Benildeans: Do we need Silverstar to cover our games?

[AltarBoy^_^]

Since UAAP left Silverstar and moved on to Studio 23 of ABS-CSB. I think an outfit such as Silverstar would cover the NCAA better. Media Conglomerates FAILED to cover most of the NCAA games and lacked sponsors and advertisers. Since PTV-4 covered the Sydney Olympic games, MCI was backtracked and the NCAA lost a lot of supporters again. Paano aasenso NCAA kung hindi ito priority at hindi nabibigyan ng priority ng tv outfit nito?! The NCAA committee bungled a lot on this part. I am disgusted.

What the NCAA needs:
1. A better coverage of the NCAA games
2. Better sports commentators
3. More sponsors
4. A better venue

NCAA lost glamour to the UAAP pero its never too late to rehabilitate the oldest collegiate league and I think we should voice out our opinions regarding this issue. It's beneficial not only to Benilde but to all its rival schools in the NCAA. I hope to hear constructive criticisms. No more of that thrash and bash from the UAAP pexers please. Thank you! :smokin:

[viemann]

Sana Silverstar na. If its not Silvestar may iba pa kaya???

[FineST]

Originally posted by viemann
Sana Silverstar na. If its not Silvestar may iba pa kaya???

pwede naman siguro ang vintage TV, yung dati sa NCAA, mas maganda ang quality, regarding sa airtime, di kase masyado marami ang supporters ng ncaa compared to uaap.

[viemann]

Yup sana nga Vintage ulit. If Studio23 has MBA and UAAP sana Vintage PBA at NCAA.

[Romancon]

Naiinis talaga ako dahil napaka "POOR" ng COVERAGE ng NCAA! Minsan pinapalabas pag swerte kaso nga lang delayed! Correct ka dyan AltarBoy they need a better sponsor and venue. Ka cheapan kc yung venue ng NCAA, ang napaka GLOOMY na RIzal Memorial ba naman O.K lang kc malapit ang CSB sans nga lang i pa ayos!
Mas dapat nga nilang pagtuunan ng pansin ang NCAA dahil mas older ito kaysa UAAP.
Dva!

[berdy]

FYI, Vintage TV doesn't exist anymore that's why channel 13 is now called Viva TV. RE: the coverage of the NCAA, i definitely agree that they should find someone better to cover their games. They didn't even show the last game of the Finals :crazy:

[AltarBoy^_^]

Ang contract ng NCAA dati sa Vintage (Viva-Tv) was good for two years lang. I think hindi na na-renew ang contract due to the "Letran-JRC Rumble". Madadala talaga mga sponsors sa NCAA kung puro gulo na lang ang liga. But here's the ironic part, WALANG GULO na nangyari between San Sebastian and St. Benilde but why wasn't there a coverage of the last game of the finals? Something's very fishy. Sana malaman natin. We need a better venue than Rizal Memorial Coliseum if the government can't even rehabilitate it in the first place! Better coverage please. More airtime (kahit hindi live). Mag-aagawan pa yan sa live games ang mga schools kapag thursdays lang ang televised. We need a better tv outfit!!! Hope Mr. Henry Atayde (St. Benilde Rep to the NCAA committee) voice out on this one. Peace! :smokin:

WE NEED A BETTER TV COVERAGE!!! :grrr:

[AltarBoy^_^]

Push ko lang thread ko....:silly:

[viemann]

Originally posted by AltarBoy^_^
Ang contract ng NCAA dati sa Vintage (Viva-Tv) was good for two years lang. I think hindi na na-renew ang contract due to the "Letran-JRC Rumble". Madadala talaga mga sponsors sa NCAA kung puro gulo na lang ang liga. But here's the ironic part, WALANG GULO na nangyari between San Sebastian and St. Benilde but why wasn't there a coverage of the last game of the finals? Something's very fishy. Sana malaman natin. We need a better venue than Rizal Memorial Coliseum if the government can't even rehabilitate it in the first place! Better coverage please. More airtime (kahit hindi live). Mag-aagawan pa yan sa live games ang mga schools kapag thursdays lang ang televised. We need a better tv outfit!!! Hope Mr. Henry Atayde (St. Benilde Rep to the NCAA committee) voice out on this one. Peace! :smokin:

