even if public high schools such as Pisay and MaSci turn down their applicants because of qualifications, those applicants can still enroll in public high schools such as Magsaysay, Arellano, Recto, et. al. Those schools will never turn them down because that's against the policies formulated by DepED in complying with the rules of law.
And if I may correct you, those SUCs you cited also have their own qualifications, may be not as rigid as UP... but still they have their own set of qualifications. :rolleyes:
PLM for one (though not an SUC because it is more of a city university funded by the local government and not by the national govt), has its own set of qualifications. Even some honor students from other high schools flunk the PLMAT. :rolleyes: Not everyone has the privelege to enter PLM... Even the bona fide Manilenos cannot enroll in PLM if they cannot pass the PLMAT. And PLM also has cut-off... even if you pass the PLMAT but you're below the cut-off, you still cannot enroll (percentile rank).
BOTTOM LINE, ALL universities and colleges have their own qualifications... hence the poor JUAN and JUANAS are not guaranteed a slot in tertiary education, even in a public university, even if they want to. :rolleyes: This is what makes it different from SECONDARY AND PRIMARY EDUCATION wherein the "BOPOLS" can still enroll.
MAYBE, what you're trying to say is that EDUCATION should be a RIGHT and not a PRIVELEGE... if you said so, then I should have agreed to you.
BUT in the current setting, in our current socio-economic condition, NO, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE FOR TERTIARY EDUCATION TO BE A RIGHT TO EVERYBODY.
Natuwa naman ako dito... at least you admit it. :lol:
===================
YOUR TERTIARY EDUCATION IS A PRIVELEGE... use that privelege to the benefit of this country.
I believe that SCUD already pointed out the provisions in constitution that allow the STATE to IMPOSE its citizens to do service to the public when needed. THIS has been discussed in your PolSci, am I right? :rolleyes:
It's now a matter of perspective, on how you look at this... Do you have a sense of nationalism to give in to the govt rules and to serve this country in a small period of time before you do what you long to do?
Do you see your education as something that you owe to the people and that you would like to return it back in form of public service? or you see your education as something that the people owe to you because you regard yourself as the best among the best? :rolleyes:
Obviously, di mo ma-comprehend. If you cant understand or refuse to understand the points, then wala na sa akin yung problema. There's no use talking to people who can't comprehend. Yung mga questions mo na-resolve na rin yan ng mga arguments dito. Pointless din mga assertions ninyo. Ilang beses ko na nga in-underline yung qualifications e. Pag-isipan niyo nga mga rebuttals niyo. :bop:
Paulit ulit lang tayo dito just like your "privelege."
cretinous00
Feb 13, 2008, 08:40 PM
second suggestion to the rodney dangerfeld of moderators:
don't just screen posts according to the yellow box. also screen the boring ones (like the four posts before this one.) make it a hobby to conquer boredom. they say it's a great 'rejuvenator.'
Dacs
Feb 13, 2008, 09:39 PM
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8042
Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995
SEC. 5. TERMINATION OR BAN ON DEPLOYMENT - Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 hereof, the government, in pursuit of the national interest or when public welfare so requires, may, at any time, terminate or impose a ban on the deployment of migrant workers.
Wag na natin iliko-liko pa ang usapan tungkol sa Ban on Deployment dahil nasa batas na yan. Kaya nagkakaproblema tayo sa Pilipinas dahil sa daming gustong magbigay ng interpretasyon sa batas para lang makalusot.
I agree.
Lahat tayo ay may responsibilidad para dito.
KuyaDanny
Feb 13, 2008, 10:00 PM
Cretinous:
Pay me first.
la_flash
Feb 14, 2008, 12:20 AM
Obviously, di mo ma-comprehend. If you cant understand or refuse to understand the points, then wala na sa akin yung problema. There's no use talking to people who can't comprehend. Yung mga questions mo na-resolve na rin yan ng mga arguments dito. Pointless din mga assertions ninyo. Ilang beses ko na nga in-underline yung qualifications e. Pag-isipan niyo nga mga rebuttals niyo. :bop:
Paulit ulit lang tayo dito just like your "privelege."
Oh my, did you read my whole post? :rolleyes:
It's you who can't comprehend it. If you cannot accept that tertiary education is a privelege, then it's no more a problem of mine. Talk to your fellow UPian. I am obviously just wasting my time with you. :rolleyes:
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 14, 2008, 11:29 PM
Sana naman ay pakinggan ng mga upian na dapat lang mag-lingkod muna sila sa bayan. 'Wag nang hintayin pa na ang St. Mary's Academy of Meycauayan, Bulacan pa ang maging lider at promotor sa mga ganitong panawagan ng ating inang bayan.
At dapat gayahin ang ginagawa ng DOST: aabonohan ang pag-aaral mo, pero kailangan mong maglingkod sa bayan muna pagkatapos.
:)
cretinous00
Feb 15, 2008, 07:30 AM
Is someone here smart enough to explain just WHY we should serve the country (whether or not we passed the UPCAT?)
la_flash
Feb 15, 2008, 10:25 AM
Is someone here smart enough to explain just WHY we should serve the country (whether or not we passed the UPCAT?)
Well may I suggest that you try reading the constitution. I thank you.
cretinous00
Feb 15, 2008, 02:15 PM
Did it in the year it was drafted. Sorry, doesn't explain why. It's like the bible: a masterpiece of ambiguity and imprecision.
la_flash
Feb 15, 2008, 05:46 PM
Did it in the year it was drafted. Sorry, doesn't explain why. It's like the bible: a masterpiece of ambiguity and imprecision.
You're that OLD... :lol:
If you didn't get it the first time you read your constitution until now, your PolSci teacher should have been fired from UPD. :lol:
aiden
Feb 15, 2008, 06:05 PM
Roilo Golez had a talk at DLSU the other day at DLSU's student congress. HE said that education should be for economics and not community development. :grrr:
How could we have "leaders" like him? :bop:
philippines123
Feb 15, 2008, 06:40 PM
Tertiary education should be a right... but it turned to be a privilege of those with money, or with brains, and/or those whose parents are professors.
I think all college graduates should work at least two years in the country before leaving.
la_flash
Feb 15, 2008, 07:58 PM
Tertiary education should be a right... but it turned to be a privilege of those with money, or with brains, and/or those whose parents are professors.
I think all college graduates should work at least two years in the country before leaving.
You're one of the UPians who got it right, I mean correctly. :lol:
Again, tertiary education should be a right but it appears to be a privelege, and it still is a privelege up to this very day. :D
KuyaDanny
Feb 15, 2008, 08:48 PM
Privilege, la_flash. Not privelege. The wolves might get you. ;)
cretinous00
Feb 15, 2008, 09:41 PM
You're that OLD... :lol:
If you didn't get it the first time you read your constitution until now, your PolSci teacher should have been fired from UPD. :lol:
Mr. 50% passing rate school in Manila, the Constitution gives the government the power to call on any citizen to duty. Otherwise, the citizen is free to live his life as he wants it. I challenge you to prove that I, a UP grauate, am obligated to do public service without due call by the Government. Go on, embarass yourself.
_SCUD_
Feb 15, 2008, 10:49 PM
Is someone here smart enough to explain just WHY we should serve the country (whether or not we passed the UPCAT?)
Pwede ko i-esplika sayo yan.
Pero dapat pagkatapos ko, sabihin mo naman sa amin WHY WE SHOULD NOT serve the country.
_SCUD_
Feb 15, 2008, 10:56 PM
Mr. 50% passing rate school in Manila, the Constitution gives the government the power to call on any citizen to duty. Otherwise, the citizen is free to live his life as he wants it. I challenge you to prove that I, a UP grauate, am obligated to do public service without due call by the Government. Go on, embarass yourself.
pasabat ulit, masyadong madali ang mga tanong.
Obligado kang maglingkod sa bayan kahit hindi ka ipatawag ng gobyerno, dahil noon pa alam kong nanumpa ka na. Natatandaan mo ba, itinataas-taas mo pa ang kamay mo habang nanunumpa ka sa pagiging makabayan? O baka naman gusto mo bawiin ang sumpa mo na yan? :naughty:
_SCUD_
Feb 15, 2008, 11:05 PM
Ipaalala ko lang sa mga kababayan natin na lahat tayo nanumpa sa bayan ha. Huwag na kayong maghanap pa ng palusot dahil lang sa ayaw nyo magsilbi, nakakahiya ang ganyan.
Old Version
Iniibig ko ang Pilipinas.
Ito ang aking lupang sinilangan.
Ito ang tahanan ng aking lahi.
Ako?y kanyang kinukupkop at tinutulungan,
upang maging malakas, maligaya at kapakipakinabang.
Bilang ganti ay diringgin ko ang payo ng aking mga magulang.
Susundin ko ang mga tuntunin ng aking paaralan.
Tutuparin ko ang tungkulin ng isang mamamayang makabayan at masunurin sa batas.
Paglilingkuran ko ang aking bayan nang walang pag-iimbot at nang buong katapatan.
Sisikapin kong maging isang tunay na Pilipino,
sa isip, sa salita at sa gawa.
New Version (by Raul Roco)
Iniibig ko ang Pilipinas,
aking lupang sinilangan,
tahanan ng aking lahi,
kinukupkop ako at tinutulungang
maging malakas, masipag at marangal.
Dahil mahal ko ang Pilipinas,
diringgin ko ang payo ng aking magulang,
susundin ko ang tuntunin ng paaralan,
tutuparin ko ang tungkulin
ng mamamayang makabayan:
naglilingkod, nag-aaral at nagdarasal
ng buong katapatan.
Iaalay ko ang aking buhay,
pangarap, pagsisikap
sa bansang Pilipinas.
n3X
Feb 15, 2008, 11:08 PM
Privilege, la_flash. Not privelege. The wolves might get you. ;)
Halatang di nagbabasa diba. Binigyan na yan ng correction posts earlier. Tapos akala mo kung sinong nakaka-comprehend and "who got it correctly." :rotflmao:
So impartial MODERATOR, ano tong figurative na mga wolves? :naughty:
tantararantaran
Feb 15, 2008, 11:36 PM
You're that OLD... :lol:
If you didn't get it the first time you read your constitution until now, your PolSci teacher should have been fired from UPD. :lol:
Uhm, is the Philippine constitution really taught in Political Science? Errrr... Couldn't quite make the connection.
philippines123
Feb 16, 2008, 01:09 AM
Hi La_Flash...
Yes UP grad here... more 2 years ng working... and proud to say, I am earning the same amount as those working abroad... so why leave?
Imbis na ako pakinabangan ng ibang bansa... mga multinational companies pinapakinabangan ko dito sa Pilipinas. Pag mayaman na ako... magbi-business ako tapos lecturer din sa UP or sa Cavite State U. Haaaay.... this is my dream life... petiks petiks... run ng business, tapos kagalng-galang ka kase you're sharing knowledge sa Pipol... especially the youth.
Tapat ako magbayad ng buwis... kahit na nakukurakot lang karamihan sa ating binabayad.
And to share lang, medyo off topic... taga BIR or munisipyo ng Makati nagpunta sa office kanina para mag-issue ng CTC... at take note... di na nya kino-compute ito... titingnan nya lang ang taxable amount total dito at yun na rin ang community tax to be paid. di nya sinunod ang nasa batas na PhP 5.00 + PhP 1.00 per 1000 gross annual income... so napamahal ako supposedly ng PhP900.00+++... buti wala akong malaking cash sa wallet kundi napasubo ako ng 1000+++ na sedula, e nakakakuha nga ako non ng 5 pesos lang noong araw...
kaya di ko rin masisi yung iba na umalis... kundi palpak ang koleksyon ng buwis, garapal pang mangolekta ng buwis ang ilang empleyado. Tapos mababalitaan na lang.. kinurakot ni ganito ang pera ng ganitong ahensya... etc etc...
philippines123
Feb 16, 2008, 09:21 AM
nakakawa lang talaga yung mga desididong mag-aral pero walang pera... o walang oras dahil breadwinner na agad ng pamilya kahit bata pa... sana ito ang pagtuunan ng pansin ng lahat... ang pag-aralin lahat ng tao hanggang college...
tapos kung sino pa yung hindi nakapag-aral, karamihan sa kanila ang tapat na naglilingkod sa bayan kahit na akkarampot lang ang kita.
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 16, 2008, 12:37 PM
Ipaalala ko lang sa mga kababayan natin na lahat tayo nanumpa sa bayan ha. Huwag na kayong maghanap pa ng palusot dahil lang sa ayaw nyo magsilbi, nakakahiya ang ganyan.
Old Version
Iniibig ko ang Pilipinas.
Ito ang aking lupang sinilangan.
Ito ang tahanan ng aking lahi.
Ako?y kanyang kinukupkop at tinutulungan,
upang maging malakas, maligaya at kapakipakinabang.
Bilang ganti ay diringgin ko ang payo ng aking mga magulang.
Susundin ko ang mga tuntunin ng aking paaralan.
Tutuparin ko ang tungkulin ng isang mamamayang makabayan at masunurin sa batas.
Paglilingkuran ko ang aking bayan nang walang pag-iimbot at nang buong katapatan.
Sisikapin kong maging isang tunay na Pilipino,
sa isip, sa salita at sa gawa.
New Version (by Raul Roco)
Iniibig ko ang Pilipinas,
aking lupang sinilangan,
tahanan ng aking lahi,
kinukupkop ako at tinutulungang
maging malakas, masipag at marangal.
Dahil mahal ko ang Pilipinas,
diringgin ko ang payo ng aking magulang,
susundin ko ang tuntunin ng paaralan,
tutuparin ko ang tungkulin
ng mamamayang makabayan:
naglilingkod, nag-aaral at nagdarasal
ng buong katapatan.
Iaalay ko ang aking buhay,
pangarap, pagsisikap
sa bansang Pilipinas.
At higit sa lahat ang tagos sa puso't kaluluwang "Ang mamatay ng dahil sa iyo."
Mukhang kinakanta nila 'yan sa butas na basket eh.
http://pinoyexchange.com/forums/images/icons/icon13.gif
la_flash
Feb 16, 2008, 12:50 PM
I stand corrected, KD. It should be privilege not privelege. I don't see them as wolves, they are more like puppies.. :lol: Di naman matigas ang ulo kapag kino-correct, di ba n3x, cretinous? :glee: Again, thanks.