WE NEED A BETTER TV COVERAGE!!! :grrr:

yung game 2 ng finals hindi nila kinover di ba kasi i did not see any camera dun sa opposite ng side natin...sana naman kinover nila kasi thursday naman the day after e diba thursdays and normal na coverage ng NCAA games. Bat naman ganon??? Kung ano pa yung pinakaimportanteng laro yun pa yung hindi pinalabas.Imbes na iniaahon ng NCAA Committee yung liga eh mas lalo pa yata nilang hinahayaan na mabaon at malaos.

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by viemann
Originally posted by AltarBoy^_^
Ang contract ng NCAA dati sa Vintage (Viva-Tv) was good for two years lang. I think hindi na na-renew ang contract due to the "Letran-JRC Rumble". Madadala talaga mga sponsors sa NCAA kung puro gulo na lang ang liga. But here's the ironic part, WALANG GULO na nangyari between San Sebastian and St. Benilde but why wasn't there a coverage of the last game of the finals? Something's very fishy. Sana malaman natin. We need a better venue than Rizal Memorial Coliseum if the government can't even rehabilitate it in the first place! Better coverage please. More airtime (kahit hindi live). Mag-aagawan pa yan sa live games ang mga schools kapag thursdays lang ang televised. We need a better tv outfit!!! Hope Mr. Henry Atayde (St. Benilde Rep to the NCAA committee) voice out on this one. Peace! :smokin:

WE NEED A BETTER TV COVERAGE!!! :grrr:

yung game 2 ng finals hindi nila kinover di ba kasi i did not see any camera dun sa opposite ng side natin...sana naman kinover nila kasi thursday naman the day after e diba thursdays and normal na coverage ng NCAA games. Bat naman ganon??? Kung ano pa yung pinakaimportanteng laro yun pa yung hindi pinalabas.Imbes na iniaahon ng NCAA Committee yung liga eh mas lalo pa yata nilang hinahayaan na mabaon at malaos.

The NCAA committee needs to rehabilitate itself. I'll ask our rep to the NCAA regarding the coverage. We may be wrong and I smell something fishy. First timer lang ang tv outfit na yan tapos kuripot pa sa coverage o baka naman kinuripot yan ng NCAA sa budget kaya ganyan yan. I smell graft and corruption. And it stinks to high heavens! Eh paano kung UPHR at JRC ang naglaban sa finals? Palagay niyo?:smokin:

ANIMO BENILDE!!!

[Jackal]

Tinitipid kasi ang pera na mga tao humahawak ng NCAA mga inutil sila.... :lol: Kaya ndi umuunlad ang Pilinas kasi sa mga tao katulad nila.... :bop: :bop: I really hate the NCAA board :grrr::grrr: Humanda lang sila pag tayo nag host mga benildeans. :cool: :smokin:

[tweetyheart]

Originally posted by FineST
pwede naman siguro ang vintage TV, yung dati sa NCAA, mas maganda ang quality, regarding sa airtime, di kase masyado marami ang supporters ng ncaa compared to uaap.

Opinyon lang po... pero I will have to disagree na mas maganda yung coverage dati ng Vintage TV sa NCAA noon 1997 (?) kaysa coverage ng UAAP ng Silverstar.

I'm a basketball fan and I studied in a UAAP school pero my older sister studied in a NCAA school... thus, I got to watch the coverage of both leagues. And I used to jokingly tell my sister na kaya kinuha ng Vintage yung NCAA eh dahil hindi nakuha ng Vintage ang UAAP noon... and she would get really mad at me.

Coverage wise... since Vintage gumagawa ng PBA noon, ganoon din coverage nila ng NCAA... maganda yung mga grafixs... pero hindi masyadong magaling ang mga commentators... lalo na kung itatapat kina Jude Kaboom! Turcuato, Jimmy Javier at Joaqui Trillo... kasama pati noon si Ria Tanjuatco at Ella Aldeguer.

And I always enjoyed watching UAAP because it has a definite timeslot - 1PM - 5PM while NCAA had erratic schedules... kadalasan, napupuyat sister ko manood kasi late at night na pinapalabas yung games noon.

Ngayon nga... complain ko sa coverage ng Studio 23 eh nabawasan ang timeslot ng UAAP (1PM - 3PM) pag Saturdays and Sundays dahil may MBA na kasunod.

I think what the NCAA needs is a broadcaster that will take the risk like what Silverstar did. Yung mag-iinvest ng longtime at magde-develop sa league bago mag-isip ng profits. Opinyon lang.

[quameth]

OO sobrang pangit ng TV coverages this year.. kala ko nga wala...Napanood ko yung game1 ng Finals and sobrang bobo ang commentator and *** isang achorman na nagbibigay ng updates sa laro.. yung maiitim na medyo skinhead.. d marunong magdeliver ng reports... pautal utal ang sentence nya ... i wonder kung saang university sya nagaral ng journalism....
Regarding sa Viva-TV .. magagaling ang technical aspect ng presentation pero d magaling *** commentator kasi *** mag commentator na pinadadala nila ay hindi seasoned veterans like what they fielded sa PBA like joaquin henson, etc..
bale parang breeding ground nila ang NCAA to develop a good commentator..

silverstar ok na rin ang commentator pero they failed miserably regarding sa techinical aspects...

media conglomerates simply SUCK!!!!

by the way, sino pala *** host next NCAA?

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by tweetyheart
Originally posted by FineST
pwede naman siguro ang vintage TV, yung dati sa NCAA, mas maganda ang quality, regarding sa airtime, di kase masyado marami ang supporters ng ncaa compared to uaap.

Opinyon lang po... pero I will have to disagree na mas maganda yung coverage dati ng Vintage TV sa NCAA noon 1997 (?) kaysa coverage ng UAAP ng Silverstar.

I'm a basketball fan and I studied in a UAAP school pero my older sister studied in a NCAA school... thus, I got to watch the coverage of both leagues. And I used to jokingly tell my sister na kaya kinuha ng Vintage yung NCAA eh dahil hindi nakuha ng Vintage ang UAAP noon... and she would get really mad at me.

Coverage wise... since Vintage gumagawa ng PBA noon, ganoon din coverage nila ng NCAA... maganda yung mga grafixs... pero hindi masyadong magaling ang mga commentators... lalo na kung itatapat kina Jude Kaboom! Turcuato, Jimmy Javier at Joaqui Trillo... kasama pati noon si Ria Tanjuatco at Ella Aldeguer.

And I always enjoyed watching UAAP because it has a definite timeslot - 1PM - 5PM while NCAA had erratic schedules... kadalasan, napupuyat sister ko manood kasi late at night na pinapalabas yung games noon.

Ngayon nga... complain ko sa coverage ng Studio 23 eh nabawasan ang timeslot ng UAAP (1PM - 3PM) pag Saturdays and Sundays dahil may MBA na kasunod.

I think what the NCAA needs is a broadcaster that will take the risk like what Silverstar did. Yung mag-iinvest ng longtime at magde-develop sa league bago mag-isip ng profits. Opinyon lang.



Sayang talaga Vintage. Nasiraan lang sila ng loob sa NCAA dahil sa mga gulo na nangyayari sa basketball games kaya nadala na yata sila na mag-cover ng games. Maganda ang Vintage. Silverstar ay magaling din dahil they made UAAP what it is right now. The commentators sa Silverstar are better than the people in Vintage and Media Conglomerates combined. Medyo mas mahal yata presyo ng Vintage kaysa Silverstar kaya mas pipiliin ko ang Silverstar. Sulit ang coverage and not too much advertisement crap. :smokin:

[tweetyheart]

excuse... kahit di ako taga-Benilde... po-post ako ha :)

[tweetyheart]

Kung lahat ng broadcaster eh masisiraan ng loob tulad ng Vintage noon o ng sinasabi mong Media Conglomerates ngayon, eh ano na lang mangyayari sa mga upcoming leagues na may potential naman sumikat?