@tantaran*, yes, Phil. Const. was taught in our Pol. Sci way back in college. I didn't know that they don't teach Phil. Const. as part of topics covered in Pol. Sci. in UP. I will not assume anything. Phil. Const. must have been taught in a separate course/subject in UP. Nevertheless, did they (UP profs) teach you how to read and interpret your constitution? :naughty:
@cretinous, 50% in archi is not bad for a school w/c budget is not funded enough by the city government. Again, the reasons of those who failed the archi board exams in PLM might be the same reason why one of your UP dudes failed his. :lol: Comparing the budget that Manila gives to each PLM student and the budget that the national govt gives to each UP student, you'll know who receives the larger sum, won't you? :glee:
Back on topic, cretinous, one pexer here have shown you provisions in the constitution that allow the state to call its citizens to serve the country when needed. This thread is about the proposal to require all health workers (?) to serve two years here before seeking for a greener pasture abroad. Who will require those health workers to stay? Of course, the govt is the one that will release such order. Now, are you trying to say that this is not justified, Mister?
As I've said earlier, the state can require the graduates from SUCs to stay, but it is better if they can do the same to non-SUC grads.
Ok, wolves... ATTACK!!! :rotfl:
la_flash
Feb 16, 2008, 12:58 PM
same here philippines123... i am earning more than enough here. But, I may opt to work abroad to broaden my horizon (and there are much more opportunities for engrs abroad compared here).
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 16, 2008, 02:02 PM
At 'yung mga nagsasabing bakit ba ine-equate ang paglilingkod sa bayan sa pag-stay sa Pilipinas ay magsitigil kayo!!!
Naiintindihan niyo ba ang ibig sabihin ng brain drain? Hala, sige, gamutin na lang ng mga Pinoy na doktor na nagtatampisaw sa isnow ang mga mamamayan natin sa baryo sa pamamagitan ng chatroom.
:rolleyes:
philippines123
Feb 16, 2008, 03:02 PM
I only go abroad for training... if ever... study there for PhD degree... siguro 5 years from now. Pero work... dito talaga... sideline lang siguro habang nag-aaral don...
n3X
Feb 16, 2008, 03:09 PM
kino-correct? hahaha Bakit akala mo correct ka talaga kahit time and again na-disprove yung mga posts mo?
Meron talagang mga may delusion dito na mas korek sila kahit halatang halata naman insecurity and kawalan nila ng punto at ascendancy. Paulit ulit lang at padagdag ng padagdag ang sinasabi kasi wala talagang ma-aassert. Kaawa-awa. Wag ng patulan mga yan.
And to the moderator who has not answered my query: be conscious of YOUR OWN posts! Mas lalo dito na MODERATED ang forum, may power ka to censor, dapat impartial ka.
cretinous00
Feb 16, 2008, 04:53 PM
Pwede ko i-esplika sayo yan.
Pero dapat pagkatapos ko, sabihin mo naman sa amin WHY WE SHOULD NOT serve the country.
call! yung dapat matuwa kaming lahat dito, hah!
la_flash
Feb 16, 2008, 07:38 PM
@n3x, and how do you think that you're correct? and how have you disproved our points? and how have you concluded that we are delusional, eh?
Haha... you can't even proved that tertiary education is a right and that your UP education is not a privilege. You can't even distiguish what's the difference between a "should be" and an "is".
Try to disprove me, just this time, n3x... :glee:
la_flash
Feb 16, 2008, 07:42 PM
@philippines123, same here. I go abroad for training, business related functions and for pleasure... :lol: For engineers like me, the pasteur is greener on the other side of the fence. So yeah, I will work abroad in a year or two... who knows?
If I were a nurse or a doctor, I would heed the call of the govt to serve the people first for at least two years then go abroad. :D
At 'yung mga nagsasabing bakit ba ine-equate ang paglilingkod sa bayan sa pag-stay sa Pilipinas ay magsitigil kayo!!!
Naiintindihan niyo ba ang ibig sabihin ng brain drain? Hala, sige, gamutin na lang ng mga Pinoy na doktor na nagtatampisaw sa isnow ang mga mamamayan natin sa baryo sa pamamagitan ng chatroom.
:rolleyes:
Well some of them just can't understand that.
la_flash
Feb 16, 2008, 07:52 PM
ok before the wolves attack me, "can't even proved" should have been "can't even prove", ok? :lol:
On-Topic - The question is, if tertiary education is a privilege, can the state force you to serve the people? or the dire need of the people for health care due to brain drain is enough justification for the state to do it? Basically, can the state force the graduates from SUCs only because they are the ones who are privileged enough to acquire education funded by the govt? or can they require other graduates to do the same?
tantararantaran
Feb 16, 2008, 11:44 PM
Is this thread going anywhere? Not being the know-it-all here, but I see posters thinking about staying in the country as the ultimate be-all and end-all of serving the country, while they themselves are out of their beloved country they wish to be served well. There are those who cannot understand the simple logic of brain drain and how staying in the country can be, in one form, a type of nationalism. Worse, some people cannot understand that there can be OTHER (perhaps even more productive) forms of nationalism, aside from working inside the country. And lastly, I don't understand how a thread title "paglilingkod sa bayan" can be so much confined to whether it should be mandatory or not for a graduate to stay in the country. It should've been titled "pagtratrabaho sa bayan" or "pagtira sa bayan" or whatever a more apt title that the threadstarter should have thought of, to make it a little more specific.
I have a question for everyone, granting that "paglilingkod sa bayan" equals staying here for two years after graduation. How can you ever think of loving your country (if staying is the only means) if your and your family's stomachs are crying tears of acidic hunger? Can you honestly say to yourselves that as long as you love your country, you wouldn't mind living a very uncomfortable life. And lastly, how can you love a country that does not love you back?
Disclaimer: I love the Philippines though, and I don't have any plans of going out of the country to work, even though every other relative of mine would encourage me to go abroad. Do I believe that my country loves me? I say I want to be pretty optimistic about that, haha.
_SCUD_
Feb 17, 2008, 12:44 AM
call! yung dapat matuwa kaming lahat dito, hah!
Bakit ka kailangan magsilbi sa bayan?
Dahil sinumpaan mo ang pagsisilbi sa bayan at dahil nasa Saligang Batas ng Pilipinas yan.
Huwag mong linlangin ang sarili mo na mas malakas ka sa bayan, na kung ano ang gusto mo ay masusunod dahil taga UP ka. Maliban sa konstitusyon, pinapayagan din ng batas ang gobyerno ang pagtigil sa pagpapalabas ng mga Migrant Workers kung nakataya ang National Interest. Ang kulang na lang, pilitin pa kayo magsilbi sa bayan matapos kayong pag-aralin ng mga Pilipino.
Ayaw naman namin masayang ang talino at talento ng mga Iskolar ng Bayan kung iba-ban nga ang deployment pero hindi naman pipilitin magsilbi.
Ayaw namin kayong makita na nakatunganga sa bahay, nakahilata sa banig habang nagkakamot ng itlog.
Dalawang taon lang ang hinihingi ng National Health Service Act sa inyo, pagkatapos niyan hindi namin hahadlangan na makamit ang pangarap niyong makahawak ng tunay na snow na sa pelikula nyo lang makikita.