Ako sa tingin ko, masyadong focused ang Vintage noon sa PBA para bigyan ng attention ang NCAA. Ganoon din ang Studio 23 ngayon na divided ang attention between MBA and UAAP.

And yes, I agree with you sa sinabi mo that Silverstar helped bring UAAP where it is now... they helped popularize the league even more.

Sana na lang lahat ng leagues - whether basketball or soccer or any other sport ay may sari-sariling matinong broadcaster na magko-cover para walang away...para lahat sikat.

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by tweetyheart
Kung lahat ng broadcaster eh masisiraan ng loob tulad ng Vintage noon o ng sinasabi mong Media Conglomerates ngayon, eh ano na lang mangyayari sa mga upcoming leagues na may potential naman sumikat?

Ako sa tingin ko, masyadong focused ang Vintage noon sa PBA para bigyan ng attention ang NCAA. Ganoon din ang Studio 23 ngayon na divided ang attention between MBA and UAAP.

And yes, I agree with you sa sinabi mo that Silverstar helped bring UAAP where it is now... they helped popularize the league even more.

Sana na lang lahat ng leagues - whether basketball or soccer or any other sport ay may sari-sariling matinong broadcaster na magko-cover para walang away...para lahat sikat.

Local version ng ESPN? Why not?! Plano pa naman ng Media Conglomerates nuon na ipapalabas ang games ng NCAA sa ESPN pero hindi na yata natuloy. Puro salita lang yata mga yan. Vintage is good pero bagay lang siya sa PBA. Studio 23 is good for MBA and UAAP. Eh NCAA? We need a tv outfit that can meet the needs of a league like ours. We need to rehabilitate NCAA's image and what better way to make it better than a better coverage of its games and I want Silverstar!!! :smokin:

[Kaboom!]

Actually, as far as I know, Silverstar tried to be part of the coverage for this year's NCAA but it didn't work out with the Team Orbos group who had the rights. Silverstar was also swamped with taking care of the Olympic preparations.

We'll just have to see next year as to what happens.

Peace.

[tweetyheart]

Originally posted by AltarBoy^_^
Local version ng ESPN? Why not?! Plano pa naman ng Media Conglomerates nuon na ipapalabas ang games ng NCAA sa ESPN pero hindi na yata natuloy. Puro salita lang yata mga yan.

AltarBoy^_^ - I don't think any media outfit can turn around NCAA at once or even in a year and bring the level of TV coverage to what Silverstar did for the UAAP since 1991. Gosh! 9 years?! who can beat that? ... kahit nga UAAP na-surpass pa ang popularity ng PBL because of the regular coverages before... and to think PBL was also televised by Silverstar noon. ngayon, sino na ba?

But tt would take a lot of money... a lot of risk... and a lot of heart and dedication... specially with the present economic situation today...

At kung totoo yung sinabi ni Kaboom!... sayang that it did not materialize... the more, the merrier... di ba?

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by tweetyheart
Originally posted by AltarBoy^_^
Local version ng ESPN? Why not?! Plano pa naman ng Media Conglomerates nuon na ipapalabas ang games ng NCAA sa ESPN pero hindi na yata natuloy. Puro salita lang yata mga yan.

AltarBoy^_^ - I don't think any media outfit can turn around NCAA at once or even in a year and bring the level of TV coverage to what Silverstar did for the UAAP since 1991. Gosh! 9 years?! who can beat that? ... kahit nga UAAP na-surpass pa ang popularity ng PBL because of the regular coverages before... and to think PBL was also televised by Silverstar noon. ngayon, sino na ba?

But tt would take a lot of money... a lot of risk... and a lot of heart and dedication... specially with the present economic situation today...

At kung totoo yung sinabi ni Kaboom!... sayang that it did not materialize... the more, the merrier... di ba?

A respectable league like the NCAA needs a respectable tv outfit like Silverstar. I have been following Silverstar since it handled the UAAP. The UAAP and Silverstar were a perfect combination from the start. Sa amin lang sa NCAA, we want a decent coverage lang naman. Hindi naman overnight ang change ng UAAP and I am confident in Silverstar in handling the games. Kaso, in demand pala sila at hindi nag-materialize ang pagkuha sa NCAA. Hindi ko lang alam kung ang contract ng Media Conglomerates will not be for one season lang. And if they are still the tv outfit, I hope and pray that they improve for the sake of our league. :smokin:

[fighting_blazer-20]

I think it's great if Silverstar covers NCAA and it'll be good for the league that their needed exposure so there's nothing worng about it. Sana next year Silverstar na. I don't the details of the contract with MCG.

[silverstar]

I am not the big boss in Silverstar but I have printed out this forum for my boss to read.

FYI, I have worked with the company for the past 9 years. Thank you for your kind words and for believing that our company could make a good coverage of the NCAA. But if NCAA still has a commitment to the other production outfit, then Silverstar's big bosses are gentlemen enough not to "grab other people's contracts."

Based on what management told us, Silverstar and NCAA had initial talks. But things did not materialize. In my opinion, it would have been unfair to the NCAA if the deal pushed through. We were occupied with the court proceedings at that time and we were also preparing to help PTV with the Olympics. But it was never a problem for us to handle big productions at the same time as we have competent staff attending to various projects.

I hope everything works out well for the NCAA next year.

[msc88]

It's really too bad that Silverstar was pre-occupied with the Olympics and the UAAP case a few months ago. I wonder what happened with the case...

Will the production outfit that covered it last season still cover it next year? I hope that whoever covered the NCAA last season would really have a genuine long-term commitment to develop and televise it - like what Silverstar did for the UAAP. Including all other sports and not just basketball.

But if last season's production outfit only covers 1 year... I hope that Silverstar would not be busy with any other major sporting event so that your board members could start talking to them again.

[silverstar]

I would also want to react to what AltarBoy^_^ posted -
"The UAAP and Silverstar were a perfect combination from the start."

That is because it started out on friendship... When UP was host in 1991, PE Dean Cynthia Abad Santos and alumna Tessa Jazmines called on the UP community to help host the 54th UAAP Season. And with barely 2 weeks prior to the Opening of the 1991 Season, Mr. Kierulf of Silverstar, being an alumni of UP, organized the production team with several UP volunteers even without sponsors...and the rest is history.

It is just too bad that what seemed to be a "perfect combination" and what was built on friendship, that developed into a nine year partnership, would end the way it did. And we learned a valuable lesson from this experience.

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by silverstar
I would also want to react to what AltarBoy^_^ posted -
"The UAAP and Silverstar were a perfect combination from the start."

That is because it started out on friendship... When UP was host in 1991, PE Dean Cynthia Abad Santos and alumna Tessa Jazmines called on the UP community to help host the 54th UAAP Season. And with barely 2 weeks prior to the Opening of the 1991 Season, Mr. Kierulf of Silverstar, being an alumni of UP, organized the production team with several UP volunteers even without sponsors...and the rest is history.

It is just too bad that what seemed to be a "perfect combination" and what was built on friendship, that developed into a nine year partnership, would end the way it did. And we learned a valuable lesson from this experience.


In more ways than one, Silverstar catapulted the UAAP to what it is right now. And we know that you just can't grab the NCAA while MCG might be covering until next year. Malaking sayang kayo. I preferred you guys from Studio 23 talaga dahil mas maganda coverage niyo and I hope that if the NCAA were in your outfit, we may stay longer than 9 years without the hassles. Ethics is what some people need.

[lenti]

Originally posted by AltarBoy^_^
In more ways than one, Silverstar catapulted the UAAP to what it is right now....I preferred you guys from Studio 23 talaga dahil mas maganda coverage niyo and I hope that if the NCAA were in your outfit, we may stay longer than 9 years without the hassles. Ethics is what some people need.

i think the key in Silverstar's coverage is that nakuha nila yung "heart of being collegiate" or the "essence of amateurism" and not copy the coverage styles of Vintage.