O ikaw..WHY NOT SERVE THE COUNTRY?
kapitangkiko
Feb 17, 2008, 02:58 AM
Pasingit lang ulit ha?
Nasagot ba ba kung paanong naging paglilingkod sa bayan yung pamamalagi sa Pilipinas? At yung pag-alis ng Pilipinas ay pagiging walang silbi sa bayan?
I have not read any single example except vague references to "brain drain".
People talk a lot about brain drain here, maybe we should talk about unemployment too?
May brain drain ba talaga o mas malaking problema ang kawalan ng trabaho sa Pilipinas?
Kung may brain drain man, has it reached national security proportions para isabatas yung pagrequire for graduates to stay for a period of time before being allowed to go abroad?
If training is a good, acceptable way to go abroad - what better training is there than for fresh grad health workers to work abroad where they have better access to quality training?
Mas may "brain" ba ang fresh grad kesa sa beteranong nag-espesyalista sa ibang bansa para bumalik at maglingkod sa mga kababayan?
Siguro nga if ever such a law is passed it is best to target SUC's especially UP para ma-curb yung brain drain. It appears that some people believe without knowing it that that those are the only places where brains are.
And making it difficult for them to look for greener pastures narrows the competition down.
_SCUD_
Feb 17, 2008, 11:58 AM
I have a question for everyone, granting that "paglilingkod sa bayan" equals staying here for two years after graduation. How can you ever think of loving your country (if staying is the only means) if your and your family's stomachs are crying tears of acidic hunger? Can you honestly say to yourselves that as long as you love your country, you wouldn't mind living a very uncomfortable life. And lastly, how can you love a country that does not love you back?
Huwag mo naman kaming dramahan. Ilan porsyento ba ng mga estudyante sa UP ang talagang mahihirap at halos walang makain? Kahit papano nakakapagmeryenda pa kayo ng kikiam habang sinusuportahan kayo ng gobyerno, samantalang ang mga pasyente na humihingi sa inyo ng paglilingkod namamatay na dilat ang mata.
Hindi ka nga ba minahal ng bansa na nagpaaral sayo?
Bayan muna bago ang sarili, nakinabang na rin naman kayo sa kaban ng bayan.
_SCUD_
Feb 17, 2008, 12:11 PM
Pasingit lang ulit ha?
Nasagot ba ba kung paanong naging paglilingkod sa bayan yung pamamalagi sa Pilipinas? At yung pag-alis ng Pilipinas ay pagiging walang silbi sa bayan?
I have not read any single example except vague references to "brain drain".
Kung talagang wala sa loob niyo ang paglilingkod sa bayan, wala talagang maaasahan sa inyo kahit saan panig man kayo ng mundo.
Ngayon, kung talagang bukal sa loob niyo ang pagsisilbi, hindi kayo matatakot sa Mandatory Service at maikli pa sa inyo ang 2 taon.
Ganyan lang kasimple yan.
Kung ayaw, may dahilan
Kung gusto, may paraan.
n3X
Feb 17, 2008, 07:29 PM
la_flash, I already did. Read again.
cretinous00
Feb 18, 2008, 07:30 AM
pasabat ulit, masyadong madali ang mga tanong.
Obligado kang maglingkod sa bayan kahit hindi ka ipatawag ng gobyerno, dahil noon pa alam kong nanumpa ka na. Natatandaan mo ba, itinataas-taas mo pa ang kamay mo habang nanunumpa ka sa pagiging makabayan? O baka naman gusto mo bawiin ang sumpa mo na yan? :naughty:
bagsak ka na. i first made the panatang makabayan when i was six. i last made it when i was sixteen. i was never made to utter it after i was eighteen, and to think i studied in government schools. there's a big difference between what your school requires you to say and promise while you're still a minor and what you're supposed to do as an adult with your own load of problems and responsibilities.
another one please.
cretinous00
Feb 18, 2008, 07:39 AM
Bakit ka kailangan magsilbi sa bayan?
Dahil sinumpaan mo ang pagsisilbi sa bayan at dahil nasa Saligang Batas ng Pilipinas yan.
Huwag mong linlangin ang sarili mo na mas malakas ka sa bayan, na kung ano ang gusto mo ay masusunod dahil taga UP ka. Maliban sa konstitusyon, pinapayagan din ng batas ang gobyerno ang pagtigil sa pagpapalabas ng mga Migrant Workers kung nakataya ang National Interest. Ang kulang na lang, pilitin pa kayo magsilbi sa bayan matapos kayong pag-aralin ng mga Pilipino.
Ayaw naman namin masayang ang talino at talento ng mga Iskolar ng Bayan kung iba-ban nga ang deployment pero hindi naman pipilitin magsilbi.
Ayaw namin kayong makita na nakatunganga sa bahay, nakahilata sa banig habang nagkakamot ng itlog.
Dalawang taon lang ang hinihingi ng National Health Service Act sa inyo, pagkatapos niyan hindi namin hahadlangan na makamit ang pangarap niyong makahawak ng tunay na snow na sa pelikula nyo lang makikita.
O ikaw..WHY NOT SERVE THE COUNTRY?
a somewhat better answer than invoking "panatang makabayan." the constitution says the government reserves the right to call any citizen to duty if it finds the need. IF IT FINDS THE NEED. it means service on a fiscal necessity. a citizen doesn't have to render service on his own volition. that's as far as your constitution goes. sorry, not acceptable.
and to answer your question, i can give you two of several good reasons. one, i don't owe my country anything (not at this point.) two, i don't believe in nationalism. the first one's argumentative. the second's academic.
what else besides a student's oath and something as revisable as a constitution?
Dacs
Feb 18, 2008, 08:56 AM
Don't you guys find it ironic that some people in PEX apparently pushes on SUC products by not doing enough while conveniently ignoring the fact that there are also graduates of some private schools (where some people here claims to produce much more graduates than some schools), who have just as much responsibility in the country?
I dunno what's worse, the fact that the we have a brain drain or the fact that those who come from those private schools apparently cannot do anything for the country.
Look at the numbers. Some people in PEx are actually proud that they can produce that many graduates. But at the end of they day, if they cannot contribute to this country, they're no better than those some people claim here of those SUC products who are "ingrates".
O di kaya'y pag graduate ka ng private school eh pede ka na agad magtampisaw sa isnow at dakutin ang mga tae ng mga porener.
If those so called "ingrate" SUC graduates can't do anything, can those people instead step up to the plate and actually do something?
But I'm willing to bet what's really happing. Reality is, those "ingrates" are not ingrates at all and most (though not all) of them are actually doing their share, and this goes as well for those private school graduates.
This thread is has just turned into a convenient excuse for some people here for a glorified "pataasan ng ihi" and to have this holier-than-thou attitude toward others.
Pwe :rolleyes:
la_flash
Feb 18, 2008, 10:00 AM
n3x, you didn't. sorry. :glee:
enough of this. it's really tiring to debate with somebody who doesn't know what's the difference of a privilege and of a right. Plus the fact that he seems oblivious to the fact that tertiary education now is a privilege, not only in the Philippines, but in the whole world. :rolleyes: :lol:
how can the medical workers serve if they have migrated already in other countries?
yes, you can go back to this land when after you have improved on your craft abroad, but can it be way too late when that time comes?
those of us who live in manila don't actually see this... but the condition of the barrios in the far flung areas is actually depressing. There are times that there were no doctors, no nurses to attend to the need of the patients. What's the current ratio of doctors to patients?