Di ba Vintage started with the girls as interviewers... pero they didn't seem to know anything... except for Ronith Ang.. but when Silverstar started with the courside check reporters... like Ria Tanjuatco and Ella Aldeguer... they knew their basketball and they made a lot of sense... and lo and behold! there are a lot of women basketball reporters now...

oops...na-off topic na yata... what I wanted to drive at is Silverstar pioneered a lot of things in collegiate coverages... they also televised the championships of UAAP's other events like volleyball and soccer... mahabang planning talaga ang kailangan... and it's a good thing that AltarBoy^_^ has started this topic where opinions can be freely exchanged.

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by lenti
Originally posted by AltarBoy^_^
In more ways than one, Silverstar catapulted the UAAP to what it is right now....I preferred you guys from Studio 23 talaga dahil mas maganda coverage niyo and I hope that if the NCAA were in your outfit, we may stay longer than 9 years without the hassles. Ethics is what some people need.

i think the key in Silverstar's coverage is that nakuha nila yung "heart of being collegiate" or the "essence of amateurism" and not copy the coverage styles of Vintage.

Di ba Vintage started with the girls as interviewers... pero they didn't seem to know anything... except for Ronith Ang.. but when Silverstar started with the courside check reporters... like Ria Tanjuatco and Ella Aldeguer... they knew their basketball and they made a lot of sense... and lo and behold! there are a lot of women basketball reporters now...

oops...na-off topic na yata... what I wanted to drive at is Silverstar pioneered a lot of things in collegiate coverages... they also televised the championships of UAAP's other events like volleyball and soccer... mahabang planning talaga ang kailangan... and it's a good thing that AltarBoy^_^ has started this topic where opinions can be freely exchanged.

Thank you very much. I would also like to commend Silverstar for showing the other sports. Lalo na dati yung Ateneo vs Lasalle football championships. Silverstar varies in coverage formula to Vintage and it shows how this outfit became respectable and unique to the rest of the tv outfits who never went beyond basketball. Dynamic, hardworking and talented commentators from Silverstar are one of its reasons for it formula for success.
I would like to give MCG the benefit of the doubt muna and wait for the next season when they cover the NCAA again. I am disappointed sa performance nila nitong basketball season in terms of coverage and staff. More in-depth analysis of the teams (kaya nga nagulat mga yan nang pumasok Benilde, walang team analysis masyado). Pinagbigyan lang yata ang mga sponsors during the half-time break dahil walang cheering performance nung finals. They hit two birds with one stone on that part, they suspended half-time performances and at the same time, give Lotte Chewing Gum time to do its gimmik/promo of a three-point shootout. It sucks but it happened na. Oh yeah, they don't televise the half-time performances. Sana next season eh gawin nila yun while making their half-time analysis. More people would be glued to their tv sets if they saw what was happening during the half-time break diba? Ang dami kong hiling na pagbabago sa MCG pero I am still hoping for Silverstar to save us if MCG does not live up to the demands of its viewers. :smokin:

[supreme goddess]

wow i just read this thread!


ang galing!for once, there is a constructive thread here in pex.. a refreshing change indeed from all the bashing that happens here!:)

i just have a couple of questions...

1)who are the people involved in MCG?

2)how long is their contract with ncaa?is this something that u can renew annually?

3)don't the schools have a say in choosing or monioring or assesing the performance of this year's ncaa coverage?

4)bakit parang walang effort ang ncaa to improve all the aspects of the league?it's bizarre that ncaa seems to be stuck in a rut considering that the competitor league(uaap)is getting a lot of attention..

for the record, i also liked the coverage of silverstar better than channel 23..i don't want to sound like a purist pero parang with ch23's coverage, nawawala yung essence ng laro kasi naman parang mas concern ng ch 23 ang commercial load..i understand that there isa business side to all of this pero diba dapat mas mag prevail yung basketball more than the sponsors?:( and kakainis ha pag may game tapos ang taas ng momentum biglang may mag-aannounce,"MANDATORY TIME OUT!" arggh talaga!

la lang..

[big_daddy]

Originally posted by supreme goddess

wow i just read this thread!


ang galing!for once, there is a constructive thread here in pex.. a refreshing change indeed from all the bashing that happens here!:)

i just have a couple of questions...

1)who are the people involved in MCG?

2)how long is their contract with ncaa?is this something that u can renew annually?

3)don't the schools have a say in choosing or monioring or assesing the performance of this year's ncaa coverage?

4)bakit parang walang effort ang ncaa to improve all the aspects of the league?it's bizarre that ncaa seems to be stuck in a rut considering that the competitor league(uaap)is getting a lot of attention..

for the record, i also liked the coverage of silverstar better than channel 23..i don't want to sound like a purist pero parang with ch23's coverage, nawawala yung essence ng laro kasi naman parang mas concern ng ch 23 ang commercial load..i understand that there isa business side to all of this pero diba dapat mas mag prevail yung basketball more than the sponsors?:( and kakainis ha pag may game tapos ang taas ng momentum biglang may mag-aannounce,"MANDATORY TIME OUT!" arggh talaga!

la lang..

the mandatory time out is part of the uaap rules.its a 2 minute timeout given to the teams. actually, if the tv coverage is not live hindi na gngwa yun.

the ncaa should also take into consideration the tv coverage of the league. ang jologs na nga nila pati coverage squa-qua pa.

[AltarBoy^_^]

Supreme Goddess,
We need a background info on MCG. I forgot who runs it but they do need improvements when their contract with the NCAA last for another year or more(?). I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this outfit can do better.

The NCAA needs greater exposure. Kahit manalo pa PCU sa chapionship or any other school, basta exposure ay hindi lang basketball. Why don't they feature football, volleyball, taekwondo and other sports?! :smokin:

[EpaL_KiNg]

No wonder Benildeans are so typical. You need brains to cover your Stupidity.

:rolleyes:

[tweetyheart]

This thread only proves that Benildeans are concerned about what's happening to the NCAA. And that's being intelligent - not stupid.

This is a free discussion so thank you for posting your "opinion"...

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by EpaL_KiNg
No wonder Benildeans are so typical. You need brains to cover your Stupidity.

:rolleyes:

Hello there Epal_King! Nice to hear from you again. Kamusta na? Epal ka pa rin talaga! :silly: Haven't you learned your lesson? Oh yeah, you never learn cause you don't have the capability to learn pala, my mistake. And as usual, you invaded a thread that you cannot comprehend once again. But the word Benildean attracted you to this thread diba? Got dumped again by another Benildean Boy of yours? Sourgrapers nga naman. Tsk tsk tsk. Go join the rest of the rugby boys na lang and waste yourself for the benefit of all intelligent pexers here! :smokin:

[tweetyheart]

I agree with supreme goddess that "for once, there is a constructive thread here in pex.. a refreshing change indeed from all the bashing that happens here!"

Actually, it is very embarrassing to all the PEx moderators (specially to Kaboom!) when people resort to "bashing" and "trash-talking"

So PLEASE! do your best to post well-thought out, intelligent posts here.

I believe I've said what I can say so I hope other people can give AltarBoy^_^ and the NCAA other messages here.

[Jackal]

:) :smokin:

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by tweetyheart
I agree with supreme goddess that "for once, there is a constructive thread here in pex.. a refreshing change indeed from all the bashing that happens here!"

Actually, it is very embarrassing to all the PEx moderators (specially to Kaboom!) when people resort to "bashing" and "trash-talking"

So PLEASE! do your best to post well-thought out, intelligent posts here.

I believe I've said what I can say so I hope other people can give AltarBoy^_^ and the NCAA other messages here.