So how can those medical workers in the foreign land can actually help those in desperate need as of this very moment? eh?
My cousins, some of them are nursing grads from a private university, did serve this country before they left. They actually served more than two years. At least di nangangati ang kanilang puwet na umalis ng bansa. :lol:
ЅUX2BÜ
Feb 18, 2008, 01:03 PM
These upians still do not get the reason why the likes of Tan and Roman are calling upon them first and the other SUC graduates to serve the country, and they have even questioned why brain drain is the (only) reason. Susme. Magsitigil kayo! Tan and Roman have been asking you to stay and serve the country because of brain drain!!! Ano pa bang ibang rason?!?!? And why you? Because the government, in its prevailing predilection and/or because of the charters defining your existence, has the authority and power over you. It has to make sure that the status rei publicae is looked into in times of war, famine, and specifically right now that the country is experiencing brain drain and the government has to tap into its "immediate resources" which are you, iskolar ng bayan!
:rolleyes:
tantararantaran
Feb 18, 2008, 01:24 PM
Huwag mo naman kaming dramahan. Ilan porsyento ba ng mga estudyante sa UP ang talagang mahihirap at halos walang makain? Kahit papano nakakapagmeryenda pa kayo ng kikiam habang sinusuportahan kayo ng gobyerno, samantalang ang mga pasyente na humihingi sa inyo ng paglilingkod namamatay na dilat ang mata.
Oh come on, dude, is kikiam your symbolism of nourishment, moreso a comfortable life? it's not being madrama, as how you put it, but if you think long term, and you think about your family and how your family cannot be happy with only kikiam on their plates, then you'll get what i mean. It's simple, you love your country, pero you love your family as well. And for the most of us (and i think this is only one of the few facts mentioned in this thread), we love our family better than how we love our country. even I do, as I am sure you do as well.
Hindi ka nga ba minahal ng bansa na nagpaaral sayo?
Bayan muna bago ang sarili, nakinabang na rin naman kayo sa kaban ng bayan.
Talking about taking things out of context. You can try to read my disclaimer and look for yourself that i already answered this question even before you asked it. It's pathetic that you are using ad hominem for your argument, and what's even more pathetic is that your ad hominem argument has been rebutted even before you made it. Please do yourself a favor, don't dwell too much on the details of the posts that you wanna argue on, try to read everything and get the whole picture. ;) (Damn me, I also used ad hominem on that one! :bop: )
And lastly, I think I was trying to ask some questions. Is it just me or there's really nothing in what you said that has answered the queries? You could've put some efforts in honestly answering the questions than just by bashing them, after all, answering them can raise your points pretty well, as you can use them to your advantage if only your answers have substance. ;)
kapitangkiko
Feb 18, 2008, 07:57 PM
Kung talagang wala sa loob niyo ang paglilingkod sa bayan, wala talagang maaasahan sa inyo kahit saan panig man kayo ng mundo.
Ngayon, kung talagang bukal sa loob niyo ang pagsisilbi, hindi kayo matatakot sa Mandatory Service at maikli pa sa inyo ang 2 taon.
Ganyan lang kasimple yan.
Kung ayaw, may dahilan
Kung gusto, may paraan.
Sorry di ko pa rin makuha relevance nito sa tanong ko. Medyo oblique na naman yung sagot e. :rolleyes:
kapitangkiko
Feb 18, 2008, 08:44 PM
La_flash, it pains me that we're on different sides of the fence again :D But no worries, this is all in the spirit of healthy PEx discussion, right? ;)
how can the medical workers serve if they have migrated already in other countries? Can you really, honestly tell us that a medical worker is serving the country just because he/she stayed? I know there are loads of ways to do so but for just plain staying??
Does someone who stayed in the barrio and bummed around serve the country better than one who went away to improve his craft with the aim of bringing it back to and sharing it with his countrymen later?
On the other hand, I'd say that just one way for a medical worker to serve the country even if he has already emigrated from the Philippines is by earning a lot of money in his country of residence and sending part of it home - money that could maybe be used for his sibling's education or the improvement of his family's living conditions, and as well in the process gaining world-class training.
yes, you can go back to this land when after you have improved on your craft abroad, but can it be way too late when that time comes?Who knows when it is too late? Would you rather he does not improve himself for fear of missing the boat eventually? Isn't that a bit too fatalistic?
those of us who live in manila don't actually see this... but the condition of the barrios in the far flung areas is actually depressing. There are times that there were no doctors, no nurses to attend to the need of the patients. What's the current ratio of doctors to patients? Yes, maybe this is a good time to give figures/stats? Has anyone here who's been making this claim (of brain drain, etc.) actually give numbers?
And if there really is such a problem, would limiting your preceived solution to SUC's really solve it?
Or if it is a matter of national interest, aren't all Filipinos supposed to be involved in it?
So how can those medical workers in the foreign land can actually help those in desperate need as of this very moment? eh?
My cousins, some of them are nursing grads from a private university, did serve this country before they left. They actually served more than two years. At least di nangangati ang kanilang puwet na umalis ng bansa. :lol:Hurray for your cousins! But what is so magical about 2 years?
What if someone graduated as a medical worker, stayed for 10 years but was not really productive? Bummed around? Or worked as a call center agent because it pays better than being a medical worker in the barrios? Is that a medical worker serving the country?
What if he decided he would leave the country after 10 years of bumming around and worked abroad as a medical worker - would that be acceptable?
What about those doctors and lawyers and engineers, etc. (apparently mostly non-UP grads) who go abroad to study nursing or caregiving? Are they serving the country?
It is easy to lay the blame on a group of people for as long as we do not belong in that group. It is easy to say - Yeah, let those SUC grads serve for two years before they are allowed to work abroad - because we are not among them.
But come on, serving the country is everybody's business and you can do so regardless of where you are - be you in Pinas or be you in Mars.
You don't have to be a miserable underemployed employee in Makati or an idealistic doctor in the barrio to be called someone who is serving the country.
To me, that's all there is to it.
n3X
Feb 18, 2008, 10:09 PM
This thread is has just turned into a convenient excuse for some people here for a glorified "pataasan ng ihi" and to have this holier-than-thou attitude toward others.
Pwe :rolleyes:
Kaya nga, wag na natin patulan. Sa rami ng debate dito sa Pex makikita naman kung sino value adding sa hindi e. Pabayaan nyo na at wag nyo ng patulan kung nasabi nyo na punto nyo. Mahirap makipagdebate sa mga sarado ang utak at di nakakaintindi. :lol:
la_flash
Feb 18, 2008, 11:13 PM
Of course kapitangkiko, this is all in the spirit of healthy discussion. :D
For me, it all boils down to who are really here in this forsaken land and actually helping those in desperate need for medical care presently. Those working in the foreign land are automatically out. They can not possibly help, in our current situation, to those in need when one of the problems is the lack of manpower in medical care. Yes, they can send help through monetary means. But what money can do if the people who are supposed to do the job are not here? The money, the medicines, all of which mean nothing if there are no doctors to diagnose diseases and to prescribe medicines, or no nurses to monitor the patients and attend to their needs.