Thank you for posting and I hope that other people would be aware that the topic I have started is to make a change talaga from all the bashings that are happening after the UAAP and NCAA basketball season. And it's good to know that a lot of people (except Epal_King) have responded positively to this thread and gave intellectual and level-headed posts here. Peace! Hope you guys can contribute more info and suggestions. Thanks! :smokin:

[fighting_blazer-20]

Originally posted by big_daddy
Originally posted by supreme goddess

wow i just read this thread!


ang galing!for once, there is a constructive thread here in pex.. a refreshing change indeed from all the bashing that happens here!:)

i just have a couple of questions...

1)who are the people involved in MCG?

2)how long is their contract with ncaa?is this something that u can renew annually?

3)don't the schools have a say in choosing or monioring or assesing the performance of this year's ncaa coverage?

4)bakit parang walang effort ang ncaa to improve all the aspects of the league?it's bizarre that ncaa seems to be stuck in a rut considering that the competitor league(uaap)is getting a lot of attention..

for the record, i also liked the coverage of silverstar better than channel 23..i don't want to sound like a purist pero parang with ch23's coverage, nawawala yung essence ng laro kasi naman parang mas concern ng ch 23 ang commercial load..i understand that there isa business side to all of this pero diba dapat mas mag prevail yung basketball more than the sponsors?:( and kakainis ha pag may game tapos ang taas ng momentum biglang may mag-aannounce,"MANDATORY TIME OUT!" arggh talaga!

la lang..

the mandatory time out is part of the uaap rules.its a 2 minute timeout given to the teams. actually, if the tv coverage is not live hindi na gngwa yun.

the ncaa should also take into consideration the tv coverage of the league. ang jologs na nga nila pati coverage squa-qua pa.



Also what I didn't like about this years UAAP is that it got too commercialize. Last year ok pa but this year ibang-iba na yung league.

[counterstrike]

pwede iba na lang kasi, i've been following the coverage of silverstar and it needs improvement, payag ako pag sa vintage kasi pag sa channel 4 lagi na lang mai-interrupt yung broadcast because of the lotto draw di ba? and pag sa 13 sure kang mapapanood mo ang buong game at sana live telecast na, hindi yung delay para naman umasenso tayo

animo benilde!!

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by counterstrike
pwede iba na lang kasi, i've been following the coverage of silverstar and it needs improvement, payag ako pag sa vintage kasi pag sa channel 4 lagi na lang mai-interrupt yung broadcast because of the lotto draw di ba? and pag sa 13 sure kang mapapanood mo ang buong game at sana live telecast na, hindi yung delay para naman umasenso tayo

animo benilde!!

Maganda sana sa vintage, kaso delayed hindi tulad sa silverstar. if only silverstar would transfer its coverage to a better tv station na lang, that might help silverstar grow better. Peace! :smokin:

[tweetyheart]

It seems that when we talk about "broadcast", "delayed" and "live," we are merely referring to basketball.

of course, it is only fitting that basketball be given its exposure because it seems that it is the "tie that binds" the coverage together... meaning, the "money earner" (???) for the other sports. meaning, if enough funds are generated from basketball, then the other sports can be covered.

but i still believe that the whole season should be considered - not just basketball. and i commend silverstar for showing the other sports - kahit highlights lang. and i hope studio 23 will do the same for the UAAP.

as for the NCAA, i also hope that MCI would do the same.

[AltarBoy^_^]

Originally posted by tweetyheart
It seems that when we talk about "broadcast", "delayed" and "live," we are merely referring to basketball.

of course, it is only fitting that basketball be given its exposure because it seems that it is the "tie that binds" the coverage together... meaning, the "money earner" (???) for the other sports. meaning, if enough funds are generated from basketball, then the other sports can be covered.

but i still believe that the whole season should be considered - not just basketball. and i commend silverstar for showing the other sports - kahit highlights lang. and i hope studio 23 will do the same for the UAAP.

as for the NCAA, i also hope that MCI would do the same.


That remains to be seen in January. Kung ifi-feature ng MCI ang NCAA football. I just hope that they can give the NCAA enough exposure not just to gain corporate sponsors but the respect of its school members. :smokin:

[FoOtah]

ofcors, uaap will be far ahead of ncaa, silverstar or no silverstar!....for obvious reasons!