What about those who bum around in this country? YES, they don't help. I am only talking about those who have stayed and who are actually lending a helping hand. I don't know if doctors are nurses are trained to be bums. What I know is that doctors and nurses are industrious people. There can be exception to the rule, but over-all, we should expect almost all of them to be helpful.
What difference does two years make? A LOT. For one, it impedes the brain drain. The doctors and nurses are compelled to work here for at least two years. That would be enough for now.
Why only SUCs? I say include all graduates, but as I see it, the state cannot force the non-SUC grads to stay for the latter paid for their own education. However, like what DOST does with its scholars, they can force the SUC grads to serve this country first before leaving. The SUC grads' education is a privilege. It's only right that SUC grads return the favor. :D
kiko17
Feb 19, 2008, 01:09 AM
you know why some people are pushing for SUC graduates to stay and serve the country? because they'd rather stay in the sidelines, watch things happen, be spectators, mock the system, point out others mistakes, all the while make tampisaw in the snow while lambasting others for trying to make better lives for themselves as they did.
it amazes me how the stauch supporters of staying and serving the country, and helping the poor and what-nots are making tampisaw in the snow several timezones away. talk about hypocrisy. diba? ang mga lolo mo talaga! hmmp!
mga kuya, we know our role, sana naman you make an effort to know yours diba?
boy_wonder
Feb 19, 2008, 06:48 AM
Ang "Paglilingkod sa Bayan" ay isa lamang paraan upang maglingkod PARA SA bayan. Maaari kang magsilbi para sa Pilipinas kahit nasa ibang lupain ka pa. Jose Rizal had proven it in his time.
Just do what you think is best for the Filipino and for the nation.
cretinous00
Feb 19, 2008, 06:51 AM
We don't believe there's such a thing as brain drain. Legions of brilliant Thomasians (5 for every UPian) are in the Philippines dutifully serving the country. UPians have always been a minority anyway, especially when it comes to the number of board examinees. :glee:
Roman is just one in a steady succession of UP prez', each with their own (sometimes weird) ideas. But one thing I like about being a UPian is I can think beyond what the likes of Tan and Roman say. I can even even appreciate the Constitution and what it really stands for. No literal understanding for me. That's the mark of superior education. :glee::glee::glee:
cretinous00
Feb 19, 2008, 11:24 AM
We have a culture of parasitism. Given the cost to educate one's child as a doctor or even a nurse, how would you feel of 'others' now demand that your child render medical services to 'others' for free (or at vastly reduced cost?)
Dacs
Feb 19, 2008, 12:09 PM
Ano ba ito, por que nagbabayad kayo ng buwis ay ipapasa na ang responsibilidad sa iba?
Pwe! :rolleyes:
Private school graduates, here's your chance to shine!
Since we ingrate SUC products apparently don't care for our country, this is your opportunity to do something about it.
But if push comes to shove and those SUC products are compelled to stay here (and those from private unis are not), then it'll only show that private institutions are just good for nothing diploma mills whose only purpose is to produce graduates in the service of the foreigners.
Ang sagwa pakinggan diba?
Before some of you get your panties in a bunch, I don't agree with the above statement. But hasty generalization cuts both ways. Di lang lagi kami.
As I've always said, this is NOT only our responsibility. This calls for ALL people to be responsible for our country's welfare.
And no matter what we've said in this thread, we're just so shortsighted (and dumb at times) to underestimate what the Filipino professionals are capable of.
That all said, I think it's in order for our government to address this. If those people who can actually pull some strings in the government can read this, I think (in my opinion) that it's wise for the regulatory boards to impose a 2 year requirement (just like Architecture) for some (if not all) licensure examination for these reasons:
1. We'll have a steady influx of professionals in the country and
2. It'll give the professional the hands-on experience he/she needs in his/her practice of his/her profession.
Better (or worse), change the charter of UP (or other SUCs for that matter) to require its graduates to stay here for two years.
IMO though, I don't see that's gonna happen.
paenggoy
Feb 19, 2008, 03:33 PM
With regards to the claim that the government must provide cheap access to higher education, from what I remember, the Constitution states that education is mandatory only until the secondary level.
The DepED reports a cohort survival rate of around 50 percent until secondary level, an average class size of something like 60, and shortages with necessities ranging from textbooks to classrooms. Given these problems, the government should probably focus on providing enough resources for pre-tertiary education and technical and vocational training. This implies that requirements mentioned in this thread for state tertiary schools looks logical.
la_flash
Feb 19, 2008, 05:35 PM
Ang "Paglilingkod sa Bayan" ay isa lamang paraan upang maglingkod PARA SA bayan. Maaari kang magsilbi para sa Pilipinas kahit nasa ibang lupain ka pa. Jose Rizal had proven it in his time.
Just do what you think is best for the Filipino and for the nation.
NOT always true. How can those in the foreign land help those in the desperate need for medical attention right at this very moment,eh?
Magpapadala ng pera? Magpapadala ng gamot? Eh sino nga ang hahatol upang ano'ng gamot ba ang irereseta? at sino ba ang titingin sa kanilang kondisyon? Kung ang lahat ng mga doktor at nurses ay nasa ibang lupain na?
Teka lang, medyo gumugulo na ang topic eh. Sa pagkakaalam ko, medical healthcare lang ang pinag-uusapan dito. Bakit ba nasama ang mga inhinyero sa usapan? Unang-una, sa pagkakaalam ko, walang brain drain sa engineering, at least in the field of my expertise. Sobra pa nga ang bilang ng inhinyero kaysa aktwal na kailangan ng bansang ito. Dahil unang-una, di prioridad ng gobyernong ito ang pag-unlad sa agham, teknolohiya at engineering. Let's stay on topic guys.
Ang realidad ngayon ay may brain drain sa nurses at doktor.
Why SUCs only? Because your education is a privilege (ay kasama pala ako doon dahil graduate ako sa isang city university... so utang ko ang edukasyon ko sa mamamayan at pamahalaang lungsod ng Maynila). Return the favor, will ya?
It would be better if all grads will be forced to stay here for two years. Yeah, that would be better. The more the merrier ika nga. Pero sinabi ko na, ang edukasyon ng mga taga private university ay galing sa kanilang sariling mga bulsa at di mula sa buwis ng taong bayan... there you go... :D
Are the other grads waiting only in the sidelines and observing from afar? This is NOT NECESSARILY TRUE. A Hasty Generalization if I may say. Those private university grads may have been the ones who opted to stay for a little longer to serve the country. I know quite a handful of them. :D
@paenggoy, some still can't get that point re tertiary education. At least we both know what we're talking about. :D
Dacs
Feb 19, 2008, 05:49 PM
Why only SUCs? I say include all graduates, but as I see it, the state cannot force the non-SUC grads to stay for the latter paid for their own education. However, like what DOST does with its scholars, they can force the SUC grads to serve this country first before leaving. The SUC grads' education is a privilege. It's only right that SUC grads return the favor. :D
Actually the government can, in cases of war at least.
kapitangkiko
Feb 19, 2008, 07:05 PM
I still don't see the wisdom in imposing a ban on deployment just because of a perceived (by some) problem but I may be wrong.
Again, if statistics (which I am still waiting for) would show that there is such a problem and that the proposition would solve it - then why not? But since serving the country is everybody's duty, then it doesn't make sense to just impose it on SUC grads, does it?
What I am also more worried about is the apparent perception and generalization of some that:
1. you are serving the country just because you are staying;
2. wala kang silbi sa bayan pag umalis ka;
3. the medical profession is all about taking care of sick people;
4. at yung idea na SUC grads lang ang may utang sa bayan dahil sa edukasyong tinanggap nila.
My take:
Hindi porke nasa Pilipinas ka nagsisilbi ka sa bayan. Do you even pay your taxes without understating your income?
Ni naiisip mo ba ang pagka-Pilipino mo pag nasa Pilipinas ka? O mas importante sa iyo kung kapuso o kapamilya ka?
I think nowhere does your being Filipino hit you than when you are abroad. Nasa sa iyo na lang kung paano mo itaguyod o ikahiya iyon at ganundin nasa sa iyo kung paano ka makakapagsilbi sa bayan kahit malayo ka rito.
Hindi rin porke nasa labas ka ng bansa ibig sabihin wala ka nang silbi sa bayan.
As in the Jose Rizal example - our history shows that people who were out of the country during interesting times were actually the ones who were able to initiate change.
Forget about the so-called OFW => bagong bayani thing, there are lots of other ways to serve the country and our countrymen than just being beside them and tending to them.
Let's think and make this family analogy:
Sino ba ang mas may silbi sa pamilya mo - ang kapatid mong nasa pilipinas na walang trabaho pero tumutulong sa gawaing bahay, o kung meron mang trabaho ay kulang pa sa pansariling gastusin ang kinikita?
O yung kapatid mong may maayos na trabaho sa ibang bansa na bagamat nagsisilbi rin sa ibang lahi ay nagsisilbi rin sa sariling pamilya sa ibang paraan maliban sa pagtulong sa gawaing-bahay?
Maaring walang itulak-kabigin di ba? Pero isa lang ang sigurado: pareho silang may silbi sa pamilya mo, kahit paano!
kapitangkiko
Feb 19, 2008, 07:33 PM
NOT always true. How can those in the foreign land help those in the desperate need for medical attention right at this very moment,eh?
Magpapadala ng pera? Magpapadala ng gamot? Eh sino nga ang hahatol upang ano'ng gamot ba ang irereseta? at sino ba ang titingin sa kanilang kondisyon? Kung ang lahat ng mga doktor at nurses ay nasa ibang lupain na?Lahat?? Ibang usapan naman yan e. Let's stick to the current situation.
And also if given a choice I would rather have a veteran than a fresh grad look after me. So maybe they should ban the deployment abroad of already rich veteran doctors than the fresh grads who could gain more (in training and income) from working abroad?
Teka lang, medyo gumugulo na ang topic eh. Sa pagkakaalam ko, medical healthcare lang ang pinag-uusapan dito. Bakit ba nasama ang mga inhinyero sa usapan? Unang-una, sa pagkakaalam ko, walang brain drain sa engineering, at least in the field of my expertise. Sobra pa nga ang bilang ng inhinyero kaysa aktwal na kailangan ng bansang ito. Dahil unang-una, di prioridad ng gobyernong ito ang pag-unlad sa agham, teknolohiya at engineering. Let's stay on topic guys. The thread title after all is "Paglilingkod sa Bayan" :D
Is health care the government’s priority? I don’t think so.
Ang realidad ngayon ay may brain drain sa nurses at doktor.San na yung stats that la_flash? Since elementary naririnig ko na yang brain drain and yet we continue to send our children to take up courses that would give them the opportunity to work and study further abroad.
Why SUCs only? Because your education is a privilege (ay kasama pala ako doon dahil graduate ako sa isang city university... so utang ko ang edukasyon ko sa mamamayan at pamahalaang lungsod ng Maynila). Return the favor, will ya? Again, di ko na naman makuha yung returning the favor by staying.
It would be better if all grads will be forced to stay here for two years. Yeah, that would be better. The more the merrier ika nga. Pero sinabi ko na, ang edukasyon ng mga taga private university ay galing sa kanilang sariling mga bulsa at di mula sa buwis ng taong bayan... there you go... :D
Are the other grads waiting only in the sidelines and observing from afar? This is NOT NECESSARILY TRUE. A Hasty Generalization if I may say. Those private university grads may have been the ones who opted to stay for a little longer to serve the country. I know quite a handful of them. :DReally? Their reason for staying is to serve the country? Bilib naman ako dun for having made that conscious decision! Yan ang mga tunay na bagong bayani! Unless that was really what they wanted to do in the first place – stay – and it’s not about serving the country. Then they’re really no better than those who left, are they?
la_flash
Feb 19, 2008, 08:08 PM
Actually the government can, in cases of war at least.
True. But that is because the state is under imminent danger and the question of whether you have been privileged enough to have acquired a government funded tertiary education is already irrelevant, don't you think?
boy_wonder
Feb 19, 2008, 08:15 PM
NOT always true. How can those in the foreign land help those in the desperate need for medical attention right at this very moment,eh?
Magpapadala ng pera? Magpapadala ng gamot? Eh sino nga ang hahatol upang ano'ng gamot ba ang irereseta? at sino ba ang titingin sa kanilang kondisyon? Kung ang lahat ng mga doktor at nurses ay nasa ibang lupain na?
Ang sinasabi ko lang naman ay kung paglilingkod PARA SA bayan ang inyong hinihingi, hindi lang ang paglilingkod SA bayan ang paraan. Ang hirap isipin na ang paglilingkod para sa bayan ay dala lamang ng pressure ng mga policies at hindi bukal sa kalooban.
Hindi pinakamainam na solusyon ang pagpigil sa labor force na lumabas ng bansa. Napakalaki ng populasyon ng Pilipinas. NAPAKARAMING TAO ang nasa bansa pa rin. We should take that fact as a potential factor for development in the industry. Ang excuses na lang diyan ay ang katamaran at ang kawalan ng kakayahan. And these are the real roots of the problem. Ibang strategy ang dapat at para diyan, hindi ang pagpigil sa mga nagtutungo sa ibang bansa upang maglingkod para sa bayan.
cretinous00
Feb 20, 2008, 07:09 AM
two questions: why must those who are living on a financial surplus, who owe this government nothing, be forced to render service? shouldn't the needy, the perpetual financial deficits, and those who depend on government aid, be the ones who should serve?
_SCUD_
Feb 20, 2008, 08:14 AM
Nakaklungkot at nakakaawa naman ang mga kababayan namin.
Akalain mo ba naman mga pinag-aral pa sa Unibersidad ng PILIPINAS ang mga kontra sa paglilingkod sa bayan.
NAKAKAHIYA NAMAN KAYO!
Huwag niyo ibalik sa amin ang mga responsibilidad na dapat sana kayo ang nauuna. Pinagdaanan ko na yan kaya hindi ako apektado. Uliti-ulitin nyo man ang salitang HYPOCRISY dahil sa tingin nyo wala kaming karapatan dahil wala kami sa Pilipinas, mas nakakaawa lang kayo tingnan dahil sa patuloy na pagtalikod nyo sa mga sinumpaan ninyong tungkulin.
Mahiya nga kayo sa pagpipilit na ipasok ang pamilya kontra sa paglilingkod sa bayan. Kung inuna ng mga bayani ( at iba na ring mga taga UP) ang kanilang pamilya bago ang bansa, malamang wala kayo sa kinalalagyan nyo ngayon.
Huwag nyo na rin isksik sa amin na taxpayers din kayo na nagpaaral sa mga Iskolar ng Bayan. Aba'y dapat lang magbayad din kayo ng buwis habang pinag-aaral kayo ng gobyerno, kakapalan naman siguro ng mukha kung pinag-aral na kayo, hindi pa kayo nagbabayad ng batas, hindi rin kayo naglilingkod sa bayan.
_SCUD_
Feb 20, 2008, 08:22 AM
Oh come on, dude, is kikiam your symbolism of nourishment, moreso a comfortable life? it's not being madrama, as how you put it, but if you think long term, and you think about your family and how your family cannot be happy with only kikiam on their plates, then you'll get what i mean. It's simple, you love your country, pero you love your family as well. And for the most of us (and i think this is only one of the few facts mentioned in this thread), we love our family better than how we love our country. even I do, as I am sure you do as well.
Isa pa itong nakakahiya.
Nasaan kaya ang Pilipinas ngayon kung inuna ni Ninoy si Kris?
Huwag ka maghanap ng "may relevance" sa mga sinasabi ko, dahil unang-una hangga't sarado ang mga mata mo sa paligid talagang di mo yan makikita.
Palagay mo ba maniniwala ako sa'yo sa sinasabi mong mahirap kayo at kailangan unahin mo ang kakainin ng pamilya mo bago ang bayan. Ulitin ko lang, KADRAMAHAN yan para lang makalusot ka sa obligasyon mo sa bayan.
Kung noon napupuno ang jeep na UP Ikot (may nakasabit pa) ng mga mukhang pulubing isko na nakapambahay at naka-spartan, ngayon hatid sundo na sila ng kanilang mga Mommy at Daddy.
Sige nga sabihin mo sa akin na mahirap ka at wala kang makain, baka pwede exempted ka sa paglilingkod sa bayan.
_SCUD_
Feb 20, 2008, 08:37 AM
Paulit ulit na statistics na naman ang nababasa ko..haayy
Naka-ilang page na ang nagdaan, hindi kasa nagbabasa ng report ni Dr. Tan.
O eto ulit, galing sa website ng Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (pcij (http://www.pcij.org/stories/2005/nursing-crisis-galvez-tan.pdf))
In the year 2001, the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA), reported the departure of 13, 536 Filipino nurses to 31 countries. The majority went to the U.K. with 5, 383 nurses, Saudi Arabia with 5, 045 and Ireland 1,529. The POEA reported only 304 nurses going to the USA. This is definitely gross underreporting since the International Union of Nurses reported that close to 10,000 Filipino nurses were directly hired by US based hospitals in 2001 through their nursing job fairs held in various parts of the Philippines.
In 2002, the POEA further reports that a total of 11,911 Filipino nurses left for 33 countries. In 2003, POEA initially reported 8,968 nurses leaving. Again with underreporting of those who left for the USA. Clearly, the trend is here to stay. Sadly, this is no longer “brain drain” but more appropriately “brain hemorrhage” already of our Filipino nurses.
These annual outflow of Filipino nurses for Years 2001-2002 is two to three times greater than the annual production of licensed nurses during the same two year period. Since 1999, the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) through the Board of Nursing gives licenses to only 5, 784 to 8,419 nurses annually. This is despite the increase of nursing schools from 142 to 240 within the last four years. There were only 40 nursing schools in the 1980s. So very soon, the Philippines will be bled dry of nurses
tantararantaran
Feb 20, 2008, 12:37 PM
Isa pa itong nakakahiya.
Nasaan kaya ang Pilipinas ngayon kung inuna ni Ninoy si Kris?
I said most of us love our families more than our country. Most is the operative word, in Tagalog, karamihan, definitely not everyone. Ninoy was one of the few who love their country more than their families (but come to think of it, if Aquino's family is starving, would he have been as patriotic as he was? But that's another story), and lucky for the Philippines to have such. But on the grander scheme of things, there are many Filipinos who are so unlike Ninoy (the ones I was describing) and to some extent (i emphasize, to some extent, not necessarily extremely true), it is good for the country. Imagine 80million extremely patriotic Filipinos, Ninoy-ish if you may say so, and 80million views on a certain issue, with 80million ways to act, wouldn't it be chaotic? Believe me, if in a public forum like this (with just a handful of Filipinos), we cannot agree on how to serve the country, how much more if there are 80million assertive individuals who are willing to shed their own blood for their country? That's why we value individual differences (which, as some of the posters here would agree, would lead to differences in approach in serving the country)
Huwag ka maghanap ng "may relevance" sa mga sinasabi ko, dahil unang-una hangga't sarado ang mga mata mo sa paligid talagang di mo yan makikita.
Well, if your eyes are really open to reality dude, you would want more experienced medical practitioners in the Phillippines rather than fresh graduates (regardless of where they graduated from) who have little to no experience. Once you look at the dire state of our public health system, the fresh graduates can really do so little about the situation. Yes, you may argue that the country needs health care manpower blah blah, but it isn't the whole story, it's just a little fraction of how the Philippine health system sucks. The amount of manpower isn't really the key, we need quality manpower, if we need to resolve the brain drain in the country.
Palagay mo ba maniniwala ako sa'yo sa sinasabi mong mahirap kayo at kailangan unahin mo ang kakainin ng pamilya mo bago ang bayan. Ulitin ko lang, KADRAMAHAN yan para lang makalusot ka sa obligasyon mo sa bayan.
Kung noon napupuno ang jeep na UP Ikot (may nakasabit pa) ng mga mukhang pulubing isko na nakapambahay at naka-spartan, ngayon hatid sundo na sila ng kanilang mga Mommy at Daddy.
Sige nga sabihin mo sa akin na mahirap ka at wala kang makain, baka pwede exempted ka sa paglilingkod sa bayan.
Haven't i suggested some ways to improve the argumentations that you make? If you really don't care about it, then, it's not my problem anymore.
Anyhow, here are my answers to the above statements
First: stop using ad hominem, it just makes your argumentations pathetic (please don't let me repeat this in my next reply to your post)
Second: Am I asking you to believe me that I am rag-poor? Please quote any of my posts that I was persuading you (oh that's too assuming, change it to I was persuading everyone) that I am, because I'm not. I'm not high-society rich though, I'm part of the working class (there, I gave away a little of my identity already:bop: ).
Third: Once someone speaks of a scenario in a debate (and i assume it is the same in a public forum such as this), it does not necessarily mean that he is in the same situation, so don't conclude that because I'm mentioning someone else's situation, it means I'm in the same (oh, include hasty generalization in your list of fallacies).
Lastly: Please please READ. If you care to look at my previous posts, I said that i have no plans of going out of the country to work, much less, to migrate (though i must say that there really is a greener pasture at the other side of the fence for my profession) because it is MY way of serving the country. If others have their own, why not let them be?
If I may suggest, please be careful at what you say, because the more you say something, the more loopholes people here find in you. ;)
boy_wonder
Feb 20, 2008, 01:13 PM
Akalain mo ba naman mga pinag-aral pa sa Unibersidad ng PILIPINAS ang mga kontra sa paglilingkod sa bayan.
Did a brain process this conclusion?:lol:
vBulletin® v3.6.10, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.